check for `..` pattern in `redundant_pattern_matching`
The `redundant_pattern_matching` lint currently checks for `if let Some(_) = ...`, but not for `if let Some(..) = ...`.
This PR makes sure to also check for the `..` pattern in tuple structs.
It also found one such instance in clippy itself so that shows it's worth checking for this pattern as well 😅
changelog: [`redundant_pattern_matching`]: check for `..` pattern in tuple structs
Fix false positive in `allow_attributes`
This would emit a warning if used in a proc-macro with the feature `lint_reasons` enabled. This is now fixed.
changelog: [`allow_attributes`]: Don't lint if in external macro
Ignore `shadow` warns in code from macro expansions
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9757
I am in doubt if just looking for `pat.span.from_expansion()` would be sufficient instead of looking for both `pat.span.desugaring_kind().is_some()` or `pat.span.from_expansion()`. The tests (including the new one) passes if I leave the only `if pat.span.from_expansion()`. Any feedbacks?
Also, this is my first PR here, sorry for anything and thanks for the patience!
changelog: [`shadow_same`, `shadow_reuse`, `shadow_unrelated`]: avoiding warns in macro-generated code
New lint: detect `if` expressions with simple boolean assignments to the same target
Closes#10430
changelog: [`needless_bool_assign`] new lint to detect simple boolean assignment to the same target in `if` branches
Run various queries from other queries instead of explicitly in phases
These are just legacy leftovers from when rustc didn't have a query system. While there are more cleanups of this sort that can be done here, I want to land them in smaller steps.
This phased order of query invocations was already a lie, as any query that looks at types (e.g. the wf checks run before) can invoke e.g. const eval which invokes borrowck, which invokes typeck, ...
use `is_inside_const_context` for `in_constant` util fn
Fixes#10452.
This PR improves the `in_constant` util function to detect more cases of const contexts. Previously this function would not detect cases like expressions in array length position or expression in an inline const block `const { .. }`.
changelog: [`bool_to_int_with_if`]: recognize array length operand as being in a const context and don't suggest `usize::from` there
Don't suggest `suboptimal_flops` unavailable in nostd
Fixes#10634
changelog: Enhancement: [`suboptimal_flops`]: Do not suggest `{f32,f64}::abs()` or `{f32,f64}::mul_add()` in a `no_std`-environment.
Add `items_after_test_module` lint
Resolves task *3* of #10506, alongside *1* resolved at #10543 in an effort to help standarize a little bit more testing modules.
---
changelog:[`items_after_test_module`]: Added the lint.
make [`len_zero`] lint not spanning over parenthesis
sorry it should be a quick fix but I was caught up by other stuffs last couple weeks 🤦♂️
---
fixes: #10529
changelog: make [`len_zero`] lint not spanning over parenthesis
Evaluate place expression in `PlaceMention`
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102256 introduces a `PlaceMention(place)` MIR statement which keep trace of `let _ = place` statements from surface rust, but without semantics.
This PR proposes to change the behaviour of `let _ =` patterns with respect to the borrow-checker to verify that the bound place is live.
Specifically, consider this code:
```rust
let _ = {
let a = 5;
&a
};
```
This passes borrowck without error on stable. Meanwhile, replacing `_` by `_: _` or `_p` errors with "error[E0597]: `a` does not live long enough", [see playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=c448d25a7c205dc95a0967fe96bccce8).
This PR *does not* change how `_` patterns behave with respect to initializedness: it remains ok to bind a moved-from place to `_`.
The relevant test is `tests/ui/borrowck/let_underscore_temporary.rs`. Crater check found no regression.
For consistency, this PR changes miri to evaluate the place found in `PlaceMention`, and report eventual dangling pointers found within it.
r? `@RalfJung`
Add offset_of! macro (RFC 3308)
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3308 (tracking issue #106655) by adding the built in macro `core::mem::offset_of`. Two of the future possibilities are also implemented:
* Nested field accesses (without array indexing)
* DST support (for `Sized` fields)
I wrote this a few months ago, before the RFC merged. Now that it's merged, I decided to rebase and finish it.
cc `@thomcc` (RFC author)
Allow to feed a value in another query's cache and remove `WithOptConstParam`
I used it to remove `WithOptConstParam` queries, as an example.
