Auto merge of #122520 - scottmcm:stabilize_unchecked_math_basics, r=jhpratt

Stabilize `unchecked_{add,sub,mul}`

Tracking issue: #85122

I think we might as well just stabilize these basic three.  They're the ones that have `nuw`/`nsw` flags in LLVM.

Notably, this doesn't include the potentially-more-complex or -more-situational things like `unchecked_neg` or `unchecked_shr` that are under different feature flags.

To quote Ralf https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85122#issuecomment-1681669646,

> Are there any objections to stabilizing at least `unchecked_{add,sub,mul}`? For those there shouldn't be any surprises about what their safety requirements are.

*Semantially* these are [already available on stable, even in `const`, via](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=bdb1ff889b61950897f1e9f56d0c9a36) `checked_*`+`unreachable_unchecked`.  So IMHO we might as well just let people write them directly, rather than try to go through a `let Some(x) = x.checked_add(y) else { unsafe { hint::unreachable_unchecked() }};` dance.

I added additional text to each method to attempt to better describe the behaviour and encourage `wrapping_*` instead.

r? rust-lang/libs-api
This commit is contained in:
bors 2024-03-29 20:25:08 +00:00
commit faae5f1ffe
15 changed files with 70 additions and 60 deletions

View File

@ -166,7 +166,6 @@
#![feature(try_trait_v2)]
#![feature(try_with_capacity)]
#![feature(tuple_trait)]
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
#![feature(unicode_internals)]
#![feature(unsize)]
#![feature(utf8_chunks)]

View File

@ -2240,24 +2240,27 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" {
/// Returns the result of an unchecked addition, resulting in
/// undefined behavior when `x + y > T::MAX` or `x + y < T::MIN`.
///
/// This intrinsic does not have a stable counterpart.
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_int_unchecked_arith", issue = "none")]
/// The stable counterpart of this intrinsic is `unchecked_add` on the various
/// integer types, such as [`u16::unchecked_add`] and [`i64::unchecked_add`].
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_nounwind]
pub fn unchecked_add<T: Copy>(x: T, y: T) -> T;
/// Returns the result of an unchecked subtraction, resulting in
/// undefined behavior when `x - y > T::MAX` or `x - y < T::MIN`.
///
/// This intrinsic does not have a stable counterpart.
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_int_unchecked_arith", issue = "none")]
/// The stable counterpart of this intrinsic is `unchecked_sub` on the various
/// integer types, such as [`u16::unchecked_sub`] and [`i64::unchecked_sub`].
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_nounwind]
pub fn unchecked_sub<T: Copy>(x: T, y: T) -> T;
/// Returns the result of an unchecked multiplication, resulting in
/// undefined behavior when `x * y > T::MAX` or `x * y < T::MIN`.
///
/// This intrinsic does not have a stable counterpart.
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_int_unchecked_arith", issue = "none")]
/// The stable counterpart of this intrinsic is `unchecked_mul` on the various
/// integer types, such as [`u16::unchecked_mul`] and [`i64::unchecked_mul`].
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_nounwind]
pub fn unchecked_mul<T: Copy>(x: T, y: T) -> T;

View File

@ -137,7 +137,6 @@
#![feature(const_heap)]
#![feature(const_hint_assert_unchecked)]
#![feature(const_index_range_slice_index)]
#![feature(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
#![feature(const_intrinsic_copy)]
#![feature(const_intrinsic_forget)]
#![feature(const_ipv4)]
@ -197,7 +196,6 @@
#![feature(str_split_inclusive_remainder)]
#![feature(str_split_remainder)]
#![feature(strict_provenance)]
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
#![feature(unchecked_shifts)]
#![feature(utf16_extra)]
#![feature(utf16_extra_const)]

