mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-11-25 16:24:46 +00:00
Elaborate supertraits in dyn candidates
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a891ec4fe
commit
fa9ae7b9d3
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ use rustc_type_ir::data_structures::HashMap;
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir::fold::{TypeFoldable, TypeFolder, TypeSuperFoldable};
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir::inherent::*;
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir::lang_items::TraitSolverLangItem;
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir::{self as ty, Interner, Upcast as _};
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir::{self as ty, elaborate, Interner, Upcast as _};
|
||||
use rustc_type_ir_macros::{TypeFoldable_Generic, TypeVisitable_Generic};
|
||||
use tracing::instrument;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -671,11 +671,19 @@ where
|
||||
{
|
||||
let cx = ecx.cx();
|
||||
let mut requirements = vec![];
|
||||
requirements.extend(
|
||||
// Elaborating all supertrait outlives obligations here is not soundness critical,
|
||||
// since if we just used the unelaborated set, then the transitive supertraits would
|
||||
// be reachable when proving the former. However, since we elaborate all supertrait
|
||||
// outlives obligations when confirming impls, we would end up with a different set
|
||||
// of outlives obligations here if we didn't do the same, leading to ambiguity.
|
||||
// FIXME(-Znext-solver=coinductive): Adding supertraits here can be removed once we
|
||||
// make impls coinductive always, since they'll always need to prove their supertraits.
|
||||
requirements.extend(elaborate::elaborate(
|
||||
cx,
|
||||
cx.explicit_super_predicates_of(trait_ref.def_id)
|
||||
.iter_instantiated(cx, trait_ref.args)
|
||||
.map(|(pred, _)| pred),
|
||||
);
|
||||
));
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME(associated_const_equality): Also add associated consts to
|
||||
// the requirements here.
|
||||
|
@ -87,9 +87,9 @@ where
|
||||
.map(|pred| goal.with(cx, pred));
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(GoalSource::ImplWhereBound, where_clause_bounds);
|
||||
|
||||
// We currently elaborate all supertrait obligations from impls. This
|
||||
// can be removed when we actually do coinduction correctly and just
|
||||
// register that the impl header must be WF.
|
||||
// We currently elaborate all supertrait outlives obligations from impls.
|
||||
// This can be removed when we actually do coinduction correctly, and prove
|
||||
// all supertrait obligations unconditionally.
|
||||
let goal_clause: I::Clause = goal.predicate.upcast(cx);
|
||||
for clause in elaborate::elaborate(cx, [goal_clause]) {
|
||||
if matches!(
|
||||
|
@ -2800,6 +2800,7 @@ impl<'tcx> SelectionContext<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Register any outlives obligations from the trait here, cc #124336.
|
||||
if matches!(self.tcx().def_kind(def_id), DefKind::Impl { of_trait: true })
|
||||
&& let Some(header) = self.tcx().impl_trait_header(def_id)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user