Implement non-const `Destruct` trait in new solver
Makes it so that we can call stdlib methods like `Option::map` in **non-const** environments, since *many* stdlib methods have `Destruct` bounds 😅
This doesn't bother to implement `const Destruct` yet, but it shouldn't be too hard to do so. Just didn't bother since we already don't have much support for const traits in the new solver anyways. I'd be happy to add skeleton support for `const Destruct`, though, if the reviewer desires.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108629 (rustdoc: add support for type filters in arguments and generics)
- #108924 (panic_immediate_abort requires abort as a panic strategy)
- #108961 (Refine error spans for const args in hir typeck)
- #108986 (sync LVI tests)
- #109142 (Add block-based mutex unlocking example)
- #109368 (fix typo in the creation of OpenOption for RustyHermit)
- #109493 (Return nested obligations from canonical response var unification)
- #109515 (Add AixLinker to support linking on AIX)
- #109536 (resolve: Rename some cstore methods to match queries and add comments)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Return nested obligations from canonical response var unification
Handle alias-eq obligations being emitted from `instantiate_and_apply_query_response` in:
* `EvalCtxt` - by processing the nested obligations in the next loop by `new_goals`
* `FulfillCtxt` - by adding the nested obligations to the fulfillment's pending obligations
* `InferCtxt::evaluate_obligation` - ~~by returning `EvaluationResult::EvaluatedToAmbig` (boo 👎, see the FIXME)~~ same behavior as above, since we use fulfillment and `select_where_possible`
The only one that's truly sketchy is `evaluate_obligation`, but it's not hard to modify this behavior moving forward.
From #109037, I think a smaller repro could be crafted if I were smarter, but I am not, so I just took this from #105878.
r? `@lcnr` cc `@BoxyUwU`
Refine error spans for const args in hir typeck
Improve just a couple of error messages having to do with mismatched consts.
r? `@ghost` i'll put this up when the dependent commits are merged
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108541 (Suppress `opaque_hidden_inferred_bound` for nested RPITs)
- #109137 (resolve: Querify most cstore access methods (subset 2))
- #109380 (add `known-bug` test for unsoundness issue)
- #109462 (Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate))
- #109475 (Simpler checked shifts in MIR building)
- #109504 (Stabilize `arc_into_inner` and `rc_into_inner`.)
- #109506 (make param bound vars visibly bound vars with -Zverbose)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make alias-eq have a relation direction (and rename it to alias-relate)
Emitting an "alias-eq" is too strict in some situations, since we don't always want strict equality between a projection and rigid ty. Adds a relation direction.
* I could probably just reuse this [`RelationDir`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/combine/enum.RelationDir.html) -- happy to uplift that struct into middle and use that instead, but I didn't feel compelled to... 🤷
* Some of the matching in `compute_alias_relate_goal` is a bit verbose -- I guess I could simplify it by using [`At::relate`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_infer/infer/at/struct.At.html#method.relate) and mapping the relation-dir to a variance.
* Alternatively, I coulld simplify things by making more helper functions on `EvalCtxt` (e.g. `EvalCtxt::relate_with_direction(T, T)` that also does the nested goal registration). No preference.
r? ```@lcnr``` cc ```@BoxyUwU``` though boxy can claim it if she wants
NOTE: first commit is all the changes, the second is just renaming stuff
new solver cleanup + implement coherence
the cleanup:
- change `Certainty::unify_and` to consider ambig + overflow to be ambig
- rename `trait_candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` to `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
- remove outdated fixme
For coherence I mostly just add an ambiguous candidate if the current trait ref is unknowable. I am doing the same for reservation impl where I also just add an ambiguous candidate.
a general type system cleanup
removes the helper functions `traits::fully_solve_X` as they add more complexity then they are worth. It's confusing which of these helpers should be used in which context.
changes the way we deal with overflow to always add depth in `evaluate_predicates_recursively`. It may make sense to actually fully transition to not have `recursion_depth` on obligations but that's probably a bit too much for this PR.
also removes some other small - and imo unnecessary - helpers.
r? types
Do not suggest bounds restrictions for synthesized RPITITs
Before this PR we were getting ...
```
warning: the feature `async_fn_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:5:12
|
5 | #![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:17:20
|
17 | assert_is_send(test::<T>());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ future returned by `test` is not `Send`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = ()>`
note: future is not `Send` as it awaits another future which is not `Send`
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:13:5
|
13 | T::bar().await;
| ^^^^^^^^ await occurs here on type `impl Future<Output = ()>`, which is not `Send`
note: required by a bound in `assert_is_send`
--> tests/ui/async-await/in-trait/missing-send-bound.rs:21:27
|
21 | fn assert_is_send(_: impl Send) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `assert_is_send`
help: consider further restricting the associated type
|
16 | fn test2<T: Foo>() where impl Future<Output = ()>: Send {
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
and we want this output ...
