Revert: Add *_value methods to proc_macro lib
This reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136355. That PR caused unexpected breakage:
- the rustc-dev component can no longer be loaded by cargo, which impacts Miri and clippy and likely others
- rustc_lexer can no longer be published to crates.io, which impacts RA
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138647 for context.
Cc `@GuillaumeGomez` `@Amanieu`
Implement `read_buf` for Hermit
Following https://github.com/hermit-os/kernel/pull/1606, it is now safe to implement `Read::read_buf` for file descriptors on Hermit.
cc ```@mkroening```
uefi: fs: Implement exists
Also adds the initial file abstractions.
The file opening algorithm is inspired from UEFI shell. It starts by classifying if the Path is Shell mapping, text representation of device path protocol, or a relative path and converts into an absolute text representation of device path protocol.
After that, it queries all handles supporting
EFI_SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOCOL and opens the volume that matches the device path protocol prefix (similar to Windows drive). After that, it opens the file in the volume using the remaining pat.
It also introduces OwnedDevicePath and BorrowedDevicePath abstractions to allow working with the base UEFI and Shell device paths efficiently.
DevicePath in UEFI behaves like an a group of nodes laied out in the memory contiguously and thus can be modeled using iterators.
This is an effort to break the original PR (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129700) into much smaller chunks for faster upstreaming.
Also adds the initial file abstractions.
The file opening algorithm is inspired from UEFI shell. It starts by
classifying if the Path is Shell mapping, text representation of device
path protocol, or a relative path and converts into an absolute text
representation of device path protocol.
After that, it queries all handles supporting
EFI_SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOCOL and opens the volume that matches the
device path protocol prefix (similar to Windows drive). After that, it
opens the file in the volume using the remaining pat.
It also introduces OwnedDevicePath and BorrowedDevicePath abstractions
to allow working with the base UEFI and Shell device paths efficiently.
DevicePath in UEFI behaves like an a group of nodes laied out in the
memory contiguously and thus can be modeled using iterators.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@beagleboard.org>
Mangle rustc_std_internal_symbols functions
This reduces the risk of issues when using a staticlib or rust dylib compiled with a different rustc version in a rust program. Currently this will either (in the case of staticlib) cause a linker error due to duplicate symbol definitions, or (in the case of rust dylibs) cause rustc_std_internal_symbols functions to be silently overridden. As rust gets more commonly used inside the implementation of libraries consumed with a C interface (like Spidermonkey, Ruby YJIT (curently has to do partial linking of all rust code to hide all symbols not part of the C api), the Rusticl OpenCL implementation in mesa) this is becoming much more of an issue. With this PR the only symbols remaining with an unmangled name are rust_eh_personality (LLVM doesn't allow renaming it) and `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable`.
Helps mitigate https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104707
try-job: aarch64-gnu-debug
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-apple-1
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: i686-mingw-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: test-various
try-job: armhf-gnu
Denote `ControlFlow` as `#[must_use]`
I've repeatedly hit bugs in the compiler due to `ControlFlow` not being marked `#[must_use]`. There seems to be an accepted ACP to make the type `#[must_use]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/444), so this PR implements that part of it.
Most of the usages in the compiler that trigger this new warning are "root" usages (calling into an API that uses control-flow internally, but for which the callee doesn't really care) and have been suppressed by `let _ = ...`, but I did legitimately find one instance of a missing `?` and one for a never-used `ControlFlow` value in #137448.
Presumably this needs an FCP too, so I'm opening this and nominating it for T-libs-api.
This PR also touches the tools (incl. rust-analyzer), but if this went into FCP, I'd split those out into separate PRs which can land before this one does.
r? libs-api
`@rustbot` label: T-libs-api I-libs-api-nominated
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136293 (document capacity for ZST as example)
- #136359 (doc all differences of ptr:copy(_nonoverlapping) with memcpy and memmove)
- #136816 (refactor `notable_traits_button` to use iterator combinators instead of for loop)
- #138552 (Misc print request handling cleanups + a centralized test for print request stability gating)
- #138573 (Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum
It's bitflags in practice, so an enum is unsound, as an enum must only have the described values. The x86_64 psABI declares it as a `typedef int _Unwind_Action`, which seems reasonable. I made a newtype first but that was more annoying than just a typedef. We don't really use this value for much other than a short check.
I ran `x check library --target aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu,x86_64-pc-windows-gnu,x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx,x86_64-unknown-haiku,x86_64-unknown-fuchsi
a,x86_64-unknown-freebsd,x86_64-unknown-dragonfly,x86_64-unknown-netbsd,x86_64-unknown-openbsd,x86_64-unknown-redox,riscv64-linux-android,armv7-unknown-freebsd` (and some more but they failed to build for other reasons :D)
fixes#138558
r? workingjubilee have fun
document capacity for ZST as example
The main text already covers this, although it provides weaker guarantees, but I think an example in the right spot does not hurt. Fixes#80747
Add `From<{integer}>` for `f16`/`f128` impls
This PR adds `impl From<{bool,i8,u8}> for f16` and `impl From<{bool,i8,u8,i16,u16,i32,u32}> for f128`.
The `From<{i64,u64}> for f128` impls are left commented out as adding them would allow using `f128` on stable before it is stabilised like in the following example:
```rust
fn f<T: From<u64>>(x: T) -> T { x }
fn main() {
let x = f(1.0); // the type of the literal is inferred to be `f128`
}
```
None of the impls added in this PR have this issue as they are all, at minimum, also implemented by `f64`.
