mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-11-22 06:44:35 +00:00
Rollup merge of #78114 - jyn514:private, r=oli-obk
Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint Previously, trying to allow this would give another error! ``` warning: unknown lint: `private_intra_doc_links` --> private.rs:1:10 | 1 | #![allow(private_intra_doc_links)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: did you mean: `broken_intra_doc_links` | = note: `#[warn(unknown_lints)]` on by default warning: public documentation for `DocMe` links to private item `DontDocMe` --> private.rs:2:11 | 2 | /// docs [DontDocMe] | ^^^^^^^^^ this item is private | = note: `#[warn(private_intra_doc_links)]` on by default = note: this link will resolve properly if you pass `--document-private-items` ``` Fixes the issue found in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77249#issuecomment-712339227. r? ````````@Manishearth```````` Does anyone know why this additional step is necessary? It seems weird this has to be declared in 3 different places.
This commit is contained in:
commit
b9671ae5f8
@ -2801,6 +2801,7 @@ declare_lint_pass! {
|
|||||||
UNSTABLE_NAME_COLLISIONS,
|
UNSTABLE_NAME_COLLISIONS,
|
||||||
IRREFUTABLE_LET_PATTERNS,
|
IRREFUTABLE_LET_PATTERNS,
|
||||||
BROKEN_INTRA_DOC_LINKS,
|
BROKEN_INTRA_DOC_LINKS,
|
||||||
|
PRIVATE_INTRA_DOC_LINKS,
|
||||||
INVALID_CODEBLOCK_ATTRIBUTES,
|
INVALID_CODEBLOCK_ATTRIBUTES,
|
||||||
MISSING_CRATE_LEVEL_DOCS,
|
MISSING_CRATE_LEVEL_DOCS,
|
||||||
MISSING_DOC_CODE_EXAMPLES,
|
MISSING_DOC_CODE_EXAMPLES,
|
||||||
|
@ -322,7 +322,8 @@ pub fn run_core(
|
|||||||
let cpath = Some(input.clone());
|
let cpath = Some(input.clone());
|
||||||
let input = Input::File(input);
|
let input = Input::File(input);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let intra_link_resolution_failure_name = lint::builtin::BROKEN_INTRA_DOC_LINKS.name;
|
let broken_intra_doc_links = lint::builtin::BROKEN_INTRA_DOC_LINKS.name;
|
||||||
|
let private_intra_doc_links = lint::builtin::PRIVATE_INTRA_DOC_LINKS.name;
|
||||||
let missing_docs = rustc_lint::builtin::MISSING_DOCS.name;
|
let missing_docs = rustc_lint::builtin::MISSING_DOCS.name;
|
||||||
let missing_doc_example = rustc_lint::builtin::MISSING_DOC_CODE_EXAMPLES.name;
|
let missing_doc_example = rustc_lint::builtin::MISSING_DOC_CODE_EXAMPLES.name;
|
||||||
let private_doc_tests = rustc_lint::builtin::PRIVATE_DOC_TESTS.name;
|
let private_doc_tests = rustc_lint::builtin::PRIVATE_DOC_TESTS.name;
|
||||||
@ -336,7 +337,8 @@ pub fn run_core(
|
|||||||
// In addition to those specific lints, we also need to allow those given through
|
// In addition to those specific lints, we also need to allow those given through
|
||||||
// command line, otherwise they'll get ignored and we don't want that.
|
// command line, otherwise they'll get ignored and we don't want that.
|
||||||
let lints_to_show = vec![
|
let lints_to_show = vec![
|
||||||
intra_link_resolution_failure_name.to_owned(),
|
broken_intra_doc_links.to_owned(),
|
||||||
|
private_intra_doc_links.to_owned(),
|
||||||
missing_docs.to_owned(),
|
missing_docs.to_owned(),
|
||||||
missing_doc_example.to_owned(),
|
missing_doc_example.to_owned(),
|
||||||
private_doc_tests.to_owned(),
|
private_doc_tests.to_owned(),
|
||||||
@ -349,9 +351,8 @@ pub fn run_core(
|
|||||||
];
|
];
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let (lint_opts, lint_caps) = init_lints(lints_to_show, lint_opts, |lint| {
|
let (lint_opts, lint_caps) = init_lints(lints_to_show, lint_opts, |lint| {
|
||||||
if lint.name == intra_link_resolution_failure_name
|
// FIXME: why is this necessary?
|
||||||
|| lint.name == invalid_codeblock_attributes_name
|
if lint.name == broken_intra_doc_links || lint.name == invalid_codeblock_attributes_name {
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
None
|
None
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
Some((lint.name_lower(), lint::Allow))
|
Some((lint.name_lower(), lint::Allow))
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user