Commit Graph

796 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Taiki Endo
96e7eaf478 Move remaining inline assembly test files into asm directory 2024-11-01 22:12:55 +09:00
bors
a0d98ff0e5 Auto merge of #132356 - jieyouxu:unsound-simplify_aggregate_to_copy, r=cjgillot,DianQK
Mark `simplify_aggregate_to_copy` mir-opt as unsound

Mark the `simplify_aggregate_to_copy` mir-opt added in #128299 as unsound as it seems to miscompile the MCVE reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132353. The mir-opt can be re-enabled once this case is fixed.

```rs
fn pop_min(mut score2head: Vec<Option<usize>>) -> Option<usize> {
    loop {
        if let Some(col) = score2head[0] {
            score2head[0] = None;
            return Some(col);
        }
    }
}

fn main() {
    let min = pop_min(vec![Some(1)]);
    println!("min: {:?}", min);
    // panic happens here on beta in release mode
    // but not in debug mode
    min.unwrap();
}
```

This MCVE is included as a `run-pass` ui regression test in the first commit. I built the ui test with a nightly manually, and can reproduce the behavioral difference with `-C opt-level=0` and `-C opt-level=1`. Locally, this ui test will fail unless it was run on a compiler built with the second commit marking the mir-opt as unsound thus disabling it by default.

This PR **partially reverts** commit e7386b3, reversing changes made to 02b1be1. The mir-opt implementation is just marked as unsound but **not** reverted to make reland reviews easier. Test changes are **reverted if they were not pure additions**. Tests added by the original PR received `-Z unsound-mir-opts` compile-flags.

cc `@DianQK` `@cjgillot` (PR author and reviewer of #128299)
2024-10-31 15:29:14 +00:00
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)
a8b34f58cf tests/codegen: add minicore compiletest self-test 2024-10-31 18:20:11 +08:00
许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)
10b8ba4ecb Mark simplify_aggregate_to_copy mir-opt as unsound
Co-authored-by: DianQK <dianqk@dianqk.net>
2024-10-31 13:48:06 +08:00
Stuart Cook
9c73bcfa8d
Rollup merge of #130225 - adetaylor:rename-old-receiver, r=wesleywiser
Rename Receiver -> LegacyReceiver

As part of the "arbitrary self types v2" project, we are going to replace the current `Receiver` trait with a new mechanism based on a new, different `Receiver` trait.

This PR renames the old trait to get it out the way. Naming is hard. Options considered included:
* HardCodedReceiver (because it should only be used for things in the standard library, and hence is sort-of hard coded)
* LegacyReceiver
* TargetLessReceiver
* OldReceiver

These are all bad names, but fortunately this will be temporary. Assuming the new mechanism proceeds to stabilization as intended, the legacy trait will be removed altogether.

Although we expect this trait to be used only in the standard library, we suspect it may be in use elsehwere, so we're landing this change separately to identify any surprising breakages.

It's known that this trait is used within the Rust for Linux project; a patch is in progress to remove their dependency.

This is a part of the arbitrary self types v2 project,
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874

r? `@wesleywiser`
2024-10-24 14:19:53 +11:00
León Orell Valerian Liehr
a144561608
Rollup merge of #131955 - SpriteOvO:riscv-int-arg-attr, r=workingjubilee
Set `signext` or `zeroext` for integer arguments on RISC-V and LoongArch64

This PR contains 3 commits:

- the first one introduces a new function `adjust_for_rust_abi` in `rustc_target`, and moves the x86 specific adjustment code into it;
- the second one adds RISC-V specific adjustment code into it, which sets `signext` or `zeroext` attribute for integer arguments.
- **UPDATE**: added the 3rd commit to apply the same adjustment for LoongArch64.
2024-10-23 22:11:03 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
af356d6d73
Rollup merge of #132031 - slanterns:rc_default, r=ibraheemdev
Optimize `Rc<T>::default`

The missing piece of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131460.