This PR will need a crater run for the `From<{i32,u32}>` impls, as `f64` is no longer the only float type to implement them (similar to the cause of #125198).
cc `@bjoernager`
r? `@tgross35`
Tracking issue: #116909
It's bitflags in practice, so an enum is unsound, as an enum must only
have the described values. The x86_64 psABI declares it as a `typedef
int _Unwind_Action`, which seems reasonable. I made a newtype first but
that was more annoying than just a typedef. We don't really use this
value for much other than a short check.
Optimize multi-char string patterns
Uses specialization for `[T]::contains` from #130991 to optimize multi-char patterns in string searches.
Requesting a perf run to see if this actually has an effect 🙏
(I think that adding `char` to the list of types for which the `SliceContains` is specialized is a good idea, even if it doesn't show up on perf - might be helpful for downstream users)
core: Make `Debug` impl of raw pointers print metadata if present
Make Rust pointers appear less magic by including metadata information in their `Debug` output.
This does not break Rust stability guarantees because `Debug` impl are explicitly exempted from stability:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/trait.Debug.html#stability
> ## Stability
>
> Derived `Debug` formats are not stable, and so may change with future Rust versions. Additionally, `Debug` implementations of types provided by the standard library (`std`, `core`, `alloc`, etc.) are not stable, and may also change with future Rust versions.
Note that a regression test is added as a separate commit to make it clear what impact the last commit has on the output.
Closes#128684 because the output of that code now becomes:
```
thread 'main' panicked at src/main.rs:5:5:
assertion `left == right` failed
left: Pointer { addr: 0x7ffd45c6fc6b, metadata: 5 }
right: Pointer { addr: 0x7ffd45c6fc6b, metadata: 3 }
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```
debug-assert that the size_hint is well-formed in `collect`
Closes#137919
In the hopes of helping to catch any future accidentally-incorrect rustc or stdlib iterators (like the ones #137908 accidentally found), this has `Iterator::collect` call `size_hint` and check its `low` doesn't exceed its `Some(high)`.
There's of course a bazillion more places this *could* be checked, but the hope is that this one is a good tradeoff of being likely to catch lots of things while having minimal maintenance cost (especially compared to putting it in *every* container's `from_iter`).
Expand and organize `offset_of!` documentation.
* Give example of how to get the offset of an unsized tail field (prompted by discussion <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133055#discussion_r1986422206>).
* Specify the return type.
* Add section headings.
* Reduce “Visibility is respected…”, to a single sentence.
* Move `offset_of_enum` documentation to unstable book (with link to it).
* Add `offset_of_slice` documentation in unstable book.
r? Mark-Simulacrum
Add missing doc for intrinsic (Fix PR135334)
The previous [PR135334](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135334) mentioned that some of the intrinsic APIs were missing safety descriptions.
Among intrinsic APIs that miss safety specifications, most are related to numerical operations. They might need to be discussed and then seen how to organize.
Apart from them, only a few intrinsics lack safety. So this PR deals with the APIs with non-numerical operations in priority.
Fix Ptr inconsistency in {Rc,Arc}
### PR Description
This pr aims to address the problem discussed on [zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/219381-t-libs/topic/Inconsistency.20in.20.7BRc.2CArc.7D's.20ptr.20requirements/with/504259637).
### Problem Clarification
As this post presents, the `{Rc, Arc}::{in/de-crement_strong_count_/in}` do not limit the layout of the memory that `ptr` points to, while internally `Rc::from_raw_in` is called directly.
UB doesn't just appear when the strong count is decremented to zero. Miri also detects the UB of `out-of-bounds pointer use` when increment strong count is called on a pointer with an incorrect layout(shown as below).
```rust
use std::rc::Rc;
#[repr(align(8))]
struct Aligned8(u64);
#[repr(align(16))]
struct Aligned16(u64);
fn main() {
let rc: Rc<Aligned8> = Rc::new(Aligned8(42));
let raw_ptr = Rc::into_raw(rc);
unsafe {
Rc::increment_strong_count(raw_ptr as *const Aligned16);
}
}
```
Miri output:
```
error: Undefined Behavior: out-of-bounds pointer use: expected a pointer to 32 bytes of memory, but got alloc954 which is only 24 bytes from the end of the allocation
```
Remove `#[cfg(not(test))]` gates in `core`
These gates are unnecessary now that unit tests for `core` are in a separate package, `coretests`, instead of in the same files as the source code. They previously prevented the two `core` versions from conflicting with each other.
Expand `CloneToUninit` documentation.
* Clarify relationship to `dyn` after #133003.
* Add an example of using it with `dyn` as #133003 enabled.
* Replace parameter name `dst` with `dest` to avoid confusion between abbreviations for “DeSTination” and “Dynamically-Sized Type”.
* Add an example of implementing it.
* Add links to Rust Reference for the mentioned concepts.
* Mention that its method should rarely be called.
* Various small corrections.
Please review the `unsafe` code closely, as I am not an expert in the best possible ways to express these operations. (It might also be better to omit the implementation example entirely.)
cc `@zachs18` #126799
remove must_use from <*const T>::expose_provenance
`<*mut T>::expose_provenance` does not have this attribute, and in fact the function is documented to have a side-effect, so there are perfectly legitimate use-cases where the return value would be ignored.
uefi: helpers: Add DevicePathNode abstractions
- UEFI device path is a series of nodes layed out in a contiguous memory region. So it makes sense to use Iterator abstraction for modeling DevicePaths
- This PR has been split off from #135368 for easier review. The allow dead_code will be removed in #135368
cc `@nicholasbishop`
