New zeroed slice
Add to #63291 the methods
```rust
impl<T> Box<[T]> { pub fn new_zeroed_slice(len: usize) -> Box<[MaybeUninit<T>]> {…} }
impl<T> Rc<[T]> { pub fn new_zeroed_slice(len: usize) -> Rc<[MaybeUninit<T>]> {…} }
impl<T> Arc<[T]> { pub fn new_zeroed_slice(len: usize) -> Arc<[MaybeUninit<T>]> {…} }
```
as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63291#issuecomment-605511675 .
Also optimize `{Rc, Arc}::new_zeroed` to use `alloc_zeroed`, otherwise they are no more efficient than using `new_uninit` and zeroing the memory manually (which was the original implementation).
Move to intra-doc links for task.rs and vec.rs
Partial fix for #75080
links for [`get`], [`get_mut`] skipped due to #75643
link for [`copy_from_slice`] skipped due to #63351
Don't panic in Vec::shrink_to_fit
We can help the compiler see that `Vec::shrink_to_fit` will never reach the panic case in `RawVec::shrink_to_fit`, just by guarding the call only for cases where the capacity is strictly greater. A capacity less than the length is only possible through an unsafe call to `set_len`, which would break the `Vec` invariants, so `shrink_to_fit` can just ignore that.
This removes the panicking code from the examples in both #71861 and #75636.
Revert the fundamental changes in #74762 and #75257
Before possibly going over to #75487. Also contains some added and fixed comments.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Migrate unit tests of btree collections to their native breeding ground
There's one BTreeSet test case that I couldn't easily convince to come along, maybe because it truly is an integration test. But leaving it in place would mean git wouldn't see the move so I also moved it to a new file.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
BTreeMap: purge innocent use of into_kv_mut
Replace the use of `into_kv_mut` into more precise calls. This makes more sense if you know that the single remaining use of `into_kv_mut` is in fact evil and can be trialled in court (#75200) and sent to a correction facility (#73971).
No real performance difference reported (but functions that might benefit a tiny constant bit like `BTreeMap::get_mut` aren't benchmarked):
```
benchcmp old new --threshold 5
name old ns/iter new ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
btree::map::clone_fat_100 63,073 59,256 -3,817 -6.05% x 1.06
btree::map::iter_100 3,514 3,235 -279 -7.94% x 1.09
```
Stop BTreeMap casts from reborrowing
Down in btree/node.rs, the interface and use of `cast_unchecked` look a bit shady. It's really just there for inverting `forget_type` which does not borrow. By borrowing we can't write the same `cast_unchecked` in the same way at the Handle level.
No change in undefined behaviour or performance.
Hard way to respect BTreeMap's minimum node length
Resolves#74834 the hard way (though not the hardest imaginable).
Benchmarks (which are all biased/realistic, inserting keys in ascending order) say:
```
benchcmp r0 r1 --threshold 10
name r0 ns/iter r1 ns/iter diff ns/iter diff % speedup
btree::map::clone_slim_100_and_clear 2,183 2,723 540 24.74% x 0.80
btree::map::clone_slim_100_and_drain_all 3,652 4,173 521 14.27% x 0.88
btree::map::clone_slim_100_and_drain_half 3,320 3,940 620 18.67% x 0.84
btree::map::clone_slim_100_and_into_iter 2,154 2,717 563 26.14% x 0.79
btree::map::clone_slim_100_and_pop_all 3,372 3,870 498 14.77% x 0.87
btree::map::clone_slim_100_and_remove_all 5,111 5,647 536 10.49% x 0.91
btree::map::clone_slim_100_and_remove_half 3,259 3,821 562 17.24% x 0.85
btree::map::iter_0 1,733 1,509 -224 -12.93% x 1.15
btree::map::iter_100 2,714 3,739 1,025 37.77% x 0.73
btree::map::iter_10k 3,728 4,269 541 14.51% x 0.87
btree::map::range_unbounded_unbounded 28,426 36,631 8,205 28.86% x 0.78
btree::map::range_unbounded_vs_iter 28,808 34,056 5,248 18.22% x 0.85
```
This difference is not caused by the `debug_assert`-related code in the function `splitpoint`, it's the same without.
The previous `assert_eq` generated quite some code, which is especially
problematic when this call is inlined. This commit also slightly
improves the panic message from:
assertion failed: `(left == right)`
left: `3`,
right: `2`: destination and source slices have different lengths
...to:
source slice length (2) does not match destination slice length (3)
fix wrong word in documentation
Change "two" to "three", since there are three significantly different things printed below that sentence:
---
While these:
```rust
println!("{}, `{name:.*}` has 3 fractional digits", "Hello", 3, name=1234.56);
println!("{}, `{name:.*}` has 3 characters", "Hello", 3, name="1234.56");
println!("{}, `{name:>8.*}` has 3 right-aligned characters", "Hello", 3, name="1234.56");
```
print two significantly different things:
``` rust
Hello, `1234.560` has 3 fractional digits
Hello, `123` has 3 characters
Hello, ` 123` has 3 right-aligned characters
```
---
[`https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/#precision`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/#precision)
Implement `into_keys` and `into_values` for associative maps
This PR implements `into_keys` and `into_values` for HashMap and BTreeMap types. They are implemented as unstable, under `map_into_keys_values` feature.
Fixes#55214.
r? @dtolnay
Move bulk of BTreeMap::insert method down to new method on handle
Adjust the boundary between the map and node layers for insertion: do more in the node layer, keep root manipulation and pointer dereferencing separate. No change in undefined behaviour or performance.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
BTreeMap: define forget_type only when relevant
Similar to `forget_node_type` for handles.
No effect on generated code, apart maybe from the superfluous calls that might not have been optimized away.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
BTreeMap::drain_filter should not touch the root during iteration
Although Miri doesn't point it out, I believe there is undefined behaviour using `drain_filter` when draining the 11th-last element from a tree that was larger. When this happens, the last remaining child nodes are merged, the root becomes empty and is popped from the tree. That last step establishes a mutable reference to the node elected root and writes a pointer in `node::Root`, while iteration continues to visit the same node.
This is mostly code from #74437, slightly adapted.
Stabilize Vec::leak as a method
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62195
The signature is changed to a method rather than an associated function:
```diff
-pub fn leak<'a>(vec: Vec<T>) -> &'a mut [T]
+pub fn leak<'a>(self) -> &'a mut [T]
```
The reason for `Box::leak` not to be a method (`Deref` to an arbitrary `T` which might have its own, different `leak` method) does not apply.
add `slice::array_chunks` to std
Now that #74113 has landed, these methods are suddenly usable. A rebirth of #72334
Tests are directly copied from `chunks_exact` and some additional tests for type inference.
r? @withoutboats as you are both part of t-libs and working on const generics. closes#60735
Don't use "weak count" around Weak::from_raw_ptr
As `Rc/Arc::weak_count` returns 0 when having no strong counts, this
could be confusing and it's better to avoid using that completely.
Closes#73840.