Also refactored `Arc<T>::default` by using a safe `NonNull::from(Box::leak(_))` to replace the unnecessarily unsafe call to `NonNull::new_unchecked(Box::into_raw(_))`. The remaining unsafety is coming from `[Rc|Arc]::from_inner`, which is safe from the construction of `[Rc|Arc]Inner`.
2024-10-23 06:51:25 +02:00
Asuna
57bffe1d59 Set signext or zeroext for integer arguments on LoongArch64 2024-10-23 04:42:21 +02:00
Asuna
6b65524620 Set signext or zeroext for integer arguments on RISC-V 2024-10-23 04:42:03 +02:00
bors
8bf64f106a Auto merge of #131871 - RalfJung:x86-32-float, r=workingjubilee
x86-32 float return for 'Rust' ABI: treat all float types consistently

This helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131819: for our own ABI on x86-32, we want to *never* use the float registers. The previous logic only considered F32 and F64, but skipped F16 and F128. So I made the logic just apply to all float types.

try-job: i686-gnu
try-job: i686-gnu-nopt
2024-10-22 22:36:59 +00:00
Adrian Taylor
8f85b90ca6 Rename Receiver -> LegacyReceiver
As part of the "arbitrary self types v2" project, we are going to
replace the current `Receiver` trait with a new mechanism based on a
new, different `Receiver` trait.

This PR renames the old trait to get it out the way. Naming is hard.
Options considered included:
* HardCodedReceiver (because it should only be used for things in the
  standard library, and hence is sort-of hard coded)
* LegacyReceiver
* TargetLessReceiver
* OldReceiver

These are all bad names, but fortunately this will be temporary.
Assuming the new mechanism proceeds to stabilization as intended, the
legacy trait will be removed altogether.

Although we expect this trait to be used only in the standard library,
we suspect it may be in use elsehwere, so we're landing this change
separately to identify any surprising breakages.

It's known that this trait is used within the Rust for Linux project; a
patch is in progress to remove their dependency.

This is a part of the arbitrary self types v2 project,
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874

r? @wesleywiser
2024-10-22 12:55:16 +00:00
Slanterns
7782401c52
add codegen test 2024-10-22 02:25:38 -07:00
Jubilee
1b24c6fc14
Rollup merge of #131807 - beetrees:riscv-target-abi, r=workingjubilee
Always specify `llvm_abiname` for RISC-V targets

For RISC-V targets, when `llvm_abiname` is not specified LLVM will infer the ABI from the target features, causing #116344 to occur. This PR adds the correct `llvm_abiname` to all RISC-V targets where it is missing (which are all soft-float targets), and adds a test to prevent future RISC-V targets from accidentally omitting `llvm_abiname`. The only affect of this PR is that `-Ctarget-feature=+f` (or similar) will no longer affect the ABI on the modified targets.

<!-- homu-ignore:start -->
r? `@RalfJung`
<!--- homu-ignore:end -->
2024-10-21 20:32:01 -07:00
Jubilee
fe2cbbd2d5
Rollup merge of #130432 - azhogin:azhogin/regparm, r=workingjubilee,pnkfelix
rust_for_linux: -Zregparm=<N> commandline flag for X86 (#116972)

Command line flag `-Zregparm=<N>` for X86 (32-bit) for rust-for-linux: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116972
Implemented in the similar way as fastcall/vectorcall support (args are marked InReg if fit).
2024-10-21 20:32:00 -07:00
Ralf Jung
56ee492a6e move strict provenance lints to new feature gate, remove old feature gates 2024-10-21 15:22:17 +01:00
Ralf Jung
57d5f864e3 x86-32 float return for 'Rust' ABI: treat all float types consistently 2024-10-20 11:41:08 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
91e46844c8
Rollup merge of #131920 - clubby789:108395-test, r=jieyouxu
Add codegen test for branchy bool match

Closes #108395
2024-10-19 22:00:58 +02:00
bors
a2a1206811 Auto merge of #131211 - bjorn3:rust_abi_follow_c_rules, r=nikic,jieyouxu
Return values larger than 2 registers using a return area pointer

LLVM and Cranelift disagree about how to return values that don't fit in the registers designated for return values. LLVM will force the entire return value to be passed by return area pointer, while Cranelift will look at each IR level return value independently and decide to pass it in a register or not, which would result in the return value being passed partially in registers and partially through a return area pointer.

