Commit Graph

18 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Goulet
6af30ec720 Remove a false statement from Unsize docs, add a test 2023-11-01 20:16:11 +00:00
Oli Scherer
455cf5a4f6 Improve some diagnostics around ?Trait bounds 2023-10-30 17:47:07 +00:00
Oli Scherer
beaf46f7e5 Work around the fact that check_mod_type_wf may spuriously return ErrorGuaranteed, even if that error is only emitted by check_modwitem_types 2023-10-25 12:04:54 +00:00
bohan
7c53e87d55 fix: skip opt if body has tainted error 2023-09-13 23:07:39 +08:00
Michael Goulet
30e6cea0ae Point out if a local trait has no implementations 2023-09-10 21:20:36 +00:00
bohan
967410c640 fix: return ealry when has tainted in mir-lint 2023-09-08 09:30:23 +08:00
Esteban Küber
120c24dab5 Point at appropriate type parameter in more trait bound errors 2023-08-26 01:07:05 +00:00
Michael Goulet
7d8563c602 Separate consider_unsize_to_dyn_candidate from other unsize candidates 2023-08-15 01:02:43 +00:00
bors
6fc0273b5a Auto merge of #112320 - compiler-errors:do-not-impl-via-obj, r=lcnr
Add `implement_via_object` to `rustc_deny_explicit_impl` to control object candidate assembly

Some built-in traits are special, since they are used to prove facts about the program that are important for later phases of compilation such as codegen and CTFE. For example, the `Unsize` trait is used to assert to the compiler that we are able to unsize a type into another type. It doesn't have any methods because it doesn't actually *instruct* the compiler how to do this unsizing, but this is later used (alongside an exhaustive match of combinations of unsizeable types) during codegen to generate unsize coercion code.

Due to this, these built-in traits are incompatible with the type erasure provided by object types. For example, the existence of `dyn Unsize<T>` does not mean that the compiler is able to unsize `Box<dyn Unsize<T>>` into `Box<T>`, since `Unsize` is a *witness* to the fact that a type can be unsized, and it doesn't actually encode that unsizing operation in its vtable as mentioned above.

The old trait solver gets around this fact by having complex control flow that never considers object bounds for certain built-in traits:
2f896da247/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/candidate_assembly.rs (L61-L132)

However, candidate assembly in the new solver is much more lovely, and I'd hate to add this list of opt-out cases into the new solver. Instead of maintaining this complex and hard-coded control flow, instead we can make this a property of the trait via a built-in attribute. We already have such a build attribute that's applied to every single trait that we care about: `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`. This PR adds `implement_via_object` as a meta-item to that attribute that allows us to opt a trait out of object-bound candidate assembly as well.

r? `@lcnr`
2023-06-20 08:42:37 +00:00
Michael Goulet
657d3f43a9 Add rustc_do_not_implement_via_object 2023-06-20 04:38:46 +00:00
Lukas Markeffsky
b6a3f126c0 change std::marker::Sized to just Sized 2023-06-15 12:01:38 +02:00
Michael Goulet
3db2bcf4eb Remove return type sized check hack from hir typeck 2023-05-18 01:53:01 +00:00
Michael Goulet
795fdf7d61 Simplify suggestion when returning bare dyn trait 2023-05-18 01:47:55 +00:00
Michael Goulet
14bf909e71 Note base types of coercion 2023-05-12 00:10:52 +00:00
Michael Goulet
a58682d7cc Specify what 'this' actually is 2023-02-21 05:21:07 +00:00
Ben Kimock
de01ea26c9 Fix unintentional UB in ui tests 2023-02-15 09:05:05 -05:00
Esteban Küber
62ba3e70a1 Modify primary span label for E0308
The previous output was unintuitive to users.
2023-01-30 20:12:19 +00:00
Albert Larsan
cf2dff2b1e
Move /src/test to /tests 2023-01-11 09:32:08 +00:00