btree: simplify the backdoor between set and map
The internal `btree::Recover` trait acted as a private API between
`BTreeSet` and `BTreeMap`, but we can use `pub(_)` restrictions these
days, and some of the methods don't need special handling anymore.
* `BTreeSet::get` can use `BTreeMap::get_key_value`
* `BTreeSet::take` can use `BTreeMap::remove_entry`
* `BTreeSet::replace` does need help, but this now uses a `pub(super)`
method on `BTreeMap` instead of the trait.
* `btree::Recover` is now removed.
The internal `btree::Recover` trait acted as a private API between
`BTreeSet` and `BTreeMap`, but we can use `pub(_)` restrictions these
days, and some of the methods don't need special handling anymore.
* `BTreeSet::get` can use `BTreeMap::get_key_value`
* `BTreeSet::take` can use `BTreeMap::remove_entry`
* `BTreeSet::replace` does need help, but this now uses a `pub(super)`
method on `BTreeMap` instead of the trait.
* `btree::Recover` is now removed.
split up the first paragraph of doc comments for better summaries
used `./x clippy -Aclippy::all '-Wclippy::too_long_first_doc_paragraph' library/core library/alloc` to find these issues.
This updates to a new version of builtins that includes [1], which was
the last blocker to us enabling `f128` tests on all platforms 🎉.
With this update, also change to pinning the version with `=` rather
than using the default carat versioning. This is meant to ensure that
`compiler-builtins` does not get updated as part of the weekly
`Cargo.lock` update, since updates to this crate need to be intentional:
changes to rust-lang/rust and rust-lang/compiler-builtins sometimes need
to be kept in lockstep, unlike most dependencies, and sometimes these
updates can be problematic.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/624
Implement `From<&mut {slice}>` for `Box/Rc/Arc<{slice}>`
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/424
New API:
```rust
impl<T: Clone> From<&mut [T]> for Box<[T]>
impl From<&mut str> for Box<str>
impl From<&mut CStr> for Box<CStr>
impl From<&mut OsStr> for Box<OsStr>
impl From<&mut Path> for Box<Path>
impl<T: Clone> From<&mut [T]> for Rc<[T]>
impl From<&mut str> for Rc<str>
impl From<&mut CStr> for Rc<CStr>
impl From<&mut OsStr> for Rc<OsStr>
impl From<&mut Path> for Rc<Path>
impl<T: Clone> From<&mut [T]> for Arc<[T]>
impl From<&mut str> for Arc<str>
impl From<&mut CStr> for Arc<CStr>
impl From<&mut OsStr> for Arc<OsStr>
impl From<&mut Path> for Arc<Path>
```
Since they are trait implementations, I think these are insta-stable.
As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/424#issuecomment-2299415749, a crater run might be needed.
Rc/Arc: don't leak the allocation if drop panics
Currently, when the last `Rc<T>` or `Arc<T>` is dropped and the destructor of `T` panics, the allocation will be leaked. This leak is unnecessary since the data cannot be (safely) accessed again and `Box` already deallocates in this case, so let's do the same for `Rc` and `Arc`, too.
Split `boxed.rs` into a few modules
I wanted to add an impl for `Box<_>`, but was quickly discouraged by the 3K file. This splits off a couple bits, making it at least a bit more manageable.
r? ````@workingjubilee```` (I think you are not bothered by refactorings like this?)
Const stability checks v2
The const stability system has served us well ever since `const fn` were first stabilized. It's main feature is that it enforces *recursive* validity -- a stable const fn cannot internally make use of unstable const features without an explicit marker in the form of `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]`. This is done to make sure that we don't accidentally expose unstable const features on stable in a way that would be hard to take back. As part of this, it is enforced that a `#[rustc_const_stable]` can only call `#[rustc_const_stable]` functions. However, some problems have been coming up with increased usage:
- It is baffling that we have to mark private or even unstable functions as `#[rustc_const_stable]` when they are used as helpers in regular stable `const fn`, and often people will rather add `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` instead which was not our intention.
- The system has several gaping holes: a private `const fn` without stability attributes whose inherited stability (walking up parent modules) is `#[stable]` is allowed to call *arbitrary* unstable const operations, but can itself be called from stable `const fn`. Similarly, `#[allow_internal_unstable]` on a macro completely bypasses the recursive nature of the check.
Fundamentally, the problem is that we have *three* disjoint categories of functions, and not enough attributes to distinguish them:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features
Functions in the first two categories cannot use unstable const features and they can only call functions from the first two categories.
This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.
Also, all the holes mentioned above have been closed. There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to be manually marked `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` to be sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special case so IMO it's fine.
The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked), it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or `#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply const-stability.
Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]` functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding `#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No other attributes are required.
Also see the updated dev-guide at https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/2098.
I think in the future we may want to tweak this further, so that in the hopefully common case where a public function's const-stability just exactly mirrors its regular stability, we never have to add any attribute. But right now, once the function is stable this requires `#[rustc_const_stable]`.
