Fix bad import suggestion with nested `use` tree
Fixes#105566Fixes#105373
Ideally, we'd find some way to turn these into structured suggestions -- perhaps on a separate line as a different `use` statement, but I have no idea how to access the span for the whole `use` from this point in the import resolution code.
Point out span where we could introduce higher-ranked lifetime
Somewhat addresses #105422, but not really. We don't have that much useful information here since we're still in resolution :^(
Maybe this suggestion isn't worth it. If the reviewer has an idea how we can get a more succinct binder information for a structured suggestion, it would be appreciated.
add function to tell the identical errors for ambiguity_errors
if 2 errors of the kind and ident and span of the ident, b1, b2 and misc1 misc2 are the same we call these 2 ambiguity errors identical
prevent identical ambiguity error from pushing into vector of ambiguity_errors this will fix#105177
if 2 errors of the kind and ident and span of the ident, b1, b2 and misc1 misc2 are the same
then these 2 ambiguity errors matched
prevent identical ambiguity error from pushing into vector of ambiguity_errors
this will fix#105177
Lower them into a single item with multiple resolutions instead.
This also allows to remove additional `NodId`s and `DefId`s related to those additional items.
make simple check of prinf function
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92898
With this commit we start to make some simple
check when the name resolution fails, and
we generate some helper messages in case the
name is a C name like in the case of the `printf`
and suggest the correct rust method.
`@rustbot` r? `@pnkfelix`
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
Prefer doc comments over `//`-comments in compiler
Doc comments are generally nicer: they show up in the documentation, they are shown in IDEs when you hover other mentions of items, etc. Thus it makes sense to use them instead of `//`-comments.
Separate lifetime ident from lifetime resolution in HIR
Drive-by: change how suggested generic args are computed.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103815
I recommend reviewing commit-by-commit.
With this commit we start to make some simple
check when the name resolution fails, and
we generate some helper message in case the
name is a C name like in the case of the `printf`
and suggest the correct rust method.
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
privacy: Fix more (potential) issues with effective visibilities
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103965.
See individual commits for more detailed description of the changes.
The shortcuts removed in 4eb63f618e and c7c7d16727 could actually be correct (or correct after some tweaks), but they used global reasoning like "we can skip this update because if the code compiles then some other update should do the same thing eventually".
I have some expertise in this area, but I still have doubt whether such global reasoning was correct or not, especially in presence of all possible exotic cases with imports.
After this PR all table changes should be "locally correct" after every update, even if it may be overcautious.
If similar optimizations are introduced again they will need detailed comments explaining why it's legal to do what they do and providing proofs.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104249.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104539.
resolve: Don't use constructor def ids in the map for field names
Also do some minor cleanup to insertion of those field names.
Addresses a FIXME left in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103578.
Avoid `GenFuture` shim when compiling async constructs
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators, with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to convert from `Generator` to `Future`.
The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.
The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
---
Given this demo code:
```rust
pub async fn a(arg: u32) -> Backtrace {
let bt = b().await;
let _arg = arg;
bt
}
pub async fn b() -> Backtrace {
Backtrace::force_capture()
}
```
I would get the following with the latest stable compiler (on Windows):
```
4: async_codegen:🅱️:async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:10
5: core::future::from_generator::impl$1::poll<enum2$<async_codegen:🅱️:async_fn_env$0> >
at /rustc/897e37553bba8b42751c67658967889d11ecd120\library\core\src\future\mod.rs:91
6: async_codegen:🅰️:async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:4
7: core::future::from_generator::impl$1::poll<enum2$<async_codegen:🅰️:async_fn_env$0> >
at /rustc/897e37553bba8b42751c67658967889d11ecd120\library\core\src\future\mod.rs:91
```
whereas now I get a much cleaner stack trace:
```
3: async_codegen:🅱️:async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:10
4: async_codegen:🅰️:async_fn$0
at .\src\lib.rs:4
```
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators,
with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to
convert from `Generator` to `Future`.