View File

@ -492,21 +492,25 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
/// Unchecked integer addition. Computes `self + rhs`, assuming overflow
/// cannot occur.
///
/// Calling `x.unchecked_add(y)` is semantically equivalent to calling
/// `x.`[`checked_add`]`(y).`[`unwrap_unchecked`]`()`.
///
/// If you're just trying to avoid the panic in debug mode, then **do not**
/// use this. Instead, you're looking for [`wrapping_add`].
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This results in undefined behavior when
#[doc = concat!("`self + rhs > ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX` or `self + rhs < ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MIN`,")]
/// i.e. when [`checked_add`] would return `None`.
///
/// [`unwrap_unchecked`]: option/enum.Option.html#method.unwrap_unchecked
#[doc = concat!("[`checked_add`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::checked_add")]
#[unstable(
feature = "unchecked_math",
reason = "niche optimization path",
issue = "85122",
)]
#[doc = concat!("[`wrapping_add`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::wrapping_add")]
#[stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
without modifying the original"]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "unchecked_math", issue = "85122")]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn unchecked_add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
@ -630,21 +634,25 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
/// Unchecked integer subtraction. Computes `self - rhs`, assuming overflow
/// cannot occur.
///
/// Calling `x.unchecked_sub(y)` is semantically equivalent to calling
/// `x.`[`checked_sub`]`(y).`[`unwrap_unchecked`]`()`.
///
/// If you're just trying to avoid the panic in debug mode, then **do not**
/// use this. Instead, you're looking for [`wrapping_sub`].
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This results in undefined behavior when
#[doc = concat!("`self - rhs > ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX` or `self - rhs < ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MIN`,")]
/// i.e. when [`checked_sub`] would return `None`.
///
/// [`unwrap_unchecked`]: option/enum.Option.html#method.unwrap_unchecked
#[doc = concat!("[`checked_sub`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::checked_sub")]
#[unstable(
feature = "unchecked_math",
reason = "niche optimization path",
issue = "85122",
)]
#[doc = concat!("[`wrapping_sub`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::wrapping_sub")]
#[stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
without modifying the original"]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "unchecked_math", issue = "85122")]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn unchecked_sub(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
@ -768,21 +776,25 @@ macro_rules! int_impl {
/// Unchecked integer multiplication. Computes `self * rhs`, assuming overflow
/// cannot occur.
///
/// Calling `x.unchecked_mul(y)` is semantically equivalent to calling
/// `x.`[`checked_mul`]`(y).`[`unwrap_unchecked`]`()`.
///
/// If you're just trying to avoid the panic in debug mode, then **do not**
/// use this. Instead, you're looking for [`wrapping_mul`].
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This results in undefined behavior when
#[doc = concat!("`self * rhs > ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX` or `self * rhs < ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MIN`,")]
/// i.e. when [`checked_mul`] would return `None`.
///
/// [`unwrap_unchecked`]: option/enum.Option.html#method.unwrap_unchecked
#[doc = concat!("[`checked_mul`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::checked_mul")]
#[unstable(
feature = "unchecked_math",
reason = "niche optimization path",
issue = "85122",
)]
#[doc = concat!("[`wrapping_mul`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::wrapping_mul")]
#[stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
without modifying the original"]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "unchecked_math", issue = "85122")]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn unchecked_mul(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {

