Add block-based mutex unlocking example

This commit is contained in:
The 8472 2023-03-14 21:57:26 +01:00
parent 4a04d086ca
commit db5dfd2373

View File

@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ use crate::sys::locks as sys;
/// *guard += 1;
/// ```
///
/// It is sometimes necessary to manually drop the mutex guard to unlock it
/// sooner than the end of the enclosing scope.
/// It is sometimes necessary to manually drop the mutex guard or to create an inner scope
/// to unlock it sooner than the end of the enclosing scope.
///
/// ```
/// use std::sync::{Arc, Mutex};
@ -125,11 +125,18 @@ use crate::sys::locks as sys;
/// let res_mutex_clone = Arc::clone(&res_mutex);
///
/// threads.push(thread::spawn(move || {
/// let mut data = data_mutex_clone.lock().unwrap();
/// // This is the result of some important and long-ish work.
/// let result = data.iter().fold(0, |acc, x| acc + x * 2);
/// data.push(result);
/// drop(data);
/// // Here we use a block to limit the lifetime of the lock guard.
/// let result = {
/// let mut data = data_mutex_clone.lock().unwrap();
/// // This is the result of some important and long-ish work.
/// let result = data.iter().fold(0, |acc, x| acc + x * 2);
/// data.push(result);
/// result
/// // The mutex guard gets dropped here, together with any other values
/// // created in the critical section.
/// };
/// // The guard created here is a temporary dropped at the end of the statement, i.e.
/// // the lock would not remain being held even if the thread did some additional work.
/// *res_mutex_clone.lock().unwrap() += result;
/// }));
/// });
@ -146,6 +153,8 @@ use crate::sys::locks as sys;
/// // It's even more important here than in the threads because we `.join` the
/// // threads after that. If we had not dropped the mutex guard, a thread could
/// // be waiting forever for it, causing a deadlock.
/// // As in the threads a block could have been used instead of calling the
/// // `drop` function.
/// drop(data);
/// // Here the mutex guard is not assigned to a variable and so, even if the
/// // scope does not end after this line, the mutex is still released: there is
@ -160,6 +169,7 @@ use crate::sys::locks as sys;
///
/// assert_eq!(*res_mutex.lock().unwrap(), 800);
/// ```
///
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
#[cfg_attr(not(test), rustc_diagnostic_item = "Mutex")]
pub struct Mutex<T: ?Sized> {