mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-11-27 17:24:06 +00:00
Auto merge of #119106 - lcnr:decrement-universes, r=BoxyUwU
avoid generalization inside of aliases The basic idea of this PR is that we don't generalize aliases when the instantiation could fail later on, either due to the *occurs check* or because of a universe error. We instead replace the whole alias with an inference variable and emit a nested `AliasRelate` goal. This `AliasRelate` then fully normalizes the alias before equating it with the inference variable, at which point the alias can be treated like any other rigid type. We now treat aliases differently depending on whether they are *rigid* or not. To detect whether an alias is rigid we check whether `NormalizesTo` fails. While we already do so inside of `AliasRelate` anyways, also doing so when instantiating a query response would be both ugly/difficult and likely inefficient. To avoid that I change `instantiate_and_apply_query_response` to relate types completely structurally. This change generally removes a lot of annoying complexity, which is nice. It's implemented by adding a flag to `Equate` to change it to structurally handle aliases. We currently always apply constraints from canonical queries right away. By providing all the necessary information to the canonical query, we can guarantee that instantiating the query response never fails, which further simplifies the implementation. This does add the invariant that *any information which could cause instantiating type variables to fail must also be available inside of the query*. While it's acceptable for canonicalization to result in more ambiguity, we must not cause the solver to incompletely structurally relate aliases by erasing information. This means we have to be careful when merging universes during canonicalization. As we only generalize for type and const variables we have to make sure that anything nameable by such a type or const variable inside of the canonical query is also nameable outside of it. Because of this we both stop merging universes of existential variables when canonicalizing inputs, we put all uniquified regions into a higher universe which is not nameable by any type or const variable. I will look into always replacing aliases with inference variables when generalizing in a later PR unless the alias references bound variables. This should both pretty much fix https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/4. This may allow us to merge the universes of existential variables again by changing generalize to not consider their universe when deciding whether to generalize aliases. This requires some additional non-trivial changes to alias-relate, so I am leaving that as future work. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/79. While it would be nice to decrement universe indices when existing a `forall`, that was surprisingly difficult and not necessary to fix this issue. I am really happy with the approach in this PR think it is the correct way forward to also fix the remaining cases of https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/8.
This commit is contained in:
commit
b8de591b65
@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
|
||||
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
|
||||
use rustc_errors::ErrorGuaranteed;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::{TypeVariableOrigin, TypeVariableOriginKind};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::{NllRegionVariableOrigin, ObligationEmittingRelation};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::NllRegionVariableOrigin;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::{ObligationEmittingRelation, StructurallyRelateAliases};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::{Obligation, PredicateObligations};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::mir::ConstraintCategory;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
|
||||
@ -548,6 +549,10 @@ impl<'bccx, 'tcx> ObligationEmittingRelation<'tcx> for NllTypeRelating<'_, 'bccx
|
||||
self.locations.span(self.type_checker.body)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn structurally_relate_aliases(&self) -> StructurallyRelateAliases {
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::No
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn param_env(&self) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.type_checker.param_env
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ use rustc_hir::Expr;
|
||||
use rustc_hir_analysis::astconv::AstConv;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::{TypeVariableOrigin, TypeVariableOriginKind};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::{Coercion, DefineOpaqueTypes, InferOk, InferResult};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::TraitEngine;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::TraitEngineExt as _;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::{Obligation, PredicateObligation};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::BuiltinImplSource;
|
||||
@ -61,6 +63,7 @@ use rustc_target::spec::abi::Abi;
|
||||
use rustc_trait_selection::infer::InferCtxtExt as _;
|
||||
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::error_reporting::TypeErrCtxtExt as _;
|
||||
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::query::evaluate_obligation::InferCtxtExt;
|
||||
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::TraitEngineExt as _;
|
||||
use rustc_trait_selection::traits::{
|
||||
self, NormalizeExt, ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode, ObligationCtxt,
|
||||
};
|
||||
@ -157,17 +160,19 @@ impl<'f, 'tcx> Coerce<'f, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// In the new solver, lazy norm may allow us to shallowly equate
|
||||
// more types, but we emit possibly impossible-to-satisfy obligations.
