Commit Graph

1069 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
5854680388 Auto merge of #102767 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-vcbt81v, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #102577 (Warn about Visual Studio Code branding confusion)
 - #102720 (do not reverse the expected type and found type for ObligationCauseCo…)
 - #102744 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.content .item-list`)
 - #102747 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS `.docblock a:not(.srclink)`)
 - #102748 (Disable compressed debug sections on i586-gnu)
 - #102761 (let-else: test else block with non-never uninhabited type)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-10-07 07:31:53 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
1a2a3249bc
Rollup merge of #102577 - kornelski:non-code-visual-studio, r=wesleywiser
Warn about Visual Studio Code branding confusion

VS Code is a popular companion for Rust, but Microsoft's branding is confusing, and users [may not understand](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/complie-error-when-i-run-rustc/82127) they also need the *other* VS.
2022-10-07 07:28:09 +02:00
bors
cf0fa76f27 Auto merge of #101988 - petrochenkov:flavor2, r=lqd
rustc_target: Refactor internal linker flavors

In accordance with the design from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96827#issuecomment-1208441595

`lld_flavor` and `linker_is_gnu` fields are removed from internal target specs, but still parsed from JSON specs using compatibility layer introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100552.
r? `@lqd`
2022-10-07 03:35:02 +00:00
Kornel
9b3db34072 Warn about Visual Studio Code branding confusion 2022-10-06 20:56:44 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
42df0a580f
Rollup merge of #102725 - nnethercote:rm-Z-time, r=davidtwco
Remove `-Ztime`

Because it has a lot of overlap with `-Ztime-passes` but is generally less useful. Plus some related cleanups.

Best reviewed one commit at a time.

r? `@davidtwco`
2022-10-06 16:29:45 +02:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
572b6a9c60 rustc_target: Refactor internal linker flavors
In accordance with the design from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96827#issuecomment-1208441595
2022-10-06 13:41:12 +04:00
Nicholas Nethercote
9110d925d0 Remove -Ztime option.
The compiler currently has `-Ztime` and `-Ztime-passes`. I've used
`-Ztime-passes` for years but only recently learned about `-Ztime`.

What's the difference? Let's look at the `-Zhelp` output:
```
  -Z        time=val -- measure time of rustc processes (default: no)
  -Z time-passes=val -- measure time of each rustc pass (default: no)
```
The `-Ztime-passes` description is clear, but the `-Ztime` one is less so.
Sounds like it measures the time for the entire process?

No. The real difference is that `-Ztime-passes` prints out info about passes,
and `-Ztime` does the same, but only for a subset of those passes. More
specifically, there is a distinction in the profiling code between a "verbose
generic activity" and an "extra verbose generic activity". `-Ztime-passes`
prints both kinds, while `-Ztime` only prints the first one. (It took me
a close reading of the source code to determine this difference.)

In practice this distinction has low value. Perhaps in the past the "extra
verbose" output was more voluminous, but now that we only print stats for a
pass if it exceeds 5ms or alters the RSS, `-Ztime-passes` is less spammy. Also,
a lot of the "extra verbose" cases are for individual lint passes, and you need
to also use `-Zno-interleave-lints` to see those anyway.

Therefore, this commit removes `-Ztime` and the associated machinery. One thing
to note is that the existing "extra verbose" activities all have an extra
string argument, so the commit adds the ability to accept an extra argument to
the "verbose" activities.
2022-10-06 15:49:44 +11:00
Dylan DPC
814b827efe
Rollup merge of #102440 - sunfishcode:sunfishcode/wasm-no-export-tls-api, r=oli-obk
Only export `__tls_*` on wasm32-unknown-unknown.

From talking with `@abrown,` we aren't planning to have hosts call these `__tls_*` functions; instead, TLS initialization will be handled transparently within libc. Consequently, these functions don't need to be exported.

