Add `Option::as_`(`mut_`)`slice`
This adds the following functions:
* `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]`
* `Option<T>::as_mut_slice(&mut self) -> &[T]`
The `as_slice` and `as_mut_slice_mut` functions benefit from an optimization that makes them completely branch-free. ~~Unfortunately, this optimization is not available on by-value Options, therefore the `into_slice` implementations use the plain `match` + `slice::from_ref` approach.~~
Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of `Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
The idea has been discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Option.3A.3Aas_slice). Notably the idea for the `as_slice_mut` and `into_slice´ methods came from `@cuviper` and `@Sp00ph` hardened the optimization against niche-optimized Options.
The [rust playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=74f8e4239a19f454c183aaf7b4a969e0) shows that the generated assembly of the optimized method is basically only a copy while the naive method generates code containing a `test dx, dx` on x86_64.
---
EDIT from reviewer: ACP is https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/150
This adds the following functions:
* `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]`
* `Option<T>::as_slice_mut(&mut self) -> &[T]`
The `as_slice` and `as_slice_mut` functions benefit from an
optimization that makes them completely branch-free.
Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either
the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero
or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of
`Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
Stabilize `#![feature(target_feature_11)]`
## Stabilization report
### Summary
Allows for safe functions to be marked with `#[target_feature]` attributes.
Functions marked with `#[target_feature]` are generally considered as unsafe functions: they are unsafe to call, cannot be assigned to safe function pointers, and don't implement the `Fn*` traits.
However, calling them from other `#[target_feature]` functions with a superset of features is safe.
```rust
// Demonstration function
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn avx2() {}
fn foo() {
// Calling `avx2` here is unsafe, as we must ensure
// that AVX is available first.
unsafe {
avx2();
}
}
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn bar() {
// Calling `avx2` here is safe.
avx2();
}
```
### Test cases
Tests for this feature can be found in [`src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/`](b67ba9ba20/src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/).
### Edge cases
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73631
Closures defined inside functions marked with `#[target_feature]` inherit the target features of their parent function. They can still be assigned to safe function pointers and implement the appropriate `Fn*` traits.
```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn qux() {
let my_closure = || avx2(); // this call to `avx2` is safe
let f: fn() = my_closure;
}
```
This means that in order to call a function with `#[target_feature]`, you must show that the target-feature is available while the function executes *and* for as long as whatever may escape from that function lives.
### Documentation
- Reference: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1181
---
cc tracking issue #69098
r? `@ghost`
implement const iterator using `rustc_do_not_const_check`
Previous experiment: #102225.
Explanation: rather than making all default methods work under `const` all at once, this uses `rustc_do_not_const_check` as a workaround to "trick" the compiler to not run any checks on those other default methods. Any const implementations are only required to implement the `next` method. Any actual calls to the trait methods other than `next` will either error in compile time (at CTFE runs), or run the methods correctly if they do not have any non-const operations. This is extremely easy to maintain, remove, or improve.
Bump bootstrap compiler to 1.68
This also changes our stage0.json to include the rustc component for the rustfmt pinned nightly toolchain, which is currently necessary due to rustfmt dynamically linking to that toolchain's librustc_driver and libstd.
r? `@pietroalbini`
`Split*::as_str` refactor
I've made this patch almost a year ago, so the rename and the behavior change are in one commit, sorry 😅
This fixes#84974, as it's required to make other changes work.
This PR
- Renames `as_str` method of string `Split*` iterators to `remainder` (it seems like the `as_str` name was confusing to users)
- Makes `remainder` return `Option<&str>`, to distinguish between "the iterator is exhausted" and "the tail is empty", this was [required on the tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/77998#issuecomment-832696619)
r? `@m-ou-se`
Revert "Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint"
This is a clean revert of #105484.
I confirmed that reverting that PR fixes the regression reported in #106247. ~~I can't say I understand what this code is doing, but maybe it can be re-landed with a different implementation.~~ **Edit:** https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106247#issuecomment-1367174384 has an explanation of why #105484 ends up surfacing spurious `where_clause_object_safety` errors. The implementation of `where_clause_object_safety` assumes we only check whether a trait is object safe when somebody actually uses that trait with `dyn`. However the implementation of `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` added in the problematic PR involves checking *every* trait for whether it is object-safe.