|
||||
// Filter these cases out to make sure our coercion is more accurate.
|
||||
if self.next_trait_solver() {
|
||||
if let Ok(res) = &res {
|
||||
for obligation in &res.obligations {
|
||||
if !self.predicate_may_hold(obligation) {
|
||||
return Err(TypeError::Mismatch);
|
||||
}
|
||||
match res {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { value, obligations }) if self.next_trait_solver() => {
|
||||
let mut fulfill_cx = <dyn TraitEngine<'tcx>>::new(self);
|
||||
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(self, obligations);
|
||||
let errs = fulfill_cx.select_where_possible(self);
|
||||
if errs.is_empty() {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { value, obligations: fulfill_cx.pending_obligations() })
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(TypeError::Mismatch)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
res => res,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
res
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -625,19 +630,18 @@ impl<'f, 'tcx> Coerce<'f, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let traits = [coerce_unsized_did, unsize_did];
|
||||
while !queue.is_empty() {
|
||||
let obligation = queue.remove(0);
|
||||
debug!("coerce_unsized resolve step: {:?}", obligation);
|
||||
let trait_pred = match obligation.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
|
||||
Some(ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::Trait(trait_pred)))
|
||||
if traits.contains(&trait_pred.def_id()) =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
trait_pred
|
||||
self.resolve_vars_if_possible(trait_pred)
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
coercion.obligations.push(obligation);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
let trait_pred = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(trait_pred);
|
||||
debug!("coerce_unsized resolve step: {:?}", trait_pred);
|
||||
match selcx.select(&obligation.with(selcx.tcx(), trait_pred)) {
|
||||
// Uncertain or unimplemented.
|
||||
Ok(None) => {
|
||||
|
@ -1516,6 +1516,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// In case there is still ambiguity, the returned type may be an inference
|
||||
/// variable. This is different from `structurally_resolve_type` which errors
|
||||
/// in this case.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, sp), ret)]
|
||||
pub fn try_structurally_resolve_type(&self, sp: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
|
||||
let ty = self.resolve_vars_with_obligations(ty);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -302,7 +302,23 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Trace<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.equate(a_is_expected)
|
||||
.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::No, a_is_expected)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Equates `a` and `b` while structurally relating aliases. This should only
|
||||
/// be used inside of the next generation trait solver when relating rigid aliases.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn eq_structurally_relating_aliases<T>(self, a: T, b: T) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace, a_is_expected } = self;
|
||||
debug_assert!(at.infcx.next_trait_solver());
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, DefineOpaqueTypes::No);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::Yes, a_is_expected)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ use self::region_constraints::{
|
||||
RegionConstraintCollector, RegionConstraintStorage, RegionSnapshot,
|
||||
};
|
||||
pub use self::relate::combine::CombineFields;
|
||||
pub use self::relate::StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
use self::type_variable::{TypeVariableOrigin, TypeVariableOriginKind};
|
||||
|
||||
pub mod at;
|
||||
|
@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ use super::equate::Equate;
|
||||
use super::glb::Glb;
|
||||
use super::lub::Lub;
|
||||
use super::sub::Sub;
|
||||
use super::StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
use crate::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, TypeTrace};
|
||||
use crate::traits::{Obligation, PredicateObligations};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::OriginalQueryValues;
|
||||
@ -116,8 +117,15 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(_, ty::Alias(..)) | (ty::Alias(..), _) if self.next_trait_solver() => {
|
||||
relation.register_type_relate_obligation(a, b);
|
||||
Ok(a)
|
||||
match relation.structurally_relate_aliases() {
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::Yes => {
|
||||
ty::relate::structurally_relate_tys(relation, a, b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::No => {
|
||||
relation.register_type_relate_obligation(a, b);
|
||||
Ok(a)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// All other cases of inference are errors
|
||||
@ -240,19 +248,26 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
(ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(..), _) | (_, ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(..))