Leave them exported on wasm32-unknown-unknown though, as wasm-bindgen does call them.
2022-10-05 17:27:33 +05:30
bjorn3
268e02c387 Remove type argument of array_alloca and rename to byte_array_alloca 2022-10-02 13:42:14 +00:00
bjorn3
0fe84bc38b Remove dynamic_alloca from BuilderMethods 2022-10-02 13:42:02 +00:00
bjorn3
62cf644c64 Merge apply_attrs_callsite into call and invoke
Some codegen backends are not able to apply callsite attrs after the fact.
2022-10-01 17:01:31 +00:00
bjorn3
a3cc67c796 Remove unused target_cpu and tune_cpu methods from ExtraBackendMethods 2022-10-01 16:45:33 +00:00
bjorn3
c431ea681c Remove several unused methods from MiscMethods 2022-10-01 16:45:07 +00:00
bjorn3
7c91ec4652 Remove unused Context assoc type from WriteBackendMethods 2022-10-01 16:34:45 +00:00
Dan Gohman
2d9e61f0c7 Only export __tls_* on wasm32-unknown-unknown.
From talking with @abrown, we aren't planning to have hosts call these
`__tls_*` functions; instead, TLS initialization will be handled
transparently within libc. Consequently, these functions don't need to
be exported.

Leave them exported on wasm32-unknown-unknown though, as wasm-bindgen
does call them.
2022-09-29 16:28:03 -07:00
Michael Howell
3cecc78694
Rollup merge of #102426 - sunfishcode:sunfishcode/no-wasm-init-memory, r=nagisa
Don't export `__wasm_init_memory` on WebAssembly.

Since #72889, the Rust wasm target doesn't use --passive-segments, so remove the `--export=__wasm_init_memory`.

As documented in the [tool-conventions Linking convention], `__wasm_init_memory` is not intended to be exported.

[tool-conventions Linking convention]: 7c064f3048/Linking.md (shared-memory-and-passive-segments)
2022-09-29 10:15:18 -07:00
Dan Gohman
284c94257f Don't export __wasm_init_memory on WebAssembly.
Since #72889, the Rust wasm target doesn't use --passive-segments, so
remove the `--export=__wasm_init_memory`.

As documented in the [tool-conventions Linking convention],
`__wasm_init_memory` is not intended to be exported.

[tool-conventions Linking convention]: 7c064f3048/Linking.md (shared-memory-and-passive-segments)
2022-09-28 11:13:51 -07:00
Dan Gohman
7f06d513fb Don't export __heap_base and __data_end on wasm32-wasi.
`__heap_base` and `__data_end` are exported for use by wasm-bindgen, which
uses the wasm32-unknown-unknown target. On wasm32-wasi, as a step toward
implementing the Canonical ABI, and as an aid to building speicalized WASI
API polyfill wrappers, don't export `__heap_base` and `__data_end` on
wasm32-wasi.
2022-09-27 17:42:33 -07:00
lcnr
1fc86a63f4 rustc_typeck to rustc_hir_analysis 2022-09-27 10:37:23 +02:00
Pietro Albini
3975d55d98
remove cfg(bootstrap) 2022-09-26 10:14:45 +02:00
fee1-dead
07467c5308
Rollup merge of #101997 - cuviper:drop-legacy-pm, r=nikic
Remove support for legacy PM

This removes support for optimizing with LLVM's legacy pass manager, as well as the unstable `-Znew-llvm-pass-manager` option. We have been defaulting to the new PM since LLVM 13 (except for s390x that waited for 14), and LLVM 15 removed support altogether. The only place we still use the legacy PM is for writing the output file, just like `llc` does.

cc #74705
r? ``@nikic``
2022-09-25 22:06:38 +08:00
Dylan DPC
b36a10af7e
Rollup merge of #101598 - chriswailes:sanitizers, r=nagisa,eholk
Update rustc's information on Android's sanitizers

This patch updates sanitizer support definitions for Android inside the compiler.  It also adjusts the logic to make sure no pre-built sanitizer runtime libraries are emitted as these are instead provided dynamically on Android targets.
2022-09-22 18:25:51 +05:30
Chris Wailes
3d5a41724b Update rustc's information on Android's sanitizers
This patch updates sanitizier support definitions for Android inside the
compiler.  It also adjusts the logic to make sure no pre-built sanitizer
runtime libraries are emitted as these are instead provided dynamically
on Android targets.
2022-09-20 14:16:57 -07:00
bors
4136b59b7d Auto merge of #99806 - oli-obk:unconstrained_opaque_type, r=estebank
Allow patterns to constrain the hidden type of opaque types

fixes #96572

reverts a revert as original PR was a perf regression that was fixed by reverting it: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99368#issuecomment-1186587864)