View File

@ -500,21 +500,25 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
/// Unchecked integer addition. Computes `self + rhs`, assuming overflow
/// cannot occur.
///
/// Calling `x.unchecked_add(y)` is semantically equivalent to calling
/// `x.`[`checked_add`]`(y).`[`unwrap_unchecked`]`()`.
///
/// If you're just trying to avoid the panic in debug mode, then **do not**
/// use this. Instead, you're looking for [`wrapping_add`].
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This results in undefined behavior when
#[doc = concat!("`self + rhs > ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX` or `self + rhs < ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MIN`,")]
/// i.e. when [`checked_add`] would return `None`.
///
/// [`unwrap_unchecked`]: option/enum.Option.html#method.unwrap_unchecked
#[doc = concat!("[`checked_add`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::checked_add")]
#[unstable(
feature = "unchecked_math",
reason = "niche optimization path",
issue = "85122",
)]
#[doc = concat!("[`wrapping_add`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::wrapping_add")]
#[stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
without modifying the original"]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "unchecked_math", issue = "85122")]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn unchecked_add(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
@ -644,21 +648,25 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
/// Unchecked integer subtraction. Computes `self - rhs`, assuming overflow
/// cannot occur.
///
/// Calling `x.unchecked_sub(y)` is semantically equivalent to calling
/// `x.`[`checked_sub`]`(y).`[`unwrap_unchecked`]`()`.
///
/// If you're just trying to avoid the panic in debug mode, then **do not**
/// use this. Instead, you're looking for [`wrapping_sub`].
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This results in undefined behavior when
#[doc = concat!("`self - rhs > ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX` or `self - rhs < ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MIN`,")]
/// i.e. when [`checked_sub`] would return `None`.
///
/// [`unwrap_unchecked`]: option/enum.Option.html#method.unwrap_unchecked
#[doc = concat!("[`checked_sub`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::checked_sub")]
#[unstable(
feature = "unchecked_math",
reason = "niche optimization path",
issue = "85122",
)]
#[doc = concat!("[`wrapping_sub`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::wrapping_sub")]
#[stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
without modifying the original"]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "unchecked_math", issue = "85122")]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn unchecked_sub(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {
@ -726,21 +734,25 @@ macro_rules! uint_impl {
/// Unchecked integer multiplication. Computes `self * rhs`, assuming overflow
/// cannot occur.
///
/// Calling `x.unchecked_mul(y)` is semantically equivalent to calling
/// `x.`[`checked_mul`]`(y).`[`unwrap_unchecked`]`()`.
///
/// If you're just trying to avoid the panic in debug mode, then **do not**
/// use this. Instead, you're looking for [`wrapping_mul`].
///
/// # Safety
///
/// This results in undefined behavior when
#[doc = concat!("`self * rhs > ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MAX` or `self * rhs < ", stringify!($SelfT), "::MIN`,")]
/// i.e. when [`checked_mul`] would return `None`.
///
/// [`unwrap_unchecked`]: option/enum.Option.html#method.unwrap_unchecked
#[doc = concat!("[`checked_mul`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::checked_mul")]
#[unstable(
feature = "unchecked_math",
reason = "niche optimization path",
issue = "85122",
)]
#[doc = concat!("[`wrapping_mul`]: ", stringify!($SelfT), "::wrapping_mul")]
#[stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "unchecked_math", since = "CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION")]
#[must_use = "this returns the result of the operation, \
without modifying the original"]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "unchecked_math", issue = "85122")]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn unchecked_mul(self, rhs: Self) -> Self {

View File

@ -1029,8 +1029,6 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> *const T {
#[stable(feature = "pointer_methods", since = "1.26.0")]
#[must_use = "returns a new pointer rather than modifying its argument"]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_offset", since = "1.61.0")]
// We could always go back to wrapping if unchecked becomes unacceptable
#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn sub(self, count: usize) -> Self

View File

@ -1119,8 +1119,6 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> *mut T {
#[stable(feature = "pointer_methods", since = "1.26.0")]
#[must_use = "returns a new pointer rather than modifying its argument"]
#[rustc_const_stable(feature = "const_ptr_offset", since = "1.61.0")]
// We could always go back to wrapping if unchecked becomes unacceptable
#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn sub(self, count: usize) -> Self

View File

@ -702,8 +702,6 @@ impl<T: ?Sized> NonNull<T> {
#[unstable(feature = "non_null_convenience", issue = "117691")]
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "non_null_convenience", issue = "117691")]
#[must_use = "returns a new pointer rather than modifying its argument"]
// We could always go back to wrapping if unchecked becomes unacceptable
#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
#[inline(always)]
#[cfg_attr(miri, track_caller)] // even without panics, this helps for Miri backtraces
pub const unsafe fn sub(self, count: usize) -> Self

View File

@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
fn main() {
// MAX overflow
let _val = unsafe { 40000u16.unchecked_add(30000) }; //~ ERROR: overflow executing `unchecked_add`

View File

@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
fn main() {
// MIN overflow
let _val = unsafe { (-30000i16).unchecked_add(-8000) }; //~ ERROR: overflow executing `unchecked_add`

View File

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
fn main() {
// MAX overflow
let _val = unsafe { 300u16.unchecked_mul(250u16) }; //~ ERROR: overflow executing `unchecked_mul`

View File

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
fn main() {
// MIN overflow
let _val = unsafe { 1_000_000_000i32.unchecked_mul(-4) }; //~ ERROR: overflow executing `unchecked_mul`

View File

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
fn main() {
// MIN overflow
let _val = unsafe { 14u32.unchecked_sub(22) }; //~ ERROR: overflow executing `unchecked_sub`

View File

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
#![feature(unchecked_math)]
fn main() {
// MAX overflow
let _val = unsafe { 30000i16.unchecked_sub(-7000) }; //~ ERROR: overflow executing `unchecked_sub`

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#![feature(core_intrinsics)]
#![feature(const_int_unchecked_arith)]
use std::intrinsics;