|
||||
if self.tcx.features().generic_const_exprs || self.next_trait_solver() =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
let (a, b) = if relation.a_is_expected() { (a, b) } else { (b, a) };
|
||||
match relation.structurally_relate_aliases() {
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::No => {
|
||||
let (a, b) = if relation.a_is_expected() { (a, b) } else { (b, a) };
|
||||
|
||||
relation.register_predicates([if self.next_trait_solver() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(
|
||||
a.into(),
|
||||
b.into(),
|
||||
ty::AliasRelationDirection::Equate,
|
||||
)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::ConstEquate(a, b)
|
||||
}]);
|
||||
relation.register_predicates([if self.next_trait_solver() {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::AliasRelate(
|
||||
a.into(),
|
||||
b.into(),
|
||||
ty::AliasRelationDirection::Equate,
|
||||
)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::ConstEquate(a, b)
|
||||
}]);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(b)
|
||||
Ok(b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::Yes => {
|
||||
ty::relate::structurally_relate_consts(relation, a, b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => ty::relate::structurally_relate_consts(relation, a, b),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -303,8 +318,12 @@ impl<'infcx, 'tcx> CombineFields<'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
self.infcx.tcx
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn equate<'a>(&'a mut self, a_is_expected: bool) -> Equate<'a, 'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
Equate::new(self, a_is_expected)
|
||||
pub fn equate<'a>(
|
||||
&'a mut self,
|
||||
structurally_relate_aliases: StructurallyRelateAliases,
|
||||
a_is_expected: bool,
|
||||
) -> Equate<'a, 'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
Equate::new(self, structurally_relate_aliases, a_is_expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn sub<'a>(&'a mut self, a_is_expected: bool) -> Sub<'a, 'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
@ -335,6 +354,11 @@ pub trait ObligationEmittingRelation<'tcx>: TypeRelation<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
fn param_env(&self) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether aliases should be related structurally. This is pretty much
|
||||
/// always `No` unless you're equating in some specific locations of the
|
||||
/// new solver. See the comments in these use-cases for more details.
|
||||
fn structurally_relate_aliases(&self) -> StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Register obligations that must hold in order for this relation to hold
|
||||
fn register_obligations(&mut self, obligations: PredicateObligations<'tcx>);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
use super::combine::{CombineFields, ObligationEmittingRelation};
|
||||
use super::StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
use crate::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, SubregionOrigin};
|
||||
use crate::traits::PredicateObligations;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -13,15 +14,17 @@ use rustc_span::Span;
|
||||
/// Ensures `a` is made equal to `b`. Returns `a` on success.
|
||||
pub struct Equate<'combine, 'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
fields: &'combine mut CombineFields<'infcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
structurally_relate_aliases: StructurallyRelateAliases,
|
||||
a_is_expected: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'combine, 'infcx, 'tcx> Equate<'combine, 'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn new(
|
||||
fields: &'combine mut CombineFields<'infcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
structurally_relate_aliases: StructurallyRelateAliases,
|
||||
a_is_expected: bool,
|
||||
) -> Equate<'combine, 'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
Equate { fields, a_is_expected }
|
||||
Equate { fields, structurally_relate_aliases, a_is_expected }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -99,7 +102,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeRelation<'tcx> for Equate<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
&ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, ty::AliasTy { def_id: a_def_id, .. }),
|
||||
&ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, ty::AliasTy { def_id: b_def_id, .. }),
|
||||
) if a_def_id == b_def_id => {
|
||||
self.fields.infcx.super_combine_tys(self, a, b)?;
|
||||
infcx.super_combine_tys(self, a, b)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
(&ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, ty::AliasTy { def_id, .. }), _)
|
||||
| (_, &ty::Alias(ty::Opaque, ty::AliasTy { def_id, .. }))
|
||||
@ -120,7 +123,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeRelation<'tcx> for Equate<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
self.fields.infcx.super_combine_tys(self, a, b)?;
|
||||
infcx.super_combine_tys(self, a, b)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -180,6 +183,10 @@ impl<'tcx> ObligationEmittingRelation<'tcx> for Equate<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.trace.span()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn structurally_relate_aliases(&self) -> StructurallyRelateAliases {
|
||||
self.structurally_relate_aliases
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn param_env(&self) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.param_env
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
|
||||
use std::mem;
|
||||
|
||||
use super::StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
use crate::infer::type_variable::{TypeVariableOrigin, TypeVariableOriginKind, TypeVariableValue};
|
||||
use crate::infer::{InferCtxt, ObligationEmittingRelation, RegionVariableOrigin};
|
||||
use rustc_data_structures::sso::SsoHashMap;
|
||||
@ -45,8 +46,14 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
// region/type inference variables.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We then relate `generalized_ty <: source_ty`,adding constraints like `'x: '?2` and `?1 <: ?3`.
