- ... when creating diagnostics in rustc_metadata
- use the error_code! macro
- pass macro output to diag.code()
- use fluent from within manual implementation of SessionDiagnostic
- emit the untested errors in case they occur in the wild
- stop panicking in the probably-not-dead code, add fixme to write test
translations(rustc_session): migrates `rustc_session` to use `SessionDiagnostic` - Pt. 1
## Description
This is the first PR for the migration of the module `rustc_session`. You can follow my progress [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100717#issuecomment-1220279883).
The PR migrates the files `cgu_reuse_tracker` and `parse.rs` to use `SessionDiagnostic `.
Migrate rustc_monomorphize to use SessionDiagnostic
### Description
- Migrates diagnostics in `rustc_monomorphize` to use `SessionDiagnostic`
- Adds an `impl IntoDiagnosticArg for PathBuf`
### TODO / Help!
- [x] I'm having trouble figuring out how to apply an optional note. 😕 Help!?
- Resolved. It was bad docs. Fixed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1437/files
- [x] `errors:RecursionLimit` should be `#[fatal ...]`, but that doesn't exist so it's `#[error ...]` at the moment.
- Maybe I can switch after this is merged in? --> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100694
- Or maybe I need to manually implement `SessionDiagnostic` instead of deriving it?
- [x] How does one go about converting an error inside of [a call to struct_span_lint_hir](8064a49508/compiler/rustc_monomorphize/src/collector.rs (L917-L927))?
- [x] ~What placeholder do you use in the fluent template to refer to the value in a vector? It seems like [this code](0b79f758c9/compiler/rustc_macros/src/diagnostics/diagnostic_builder.rs (L83-L114)) ought to have the answer (or something near it)...but I can't figure it out.~ You can't. Punted.
Make call suggestions more general and more accurate
Cleans up some suggestions that have to do with adding `()` to make typeck happy.
1. Drive-by rename of `expr_t` to `base_ty` since it's the type of the `base_expr`
1. Autoderef until we get to a callable type in `suggest_fn_call`.
1. Don't erroneously suggest calling constructor when a method/field does not exist on it.
1. Suggest calling a method receiver if its function output has a method (e.g. `fn.method()` => `fn().method()`)
1. Extend call suggestions to type parameters, fn pointers, trait objects where possible
1. Suggest calling in operators too (fixes#101054)
1. Use `/* {ty} */` as argument placeholder instead of just `_`, which is confusing and makes suggestions look less like `if let` syntax.
Add tier-3 support for powerpc64 and riscv64 openbsd
# powerpc64
- MCP for [powerpc64-unknown-openbsd tier-3 support](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/551)
- only need to add spec definition in rustc_target
# riscv64
- MCP for [riscv64-unknown-openbsd tier-3 support](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/552)
- add spec definition in rustc_target
- follow freebsd about avoiding linking with `libatomic`
Allow deriving multipart suggestions
This turned into a bit more of a rewrite than I was initially hoping for... Still, I think the `SessionSubdiagnostic` derive is a little cleaner overall now, and closer to the `SessionDiagnostic` derive to make future code sharing easier.
r? ``@davidtwco``
Set DebuginfoKind::Pdb in msvc_base
This PDB setting was added to `windows_msvc_base` in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98051. It's also needed for the
UEFI targets, and since `uefi_msvc_base` and `windows_msvc_base` are the
only things that inherit from `msvc_base`, just move the PDB setting up
to `mscv_base` to cover both.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101071
Rework definition of MIR phases to more closely reflect semantic concerns
Implements most of rust-lang/compiler-team#522 .
I tried my best to restrict this PR to the "core" parts of the MCP. In other words, this includes just enough changes to make the new definition of `MirPhase` make sense. That means there are a couple of FIXMEs lying around. Depending on what reviewers prefer, I can either fix them in this PR or send follow up PRs. There are also a couple other refactorings of the `rustc_mir_transform/src/lib.rs` file that I want to do in follow ups that I didn't leave explicit FIXMEs for.
Strengthen invalid_value lint to forbid uninit primitives, adjust docs to say that's UB
For context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66151#issuecomment-1174477404=
This does not make it a FCW, but it does explicitly state in the docs that uninit integers are UB.
This also doesn't affect any runtime behavior, uninit u32's will still successfully be created through mem::uninitialized.
Thought of doing this by having a struct and an enum with Default and Alt cases, but not sure if we wanted to have the text in code instead of having “demangling()” and “demangling-alt()” in the ftl file.
Don’t like the current way of having structs representing the same-ish and using long names to distinguish their expectations, instead of putting this in an enum and handling the different cases inside the type.
