Gate and validate `#[rustc_safe_intrinsic]`
Copied over from #116159:
> This was added as ungated in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100719/files#diff-09c366d3ad3ec9a42125253b610ca83cad6b156aa2a723f6c7e83eddef7b1e8fR502, probably because the author looked at the surrounding attributes, which are ungated because they are gated specially behind the staged_api feature.
>
> I don't think we need to crater this, the attribute is entirely useless without the intrinsics feature, which is already unstable..
r? ``@Nilstrieb``
lint towards rejecting consts in patterns that do not implement PartialEq
I think we definitely don't want to allow such consts, so even while the general plan around structural matching is up in the air, we can start the process of getting non-PartialEq matches out of the ecosystem.
ConstParamTy: require Eq as supertrait
As discussed with `@BoxyUwu` [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/260443-project-const-generics/topic/.60ConstParamTy.60.20and.20.60Eq.60).
We want to say that valtree equality on const generic params agrees with `==`, but that only makes sense if `==` actually exists, hence we should have an appropriate bound. Valtree equality is an equivalence relation, so such a type can always be `Eq` and not just `PartialEq`.
Properly print cstr literals in `proc_macro::Literal::to_string`
Previously we printed the contents of the string, rather than the actual string literal (e.g. `the c string` instead of `c"the c string"`).
Fixes#112820
cc #105723
Use placeholders to prevent using inferred RPITIT types to imply their own well-formedness
The issue here is that we use the same signature to do RPITIT inference as we do to compute implied bounds. To fix this, when gathering the assumed wf types for the method, we replace all of the infer vars (that will be eventually used to infer RPITIT types) with type placeholders, which imply nothing about lifetime bounds.
This solution kind of sucks, but I'm not certain there's another feasible way to fix this. If anyone has a better solution, I'd be glad to hear it.
My naive first solution was, instead of using placeholders, to replace the signature with the RPITIT projections that it originally started out with. But turns out that we can't just use the unnormalized signature of the trait method in `implied_outlives_bounds` since we normalize during WF computation -- that would cause a query cycle in `collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys`.
idk who to request review...
r? `@lcnr` or `@aliemjay` i guess.
Fixes#116060
Point at more causes of expectation of break value when possible
Follow up to #116071.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Disregard the first commit, which is in the other PR.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116073 (Allow higher-ranked fn sigs in `ValuePairs`)
- #116082 (Tweak expected message to explain what it's actually signifying)
- #116086 (More accurate suggestion for `self.` and `Self::`)
- #116104 (Reuse calculate_debuginfo_offset for fragments.)
- #116106 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
More accurate suggestion for `self.` and `Self::`
Detect that we can't suggest `self.` in an associated function without `&self` receiver.
Partially address #115992.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
implement Literal::byte_character
without this, the only way to create a `LitKind::Byte` is by
doing `"b'a'".parse::<Literal>()`, this solves that by enabling
`Literal::byte_character(b'a')`
cc #71358
The tracking issue is #115268
without this, the only way to create a `LitKind::Byte` is by
doing `"b'a'".parse::<Literal>()`, this solves that by enabling
`Literal::byte_character(b'a')`
Check that closure/generator's interior/capture types are sized
check that closure upvars and generator interiors are sized. this check is only necessary when `unsized_fn_params` or `unsized_locals` is enabled, so only check if those are active.
Fixes#93622Fixes#61335Fixes#68543
Point at cause of expectation of `break` value when possible
When encountering a type error within the value of a `break` statement, climb the HIR tree to identify if the expectation comes from an assignment or a return type (if the loop is the tail expression of a `fn`).
Fix#115905.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #115770 (Match on elem first while building move paths)
- #115999 (Capture scrutinee of if let guards correctly)
- #116056 (Make unsized casts illegal)
- #116061 (Remove TaKO8Ki from review rotation)
- #116062 (Change `start` to `#[start]` in some diagnosis)
- #116067 (Open the FileEncoder file for reading and writing)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Open the FileEncoder file for reading and writing
Maybe I just don't know `File` well enough, but the previous comment didn't make it clear enough to me that we can't use `File::create`. This one does.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116055
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
[breaking change] Validate crate name in `--extern` [MCP 650]
Reject non-ASCII-identifier crate names passed to the CLI option `--extern` (`rustc`, `rustdoc`).
Implements [MCP 650](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/650) (except that we only allow ASCII identifiers not arbitrary Rust identifiers).
Fixes#113035.
[As mentioned on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233931-t-compiler.2Fmajor-changes/topic/Disallow.20non-identifier-valid.20--extern.20cr.E2.80.A6.20compiler-team.23650/near/376826988), doing a crater run probably doesn't make sense since it wouldn't yield anything. Most users don't interact with `rustc` directly but only ever through Cargo which always passes a valid crate name to `--extern` when it invokes `rustc` and `rustdoc`. In any case, the user wouldn't be able to use such a crate name in the source code anyway.
Note that I'm not using [`rustc_session::output::validate_crate_name`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_session/output/fn.validate_crate_name.html) (used for `--crate-name` and `#![crate_name]`) since the latter doesn't reject non-ASCII crate names and ones that start with a digit.
As an aside, I've also thought about getting rid of `validate_crate_name` entirely in a separate PR (with another MCP) in favor of `is_ascii_ident` to reject more weird `--crate-name`s, `#![crate_name]`s and file names but I think that would lead to a lot of actual breakage, namely because of file names starting with a digit. In `tests/ui` 9 tests would be impacted for example.
CC `@estebank`
r? `@est31`