|
||||
let Generalization { value_may_be_infer: generalized_ty, has_unconstrained_ty_var } =
|
||||
self.generalize(relation.span(), target_vid, instantiation_variance, source_ty)?;
|
||||
let Generalization { value_may_be_infer: generalized_ty, has_unconstrained_ty_var } = self
|
||||
.generalize(
|
||||
relation.span(),
|
||||
relation.structurally_relate_aliases(),
|
||||
target_vid,
|
||||
instantiation_variance,
|
||||
source_ty,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Constrain `b_vid` to the generalized type `generalized_ty`.
|
||||
if let &ty::Infer(ty::TyVar(generalized_vid)) = generalized_ty.kind() {
|
||||
@ -178,8 +185,14 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
) -> RelateResult<'tcx, ()> {
|
||||
// FIXME(generic_const_exprs): Occurs check failures for unevaluated
|
||||
// constants and generic expressions are not yet handled correctly.
|
||||
let Generalization { value_may_be_infer: generalized_ct, has_unconstrained_ty_var } =
|
||||
self.generalize(relation.span(), target_vid, ty::Variance::Invariant, source_ct)?;
|
||||
let Generalization { value_may_be_infer: generalized_ct, has_unconstrained_ty_var } = self
|
||||
.generalize(
|
||||
relation.span(),
|
||||
relation.structurally_relate_aliases(),
|
||||
target_vid,
|
||||
ty::Variance::Invariant,
|
||||
source_ct,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
debug_assert!(!generalized_ct.is_ct_infer());
|
||||
if has_unconstrained_ty_var {
|
||||
@ -217,6 +230,7 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn generalize<T: Into<Term<'tcx>> + Relate<'tcx>>(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
span: Span,
|
||||
structurally_relate_aliases: StructurallyRelateAliases,
|
||||
target_vid: impl Into<ty::TermVid>,
|
||||
ambient_variance: ty::Variance,
|
||||
source_term: T,
|
||||
@ -237,6 +251,7 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
let mut generalizer = Generalizer {
|
||||
infcx: self,
|
||||
span,
|
||||
structurally_relate_aliases,
|
||||
root_vid,
|
||||
for_universe,
|
||||
ambient_variance,
|
||||
@ -270,6 +285,10 @@ struct Generalizer<'me, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
span: Span,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether aliases should be related structurally. If not, we have to
|
||||
/// be careful when generalizing aliases.
|
||||
structurally_relate_aliases: StructurallyRelateAliases,
|
||||
|
||||
/// The vid of the type variable that is in the process of being
|
||||
/// instantiated. If we find this within the value we are folding,
|
||||
/// that means we would have created a cyclic value.
|
||||
@ -314,13 +333,30 @@ impl<'tcx> Generalizer<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// to normalize the alias after all.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We handle this by lazily equating the alias and generalizing
|
||||
/// it to an inference variable.
