Migrate memory overlap check from validator to lint

The check attempts to identify potential undefined behaviour, rather
than whether MIR is well-formed. It belongs in the lint not validator.
This commit is contained in:
Tomasz Miąsko 2024-01-04 14:24:41 +01:00
parent a084e063e6
commit df116ec246
8 changed files with 85 additions and 237 deletions

View File

@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for Validator {
mir_phase,
unwind_edge_count: 0,
reachable_blocks: traversal::reachable_as_bitset(body),
place_cache: FxHashSet::default(),
value_cache: FxHashSet::default(),
can_unwind,
};
@ -106,7 +105,6 @@ struct CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
mir_phase: MirPhase,
unwind_edge_count: usize,
reachable_blocks: BitSet<BasicBlock>,
place_cache: FxHashSet<PlaceRef<'tcx>>,
value_cache: FxHashSet<u128>,
// If `false`, then the MIR must not contain `UnwindAction::Continue` or
// `TerminatorKind::Resume`.
@ -294,19 +292,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
match &statement.kind {
StatementKind::Assign(box (dest, rvalue)) => {
// FIXME(JakobDegen): Check this for all rvalues, not just this one.
if let Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(src) | Operand::Move(src)) = rvalue {
// The sides of an assignment must not alias. Currently this just checks whether
// the places are identical.
if dest == src {
self.fail(
location,
"encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory",
);
}
}
}
StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..) => {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::Runtime(RuntimePhase::Initial) {
self.fail(
@ -341,7 +326,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
self.fail(location, format!("explicit `{kind:?}` is forbidden"));
}
}
StatementKind::StorageLive(_)
StatementKind::Assign(..)
| StatementKind::StorageLive(_)
| StatementKind::StorageDead(_)
| StatementKind::Intrinsic(_)
| StatementKind::Coverage(_)
@ -404,10 +390,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
// The call destination place and Operand::Move place used as an argument might be
// passed by a reference to the callee. Consequently they must be non-overlapping
// and cannot be packed. Currently this simply checks for duplicate places.
self.place_cache.clear();
self.place_cache.insert(destination.as_ref());
// passed by a reference to the callee. Consequently they cannot be packed.
if is_within_packed(self.tcx, &self.body.local_decls, *destination).is_some() {
// This is bad! The callee will expect the memory to be aligned.
self.fail(
@ -418,10 +401,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
),
);
}
let mut has_duplicates = false;
for arg in args {
if let Operand::Move(place) = arg {
has_duplicates |= !self.place_cache.insert(place.as_ref());
if is_within_packed(self.tcx, &self.body.local_decls, *place).is_some() {
// This is bad! The callee will expect the memory to be aligned.
self.fail(
@ -434,16 +415,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for CfgChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
}
if has_duplicates {
self.fail(
location,
format!(
"encountered overlapping memory in `Move` arguments to `Call` terminator: {:?}",
terminator.kind,
),
);
}
}
TerminatorKind::Assert { target, unwind, .. } => {
self.check_edge(location, *target, EdgeKind::Normal);
@ -1112,17 +1083,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
)
}
}
// FIXME(JakobDegen): Check this for all rvalues, not just this one.
if let Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(src) | Operand::Move(src)) = rvalue {
// The sides of an assignment must not alias. Currently this just checks whether
// the places are identical.
if dest == src {
self.fail(
location,
"encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory",
);
}
}
}
StatementKind::AscribeUserType(..) => {
if self.mir_phase >= MirPhase::Runtime(RuntimePhase::Initial) {

View File

@ -133,7 +133,6 @@
use std::collections::hash_map::{Entry, OccupiedEntry};
use crate::simplify::remove_dead_blocks;
use crate::MirPass;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
@ -241,12 +240,6 @@ impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for DestinationPropagation {
apply_merges(body, tcx, &merges, &merged_locals);
}
if round_count != 0 {
// Merging can introduce overlap between moved arguments and/or call destination in an
// unreachable code, which validator considers to be ill-formed.
remove_dead_blocks(body);
}
trace!(round_count);
}
}