The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that
async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need
to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.
The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation
detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help
the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
Previously if the parent was not in the table, and there was nothing to inherit from, the child's private visibility was used, but that's not correct - the parent may have a larger visibility so we should set it to at least the parent's private visibility.
That parent's private visibility is also inserted into the table for caching, so it's not recalculated later if used again.
Optimizations removed in the previous commit required this function to behave incorrectly, but now those optimizations are gone so we can fix the bug.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104249
First, they require eagerly calculating private visibility (current normal module), which is somewhat expensive.
Private visibilities are also lost once calculated, instead of being cached in the table.
Second, I cannot prove that the optimizations are correct.
Maybe they can be partially reinstated in the future in cases when it's cheap and provably correct to do them.
They will also probably be merged into `fn update` in that case.
Partially fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104249
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104539
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101162 (Migrate rustc_resolve to use SessionDiagnostic, part # 1)
- #103386 (Don't allow `CoerceUnsized` into `dyn*` (except for trait upcasting))
- #103405 (Detect incorrect chaining of if and if let conditions and recover)
- #103594 (Fix non-associativity of `Instant` math on `aarch64-apple-darwin` targets)
- #104006 (Add variant_name function to `LangItem`)
- #104494 (Migrate GUI test to use functions)
- #104516 (rustdoc: clean up sidebar width CSS)
- #104550 (fix a typo)
Failed merges:
- #104554 (Use `ErrorGuaranteed::unchecked_claim_error_was_emitted` less)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
implement binding_shadows
migrate till self-in-generic-param-default
use braces in fluent message as suggested by @compiler-errors.
to fix lock file issue reported by CI
migrate 'unreachable label' error
run formatter
name the variables correctly in fluent file
SessionDiagnostic -> Diagnostic
test "pattern/pat-tuple-field-count-cross.rs" passed
test "resolve/bad-env-capture2.rs" passed
test "enum/enum-in-scope.rs" and other depended on "resolve_binding_shadows_something_unacceptable" should be passed now.
fix crash errors while running test-suite. there might be more.
then_some(..) suits better here.
all tests passed
convert TraitImpl and InvalidAsm. TraitImpl is buggy yet. will fix after receiving help from Zulip
migrate "Ralative-2018"
migrate "ancestor only"
migrate "expected found"
migrate "Indeterminate"
migrate "module only"
revert to the older implementation for now. since this is failing at the moment.
follow the convension for fluent variable
order the diag attribute as suggested in review comment
fix merge error. migrate trait-impl-duplicate
make the changes compatible with "Flatten diagnostic slug modules #103345"
fix merge
remove commented code
merge issues
fix review comments
fix tests
Add the `#[derive_const]` attribute
Closes#102371. This is a minimal patchset for the attribute to work. There are no restrictions on what traits this attribute applies to.
r? `````@oli-obk`````
resolve: More detailed effective visibility tracking for imports
Per-`DefId` tracking is not enough, due to glob imports in particular, which have a single `DefId` for the whole glob import item.
We need to track this stuff per every introduced name (`NameBinding`).
Also drop `extern` blocks from the effective visibility table, they are nominally private and it doesn't make sense to keep them there.
Later commits add some debug-only invariant checking and optimiaztions to mitigate regressions in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103965#issuecomment-1304256445.
This is a bugfix and continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102026.
resolve: Turn the binding from `#[macro_export]` into a proper `Import`
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91795.
```rust
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! m { /*...*/ }
```
is desugared to something like
```rust
macro_rules! m { /*...*/ } // Non-modularized macro_rules item
pub use m; // It's modularized reexport
```
This PR adjusts the internal representation to better match this model.
Fix E0433 No Typo Suggestions
Fixes#48676Fixes#87791Fixes#96625Fixes#95462Fixes#101637
Follows up PR #72923
Several open issues refer to the problem that E0433 does not suggest typos like other errors normally do. This fix augments the implementation of PR #72923.