FYI `@nbdd0121` `@compiler-errors`
This commit
- Renames `Split*::{as_str -> remainder}` as it seems less confusing
- Makes `remainder` return Option<&str> to distinguish between
"iterator is exhausted" and "the tail is empty"
Constify remaining `Layout` methods
Makes the methods on `Layout` that aren't yet unstably const, under the same feature and issue, #67521. Most of them required no changes, only non-trivial change is probably constifying `ValidAlignment` which may affect #102072
Simplify some pointer method implementations
- Make `pointer::with_metadata_of` const (+simplify implementation) (cc #75091)
- Simplify implementation of various pointer methods
r? ```@scottmcm```
----
`from_raw_parts::<T>(this, metadata(self))` was annoying me for a while and I've finally figured out how it should _actually_ be done.
Stabilize const char convert
Split out `const_char_from_u32_unchecked` from `const_char_convert` and stabilize the rest, i.e. stabilize the following functions:
```Rust
impl char {
pub const fn from_u32(self, i: u32) -> Option<char>;
pub const fn from_digit(self, num: u32, radix: u32) -> Option<char>;
pub const fn to_digit(self, radix: u32) -> Option<u32>;
}
// Available through core::char and std::char
mod char {
pub const fn from_u32(i: u32) -> Option<char>;
pub const fn from_digit(num: u32, radix: u32) -> Option<char>;
}
```
And put the following under the `from_u32_unchecked` const stability gate as it needs `Option::unwrap` which isn't const-stable (yet):
```Rust
impl char {
pub const unsafe fn from_u32_unchecked(i: u32) -> char;
}
// Available through core::char and std::char
mod char {
pub const unsafe fn from_u32_unchecked(i: u32) -> char;
}
```
cc the tracking issue #89259 (which I'd like to keep open for `const_char_from_u32_unchecked`).
Use a faster allocation size check in slice::from_raw_parts
I've been perusing through the codegen changes that result from turning on the standard library debug assertions. The previous check in here uses saturating arithmetic, which in my experience sometimes makes LLVM just fail to optimize things around the saturating operation.
Here is a demo of the codegen difference: https://godbolt.org/z/WMEqrjajW
Before:
```asm
example::len_check_old:
mov rax, rdi
mov ecx, 3
mul rcx
setno cl
test rax, rax
setns al
and al, cl
ret
example::len_check_old:
mov rax, rdi
mov ecx, 8
mul rcx
setno cl
test rax, rax
setns al
and al, cl
ret
```
After:
```asm
example::len_check_new:
movabs rax, 3074457345618258603
cmp rdi, rax
setb al
ret
example::len_check_new:
shr rdi, 60
sete al
ret
```
Running rustc-perf locally, this looks like up to a 4.5% improvement when `debug-assertions-std = true`.
Thanks ```@LegionMammal978``` (I think that's you?) for turning my idea into a much cleaner implementation.
r? ```@thomcc```
Following up on #92964, only add default trait implementations for the
`c-unwind` family of function pointers. The previous attempt in #92964
added trait implementations for many more ABIs and ran into concerns
regarding the increase in size of the libcore rlib.
An attempt to abstract away function pointer types behind a unified
trait to reduce the duplication of trait impls is being discussed in #99531
but this change looks to be blocked on a lang MCP.
Following @RalfJung's suggestion in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99531#issuecomment-1233440142,
this commit is another cut at #92964 but it _only_ adds the impls for
`extern "C-unwind" fn` and `unsafe extern "C-unwind" fn`.
I am interested in landing this patch to unblock the stabilization of
the `c_unwind` feature.
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2945
Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74990
PR #98165 with commits 7c360dc117 and c1a2db3372
has moved all of the components of these modules into different places,
namely {std,core}::sync and {std,core}::cell. The empty
modules remained. As they are unstable, we can simply remove them.
introduce `{char, u8}::is_ascii_octdigit`
This feature adds two new APIs: `char::is_ascii_octdigit` and `u8::is_ascii_octdigit`, under the feature gate `is_ascii_octdigit`. These methods are shorthands for `char::is_digit(self, 8)` and `u8::is_digit(self, 8)`:
```rust
// core::char
impl char {
pub fn is_ascii_octdigit(self) -> bool;
}
// core::num
impl u8 {
pub fn is_ascii_octdigit(self) -> bool;
}
```
---
Couple of things I need help understanding:
- `const`ness: have I used the right attribute in this case?
- is there a way to run the tests for `core::char` alone, instead of `./x.py test library/core`?