|
||||
/// it to an inference variable. In the new solver, we always
|
||||
/// generalize to an infer var unless the alias contains escaping
|
||||
/// bound variables.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is incomplete and will hopefully soon get fixed by #119106.
|
||||
/// Correctly handling aliases with escaping bound variables is
|
||||
/// difficult and currently incomplete in two opposite ways:
|
||||
/// - if we get an occurs check failure in the alias, replace it with a new infer var.
|
||||
/// This causes us to later emit an alias-relate goal and is incomplete in case the
|
||||
/// alias normalizes to type containing one of the bound variables.
|
||||
/// - if the alias contains an inference variable not nameable by `for_universe`, we
|
||||
/// continue generalizing the alias. This ends up pulling down the universe of the
|
||||
/// inference variable and is incomplete in case the alias would normalize to a type
|
||||
/// which does not mention that inference variable.
|
||||
fn generalize_alias_ty(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
alias: ty::AliasTy<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Result<Ty<'tcx>, TypeError<'tcx>> {
|
||||
if self.infcx.next_trait_solver() && !alias.has_escaping_bound_vars() {
|
||||
return Ok(self.infcx.next_ty_var_in_universe(
|
||||
TypeVariableOrigin { kind: TypeVariableOriginKind::MiscVariable, span: self.span },
|
||||
self.for_universe,
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let is_nested_alias = mem::replace(&mut self.in_alias, true);
|
||||
let result = match self.relate(alias, alias) {
|
||||
Ok(alias) => Ok(alias.to_ty(self.tcx())),
|
||||
@ -490,7 +526,10 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeRelation<'tcx> for Generalizer<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ty::Alias(_, data) => self.generalize_alias_ty(data),
|
||||
ty::Alias(_, data) => match self.structurally_relate_aliases {
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::No => self.generalize_alias_ty(data),
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::Yes => relate::structurally_relate_tys(self, t, t),
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
_ => relate::structurally_relate_tys(self, t, t),
|
||||
}?;
|
||||
|
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ use rustc_span::Span;
|
||||
|
||||
use super::combine::{CombineFields, ObligationEmittingRelation};
|
||||
use super::lattice::{self, LatticeDir};
|
||||
use super::StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
use crate::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, SubregionOrigin};
|
||||
use crate::traits::{ObligationCause, PredicateObligations};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -45,7 +46,9 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeRelation<'tcx> for Glb<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
b: T,
|
||||
) -> RelateResult<'tcx, T> {
|
||||
match variance {
|
||||
ty::Invariant => self.fields.equate(self.a_is_expected).relate(a, b),
|
||||
ty::Invariant => {
|
||||
self.fields.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::No, self.a_is_expected).relate(a, b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::Covariant => self.relate(a, b),
|
||||
// FIXME(#41044) -- not correct, need test
|
||||
ty::Bivariant => Ok(a),
|
||||
@ -139,6 +142,10 @@ impl<'tcx> ObligationEmittingRelation<'tcx> for Glb<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.trace.span()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn structurally_relate_aliases(&self) -> StructurallyRelateAliases {
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::No
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn param_env(&self) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.param_env
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
use super::combine::{CombineFields, ObligationEmittingRelation};
|
||||
use super::lattice::{self, LatticeDir};
|
||||
use super::StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
use crate::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, SubregionOrigin};
|
||||
use crate::traits::{ObligationCause, PredicateObligations};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -45,7 +46,9 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeRelation<'tcx> for Lub<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
b: T,
|
||||
) -> RelateResult<'tcx, T> {
|
||||
match variance {
|
||||
ty::Invariant => self.fields.equate(self.a_is_expected).relate(a, b),
|
||||
ty::Invariant => {
|
||||
self.fields.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::No, self.a_is_expected).relate(a, b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::Covariant => self.relate(a, b),
|
||||
// FIXME(#41044) -- not correct, need test
|
||||
ty::Bivariant => Ok(a),
|
||||
@ -139,6 +142,10 @@ impl<'tcx> ObligationEmittingRelation<'tcx> for Lub<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.trace.span()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn structurally_relate_aliases(&self) -> StructurallyRelateAliases {
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::No
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn param_env(&self) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.param_env
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -9,3 +9,15 @@ mod higher_ranked;
|
||||
mod lattice;
|
||||
mod lub;
|
||||
mod sub;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether aliases should be related structurally or not. Used
|
||||
/// to adjust the behavior of generalization and combine.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This should always be `No` unless in a few special-cases when
|
||||
/// instantiating canonical responses and in the new solver. Each
|
||||
/// such case should have a comment explaining why it is used.