**Background**
When the path of a function call, e.g. `Struct::foo()`, involves names that cannot be resolved, there are two errors that could be emitted by the compiler:
- If `Struct` is not found, it is ``E0433: failed to resolve: use of undeclared type `Struct` ``.
- If `foo` is not found in `Struct`, it is ``E0599: no function or associated item named `foo` found for struct `Struct` in the current scope``
When a name is used as a type, `e.g. fn foo() -> Struct`, and the name cannot be resolved, it is ``E0412: cannot find type `Struct` in this scope``.
Before #72923, `E0433` does not implement any suggestions, and the PR introduces suggestions for missing `use`s. When a resolution error occurs in the path of a function call, it tries to smart resolve just the type part of the path, e.g. `module::Struct` of a call to `module::Struct::foo()`. However, along with the suggestions, the smart-resolve function will report `E0412` since it only knows that it is a type that we cannot resolve instead of being a part of the path. So, the original implementation swap out `E0412` errors returned by the smart-resolve function with the real `E0433` error, but keeps the "missing `use`" suggestions to be reported to the programmer.
**Issue**
The current implementation only reports if there are "missing `use`" suggestions returned by the smart-resolve function; otherwise, it would fall back the normal reporting, which does not emit suggestions. But the smart-resolve function could also produce typo suggestions, which are omitted currently.
Also, it seems like that not all info has been swapped out when there are missing suggestions. The error message underlining the name in the snippet still says ``not found in this scope``, which is a `E0412` messages, if there are `use` suggestions, but says the normal `use of undeclared type` otherwise.
**Fixes**
This fix swaps out all fields in `Diagnostic` returned by the smart-resolve function except for `suggestions` with the current error, and merges the `suggestions` of the returned error and that of the current error together. If there are `use` suggestions, the error is saved to `use_injection` to be reported at the end; otherwise, the error is emitted immediately as `Resolver::report_error` does.
Some tests are updated to use the correct underlining error messages, and one additional test for typo suggestion is added to the test suite.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
Point only to the identifiers in the typo suggestions of shadowed names instead of the entire struct
Fixes#103358.
As discussed in the issue, the `Span` of the candidate `Ident` for a typo replacement is stored alongside its `Symbol` in `TypoSuggestion`. Then, the span of the identifier is what the "you might have meant to refer to" note is pointed at, rather than the entire struct definition.
Comments in #103111 and the issue both suggest that it is desirable to:
1. include names defined in the same crate as the typo,
2. ignore names defined elsewhere such as in `std`, _and_
3. include names introduced indirectly via `use`.
Since a name from another crate but introduced via `use` has non-local `def_id`, to achieve this, a suggestion is displayed if either the `def_id` of the suggested name is local, or the `span` of the suggested name is in the same file as the typo itself.
Some UI tests have also been modified to reflect this change.
r? `@cjgillot`
resolve: Revert "Set effective visibilities for imports more precisely"
In theory the change was correct, but in practice the use of import items in HIR is limited and hacky, and it expects that (effective) visibilities for all (up to) 3 IDs of the import are set to the value reflecting (effective) visibility of the whole syntactic `use` item rather than its individual components.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102352
r? `@oli-obk`
Fix the bug of next_point in source_map
There is a bug in `next_point`, the new span won't move to next position when be called in the first time.
For this reason, our current code is working like this:
1. When we really want to move to the next position, we called two times of `next_point`
2. Some code which use `next_point` actually done the same thing with `shrink_to_hi`
This fix make sure when `next_point` is called, span will move with the width at least 1, and also work correctly in the scenario of multiple bytes.
Ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103140#discussion_r997710998
r? `@davidtwco`
More dupe word typos
I only picked those changes (from the regex search) that I am pretty certain doesn't change meaning and is just a typo fix. Do correct me if any fix is undesirable and I can revert those. Thanks.
