Remove `generic_associated_types_extended` feature gate
This PR retires nightly support for the `generic_associated_types_extended` feature. This feature hasn't received much attention in the last two years or so, and I believe the feature still remains both unsound and ICEy to use. I think that if we were to redesign and reimplement it, we'd want to first figure out how to implement it soundly, but in the mean time I'd prefer to clean this up.
r? ``@lcnr`` cc ``@jackh726`` who added this feature gate I think
improve TagEncoding::Niche docs, sanity check, and UB checks
Turns out the `niche_variants` range can actually contain the `untagged_variant`. We should report this as UB in Miri, so this PR implements that.
Also rename `partially_check_layout` to `layout_sanity_check` for better consistency with how similar functions are called in other parts of the compiler.
Turns out my adjustments to the transmutation logic also fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126267.
Use correct `hir_id` for array const arg infers
Fixes#133771
`self.next_id()` results in the `DefId` for the const argument, created from the hack introduced by #133468, having no `HirId` associated with it. This then results in an ICE in metadata encoding. Fixing this then results in *another* ICE where `encode_defs` was not skipping encoding `type_of` and other queries for `DefId`s when they correspond to a `ConstArgKind::Infer` node.
This only reproduces with a library crate as metadata is not encoded for binaries, and apparently we had 0 tests for `generic_arg_infer` for array lengths in a library crate so this was not caught :<
cc #133589 `@voidc`
r? `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
Reduce false positives on some common cases from if-let-rescope lint
r? `@jieyouxu`
We would like to identify a very common case in the ecosystem in which we do not need to apply the lint suggestion for the new Edition 2024 `if let` semantics.
In this patch we excluded linting from `if let`s in statements and block tail expressions. In these simple cases, new Edition 2024 drop orders are identical to those of Edition 2021 and prior.
However, conservatively we should still lint for the other cases, because [this example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=2113df5ce78f161d32a1190faf5c7469) shows that the drop order changes are very pronounced, some of which are even sensitive to runtime data.
Gate async fn trait bound modifier on `async_trait_bounds`
This PR moves `async Fn()` trait bounds into a new feature gate: `feature(async_trait_bounds)`. The general vibe is that we will most likely stabilize the `feature(async_closure)` *without* the `async Fn()` trait bound modifier, so we need to gate that separately.
We're trying to work on the general vision of `async` trait bound modifier general in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3710, however that RFC still needs more time for consensus to converge, and we've decided that the value that users get from calling the bound `async Fn()` is *not really* worth blocking landing async closures in general.
Approved in [ACP 491](https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/491).
Remove the `unsafe` on `core::intrinsics::breakpoint()`, since it's a
safe intrinsic to call and has no prerequisites.
(Thanks to @zachs18 for figuring out the `bootstrap`/`not(bootstrap)`
logic.)
Deeply normalize when computing implied outlives bounds
r? lcnr
Unfortunately resolving regions is still slightly scuffed (though in an unrelated way). Specifically, we should be normalizing our param-env outlives when constructing the `OutlivesEnv`; otherwise, these assumptions (dd2837ec5d/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/outlives/env.rs (L78)) are not constructed correctly.
Let me know if you want us to track that somewhere.
Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target`
The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example.
Behaviour before this PR:
```console
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin
deployment_target=11.0
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos
deployment_target=1.0
```
Behaviour after this PR:
```console
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos
XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0
```
My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this:
- b292ef6934/src/build_context.rs (L1199-L1220)
- daab9244b0/src/lib.rs (L3422-L3426)
`maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/901) [reverted](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/943) in `v1.0.85`.
So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine.
``@BlackHoleFox`` wdyt?
``@rustbot`` label O-apple
r? compiler
Get rid of HIR const checker
As far as I can tell, the HIR const checker was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66170 because we were not able to issue useful const error messages in the MIR const checker.
This seems to have changed in the last 5 years, probably due to work like #90532. I've tweaked the diagnostics slightly and think the error messages have gotten *better* in fact.