While Cranelift may need to be fixed as the LLVM behavior is generally more correct with respect to the surface language, forcing this behavior in rustc itself makes it easier for other backends to conform to the Rust ABI and for the C ABI rustc already handles this behavior anyway.

In addition LLVM's decision to pass the return value in registers or using a return area pointer depends on how exactly the return type is lowered to an LLVM IR type. For example `Option<u128>` can be lowered as `{ i128, i128 }` in which case the x86_64 backend would use a return area pointer, or it could be passed as `{ i32, i128 }` in which case the x86_64 backend would pass it in registers by taking advantage of an LLVM ABI extension that allows using 3 registers for the x86_64 sysv call conv rather than the officially specified 2 registers.

This adjustment is only necessary for the Rust ABI as for other ABI's the calling convention implementations in rustc_target already ensure any return value which doesn't fit in the available amount of return registers is passed in the right way for the current target.

Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/issues/1525
cc https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/issues/9250
2024-10-19 14:21:46 +00:00
bjorn3
cc7044b080 Fix test expectations for 32bit x86 2024-10-19 13:09:21 +00:00
clubby789
aa299a9bdf Add codegen test for branchy bool match 2024-10-19 10:05:25 +00:00
Jubilee Young
b9c96780b4 compiler: Revert -Zregparm handling for extern Rust 2024-10-18 11:59:20 -07:00
Jubilee Young
d6f5b437e5 compiler: Enable test for regparm on different hosts 2024-10-18 11:59:20 -07:00
bors
d9c4b8d475 Auto merge of #131572 - cuviper:ub-index_range, r=thomcc
Avoid superfluous UB checks in `IndexRange`

`IndexRange::len` is justified as an overall invariant, and
`take_prefix` and `take_suffix` are justified by local branch
conditions. A few more UB-checked calls remain in cases that are only
supported locally by `debug_assert!`, which won't do anything in
distributed builds, so those UB checks may still be useful.

We generally expect core's `#![rustc_preserve_ub_checks]` to optimize
away in user's release builds, but the mere presence of that extra code
can sometimes inhibit optimization, as seen in #131563.
2024-10-17 22:18:24 +00:00
Andrew Zhogin
b3ae64d24f rust_for_linux: -Zregparm=<N> commandline flag for X86 (#116972) 2024-10-18 00:29:31 +07:00
beetrees
3ea91c05db
Always specify llvm_abiname for RISC-V targets 2024-10-17 02:07:02 +01:00
Matthew Maurer
0e73095169 llvm: Tolerate propagated range metadata
llvm/llvm-project#91101 propagates range information across inlining,
resulting in more metadata in this test. Tolerate the range metadata if
it appears.
2024-10-16 18:38:26 +00:00
bors
1f67a7aa8d Auto merge of #131460 - jwong101:default-placement-new, r=ibraheemdev
Optimize `Box::default` and `Arc::default` to construct more types in place

Both the `Arc` and `Box` `Default` impls currently call `T::default()` before allocating, and then moving the resulting `T` into the allocation.

Most `Default` impls are trivial, which should in theory allow
LLVM to construct `T: Default` directly in the `Box` allocation when calling
`<Box<T>>::default()`.

However, the allocation may fail, which necessitates calling `T`'s destructor if it has one.
If the destructor is non-trivial, then LLVM has a hard time proving that it's
sound to elide, which makes it construct `T` on the stack first, and then copy it into the allocation.

Change both of these impls to allocate first, and then call `T::default` into the uninitialized allocation, so that LLVM doesn't have to prove that it's sound to elide the destructor/initial stack copy.