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone)]
|
||||
pub enum StructurallyRelateAliases {
|
||||
Yes,
|
||||
No,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
use super::combine::CombineFields;
|
||||
use super::StructurallyRelateAliases;
|
||||
use crate::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, ObligationEmittingRelation, SubregionOrigin};
|
||||
use crate::traits::{Obligation, PredicateObligations};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -64,7 +65,9 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeRelation<'tcx> for Sub<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
b: T,
|
||||
) -> RelateResult<'tcx, T> {
|
||||
match variance {
|
||||
ty::Invariant => self.fields.equate(self.a_is_expected).relate(a, b),
|
||||
ty::Invariant => {
|
||||
self.fields.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::No, self.a_is_expected).relate(a, b)
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::Covariant => self.relate(a, b),
|
||||
ty::Bivariant => Ok(a),
|
||||
ty::Contravariant => self.with_expected_switched(|this| this.relate(b, a)),
|
||||
@ -204,6 +207,10 @@ impl<'tcx> ObligationEmittingRelation<'tcx> for Sub<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.trace.span()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn structurally_relate_aliases(&self) -> StructurallyRelateAliases {
|
||||
StructurallyRelateAliases::No
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn param_env(&self) -> ty::ParamEnv<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.fields.param_env
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ pub struct GoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub uncanonicalized_goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: GoalEvaluationKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
pub evaluation: CanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx>,
|
||||
/// The nested goals from instantiating the query response.
|
||||
pub returned_goals: Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq)]
|
||||
|
@ -48,20 +48,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ProofTreeFormatter<'a, 'b> {
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "{}: {:?}", goal_text, eval.uncanonicalized_goal)?;
|
||||
self.nested(|this| this.format_canonical_goal_evaluation(&eval.evaluation))?;
|
||||
if eval.returned_goals.len() > 0 {
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "NESTED GOALS ADDED TO CALLER: [")?;
|
||||
self.nested(|this| {
|
||||
for goal in eval.returned_goals.iter() {
|
||||
writeln!(this.f, "ADDED GOAL: {goal:?},")?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
})?;
|
||||
|
||||
writeln!(self.f, "]")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.nested(|this| this.format_canonical_goal_evaluation(&eval.evaluation))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn format_canonical_goal_evaluation(
|
||||
|
@ -108,21 +108,22 @@ impl<'a, Infcx: InferCtxtLike<Interner = I>, I: Interner> Canonicalizer<'a, Infc
|
||||
// universes `n`, this algorithm compresses them in place so that:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// - the new universe indices are as small as possible
|
||||
// - we only create a new universe if we would otherwise put a placeholder in
|
||||
// the same compressed universe as an existential which cannot name it
|
||||
// - we create a new universe if we would otherwise
|
||||
// 1. put existentials from a different universe into the same one
|
||||
// 2. put a placeholder in the same universe as an existential which cannot name it
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Let's walk through an example:
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E5, U2, E2, E6, U6], curr_compressed_uv: 0, next_orig_uv: 0
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E5, U2, E2, E6, U6], curr_compressed_uv: 0, next_orig_uv: 1
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E5, U2, E2, E6, U6], curr_compressed_uv: 1, next_orig_uv: 2
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E5, U1, E1, E6, U6], curr_compressed_uv: 1, next_orig_uv: 5
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E1, U1, E1, E6, U6], curr_compressed_uv: 1, next_orig_uv: 6
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E1, U1, E1, E2, U2], curr_compressed_uv: 2, next_orig_uv: -
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E2, U1, E1, E6, U6], curr_compressed_uv: 2, next_orig_uv: 6
|
||||
// - var_infos: [E0, U1, E1, U1, E1, E3, U3], curr_compressed_uv: 2, next_orig_uv: -
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This algorithm runs in `O(n²)` where `n` is the number of different universe
|
||||
// indices in the input. This should be fine as `n` is expected to be small.