I am fine with whichever option the team prefers; also understand having them as separate structs keeps it simple.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99517 (Display raw pointer as *{mut,const} T instead of *-ptr in errors)
- #99928 (Do not leak type variables from opaque type relation)
- #100473 (Attempt to normalize `FnDef` signature in `InferCtxt::cmp`)
- #100653 (Move the cast_float_to_int fallback code to GCC)
- #100941 (Point at the string inside literal and mention if we need string inte…)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Move the cast_float_to_int fallback code to GCC
Now that we require at least LLVM 13, that codegen backend is always
using its intrinsic `fptosi.sat` and `fptoui.sat` conversions, so it
doesn't need the manual implementation. However, the GCC backend still
needs it, so we can move all of that code down there.
Attempt to normalize `FnDef` signature in `InferCtxt::cmp`
Stashes a normalization callback in `InferCtxt` so that the signature we get from `tcx.fn_sig(..).subst(..)` in `InferCtxt::cmp` can be properly normalized, since we cannot expect for it to have normalized types since it comes straight from astconv.
This is kind of a hack, but I will say that `@jyn514` found the fact that we present unnormalized types to be very confusing in real life code, and I agree with that feeling. Though altogether I am still a bit unsure about whether this PR is worth the effort, so I'm open to alternatives and/or just closing it outright.
On the other hand, this isn't a ridiculously heavy implementation anyways -- it's less than a hundred lines of changes, and half of that is just miscellaneous cleanup.
This is stacked onto #100471 which is basically unrelated, and it can be rebased off of that when that lands or if needed.
---
The code:
```rust
trait Foo { type Bar; }
impl<T> Foo for T {
type Bar = i32;
}
fn foo<T>(_: <T as Foo>::Bar) {}
fn needs_i32_ref_fn(f: fn(&'static i32)) {}
fn main() {
needs_i32_ref_fn(foo::<()>);
}
```
Before:
```
= note: expected fn pointer `fn(&'static i32)`
found fn item `fn(<() as Foo>::Bar) {foo::<()>}`
```
After:
```
= note: expected fn pointer `fn(&'static i32)`
found fn item `fn(i32) {foo::<()>}`
```
Do not leak type variables from opaque type relation
The "root cause" is that we call `InferCtxt::resolve_vars_if_possible` (3d9dd681f5) on the types we get back in `TypeError::Sorts` since I added a call to it in `InferCtxt::same_type_modulo_infer`. However if this `TypeError` comes from a `InferCtxt::commit_if_ok`, then it may reference type variables that do not exist anymore, which is problematic.
We avoid this by substituting the `TypeError` with the types we had before being generalized while handling opaques.
This is kinda gross, and I feel like we can get the same issue from other places where we generalize type/const inference variables. Maybe not? I don't know.
Fixes#99914Fixes#99970Fixes#100463
Display raw pointer as *{mut,const} T instead of *-ptr in errors
The `*-ptr` is rather confusing, and we have the full information for properly displaying the information.
Use object instead of LLVM for reading bitcode from rlibs
Together with changes I plan to make as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97485 this will allow entirely removing usage of LLVM's archive reader and thus allow removing `archive_ro.rs` and `ArchiveWrapper.cpp`.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95376 (Add `vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest`)
- #100092 (Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck)
- #101019 (Suggest returning closure as `impl Fn`)
- #101022 (Erase late bound regions before comparing types in `suggest_dereferences`)
- #101101 (interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information)
- #101123 (Remove `register_attr` feature)
- #101175 (Don't --bless in pre-push hook)
- #101176 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS selectors for `.table-display`)
- #101180 (Add another MaybeUninit array test with const)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information
Next step in the reaction to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2456.
Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
```
= help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer
= help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported
```
r? ``@oli-obk``
Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck
This is certainly _one_ way to fix#100075. Not really confident it's the _best_ way to do it, though.
The root cause of this issue is that during MIR type-check, we end up trying to equate an opaque against the same opaque def-id but with different substs. Because of the way that we replace RPITs during (HIR) typeck with an inference variable, we don't end up emitting a type-checking error, so the delayed MIR bug causes an ICE.
See the `src/test/ui/impl-trait/issue-100075-2.rs` test below to make that clear -- in that example, we try to equate `{impl Sized} substs=[T]` and `{impl Sized} substs=[Option<T>]`, which causes an ICE. This new logic will instead cause us to infer `{impl Sized} substs=[Option<T>]` as the hidden type for `{impl Sized} substs=[T]`, which causes a proper error to be emitted later on when we check that an opaque isn't recursive.
I'm open to closing this in favor of something else. Ideally we'd fix this in typeck, but the thing we do to ensure backwards compatibility with weird RPIT cases makes that difficult. Also open to discussing this further.
Revert let_chains stabilization
This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
Bumps the stage0 compiler which already has it reverted.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100898 (Do not report too many expr field candidates)
- #101056 (Add the syntax of references to their documentation summary.)
- #101106 (Rustdoc-Json: Retain Stripped Modules when they are imported, not when they have items)
- #101131 (CTFE: exposing pointers and calling extern fn is just impossible)
- #101141 (Simplify `get_trait_ref` fn used for `virtual_function_elimination`)
- #101146 (Various changes to logging of borrowck-related code)
- #101156 (Remove `Sync` requirement from lint pass objects)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
