Move NeedlessBitwiseBool into Operators lint pass

This commit is contained in:
Jason Newcomb 2022-06-01 10:12:26 -04:00
parent 71c2daa60a
commit fc5eac5894
6 changed files with 70 additions and 89 deletions

View File

@ -387,7 +387,6 @@ store.register_lints(&[
mutex_atomic::MUTEX_ATOMIC,
mutex_atomic::MUTEX_INTEGER,
needless_arbitrary_self_type::NEEDLESS_ARBITRARY_SELF_TYPE,
needless_bitwise_bool::NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL,
needless_bool::BOOL_COMPARISON,
needless_bool::NEEDLESS_BOOL,
needless_borrowed_ref::NEEDLESS_BORROWED_REFERENCE,
@ -435,6 +434,7 @@ store.register_lints(&[
operators::MISREFACTORED_ASSIGN_OP,
operators::MODULO_ARITHMETIC,
operators::MODULO_ONE,
operators::NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL,
operators::OP_REF,
operators::VERBOSE_BIT_MASK,
option_env_unwrap::OPTION_ENV_UNWRAP,

View File

@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ store.register_group(true, "clippy::pedantic", Some("clippy_pedantic"), vec![
LintId::of(misc::USED_UNDERSCORE_BINDING),
LintId::of(mismatching_type_param_order::MISMATCHING_TYPE_PARAM_ORDER),
LintId::of(mut_mut::MUT_MUT),
LintId::of(needless_bitwise_bool::NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL),
LintId::of(needless_continue::NEEDLESS_CONTINUE),
LintId::of(needless_for_each::NEEDLESS_FOR_EACH),
LintId::of(needless_pass_by_value::NEEDLESS_PASS_BY_VALUE),
@ -75,6 +74,7 @@ store.register_group(true, "clippy::pedantic", Some("clippy_pedantic"), vec![
LintId::of(non_expressive_names::MANY_SINGLE_CHAR_NAMES),
LintId::of(non_expressive_names::SIMILAR_NAMES),
LintId::of(operators::FLOAT_CMP),
LintId::of(operators::NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL),
LintId::of(operators::VERBOSE_BIT_MASK),
LintId::of(pass_by_ref_or_value::LARGE_TYPES_PASSED_BY_VALUE),
LintId::of(pass_by_ref_or_value::TRIVIALLY_COPY_PASS_BY_REF),

View File

@ -302,7 +302,6 @@ mod mut_reference;
mod mutable_debug_assertion;
mod mutex_atomic;
mod needless_arbitrary_self_type;
mod needless_bitwise_bool;
mod needless_bool;
mod needless_borrowed_ref;
mod needless_continue;
@ -569,7 +568,6 @@ pub fn register_plugins(store: &mut rustc_lint::LintStore, sess: &Session, conf:
))
});
store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(booleans::NonminimalBool));
store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(needless_bitwise_bool::NeedlessBitwiseBool));
store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(enum_clike::UnportableVariant));
store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(float_literal::FloatLiteral));
store.register_late_pass(|| Box::new(ptr::Ptr));

View File

@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
use clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt;
use if_chain::if_chain;
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use rustc_hir::{BinOpKind, Expr, ExprKind};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_middle::ty;
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for uses of bitwise and/or operators between booleans, where performance may be improved by using
/// a lazy and.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// The bitwise operators do not support short-circuiting, so it may hinder code performance.
/// Additionally, boolean logic "masked" as bitwise logic is not caught by lints like `unnecessary_fold`
///
/// ### Known problems
/// This lint evaluates only when the right side is determined to have no side effects. At this time, that
/// determination is quite conservative.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// let (x,y) = (true, false);
/// if x & !y {} // where both x and y are booleans
/// ```
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// let (x,y) = (true, false);
/// if x && !y {}
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.54.0"]
pub NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL,
pedantic,
"Boolean expressions that use bitwise rather than lazy operators"
}
declare_lint_pass!(NeedlessBitwiseBool => [NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL]);
fn is_bitwise_operation(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> bool {
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(expr);
if_chain! {
if !expr.span.from_expansion();
if let (&ExprKind::Binary(ref op, _, right), &ty::Bool) = (&expr.kind, &ty.kind());
if op.node == BinOpKind::BitAnd || op.node == BinOpKind::BitOr;
if let ExprKind::Call(..) | ExprKind::MethodCall(..) | ExprKind::Binary(..) | ExprKind::Unary(..) = right.kind;
if !right.can_have_side_effects();
then {
return true;
}
}
false
}
fn suggestion_snippet(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> Option<String> {
if let ExprKind::Binary(ref op, left, right) = expr.kind {
if let (Some(l_snippet), Some(r_snippet)) = (snippet_opt(cx, left.span), snippet_opt(cx, right.span)) {
let op_snippet = match op.node {
BinOpKind::BitAnd => "&&",
_ => "||",
};
return Some(format!("{} {} {}", l_snippet, op_snippet, r_snippet));
}
}
None
}
impl LateLintPass<'_> for NeedlessBitwiseBool {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) {
if is_bitwise_operation(cx, expr) {
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL,
expr.span,
"use of bitwise operator instead of lazy operator between booleans",
|diag| {
if let Some(sugg) = suggestion_snippet(cx, expr) {
diag.span_suggestion(expr.span, "try", sugg, Applicability::MachineApplicable);
}
},
);
}
}
}

