Fix inaccurate function name in rustc_const_eval docs

This commit is contained in:
pierwill 2022-03-24 13:37:18 -05:00
parent e209e85e39
commit f1f0734718
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -520,8 +520,8 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx: 'mir, M: Machine<'mir, 'tcx>> InterpCx<'mir, 'tcx, M> {
Ok(OpTy { op, layout: place.layout })
}
// Evaluate a place with the goal of reading from it. This lets us sometimes
// avoid allocations.
/// Evaluate a place with the goal of reading from it. This lets us sometimes
/// avoid allocations.
pub fn eval_place_to_op(
&self,
place: mir::Place<'tcx>,

View File

@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ where
}
/// Computes a place. You should only use this if you intend to write into this
/// place; for reading, a more efficient alternative is `eval_place_for_read`.
/// place; for reading, a more efficient alternative is `eval_place_to_op`.
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
pub fn eval_place(
&mut self,