Thus I think the HIR const checker has reached the end of its usefulness, and we can retire it.
cc `@RalfJung`
Reducing `target_feature` check-cfg merge conflicts
It was rightfully pointed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099#discussion_r1862490542 that the expected values for the `target_feature` cfg are regularly updated and unfortunately the check-cfg tests for it are very merge-conflict prone.
This PR aims at drastically reducing the likely-hood of those, by normalizing the "and X more" diagnostic, as well as making the full expected list multi-line instead of being on a single one.
cc `@RalfJung`
r? `@jieyouxu`
fix ICE when promoted has layout size overflow
Turns out there is no reason to distinguish `tainted_by_errors` and `can_be_spurious` here, we can just track whether we allow this even in "infallible" constants.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125476
Use c"lit" for CStrings without unwrap
I've reviewed uses of `CString::new("lit")`.
Some could be changed to `c"lit"`. Some could be changed to `c"lit".to_owned()`, avoiding an `unwrap()`.
Many `CString` documentation examples could be simplified. I deliberately haven't changed all the examples to use the exact same expression, so that they can demonstrate many ways of creating `CString`s.
I've left UI tests mostly unchanged, because `c""` requires edition 2021, but most UI tests use 2015, and I didn't want to accidentally change what the tests are testing.
Move `Const::{from_anon_const,try_from_lit}` to hir_ty_lowering
Fixes#128176.
This accomplishes one of the followup items from #131081.
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
r? `@BoxyUwU`
show forbidden_lint_groups in future-compat reports
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81670. This has been a future-compat lint for a while, time to dial it up to show up in reports.
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
Add pretty-printer parenthesis insertion test
This test demonstrates numerous bugs in rustc_ast_pretty, including all five of:
- Failing to insert parentheses where necessary to preserve the meaning of a syntax tree, producing invalid syntax.
- Failing to insert parentheses, producing valid syntax with the wrong meaning.
- Inserting too many parentheses.
- Inserting parentheses in the wrong place, producing invalid syntax.
- Losing syntactically significant parts of the syntax tree.
These pretty-printer bugs have consequences for `-Zunpretty=expanded`. The `cargo expand` subcommand cannot work reliably unless rustc can consistently produce valid Rust output. Erroneous syntax cannot be passed through rustfmt, or queried with [syn-select](https://crates.io/crates/syn-select).
The test in this PR is a port of a test from Syn that tests the automatic parenthesis insertion performed by Syn's `ToTokens` impls. In Syn we actually run this test over every expression in every Rust source file in the whole rust-lang/rust repo, including rustc and the standard library and tools and test suites. For the test here, I have only used a small selection of interesting expressions. This will serve as an easy spot to accumulate regression tests as the various bugs get fixed. Once rustc's pretty-printer is in better shape, it's possible that the test can be expanded to cover a larger set of expressions collected automatically like in Syn.
rustdoc-json: Include safety of `static`s
`static`s in an `extern` block can have an associated safety annotation ["because there is nothing guaranteeing that the bit pattern at the static’s memory is valid for the type it is declared with"](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/external-blocks.html#statics). Rustdoc already knows this and displays in for HTML. This PR also includes it in JSON.
Inspired by https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/issues/975 which needs this, but it's probably useful in other places.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez.` Possibly easier to review commit-by-commit.
coverage: Use a query to identify which counter/expression IDs are used
Given that we already have a query to identify the highest-numbered counter ID in a MIR body, we can extend that query to also build bitsets of used counter/expression IDs. That lets us avoid some messy coverage bookkeeping during the main MIR traversal for codegen.
This does mean that we fail to treat some IDs as used in certain MIR-inlining scenarios, but I think that's fine, because it means that the results will be consistent across all instantiations of a function.
---
There's some more cleanup I want to do in the function coverage collector, since it isn't really collecting anything any more, but I'll leave that for future work.