View File

@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ mod integer_division;
mod misrefactored_assign_op;
mod modulo_arithmetic;
mod modulo_one;
mod needless_bitwise_bool;
mod numeric_arithmetic;
mod op_ref;
mod verbose_bit_mask;
@ -641,6 +642,35 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
"any modulo arithmetic statement"
}
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Checks for uses of bitwise and/or operators between booleans, where performance may be improved by using
/// a lazy and.
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// The bitwise operators do not support short-circuiting, so it may hinder code performance.
/// Additionally, boolean logic "masked" as bitwise logic is not caught by lints like `unnecessary_fold`
///
/// ### Known problems
/// This lint evaluates only when the right side is determined to have no side effects. At this time, that
/// determination is quite conservative.
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// let (x,y) = (true, false);
/// if x & !y {} // where both x and y are booleans
/// ```
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// let (x,y) = (true, false);
/// if x && !y {}
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.54.0"]
pub NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL,
pedantic,
"Boolean expressions that use bitwise rather than lazy operators"
}
pub struct Operators {
arithmetic_context: numeric_arithmetic::Context,
verbose_bit_mask_threshold: u64,
@ -668,6 +698,7 @@ impl_lint_pass!(Operators => [
FLOAT_CMP_CONST,
MODULO_ONE,
MODULO_ARITHMETIC,
NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL,
]);
impl Operators {
pub fn new(verbose_bit_mask_threshold: u64) -> Self {
@ -690,6 +721,7 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for Operators {
}
erasing_op::check(cx, e, op.node, lhs, rhs);
identity_op::check(cx, e, op.node, lhs, rhs);
needless_bitwise_bool::check(cx, e, op.node, lhs, rhs);
}
self.arithmetic_context.check_binary(cx, e, op.node, lhs, rhs);
bit_mask::check(cx, e, op.node, lhs, rhs);

View File

@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
use clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt;
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
use rustc_hir::{BinOpKind, Expr, ExprKind};
use rustc_lint::LateContext;
use super::NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL;
pub(super) fn check(cx: &LateContext<'_>, e: &Expr<'_>, op: BinOpKind, lhs: &Expr<'_>, rhs: &Expr<'_>) {
let op_str = match op {
BinOpKind::BitAnd => "&&",
BinOpKind::BitOr => "||",
_ => return,
};
if matches!(
rhs.kind,
ExprKind::Call(..) | ExprKind::MethodCall(..) | ExprKind::Binary(..) | ExprKind::Unary(..)
) && cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(e).is_bool()
&& !rhs.can_have_side_effects()
{
span_lint_and_then(
cx,
NEEDLESS_BITWISE_BOOL,
e.span,
"use of bitwise operator instead of lazy operator between booleans",
|diag| {
if let Some(lhs_snip) = snippet_opt(cx, lhs.span)
&& let Some(rhs_snip) = snippet_opt(cx, rhs.span)
{
let sugg = format!("{} {} {}", lhs_snip, op_str, rhs_snip);
diag.span_suggestion(e.span, "try", sugg, Applicability::MachineApplicable);
}
},
);
}
}