TODO:

* check if https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99685 is avoided
2022-09-20 12:09:52 +00:00
bors
8fd6d03e22 Auto merge of #101806 - BelovDV:issue-fix-fn-find_library, r=petrochenkov
fix verbatim with upstream dependencies

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99425#issuecomment-1207224161

r? `@petrochenkov`
2022-09-20 07:10:18 +00:00
bors
a38a082afb fix verbatim with upstream dependencies
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99425#issuecomment-1207224161

r? `@petrochenkov`
2022-09-20 07:10:17 +00:00
Josh Stone
38e0e8f7bb Remove -Znew-llvm-pass-manager 2022-09-18 13:26:03 -07:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687 (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a447 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963c (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d307 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984 (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a2 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea566677 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7e (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3 (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded86 (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b56640106 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c96 (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a84 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603c (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43 (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d40 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
bors
c524c7dd25 Auto merge of #98588 - b-naber:valtrees-cleanup, r=lcnr
Use only ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system

r? `@lcnr`
2022-09-17 03:04:22 +00:00
Oli Scherer
40e2de8c41 Revert "Revert "Rollup merge of #98582 - oli-obk:unconstrained_opaque_type, r=estebank""
This reverts commit 4a742a691e.
2022-09-16 11:36:39 +00:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
bors
6153d3cbe6 Auto merge of #101212 - eholk:dyn-star, r=compiler-errors
Initial implementation of dyn*

This PR adds extremely basic and incomplete support for [dyn*](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps//blog/2022/03/29/dyn-can-we-make-dyn-sized/). The goal is to get something in tree behind a flag to make collaboration easier, and also to make sure the implementation so far is not unreasonable. This PR does quite a few things:

* Introduce `dyn_star` feature flag
* Adds parsing for `dyn* Trait` types
* Defines `dyn* Trait` as a sized type
* Adds support for explicit casts, like `42usize as dyn* Debug`
  * Including const evaluation of such casts
* Adds codegen for drop glue so things are cleaned up properly when a `dyn* Trait` object goes out of scope
* Adds codegen for method calls, at least for methods that take `&self`

Quite a bit is still missing, but this gives us a starting point. Note that this is never intended to become stable surface syntax for Rust, but rather `dyn*` is planned to be used as an implementation detail for async functions in dyn traits.

Joint work with `@nikomatsakis` and `@compiler-errors.`

r? `@bjorn3`
2022-09-14 18:10:51 +00:00
bors
c97922dca5 Auto merge of #99443 - jam1garner:mips-virt-feature, r=nagisa
Add support for MIPS VZ ISA extension

[Link to relevant LLVM line where virt extension is specified](83fab8cee9/llvm/lib/Target/Mips/Mips.td (L172-L173))

This has been tested on mips-unknown-linux-musl with a target-cpu that is >= MIPS32 5 and `target-features=+virt`. The example was checked in a disassembler to ensure the correct assembly sequence was being generated using the virtualization instructions.

Needed additional work:

* MIPS is missing from [the Rust reference CPU feature lists](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/codegen.html#available-features)

Example docs for later:

```md
#### `mips` or `mips64`

This platform requires that `#[target_feature]` is only applied to [`unsafe`
functions][unsafe function]. This target's feature support is currently unstable
and must be enabled by `#![feature(mips_target_feature)]` ([Issue #44839])

[Issue #44839]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44839

Further documentation on these features can be found in the [MIPS Instruction Set
Reference Manual], or elsewhere on [mips.com].

[MIPS Instruction Set Reference Manual]: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/downloads-mips/documents/MD00086-2B-MIPS32BIS-AFP-6.06.pdf
[developer.arm.com]: https://www.mips.com/products/architectures/ase/

Feature        | Implicitly Enables | Description
---------------|--------------------|-------------------
`fp64`         |                    | 64-bit Floating Point
`msa`          |                    | "MIPS SIMD Architecture"
`virt`         |                    | Virtualization instructions (VZ ASE)
```

If the above is good I can also submit a PR for that if there's interest in documenting it while it's still unstable. Otherwise that can be dropped, I just wrote it before realizing it was possibly not a good idea.