For example, given the following Rust code:

```rust
#[derive(Default, Clone)]
struct Foo {
    x: Vec<u8>,
    z: String,
    y: Vec<u8>,
}

#[no_mangle]
pub fn src() -> Box<Foo> {
    Box::default()
}
```

<details open>
<summary>Before this PR:</summary>

```llvm
`@__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` = external global i8

; drop_in_place() generated in case the allocation fails

; core::ptr::drop_in_place<playground::Foo>
; Function Attrs: nounwind nonlazybind uwtable
define internal fastcc void `@"_ZN4core3ptr36drop_in_place$LT$playground..Foo$GT$17hff376aece491233bE"(ptr` noalias nocapture noundef readonly align 8 dereferenceable(72) %_1) unnamed_addr #0 personality ptr `@rust_eh_personality` {
start:
  %_1.val = load i64, ptr %_1, align 8
  %0 = icmp eq i64 %_1.val, 0
  br i1 %0, label %bb6, label %"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i"

"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i": ; preds = %start
  %1 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 8
  %_1.val6 = load ptr, ptr %1, align 8, !nonnull !3, !noundef !3
  tail call void `@__rust_dealloc(ptr` noundef nonnull %_1.val6, i64 noundef %_1.val, i64 noundef 1) #8
  br label %bb6

bb6:                                              ; preds = %"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i", %start
  %2 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 24
  %.val9 = load i64, ptr %2, align 8
  %3 = icmp eq i64 %.val9, 0
  br i1 %3, label %bb5, label %"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i.i11"

"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i.i11": ; preds = %bb6
  %4 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 32
  %.val10 = load ptr, ptr %4, align 8, !nonnull !3, !noundef !3
  tail call void `@__rust_dealloc(ptr` noundef nonnull %.val10, i64 noundef %.val9, i64 noundef 1) #8
  br label %bb5

bb5:                                              ; preds = %"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i.i11", %bb6
  %5 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 48
  %.val4 = load i64, ptr %5, align 8
  %6 = icmp eq i64 %.val4, 0
  br i1 %6, label %"_ZN4core3ptr46drop_in_place$LT$alloc..vec..Vec$LT$u8$GT$$GT$17hb5ca95423e113cf7E.exit16", label %"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i15"

"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i15": ; preds = %bb5
  %7 = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 56
  %.val5 = load ptr, ptr %7, align 8, !nonnull !3, !noundef !3
  tail call void `@__rust_dealloc(ptr` noundef nonnull %.val5, i64 noundef %.val4, i64 noundef 1) #8
  br label %"_ZN4core3ptr46drop_in_place$LT$alloc..vec..Vec$LT$u8$GT$$GT$17hb5ca95423e113cf7E.exit16"

"_ZN4core3ptr46drop_in_place$LT$alloc..vec..Vec$LT$u8$GT$$GT$17hb5ca95423e113cf7E.exit16": ; preds = %bb5, %"_ZN63_$LT$alloc..alloc..Global$u20$as$u20$core..alloc..Allocator$GT$10deallocate17heaa87468709346b1E.exit.i.i.i4.i15"
  ret void
}

; Function Attrs: nonlazybind uwtable
define noalias noundef nonnull align 8 ptr `@src()` unnamed_addr #1 personality ptr `@rust_eh_personality` {
start:

; alloca to place `Foo` in.
  %_1 = alloca [72 x i8], align 8
  call void `@llvm.lifetime.start.p0(i64` 72, ptr nonnull %_1)
  store i64 0, ptr %_1, align 8
  %_2.sroa.4.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 8
  store ptr inttoptr (i64 1 to ptr), ptr %_2.sroa.4.0._1.sroa_idx, align 8
  %_2.sroa.5.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 16
  %_3.sroa.4.0..sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 32
  call void `@llvm.memset.p0.i64(ptr` noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(16) %_2.sroa.5.0._1.sroa_idx, i8 0, i64 16, i1 false)
  store ptr inttoptr (i64 1 to ptr), ptr %_3.sroa.4.0..sroa_idx, align 8
  %_3.sroa.5.0..sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 40
  %_4.sroa.4.0..sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 56
  call void `@llvm.memset.p0.i64(ptr` noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(16) %_3.sroa.5.0..sroa_idx, i8 0, i64 16, i1 false)
  store ptr inttoptr (i64 1 to ptr), ptr %_4.sroa.4.0..sroa_idx, align 8
  %_4.sroa.5.0..sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_1, i64 64
  store i64 0, ptr %_4.sroa.5.0..sroa_idx, align 8
  %0 = load volatile i8, ptr `@__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable,` align 1, !noalias !4
  %_0.i.i.i = tail call noalias noundef align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(72) ptr `@__rust_alloc(i64` noundef 72, i64 noundef 8) #8, !noalias !4
  %1 = icmp eq ptr %_0.i.i.i, null
  br i1 %1, label %bb2.i, label %"_ZN5alloc5boxed12Box$LT$T$GT$3new17h0864de14f863a27aE.exit"

bb2.i:                                            ; preds = %start
; invoke alloc::alloc::handle_alloc_error
  invoke void `@_ZN5alloc5alloc18handle_alloc_error17h98142d0d8d74161bE(i64` noundef 8, i64 noundef 72) #9
          to label %.noexc unwind label %cleanup.i

.noexc:                                           ; preds = %bb2.i
  unreachable

cleanup.i:                                        ; preds = %bb2.i
  %2 = landingpad { ptr, i32 }
          cleanup
; call core::ptr::drop_in_place<playground::Foo>
  call fastcc void `@"_ZN4core3ptr36drop_in_place$LT$playground..Foo$GT$17hff376aece491233bE"(ptr` noalias noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(72) %_1) #10
  resume { ptr, i32 } %2

"_ZN5alloc5boxed12Box$LT$T$GT$3new17h0864de14f863a27aE.exit": ; preds = %start

; Copy from stack to heap if allocation is successful
  call void `@llvm.memcpy.p0.p0.i64(ptr` noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(72) %_0.i.i.i, ptr noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(72) %_1, i64 72, i1 false)
  call void `@llvm.lifetime.end.p0(i64` 72, ptr nonnull %_1)
  ret ptr %_0.i.i.i
}