|
||||
let mut curr_compressed_uv = ty::UniverseIndex::ROOT;
|
||||
let mut existential_in_new_uv = false;
|
||||
let mut existential_in_new_uv = None;
|
||||
let mut next_orig_uv = Some(ty::UniverseIndex::ROOT);
|
||||
while let Some(orig_uv) = next_orig_uv.take() {
|
||||
let mut update_uv = |var: &mut CanonicalVarInfo<I>, orig_uv, is_existential| {
|
||||
@ -131,14 +132,29 @@ impl<'a, Infcx: InferCtxtLike<Interner = I>, I: Interner> Canonicalizer<'a, Infc
|
||||
Ordering::Less => (), // Already updated
|
||||
Ordering::Equal => {
|
||||
if is_existential {
|
||||
existential_in_new_uv = true;
|
||||
} else if existential_in_new_uv {
|
||||
if existential_in_new_uv.is_some_and(|uv| uv < orig_uv) {
|
||||
// Condition 1.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We already put an existential from a outer universe
|
||||
// into the current compressed universe, so we need to
|
||||
// create a new one.
|
||||
curr_compressed_uv = curr_compressed_uv.next_universe();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// `curr_compressed_uv` will now contain an existential from
|
||||
// `orig_uv`. Trying to canonicalizing an existential from
|
||||
// a higher universe has to therefore use a new compressed
|
||||
// universe.
|
||||
existential_in_new_uv = Some(orig_uv);
|
||||
} else if existential_in_new_uv.is_some() {
|
||||
// Condition 2.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// `var` is a placeholder from a universe which is not nameable
|
||||
// by an existential which we already put into the compressed
|
||||
// universe `curr_compressed_uv`. We therefore have to create a
|
||||
// new universe for `var`.
|
||||
curr_compressed_uv = curr_compressed_uv.next_universe();
|
||||
existential_in_new_uv = false;
|
||||
existential_in_new_uv = None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
*var = var.with_updated_universe(curr_compressed_uv);
|
||||
@ -174,8 +190,14 @@ impl<'a, Infcx: InferCtxtLike<Interner = I>, I: Interner> Canonicalizer<'a, Infc
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We uniquify regions and always put them into their own universe
|
||||
let mut first_region = true;
|
||||
for var in var_infos.iter_mut() {
|
||||
if var.is_region() {
|
||||
if first_region {
|
||||
first_region = false;
|
||||
curr_compressed_uv = curr_compressed_uv.next_universe();
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(var.is_existential());
|
||||
*var = var.with_updated_universe(curr_compressed_uv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -8,8 +8,9 @@
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! (1.) If we end up with two rigid aliases, then we relate them structurally.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! (2.) If we end up with an infer var and a rigid alias, then
|
||||
//! we assign the alias to the infer var.
|
||||
//! (2.) If we end up with an infer var and a rigid alias, then we instantiate
|
||||
//! the infer var with the constructor of the alias and then recursively relate
|
||||
//! the terms.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! (3.) Otherwise, if we end with two rigid (non-projection) or infer types,
|
||||
//! relate them structurally.
