Reduce FormattingOptions to 64 bits
This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012
This reduces FormattingOptions from 6-7 machine words (384 bits on 64-bit platforms, 224 bits on 32-bit platforms) to just 64 bits (a single register on 64-bit platforms).
Before:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
flags: u32, // only 6 bits used
fill: char,
align: Option<Alignment>,
width: Option<usize>,
precision: Option<usize>,
}
```
After:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
/// Bits:
/// - 0-20: fill character (21 bits, a full `char`)
/// - 21: `+` flag
/// - 22: `-` flag
/// - 23: `#` flag
/// - 24: `0` flag
/// - 25: `x?` flag
/// - 26: `X?` flag
/// - 27: Width flag (if set, the width field below is used)
/// - 28: Precision flag (if set, the precision field below is used)
/// - 29-30: Alignment (0: Left, 1: Right, 2: Center, 3: Unknown)
/// - 31: Always set to 1
flags: u32,
/// Width if width flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
width: u16,
/// Precision if precision flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
precision: u16,
}
```
Avoid no-op unlink+link dances in incr comp
Incremental compilation scales quite poorly with the number of CGUs. This PR improves one reason for that.
The incr comp process hard-links all the files from an old session into a new one, then it runs the backend, which may just hard-link the new session files into the output directory. Then codegen hard-links all the output files back to the new session directory.
This PR (perhaps unimaginatively) fixes the silliness that ensues in the last step. The old `link_or_copy` implementation would be passed pairs of paths which are already the same inode, then it would blindly delete the destination and re-create the hard-link that it just deleted. This PR lets us skip both those operations. We don't skip the other two hard-links.
`cargo +stage1 b && touch crates/core/main.rs && strace -cfw -elink,linkat,unlink,unlinkat cargo +stage1 b` before and then after on `ripgrep-13.0.0`:
```
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
52.56 0.024950 25 978 485 unlink
34.38 0.016318 22 727 linkat
13.06 0.006200 24 249 unlinkat
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
100.00 0.047467 24 1954 485 total
```
```
% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
42.83 0.014521 57 252 unlink
38.41 0.013021 26 486 linkat
18.77 0.006362 25 249 unlinkat
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
100.00 0.033904 34 987 total
```
This reduces the number of hard-links that are causing perf troubles, noted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64291 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137560
Add an attribute that makes the spans from a macro edition 2021, and fix pin on edition 2024 with it
Fixes a regression, see issue below. This is a temporary fix, super let is the real solution.
Closes#138596
add `naked_functions_target_feature` unstable feature
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138568
tagging https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134213https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
This PR puts `#[target_feature(/* ... */)]` on `#[naked]` functions behind its own feature gate, so that naked functions can be stabilized. It turns out that supporting `target_feature` on naked functions is tricky on some targets, so we're splitting it out to not block stabilization of naked functions themselves. See the tracking issue for more information and workarounds.
Note that at the time of writing, the `target_features` attribute is ignored when generating code for naked functions.
r? ``@Amanieu``
Handle spans of `~const`, `const` and `async` trait bounds in macro expansion
r? `@compiler-errors`
`visit_span` is actually only used in one place (the `transcribe::Marker`), and all of this syntax is unstable, so while it would still be nice to write a test for it, I wager there's lots more interesting things in `transcribe::Marker` to write tests for. And the worst is some diagnostics being weird or incremental being not as incremental as it could be
interpret memory access hooks: also pass through the Pointer used for the access
In some ongoing work on the Miri side, we need the absolute address that the memory access occurred at. That is non-trivial to obtain since we don't have an `ecx`. So pass through the `Pointer` used for the access, which contains the address, and which is available everywhere we are calling these hooks.
r? `@oli-obk`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138435 (Add support for postfix yield expressions)
- #138685 (Use `Option<Ident>` for lowered param names.)
- #138700 (Suggest `-Whelp` when pass `--print lints` to rustc)
- #138727 (Do not rely on `type_var_origin` in `OrphanCheckErr::NonLocalInputType`)
- #138729 (Clean up `FnCtxt::resolve_coroutine_interiors`)
- #138731 (coverage: Add LLVM plumbing for expansion regions)
- #138732 (Use `def_path_str` for def id arg in `UnsupportedOpInfo`)
- #138735 (Remove `llvm` and `llvms` triagebot ping aliases for `icebreakers-llvm` ping group)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
expand: Leave traces when expanding `cfg_attr` attributes
Currently `cfg_trace` just disappears during expansion, but after this PR `#[cfg_attr(some tokens)]` will leave a `#[cfg_attr_trace(some tokens)]` attribute instead of itself in AST after expansion (the new attribute is built-in and inert, its inner tokens are the same as in the original attribute).