```
</details>

<details>
<summary>After this PR</summary>

```llvm
; Notice how there's no `drop_in_place()` generated as well

define noalias noundef nonnull align 8 ptr `@src()` unnamed_addr #0 personality ptr `@rust_eh_personality` {
start:
; no stack allocation

  %0 = load volatile i8, ptr `@__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable,` align 1
  %_0.i.i.i.i.i = tail call noalias noundef align 8 dereferenceable_or_null(72) ptr `@__rust_alloc(i64` noundef 72, i64 noundef 8) #5
  %1 = icmp eq ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, null
  br i1 %1, label %bb3.i, label %"_ZN5alloc5boxed16Box$LT$T$C$A$GT$13new_uninit_in17h80d6355ef4b73ea3E.exit"

bb3.i:                                            ; preds = %start
; call alloc::alloc::handle_alloc_error
  tail call void `@_ZN5alloc5alloc18handle_alloc_error17h98142d0d8d74161bE(i64` noundef 8, i64 noundef 72) #6
  unreachable

"_ZN5alloc5boxed16Box$LT$T$C$A$GT$13new_uninit_in17h80d6355ef4b73ea3E.exit": ; preds = %start
; construct `Foo` directly into the allocation if successful

  store i64 0, ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, align 8
  %_8.sroa.4.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, i64 8
  store ptr inttoptr (i64 1 to ptr), ptr %_8.sroa.4.0._1.sroa_idx, align 8
  %_8.sroa.5.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, i64 16
  %_8.sroa.7.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, i64 32
  tail call void `@llvm.memset.p0.i64(ptr` noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(16) %_8.sroa.5.0._1.sroa_idx, i8 0, i64 16, i1 false)
  store ptr inttoptr (i64 1 to ptr), ptr %_8.sroa.7.0._1.sroa_idx, align 8
  %_8.sroa.8.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, i64 40
  %_8.sroa.10.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, i64 56
  tail call void `@llvm.memset.p0.i64(ptr` noundef nonnull align 8 dereferenceable(16) %_8.sroa.8.0._1.sroa_idx, i8 0, i64 16, i1 false)
  store ptr inttoptr (i64 1 to ptr), ptr %_8.sroa.10.0._1.sroa_idx, align 8
  %_8.sroa.11.0._1.sroa_idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i, i64 64
  store i64 0, ptr %_8.sroa.11.0._1.sroa_idx, align 8
  ret ptr %_0.i.i.i.i.i
}
```