Relevant to #44839
2022-09-14 08:21:25 +00:00
Eric Holk
cf04547b0b Address code review comments 2022-09-13 14:50:12 -07:00
b-naber
a4bbb8db5c use ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system 2022-09-13 17:40:59 +02:00
bors
9da4644d56 Auto merge of #100101 - BelovDV:issue-99429, r=petrochenkov
change rlib format to distinguish native dependencies

Another one method to solve problem mentioned in #99429.

Changed .rlib format, it contains all bundled native libraries as archieves.
At link time rlib is unpacked and native dependencies linked separately.
New behavior hidden under separate_native_rlib_dependencies flag.
2022-09-13 04:00:24 +00:00
bors
0df1ddc185 Auto merge of #99556 - davidtwco:collapse-debuginfo, r=wesleywiser
ssa: implement `#[collapse_debuginfo]`

cc #39153 rust-lang/compiler-team#386

Debuginfo line information for macro invocations are collapsed by default - line information are replaced by the line of the outermost expansion site. Using `-Zdebug-macros` disables this behaviour.

When the `collapse_debuginfo` feature is enabled, the default behaviour is reversed so that debuginfo is not collapsed by default. In addition, the `#[collapse_debuginfo]` attribute is available and can be applied to macro definitions which will then have their line information collapsed.

r? rust-lang/wg-debugging
2022-09-13 01:19:05 +00:00
Michael Goulet
03148ff735 Make dyn-trait-method work 2022-09-12 16:56:00 -07:00
Michael Goulet
b2ed2dcaae Rename some variants 2022-09-12 16:55:59 -07:00
Michael Goulet
12ec2f0e34 Construct dyn* during const interp 2022-09-12 16:55:59 -07:00
Michael Goulet
12353c11ca Use principal of cast target as dyn-star trait ref in codegen 2022-09-12 16:55:58 -07:00
Eric Holk
c5441acf67 Call destructors when dyn* object goes out of scope 2022-09-12 16:55:57 -07:00
Eric Holk
549c105bb3 dyn* through more typechecking and MIR 2022-09-12 16:55:56 -07:00
Eric Holk
6c01273a15 Plumb dyn trait representation through ty::Dynamic 2022-09-12 16:55:55 -07:00
Daniil Belov
ffa83596fe change rlib format to discern native dependencies 2022-09-12 16:45:03 +03:00
Dylan DPC
93177758fc
Rollup merge of #100767 - kadiwa4:escape_ascii, r=jackh726
Remove manual <[u8]>::escape_ascii

`@rustbot` label: +C-cleanup
2022-09-12 15:21:30 +05:30
bors
4a6ac3c225 Auto merge of #101647 - crlf0710:test_for_99551, r=bjorn3
Fix LLVM IR type mismatch reported in #99551

Closes #99551 .
2022-09-10 17:39:16 +00:00
Charles Lew
1cbbd2aa61 Fix pointer value punning.
Seems this doesn't trigger error on LLVM 15, but let's fix it for better compatibility.
2022-09-10 23:50:20 +08:00
bors
5197c96c49 Auto merge of #101483 - oli-obk:guaranteed_opt, r=fee1-dead
The `<*const T>::guaranteed_*` methods now return an option for the unknown case

cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53020#issuecomment-1236932443

I chose `0` for "not equal" and `1` for "equal" and left `2` for the unknown case so backends can just forward to raw pointer equality and it works 

r? `@fee1-dead` or `@lcnr`

cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
2022-09-10 09:50:21 +00:00
Oli Scherer
f632dbe46f The <*const T>::guaranteed_* methods now return an option for the unknown case 2022-09-09 15:16:04 +00:00