The idea is that a query (here `typeck(function)`) can write into another query's cache (here `type_of(anon const)`). The dependency node for `type_of` would depend on all the current dependencies of `typeck`.
There is still an issue with cycles: if `type_of(anon const)` is accessed before `typeck(function)`, we will still have the usual cycle. The way around this issue is to `ensure` that `typeck(function)` is called before accessing `type_of(anon const)`.
When replayed, we may the following cases:
- `typeck` is green, in that case `type_of` is green too, and all is right;
- `type_of` is green, `typeck` may still be marked as red (it depends on strictly more things than `type_of`) -> we verify that the saved value and the re-computed value of `type_of` have the same hash;
- `type_of` is red, then `typeck` is red -> it's the caller responsibility to ensure `typeck` is recomputed *before* `type_of`.
As `anon consts` have their own `DefPathData`, it's not possible to have the def-id of the anon-const point to something outside the original function, but the general case may have to be resolved before using this device more broadly.
There is an open question about loading from the on-disk cache. If `typeck` is loaded from the on-disk cache, the side-effect does not happen. The regular `type_of` implementation can go and fetch the correct value from the decoded `typeck` results, and the dep-graph will check that the hashes match, but I'm not sure we want to rely on this behaviour.
I specifically allowed to feed the value to `type_of` from inside a call to `type_of`. In that case, the dep-graph will check that the fingerprints of both values match.
This implementation is still very sensitive to cycles, and requires that we call `typeck(function)` before `typeck(anon const)`. The reason is that `typeck(anon const)` calls `type_of(anon const)`, which calls `typeck(function)`, which feeds `type_of(anon const)`, and needs to build the MIR so needs `typeck(anon const)`. The latter call would not cycle, since `type_of(anon const)` has been set, but I'd rather not remove the cycle check.
Enable flatten-format-args by default.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012.
This enables the `flatten-format-args` feature that was added by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106824:
> This change inlines string literals, integer literals and nested format_args!() into format_args!() during ast lowering, making all of the following pairs result in equivalent hir:
>
> ```rust
> println!("Hello, {}!", "World");
> println!("Hello, World!");
> ```
>
> ```rust
> println!("[info] {}", format_args!("error"));
> println!("[info] error");
> ```
>
> ```rust
> println!("[{}] {}", status, format_args!("error: {}", msg));
> println!("[{}] error: {}", status, msg);
> ```
>
> ```rust
> println!("{} + {} = {}", 1, 2, 1 + 2);
> println!("1 + 2 = {}", 1 + 2);
> ```
>
> And so on.
>
> This is useful for macros. E.g. a `log::info!()` macro could just pass the tokens from the user directly into a `format_args!()` that gets efficiently flattened/inlined into a `format_args!("info: {}")`.
>
> It also means that `dbg!(x)` will have its file, line, and expression name inlined:
>
> ```rust
> eprintln!("[{}:{}] {} = {:#?}", file!(), line!(), stringify!(x), x); // before
> eprintln!("[example.rs:1] x = {:#?}", x); // after
> ```
>
> Which can be nice in some cases, but also means a lot more unique static strings than before if dbg!() is used a lot.
This is mostly an optimization, except that it will be visible through [`fmt::Arguments::as_str()`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/fmt/struct.Arguments.html#method.as_str).
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106823, there was already a libs-api FCP about the documentation of `fmt::Arguments::as_str()` to allow it to give `Some` rather than `None` depending on optimizations like this. That was just a documentation update though. This PR is the one that actually makes the user visible change:
```rust
assert_eq!(format_args!("abc").as_str(), Some("abc")); // Unchanged.
assert_eq!(format_args!("ab{}", "c").as_str(), Some("abc")); // Was `None` before!
```