</details>
2024-10-16 06:36:43 +00:00
Taiki Endo
d858dfedbb Fix clobber_abi and disallow SVE-related registers in Arm64EC inline assembly 2024-10-14 05:30:45 +09:00
bjorn3
8ed77fd29e Update tests for 32bit targets 2024-10-12 16:17:34 +00:00
Trevor Gross
9e72070f77
Rollup merge of #131310 - taiki-e:msp430-clobber-abi, r=Amanieu
Support clobber_abi in MSP430 inline assembly

This supports `clobber_abi` which is one of the requirements of stabilization mentioned in #93335.

Refs: Section 3.2 "Register Conventions" in [MSP430 Embedded Application Binary Interface](https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa534a/slaa534a.pdf)

cc ``@cr1901``

r? ``@Amanieu``

``@rustbot`` label +O-msp430
2024-10-11 23:57:46 -04:00
Josh Stone
5365b3f7be Avoid superfluous UB checks in IndexRange
`IndexRange::len` is justified as an overall invariant, and
`take_prefix` and `take_suffix` are justified by local branch
conditions. A few more UB-checked calls remain in cases that are only
supported locally by `debug_assert!`, which won't do anything in
distributed builds, so those UB checks may still be useful.

We generally expect core's `#![rustc_preserve_ub_checks]` to optimize
away in user's release builds, but the mere presence of that extra code
can sometimes inhibit optimization, as seen in #131563.
2024-10-11 16:22:43 -07:00
Matthias Krüger
33b1264540
Rollup merge of #131519 - davidlattimore:intrinsics-default-vis, r=Urgau
Use Default visibility for rustc-generated C symbol declarations

Non-default visibilities should only be used for definitions, not declarations, otherwise linking can fail.

This is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123994.

Issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123427

When I changed `default-hidden-visibility` to `default-visibility` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130005, I updated all places in the code that used `default-hidden-visibility`, replicating the hidden-visibility bug to also happen for protected visibility.

Without this change, trying to build rustc with `-Z default-visibility=protected` fails with a link error.
2024-10-11 15:36:52 +02:00
Zalathar
96224d80ce compiletest: Remove the magic hacks for finding output with lto=thin
This hack was intended to handle the case where `-Clto=thin` causes the
compiler to emit multiple output files (when producing LLVM-IR or assembly).

The hack only affects 4 tests, of which 3 are just meta-tests for the hack
itself. The one remaining test that motivated the hack currently doesn't even
need it!

(`tests/codegen/issues/issue-81408-dllimport-thinlto-windows.rs`)
2024-10-11 11:28:42 +11:00
David Lattimore
42c0494499 Use Default visibility for rustc-generated C symbol declarations
Non-default visibilities should only be used for definitions, not
declarations, otherwise linking can fail.

Co-authored-by: Collin Baker <collinbaker@chromium.org>
2024-10-11 08:43:27 +11:00
bjorn3
ccd1bc2ad1 Return values larger than 2 registers using a return area pointer
LLVM and Cranelift disagree about how to return values that don't fit
in the registers designated for return values. LLVM will force the
entire return value to be passed by return area pointer, while
Cranelift will look at each IR level return value independently and
decide to pass it in a register or not, which would result in the
return value being passed partially in registers and partially through
a return area pointer.

While Cranelift may need to be fixed as the LLVM behavior is generally
more correct with respect to the surface language, forcing this
behavior in rustc itself makes it easier for other backends to conform
to the Rust ABI and for the C ABI rustc already handles this behavior
anyway.