This trace attribute can then be used by lints or other diagnostics, #133823 has some examples.
Tokens in these trace attributes are set to an empty token stream, so the traces are non-existent for proc macros and cannot affect any user-observable behavior.
This is also a weakness, because if a proc macro processes some code with the trace attributes, they will be lost, so the traces are best effort rather than precise.
The next step is to do the same thing with `cfg` attributes (`#[cfg(TRUE)]` currently remains in both AST and tokens after expanding, it should be replaced with a trace instead).
The idea belongs to `@estebank.`
Use `def_path_str` for def id arg in `UnsupportedOpInfo`
We could alternatively just omit the def path from the label, but I think it's fine to keep around
Fixes#138730
coverage: Add LLVM plumbing for expansion regions
This is currently unused, but paves the way for future work on expansion regions without having to worry about the FFI parts.
The span conversion refactoring is only loosely related, but I've included it here because it would conflict with the main changes in `fill_region_tables`, and is pretty straightforward on its own.
Do not rely on `type_var_origin` in `OrphanCheckErr::NonLocalInputType`
The ordering of ty var unification means that we may end up with a root variable whose ty var origin is from another item's params.
Let's not rely on this by just unifying the infer vars with the params of the impl + resolving. It's kinda goofy but it's clearer IMO.
Fixes#132826.
r? `@fmease` or `@lcnr`
Use `Option<Ident>` for lowered param names.
Parameter patterns are lowered to an `Ident` by `lower_fn_params_to_names`, which is used when lowering bare function types, trait methods, and foreign functions. Currently, there are two exceptional cases where the lowered param can become an empty `Ident`.
- If the incoming pattern is an empty `Ident`. This occurs if the parameter is anonymous, e.g. in a bare function type.
- If the incoming pattern is neither an ident nor an underscore. Any such parameter will have triggered a compile error (hence the `span_delayed_bug`), but lowering still occurs.
This commit replaces these empty `Ident` results with `None`, which eliminates a number of `kw::Empty` uses, and makes it impossible to fail to check for these exceptional cases.
Note: the `FIXME` comment in `is_unwrap_or_empty_symbol` is removed. It actually should have been removed in #138482, the precursor to this PR. That PR changed the lowering of wild patterns to `_` symbols instead of empty symbols, which made the mentioned underscore check load-bearing.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Add support for postfix yield expressions
We've been having a discussion about whether we want postfix yield, or want to stick with prefix yield, or have both. I figured it's easy enough to support both for now and let us play around with them while the feature is still experimental.
This PR treats `yield x` and `x.yield` as semantically equivalent. There was a suggestion to make `yield x` have a `()` type (so it only works in coroutines with `Resume = ()`. I think that'd be worth trying, either in a later PR, or before this one merges, depending on people's opinions.
#43122
Consider fields to be inhabited if they are unstable
Fixes#133885 with a simple heuristic
r? Nadrieril
Not totally certain if this needs T-lang approval or a crater run.
For expansion region support, we will want to be able to convert and check
spans before creating a corresponding local file ID.
If we create local file IDs eagerly, but some expansion turns out to have no
successfully-converted spans, LLVM will complain about that expansion's file ID
having no regions.
It's very useful. There are some false positives involving integration
tests in `rustc_pattern_analysis` and `rustc_serialize`. There is also a
false positive involving `rustc_driver_impl`'s
`rustc_randomized_layouts` feature. And I removed a `rustc_span` mention
in a doc comment in `rustc_log` because it wasn't integral to the
comment but caused a dev-dependency.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135394 (`MaybeUninit` inherent slice methods part 2)
- #137051 (Implement default methods for `io::Empty` and `io::Sink`)
- #138001 (mir_build: consider privacy when checking for irrefutable patterns)
- #138540 (core/slice: Mark some `split_off` variants unstably const)
- #138589 (If a label is placed on the block of a loop instead of the header, suggest moving it to the header.)