```
warning: the feature `async_fn_in_trait` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:5:12
|
LL | #![feature(async_fn_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #91611 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91611> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:17:20
|
LL | assert_is_send(test::<T>());
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ future returned by `test` is not `Send`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `impl Future<Output = ()>`
note: future is not `Send` as it awaits another future which is not `Send`
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:13:5
|
LL | T::bar().await;
| ^^^^^^^^ await occurs here on type `impl Future<Output = ()>`, which is not `Send`
note: required by a bound in `assert_is_send`
--> $DIR/missing-send-bound.rs:21:27
|
LL | fn assert_is_send(_: impl Send) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `assert_is_send`
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
Only implement Fn* traits for extern "Rust" safe function pointers and items
Since calling the function via an `Fn` trait will assume `extern "Rust"` ABI and not do any safety checks, only safe `extern "Rust"` function can implement the `Fn` traits. This syncs the logic between the old solver and the new solver.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Constrain const vars to error if const types are mismatched
When equating two consts of different types, if either are const variables, constrain them to the correct const error kind.
This helps us avoid "successfully" matching a const against an impl signature but leaving unconstrained const vars, which will lead to incremental ICEs when we call const-eval queries during const projection.
Fixes#109296
The second commit in the stack fixes a regression in the first commit where we end up mentioning `[const error]` in an impl overlap error message. I think the error message changes for the better, but I could implement alternative strategies to avoid this without delaying the overlap error message...
r? `@BoxyUwU`
new solver: make all goal evaluation able to be automatically rerun
It is generally wrong to call `evaluate_goal` multiple times or `evaluate_goal` and `evaluate_all` for the same `QueryResult` without correctly handling rerunning the goals when inference makes progress. Not doing so will result in the assertion in `evaluate_goal` firing because rerunning the goal will lead to a more accurate `QueryResult`.
Currently there are lots of places that get this wrong and generally it is complex and error prone to handle correctly everywhere. This PR introduces a way to add goals to the `EvalCtxt` and then run all the added goals in a loop so that `evaluate_goal`/`evaluate_all` is not necessary to call manually.
There are a few complications for making everything work "right":
1. the `normalizes-to` hack that replaces the rhs with an unconstrained infer var requires special casing in the new `try_evaluate_added_goals` function similar to how `evaluate_goal`'s assertion special cases that hack.
2. `assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty`'s normalization step needs to be reran for each candidate otherwise the found candidates will potentially get a more accurate `QueryResult` when rerunning the projection/trait goal which can effect the `QueryResult` of the projection/trait goal.
This is implemented via `EvalCtxt::probe`'s closure's `EvalCtxt` inheriting the added goals of the `EvalCtxt` that `probe` is called on, allowing us to add goals in a probe, and then enter a nested probe for each candidate and evaluate added goals which include the normalization step's goals.
I made `make_canonical_response` evaluate added goals so that it will be hard to mess up the impl of the solver by forgetting to evaluate added goals. Right now the only way to mess this up would be to call `response_no_constraints` (which from the name is obviously weird).
The visibility of `evaluate_goal` means that it can be called from various `compute_x_goal` or candidate assembly functions, this is generally wrong and we should never call `evaluate_goal` manually, instead we should be calling `add_goal`/`add_goals`. This is solved by moving `evaluate_goal` `evaluate_canonical_goal` and `compute_goal` into `eval_ctxt`'s module and making them private so they cannot be called from elsewhere, forcing people to call `add_goal/s` and `evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_resposne`/`try_evaluate_added_goals`
---
Other changes:
- removed the `&& false` that was introduced to the assertion in `evaluate_goal` in #108839
- remove a `!self.did_overflow()` requirement in `search_graph.is_empty()` which causes goals that overflow to ICE
- made `EvalCtxt::eq` take `&mut self` and add all the nested goals via `add_goals` instead of returning them as 99% of call sites just immediately called `EvalCtxt::add_goals` manually.
r? `````@lcnr`````
- only borrow the refcell once per loop
- avoid complex matches to reduce branch paths in the hot loop
- use a by-ref fast path that avoids mutations at the expense of having false negatives
Install projection from RPITIT to default trait method opaque correctly
1. For new lowering strategy `-Zlower-impl-trait-in-trait-to-assoc-ty`, install the correct default trait method projection predicates (RPITIT -> opaque). This makes default trait body tests pass!
2. Fix two WF-checking bugs -- first, we want to make sure that we're always looking for an opaque type in `check_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_bounds`. That's because the RPITIT projections are normalized to opaques during wfcheck. Second, fix RPITIT's param-envs by not adding the projection predicates that we install on trait methods to make default RPITITs work -- I left a comment why.
3. Also, just a small drive-by for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. Not sure if it affects any tests, but can't hurt.
r? ````@spastorino,```` based off of #109140