In addition LLVM's decision to pass the return value in registers or
using a return area pointer depends on how exactly the return type is
lowered to an LLVM IR type. For example `Option<u128>` can be lowered
as `{ i128, i128 }` in which case the x86_64 backend would use a return
area pointer, or it could be passed as `{ i32, i128 }` in which case
the x86_64 backend would pass it in registers by taking advantage of an
LLVM ABI extension that allows using 3 registers for the x86_64 sysv
call conv rather than the officially specified 2 registers.

This adjustment is only necessary for the Rust ABI as for other ABI's
the calling convention implementations in rustc_target already ensure
any return value which doesn't fit in the available amount of return
registers is passed in the right way for the current target.
2024-10-10 14:24:43 +00:00
Joshua Wong
5e474f7d83 allocate before calling T::default in <Arc<T>>::default()
Same rationale as in the previous commit.
2024-10-10 09:50:35 -04:00
Joshua Wong
dd0620b867 allocate before calling T::default in <Box<T>>::default()
The `Box<T: Default>` impl currently calls `T::default()` before allocating
the `Box`.

Most `Default` impls are trivial, which should in theory allow
LLVM to construct `T: Default` directly in the `Box` allocation when calling
`<Box<T>>::default()`.

However, the allocation may fail, which necessitates calling `T's` destructor if it has one.
If the destructor is non-trivial, then LLVM has a hard time proving that it's
sound to elide, which makes it construct `T` on the stack first, and then copy it into the allocation.

Create an uninit `Box` first, and then write `T::default` into it, so that LLVM now only needs to prove
that the `T::default` can't panic, which should be trivial for most `Default` impls.
2024-10-10 09:49:24 -04:00
Joshua Wong
8a1462265f add initial tests for placement new changes 2024-10-10 09:47:26 -04:00
bors
e6c46db4e9 Auto merge of #131387 - Zalathar:rollup-kprp512, r=Zalathar
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #130824 (Add missing module flags for `-Zfunction-return=thunk-extern`)
 - #131170 (Fix `target_vendor` in non-IDF Xtensa ESP32 targets)
 - #131355 (Add tests for some old fixed issues)
 - #131369 (Update books)
 - #131370 (rustdoc: improve `<wbr>`-insertion for SCREAMING_CAMEL_CASE)
 - #131379 (Fix utf8-bom test)
 - #131385 (Un-vacation myself)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-10-08 04:38:04 +00:00
Stuart Cook
4d63896018
Rollup merge of #130824 - Darksonn:fix-function-return, r=wesleywiser
Add missing module flags for `-Zfunction-return=thunk-extern`

This fixes a bug in the `-Zfunction-return=thunk-extern` flag. The flag needs to be passed onto LLVM to ensure that functions such as `asan.module_ctor` and `asan.module_dtor` that are created internally in LLVM have the mitigation applied to them.

This was originally discovered [in the Linux kernel](https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANiq72myZL4_poCMuNFevtpYYc0V0embjSuKb7y=C+m3vVA_8g@mail.gmail.com/).