View File

@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
//! This pass statically detects code which has undefined behaviour or is likely to be erroneous.
//! It can be used to locate problems in MIR building or optimizations. It assumes that all code
//! can be executed, so it has false positives.
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
use rustc_middle::mir::visit::{PlaceContext, Visitor};
use rustc_middle::mir::*;
@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ pub fn lint_body<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &Body<'tcx>, when: String) {
always_live_locals,
maybe_storage_live,
maybe_storage_dead,
places: Default::default(),
};
for (bb, data) in traversal::reachable(body) {
lint.visit_basic_block_data(bb, data);
@ -45,6 +47,7 @@ struct Lint<'a, 'tcx> {
always_live_locals: &'a BitSet<Local>,
maybe_storage_live: ResultsCursor<'a, 'tcx, MaybeStorageLive<'a>>,
maybe_storage_dead: ResultsCursor<'a, 'tcx, MaybeStorageDead<'a>>,
places: FxHashSet<PlaceRef<'tcx>>,
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> Lint<'a, 'tcx> {
@ -75,10 +78,22 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Lint<'a, 'tcx> {
}
fn visit_statement(&mut self, statement: &Statement<'tcx>, location: Location) {
match statement.kind {
match &statement.kind {
StatementKind::Assign(box (dest, rvalue)) => {
if let Rvalue::Use(Operand::Copy(src) | Operand::Move(src)) = rvalue {
// The sides of an assignment must not alias. Currently this just checks whether
// the places are identical.
if dest == src {
self.fail(
location,
"encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory",
);
}
}
}
StatementKind::StorageLive(local) => {
self.maybe_storage_live.seek_before_primary_effect(location);
if self.maybe_storage_live.get().contains(local) {
if self.maybe_storage_live.get().contains(*local) {
self.fail(
location,
format!("StorageLive({local:?}) which already has storage here"),
@ -92,7 +107,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Lint<'a, 'tcx> {
}
fn visit_terminator(&mut self, terminator: &Terminator<'tcx>, location: Location) {
match terminator.kind {
match &terminator.kind {
TerminatorKind::Return => {
if self.is_fn_like {
self.maybe_storage_live.seek_after_primary_effect(location);
@ -108,6 +123,28 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Lint<'a, 'tcx> {
}
}
}
TerminatorKind::Call { args, destination, .. } => {
// The call destination place and Operand::Move place used as an argument might be
// passed by a reference to the callee. Consequently they must be non-overlapping.
// Currently this simply checks for duplicate places.
self.places.clear();
self.places.insert(destination.as_ref());
let mut has_duplicates = false;
for arg in args {
if let Operand::Move(place) = arg {
has_duplicates |= !self.places.insert(place.as_ref());
}
}
if has_duplicates {
self.fail(
location,
format!(
"encountered overlapping memory in `Move` arguments to `Call` terminator: {:?}",
terminator.kind,
),
);
}
}
_ => {}
}

View File

@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
- // MIR for `f` before DestinationPropagation
+ // MIR for `f` after DestinationPropagation
fn f(_1: T) -> () {
debug a => _1;
let mut _0: ();
let _2: T;
let mut _3: bool;
let _4: ();
let mut _5: T;
let mut _6: T;
let _7: ();
let mut _8: T;
let mut _9: T;
scope 1 {
- debug b => _2;
+ debug b => _1;
}
bb0: {
- StorageLive(_2);
- _2 = _1;
+ nop;
+ nop;
StorageLive(_3);
_3 = const false;
- goto -> bb3;
+ goto -> bb1;
}
bb1: {
- StorageLive(_4);
- StorageLive(_5);
- _5 = _1;
- StorageLive(_6);
- _6 = _1;
- _4 = g::<T>(_1, _1) -> [return: bb2, unwind unreachable];
- }
-
- bb2: {
- StorageDead(_6);
- StorageDead(_5);
- StorageDead(_4);
- _0 = const ();
- goto -> bb5;
- }
-
- bb3: {
StorageLive(_7);
- StorageLive(_8);
- _8 = _1;
- StorageLive(_9);
- _9 = _1;
- _7 = g::<T>(_1, _1) -> [return: bb4, unwind unreachable];
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ _7 = g::<T>(_1, _1) -> [return: bb2, unwind unreachable];
}
- bb4: {
- StorageDead(_9);
- StorageDead(_8);
+ bb2: {
+ nop;
+ nop;
StorageDead(_7);
_0 = const ();
- goto -> bb5;
+ goto -> bb3;
}
- bb5: {
+ bb3: {
StorageDead(_3);
- StorageDead(_2);
+ nop;
return;
}
}

