Move the extra directives for Mode::CoverageRun into iter_header

When these extra directives were ported over as part of #112300, it made sense
to introduce `iter_header_extra` and pass them in as an extra argument.

But now that #120881 has added a `mode` parameter to `iter_header` for its own
purposes, it's slightly simpler to move the coverage special-case code directly
into `iter_header` as well. This lets us get rid of `iter_header_extra`.
This commit is contained in:
Zalathar 2024-02-17 22:57:26 +11:00
parent 488ffaa726
commit c521d7fa2e

View File

@ -672,17 +672,6 @@ pub fn line_directive<'line>(
}
}
fn iter_header<R: Read>(
mode: Mode,
suite: &str,
poisoned: &mut bool,
testfile: &Path,
rdr: R,
it: &mut dyn FnMut(HeaderLine<'_>),
) {
iter_header_extra(mode, suite, poisoned, testfile, rdr, &[], it)
}
/// This is generated by collecting directives from ui tests and then extracting their directive
/// names. This is **not** an exhaustive list of all possible directives. Instead, this is a
/// best-effort approximation for diagnostics.
@ -813,23 +802,37 @@ struct HeaderLine<'ln> {
line_number: usize,
}
fn iter_header_extra(
fn iter_header(
mode: Mode,
suite: &str,
poisoned: &mut bool,
testfile: &Path,
rdr: impl Read,
extra_directives: &[&str],
it: &mut dyn FnMut(HeaderLine<'_>),
) {
if testfile.is_dir() {
return;
}
// Process any extra directives supplied by the caller (e.g. because they
// are implied by the test mode), with a dummy line number of 0.
for directive in extra_directives {
it(HeaderLine { header_revision: None, original_line: "", directive, line_number: 0 });
// Coverage tests in coverage-run mode always have these extra directives,
// without needing to specify them manually in every test file.
// (Some of the comments below have been copied over from the old
// `tests/run-make/coverage-reports/Makefile`, which no longer exists.)
if mode == Mode::CoverageRun {
let extra_directives: &[&str] = &[
"needs-profiler-support",
// FIXME(mati865): MinGW GCC miscompiles compiler-rt profiling library but with Clang it works
// properly. Since we only have GCC on the CI ignore the test for now.
"ignore-windows-gnu",
// FIXME(pietroalbini): this test currently does not work on cross-compiled
// targets because remote-test is not capable of sending back the *.profraw
// files generated by the LLVM instrumentation.
"ignore-cross-compile",
];
// Process the extra implied directives, with a dummy line number of 0.
for directive in extra_directives {
it(HeaderLine { header_revision: None, original_line: "", directive, line_number: 0 });
}
}
let comment = if testfile.extension().is_some_and(|e| e == "rs") {
@ -1162,35 +1165,14 @@ pub fn make_test_description<R: Read>(
let mut ignore_message = None;
let mut should_fail = false;
let extra_directives: &[&str] = match config.mode {
// The coverage-run tests are treated as having these extra directives,
// without needing to specify them manually in every test file.
// (Some of the comments below have been copied over from
// `tests/run-make/coverage-reports/Makefile`, which no longer exists.)
Mode::CoverageRun => {
&[
"needs-profiler-support",
// FIXME(mati865): MinGW GCC miscompiles compiler-rt profiling library but with Clang it works
// properly. Since we only have GCC on the CI ignore the test for now.
"ignore-windows-gnu",
// FIXME(pietroalbini): this test currently does not work on cross-compiled
// targets because remote-test is not capable of sending back the *.profraw
// files generated by the LLVM instrumentation.
"ignore-cross-compile",
]
}
_ => &[],
};
let mut local_poisoned = false;
iter_header_extra(
iter_header(
config.mode,
&config.suite,
&mut local_poisoned,
path,
src,
extra_directives,
&mut |HeaderLine { header_revision, original_line, directive: ln, line_number }| {
if header_revision.is_some() && header_revision != cfg {
return;