nordic-dev.net/rust
nordic-dev.net/rust
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2024-11-22 14:55:26 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rollup merge of #121224 - hi-rustin:rustin-patch-unit-binding, r=Mark-Simulacrum

Browse Source 
Remove unnecessary unit binding

It appears that the unit binding is not necessary at this time. However, I am unsure of its importance in the past. Please let me know if it is unsafe to remove.
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2024-02-18 18:54:33 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit c8f2a00aec
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
library/alloc/src/raw_vec.rs
View File

@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> RawVec<T, A> {
// and could hypothetically handle differences between stride and size, but this memory
// has already been allocated so we know it can't overflow and currently rust does not
// support such types. So we can do better by skipping some checks and avoid an unwrap.
let _: () = const { assert!(mem::size_of::<T>() % mem::align_of::<T>() == 0) };
const { assert!(mem::size_of::<T>() % mem::align_of::<T>() == 0) };
unsafe {
let align = mem::align_of::<T>();
let size = mem::size_of::<T>().unchecked_mul(self.cap.0);
@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> RawVec<T, A> {
let (ptr, layout) = if let Some(mem) = self.current_memory() { mem } else { return Ok(()) };
// See current_memory() why this assert is here
let _: () = const { assert!(mem::size_of::<T>() % mem::align_of::<T>() == 0) };
const { assert!(mem::size_of::<T>() % mem::align_of::<T>() == 0) };
// If shrinking to 0, deallocate the buffer. We don't reach this point
// for the T::IS_ZST case since current_memory() will have returned