- #138594 (Fix next solver handling of shallow trait impl check)
- #138613 (Remove E0773 "A builtin-macro was defined more than once.")
Failed merges:
- #138602 (Slim `rustc_parse_format` dependencies down)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove E0773 "A builtin-macro was defined more than once."
Error E0773 "A builtin-macro was defined more than once" is triggered when using the same `#[rustc_builtin_macro(..)]` twice. However, it can only be triggered in unstable code (using a `rustc_` attribute), and there doesn't seem to be any harm in using the same implementation from `compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/…` for multiple macro definitions.
By changing the Box to an Arc in `SyntaxExtensionKind`, we can throw away the `BuiltinMacroState::{NotYetSeen, AlreadySeen}` logic, simplifying things.
Fix next solver handling of shallow trait impl check
I'm trying to remove unnecessary direct calls to `select`, and this one seemed like a good place to start 😆
r? `@compiler-errors` or `@lcnr`
If a label is placed on the block of a loop instead of the header, suggest moving it to the header.
Fixes#138585
If a label is placed on the block of a loop instead of the header, suggest to the user moving it to the loop header instead of ~~suggesting to remove it~~ emitting a tool-only suggestion to remove it.
```rs
fn main() {
loop 'a: { return; }
}
```
```diff
error: block label not supported here
--> src/main.rs:2:10
|
2 | loop 'a: { return; }
| ^^^ not supported here
+ |
+help: if you meant to label the loop, move this label before the loop
+ |
+2 - loop 'a: { return; }
+2 + 'a: loop { return; }
+ |
```
Questions for reviewer:
* The "desired output" in the linked issue had the main diagnostic be "misplaced loop label". Should the main diagnostic message the changed instead of leaving it as "block label not supported here"?
* Should this be `Applicability::MachineApplicable`?
mir_build: consider privacy when checking for irrefutable patterns
This PR fixes#137999.
Note that, since this makes the compiler reject code that was previously accepted, it will probably need a crater run.
I include a commit that factors out a common code pattern into a helper function, purely because the fact that this was repeated all over the place was bothering me. Let me know if I should split that into a separate PR instead.
Represent diagnostic side effects as dep nodes
This changes diagnostic to be tracked as a special dep node (`SideEffect`) instead of having a list of side effects associated with each dep node. `SideEffect` is always red and when forced, it emits the diagnostic and marks itself green. Each emitted diagnostic generates a new `SideEffect` with an unique dep node index.
Some implications of this:
- Diagnostic may now be emitted more than once as they can be emitted once when the `SideEffect` gets marked green and again if the task it depends on needs to be re-executed due to another node being red. It relies on deduplicating of diagnostics to avoid that.
- Anon tasks which emits diagnostics will no longer *incorrectly* be merged with other anon tasks.
- Reusing a CGU will now emit diagnostics from the task generating it.
Parameter patterns are lowered to an `Ident` by
`lower_fn_params_to_names`, which is used when lowering bare function
types, trait methods, and foreign functions. Currently, there are two
exceptional cases where the lowered param can become an empty `Ident`.
- If the incoming pattern is an empty `Ident`. This occurs if the
parameter is anonymous, e.g. in a bare function type.
- If the incoming pattern is neither an ident nor an underscore. Any
such parameter will have triggered a compile error (hence the
`span_delayed_bug`), but lowering still occurs.
This commit replaces these empty `Ident` results with `None`, which
eliminates a number of `kw::Empty` uses, and makes it impossible to fail
to check for these exceptional cases.
Note: the `FIXME` comment in `is_unwrap_or_empty_symbol` is removed. It
actually should have been removed in #138482, the precursor to this PR.
That PR changed the lowering of wild patterns to `_` symbols instead of
empty symbols, which made the mentioned underscore check load-bearing.
Remove existing AFIDT implementation
This experiment will need to be reworked differently; I don't think we'll be going with the `dyn* Future` approach that is currently implemented.
r? oli-obk
Fixes#136286Fixes#137706Fixes#137895
Tracking:
* #133119
Revert: Add *_value methods to proc_macro lib
This reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136355. That PR caused unexpected breakage:
- the rustc-dev component can no longer be loaded by cargo, which impacts Miri and clippy and likely others
- rustc_lexer can no longer be published to crates.io, which impacts RA
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138647 for context.
Cc `@GuillaumeGomez` `@Amanieu`
