...while still keeping ambiguity errors future-proofing for uniform paths.
This corner case is not going to be stabilized for 1.32 and needs some more general experiments about retrofitting 2018 import rules to 2015 edition
resolve: Simplify treatment of ambiguity errors
If we have a glob conflict like this
```rust
mod m1 { struct S; }
mod m2 { struct S; }
use m1::*;
use m2::*;
```
we treat it as a special "ambiguity item" that's not an error by itself, but produces an error when actually used.
```rust
use m1::*; // primary
use m2::*; // secondary
=>
ambiguity S(m1::S, m2::S);
```
Ambiguity items were *sometimes* treated as their primary items for error recovery, but pretty irregularly.
After this PR they are always treated as their primary items, except that
- If an ambiguity item is marked as used, then it still produces an error.
- Ambiguity items are still filtered away when exported to other crates (which is also a use in some sense).
Implement RFC 2338, "Type alias enum variants"
This PR implements [RFC 2338](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2338), allowing one to write code like the following.
```rust
#![feature(type_alias_enum_variants)]
enum Foo {
Bar(i32),
Baz { i: i32 },
}
type Alias = Foo;
fn main() {
let t = Alias::Bar(0);
let t = Alias::Baz { i: 0 };
match t {
Alias::Bar(_i) => {}
Alias::Baz { i: _i } => {}
}
}
```
Since `Self` can be considered a type alias in this context, it also enables using `Self::Variant` as both a constructor and pattern.
Fixes issues #56199 and #56611.
N.B., after discussing the syntax for type arguments on enum variants with @petrochenkov and @eddyb (there are also a few comments on the [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49683)), the consensus seems to be treat the syntax as follows, which ought to be backwards-compatible.
```rust
Option::<u8>::None; // OK
Option::None::<u8>; // OK, but lint in near future (hard error next edition?)
Alias::<u8>::None; // OK
Alias::None::<u8>; // Error
```
I do not know if this will need an FCP, but let's start one if so.
Resolve `$crate`s for pretty-printing at more appropriate time
Doing it in `BuildReducedGraphVisitor` wasn't a good idea, identifiers wasn't actually visited half of the time.
As a result some `$crate`s weren't resolved and were therefore pretty-printed as `$crate` literally, which turns into two tokens during re-parsing of the pretty-printed text.
Now we are visiting and resolving `$crate` identifiers in an item right before sending that item to a proc macro attribute or derive.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57089
`CrateRoot` -> `PathRoot`, `::` doesn't necessarily mean crate root now
`SelfValue` -> `SelfLower`, `SelfType` -> `SelfUpper`, both `self` and `Self` can be used in type and value namespaces now
resolve: Filter away macro prelude in modules with `#[no_implicit_prelude]` on 2018 edition
This is a tiny thing.
For historical reasons macro prelude (macros from `#[macro_use] extern crate ...`, including `extern crate std`) is still available in modules with `#[no_implicit_prelude]`.
This PR provides proper isolation and removes those names from scope.
`#[no_implicit_prelude]` modules still have built-in types (`u8`), built-in attributes (`#[inline]`) and built-in macros (`env!("PATH")`) in scope. We can introduce some `#[no_implicit_prelude_at_all]` to remove those as well, but that's a separate issue.
The change is done only on 2018 edition for backward compatibility.
I'm pretty sure this can be done on 2015 as well because `#[no_implicit_prelude]` is rarely used, but I don't want to go through the crater/deprecation process right now, maybe later.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53977
r? @ghost