View File

@ -1,82 +0,0 @@
- // MIR for `f` before DestinationPropagation
+ // MIR for `f` after DestinationPropagation
fn f(_1: T) -> () {
debug a => _1;
let mut _0: ();
let _2: T;
let mut _3: bool;
let _4: ();
let mut _5: T;
let mut _6: T;
let _7: ();
let mut _8: T;
let mut _9: T;
scope 1 {
- debug b => _2;
+ debug b => _1;
}
bb0: {
- StorageLive(_2);
- _2 = _1;
+ nop;
+ nop;
StorageLive(_3);
_3 = const false;
- goto -> bb3;
+ goto -> bb1;
}
bb1: {
- StorageLive(_4);
- StorageLive(_5);
- _5 = _1;
- StorageLive(_6);
- _6 = _1;
- _4 = g::<T>(_1, _1) -> [return: bb2, unwind continue];
- }
-
- bb2: {
- StorageDead(_6);
- StorageDead(_5);
- StorageDead(_4);
- _0 = const ();
- goto -> bb5;
- }
-
- bb3: {
StorageLive(_7);
- StorageLive(_8);
- _8 = _1;
- StorageLive(_9);
- _9 = _1;
- _7 = g::<T>(_1, _1) -> [return: bb4, unwind continue];
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ nop;
+ _7 = g::<T>(_1, _1) -> [return: bb2, unwind continue];
}
- bb4: {
- StorageDead(_9);
- StorageDead(_8);
+ bb2: {
+ nop;
+ nop;
StorageDead(_7);
_0 = const ();
- goto -> bb5;
+ goto -> bb3;
}
- bb5: {
+ bb3: {
StorageDead(_3);
- StorageDead(_2);
+ nop;
return;
}
}

View File

@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
// skip-filecheck
// EMIT_MIR_FOR_EACH_PANIC_STRATEGY
// Check that unreachable code is removed after the destination propagation.
// Regression test for issue #105428.
//
// compile-flags: --crate-type=lib -Zmir-opt-level=0
// compile-flags: -Zmir-enable-passes=+GVN,+SimplifyConstCondition-after-const-prop,+DestinationPropagation
// EMIT_MIR unreachable.f.DestinationPropagation.diff
pub fn f<T: Copy>(a: T) {
let b = a;
if false {
g(a, b);
} else {
g(b, b);
}
}
#[inline(never)]
pub fn g<T: Copy>(_: T, _: T) {}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
// compile-flags: --crate-type=lib -Zlint-mir -Ztreat-err-as-bug
// build-fail
// failure-status: 101
// dont-check-compiler-stderr
// error-pattern: encountered `Assign` statement with overlapping memory
#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
extern crate core;
use core::intrinsics::mir::*;
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
pub fn main() {
mir!(
let a: [u8; 1024];
{
a = a;
Return()
}
)
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
// compile-flags: -Zlint-mir -Ztreat-err-as-bug
// build-fail
// failure-status: 101
// dont-check-compiler-stderr
// error-pattern: encountered overlapping memory in `Move` arguments to `Call`
#![feature(custom_mir, core_intrinsics)]
extern crate core;
use core::intrinsics::mir::*;
#[custom_mir(dialect = "runtime", phase = "optimized")]
pub fn main() {
mir!(
let a: [u8; 1024];
{
Call(a = f(Move(a)), ReturnTo(bb1), UnwindUnreachable())
}
bb1 = {
Return()
}
)
}
pub fn f<T: Copy>(a: T) -> T { a }