Original flag PR: #116892
PR for similar issue: #129373
Tracking issue: #116853

cc ``@ojeda``
r? ``@wesleywiser``
2024-10-08 13:19:43 +11:00
Ben Kimock
6d246e47fb Add precondition checks to ptr::offset, ptr::add, ptr::sub 2024-10-07 11:12:58 -04:00
Folkert de Vries
5fc60d1e52 various fixes for naked_asm! implementation
- fix for divergence
- fix error message
- fix another cranelift test
- fix some cranelift things
- don't set the NORETURN option for naked asm
- fix use of naked_asm! in doc comment
- fix use of naked_asm! in run-make test
- use `span_bug` in unreachable branch
2024-10-06 19:00:09 +02:00
Folkert de Vries
bc0a9543a3 more asm! -> naked_asm! in tests 2024-10-06 18:12:25 +02:00
Folkert de Vries
562ec5a6fb disallow asm! in #[naked] functions
also disallow the `noreturn` option, and infer `naked_asm!` as `!`
2024-10-06 18:12:25 +02:00
Folkert
47b42bef32 use naked_asm! in naked-function tests 2024-10-06 18:12:25 +02:00
Taiki Endo
3743618c13 Support clobber_abi in MSP430 inline assembly 2024-10-06 08:14:44 +09:00
EFanZh
d47e388843 Avoid emptiness check in PeekMut::pop 2024-10-03 22:15:52 +08:00
bors
06bb8364aa Auto merge of #131111 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-n6do187, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 4 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #130005 (Replace -Z default-hidden-visibility with -Z default-visibility)
 - #130229 (ptr::add/sub: do not claim equivalence with `offset(c as isize)`)
 - #130773 (Update Unicode escapes in `/library/core/src/char/methods.rs`)
 - #130933 (rustdoc: lists items that contain multiple paragraphs are more clear)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-10-01 19:29:26 +00:00
Guillaume Gomez
344b6a1668
Rollup merge of #130630 - taiki-e:s390x-clobber-abi, r=Amanieu
Support clobber_abi and vector/access registers (clobber-only) in s390x inline assembly

This supports `clobber_abi` which is one of the requirements of stabilization mentioned in #93335.

This also supports vector registers (as `vreg`) and access registers (as `areg`) as clobber-only, which need to support clobbering of them to implement clobber_abi.

Refs:
- "1.2.1.1. Register Preservation Rules" section in ELF Application Binary Interface s390x Supplement, Version 1.6.1 (lzsabi_s390x.pdf in https://github.com/IBM/s390x-abi/releases/tag/v1.6.1)
- Register definition in LLVM:
  - Vector registers https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZRegisterInfo.td#L249
  - Access registers https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZRegisterInfo.td#L332

I have three questions:
- ~~ELF Application Binary Interface s390x Supplement says that `cc` (condition code, bits 18-19 of PSW) is "Volatile".
  However, we do not have a register class for `cc` and instead mark `cc` as clobbered unless `preserves_flags` is specified (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111331).
  Therefore, in the current implementation, if both `preserves_flags` and `clobber_abi` are specified, `cc` is not marked as clobbered. Is this okay? Or even if `preserves_flags` is used, should `cc` be marked as clobbered if `clobber_abi` is used?~~ UPDATE: resolved https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130630#issuecomment-2367923121
- ~~ELF Application Binary Interface s390x Supplement says that `pm` (program mask, bits 20-23 of PSW) is "Cleared".
  There does not appear to be any registers associated with this in either [LLVM](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZRegisterInfo.td) or [GCC](33ccc1314d/gcc/config/s390/s390.h (L407-L431)), so at this point I don't see any way other than to just ignore it. Is this okay as-is?~~ UPDATE: resolved https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130630#issuecomment-2367923121
- Is "areg" a good name for register class name for access registers? It may be a bit confusing between that and `reg_addr`, which uses the “a” constraint (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119431)...

Note:

- GCC seems to [recognize only `a0` and `a1`](33ccc1314d/gcc/config/s390/s390.h (L428-L429)), and using `a[2-15]` [causes errors](https://godbolt.org/z/a46vx8jjn).
  Given that cg_gcc has a similar problem with other architecture (https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc/issues/485), I don't feel this is a blocker for this PR, but it is worth mentioning here.
- `vreg` should be able to accept `#[repr(simd)]` types as input if the `vector` target feature added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127506 is enabled, but core_arch has no s390x vector type and both `#[repr(simd)]` and `core::simd` are unstable, so I have not implemented it in this PR. EDIT: And supporting it is probably more complex than doing the equivalent on other architectures... https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88245#issuecomment-905559591

cc `@uweigand`

r? `@Amanieu`

`@rustbot` label +O-SystemZ
2024-10-01 17:32:07 +02:00
David Lattimore
f48194ea55 Replace -Z default-hidden-visibility with -Z default-visibility
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/782

Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <17426603+bjorn3@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-10-01 22:32:13 +10:00