### Open question
There is one point I could see we might want to do differently, and that is putting `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions (but not intrinsics) in category 2 by default, and requiring an extra attribute for `#[rustc_const_not_exposed_on_stable]` or so. This would require a bunch of extra annotations, but would have the advantage that turning a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` into `#[rustc_const_stable]` will never change the way the function is const-checked. Currently, we often discover in the const stabilization PR that a function needs some other unstable const things, and then we rush to quickly deal with that. In this alternative universe, we'd work towards getting rid of the `rustc_const_not_exposed_on_stable` before stabilization, and once that is done stabilization becomes a trivial matter. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` would then only be used for intrinsics.
I think I like this idea, but might want to do it in a follow-up PR, as it will need a whole bunch of annotations in the standard library. Also, we probably want to convert all const intrinsics to the "new" form (`#[rustc_intrinsic]` instead of an `extern` block) before doing this to avoid having to deal with two different ways of declaring intrinsics.
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` `@rust-lang/libs-api`
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129815 (but not finished since this is not yet sufficient to safely let us expose `const fn` from hashbrown)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131073 by making it so that const-stable functions are always stable
try-job: test-various
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features
This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.
Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.
The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.
Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
Rename Receiver -> LegacyReceiver
As part of the "arbitrary self types v2" project, we are going to replace the current `Receiver` trait with a new mechanism based on a new, different `Receiver` trait.
This PR renames the old trait to get it out the way. Naming is hard. Options considered included:
* HardCodedReceiver (because it should only be used for things in the standard library, and hence is sort-of hard coded)
* LegacyReceiver
* TargetLessReceiver
* OldReceiver
These are all bad names, but fortunately this will be temporary. Assuming the new mechanism proceeds to stabilization as intended, the legacy trait will be removed altogether.
Although we expect this trait to be used only in the standard library, we suspect it may be in use elsehwere, so we're landing this change separately to identify any surprising breakages.
It's known that this trait is used within the Rust for Linux project; a patch is in progress to remove their dependency.
This is a part of the arbitrary self types v2 project,
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874
r? `@wesleywiser`
Optimize `Rc<T>::default`
The missing piece of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131460.
Also refactored `Arc<T>::default` by using a safe `NonNull::from(Box::leak(_))` to replace the unnecessarily unsafe call to `NonNull::new_unchecked(Box::into_raw(_))`. The remaining unsafety is coming from `[Rc|Arc]::from_inner`, which is safe from the construction of `[Rc|Arc]Inner`.
better default capacity for str::replace
Adds smarter capacity for str::replace in cases where we know that the output will be at least as long as the original string.
As part of the "arbitrary self types v2" project, we are going to
replace the current `Receiver` trait with a new mechanism based on a
new, different `Receiver` trait.
This PR renames the old trait to get it out the way. Naming is hard.
Options considered included:
* HardCodedReceiver (because it should only be used for things in the
standard library, and hence is sort-of hard coded)
* LegacyReceiver
* TargetLessReceiver
* OldReceiver
These are all bad names, but fortunately this will be temporary.
Assuming the new mechanism proceeds to stabilization as intended, the
legacy trait will be removed altogether.
Although we expect this trait to be used only in the standard library,
we suspect it may be in use elsehwere, so we're landing this change
separately to identify any surprising breakages.
It's known that this trait is used within the Rust for Linux project; a
patch is in progress to remove their dependency.
This is a part of the arbitrary self types v2 project,
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874
r? @wesleywiser
Fix predicate signatures in retain_mut docs
This is my first PR here so let me know if I'm doing anything wrong.
The docs for `retain_mut` in `LinkedList` and `VecDeque` say the predicate takes `&e`, but it should be `&mut e` to match the actual signature. `Vec` [has it documented](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.retain_mut) correctly already.
optimize str.replace
Adds a fast path for str.replace for the ascii to ascii case. This allows for autovectorizing the code. Also should this instead be done with specialization? This way we could remove one branch. I think it is the kind of branch that is easy to predict though.
Benchmark for the fast path (replace all "a" with "b" in the rust wikipedia article, using criterion) :
| N | Speedup | Time New (ns) | Time Old (ns) |
|----------|---------|---------------|---------------|
| 2 | 2.03 | 13.567 | 27.576 |
| 8 | 1.73 | 17.478 | 30.259 |
| 11 | 2.46 | 18.296 | 45.055 |
| 16 | 2.71 | 17.181 | 46.526 |
| 37 | 4.43 | 18.526 | 81.997 |
| 64 | 8.54 | 18.670 | 159.470 |
| 200 | 9.82 | 29.634 | 291.010 |
| 2000 | 24.34 | 81.114 | 1974.300 |
| 20000 | 30.61 | 598.520 | 18318.000 |
| 1000000 | 29.31 | 33458.000 | 980540.000 |
Implemented `FromStr` for `CString` and `TryFrom<CString>` for `String`
The motivation of this change is making it possible to use `CString` in generic methods with `FromStr` and `TryInto<String>` trait bounds. The same traits are already implemented for `OsString` which is an FFI type too.