|
||||
@ -53,22 +54,15 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(Some(_), None) => {
|
||||
if rhs.is_infer() {
|
||||
self.relate(param_env, lhs, variance, rhs)?;
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(NoSolution)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
(None, Some(_)) => {
|
||||
if lhs.is_infer() {
|
||||
self.relate(param_env, lhs, variance, rhs)?;
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(NoSolution)
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Some(alias), None) => {
|
||||
self.relate_rigid_alias_non_alias(param_env, alias, variance, rhs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
(None, Some(alias)) => self.relate_rigid_alias_non_alias(
|
||||
param_env,
|
||||
alias,
|
||||
variance.xform(ty::Variance::Contravariant),
|
||||
lhs,
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
(Some(alias_lhs), Some(alias_rhs)) => {
|
||||
self.relate(param_env, alias_lhs, variance, alias_rhs)?;
|
||||
@ -77,6 +71,39 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Relate a rigid alias with another type. This is the same as
|
||||
/// an ordinary relate except that we treat the outer most alias
|
||||
/// constructor as rigid.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, param_env), ret)]
|
||||
fn relate_rigid_alias_non_alias(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
alias: ty::AliasTy<'tcx>,
|
||||
variance: ty::Variance,
|
||||
term: ty::Term<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
// NOTE: this check is purely an optimization, the structural eq would
|
||||
// always fail if the term is not an inference variable.
|
||||
if term.is_infer() {
|
||||
let tcx = self.tcx();
|
||||
// We need to relate `alias` to `term` treating only the outermost
|
||||
// constructor as rigid, relating any contained generic arguments as
|
||||
// normal. We do this by first structurally equating the `term`
|
||||
// with the alias constructor instantiated with unconstrained infer vars,
|
||||
// and then relate this with the whole `alias`.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Alternatively we could modify `Equate` for this case by adding another
|
||||
// variant to `StructurallyRelateAliases`.
|
||||
let identity_args = self.fresh_args_for_item(alias.def_id);
|
||||
let rigid_ctor = ty::AliasTy::new(tcx, alias.def_id, identity_args);
|
||||
self.eq_structurally_relating_aliases(param_env, term, rigid_ctor.to_ty(tcx).into())?;
|
||||
self.eq(param_env, alias, rigid_ctor)?;
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(NoSolution)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: This needs a name that reflects that it's okay to bottom-out with an inference var.
|
||||
/// Normalize the `term` to equate it later.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, param_env), ret)]
|
||||
@ -105,6 +132,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, param_env), ret)]
|
||||
fn try_normalize_ty_recur(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
@ -128,10 +156,9 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
);
|
||||
this.add_goal(GoalSource::Misc, normalizes_to_goal);
|
||||
this.try_evaluate_added_goals()?;
|
||||
let ty = this.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_ty);
|
||||
Ok(this.try_normalize_ty_recur(param_env, depth + 1, ty))
|
||||
Ok(this.resolve_vars_if_possible(normalized_ty))
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
Ok(ty) => ty,
|
||||
Ok(ty) => self.try_normalize_ty_recur(param_env, depth + 1, ty),
|
||||
Err(NoSolution) => Some(ty),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -777,6 +777,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// FIXME(@lcnr): The current structure here makes me unhappy and feels ugly. idk how
|
||||
// to improve this however. However, this should make it fairly straightforward to refine
|
||||
// the filtering going forward, so it seems alright-ish for now.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, goal))]
|
||||
fn discard_impls_shadowed_by_env<G: GoalKind<'tcx>>(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, G>,
|
||||
@ -799,7 +800,10 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// This feels dangerous.
|
||||
Certainty::Yes => {
|
||||
candidates.retain(|c| match c.source {
|
||||
CandidateSource::Impl(_) | CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(_) => false,
|
||||
CandidateSource::Impl(_) | CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(_) => {
|
||||
debug!(?c, "discard impl candidate");
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
CandidateSource::ParamEnv(_) | CandidateSource::AliasBound => true,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -807,6 +811,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// to be ambig and wait for inference constraints. See
|
||||
// tests/ui/traits/next-solver/env-shadows-impls/ambig-env-no-shadow.rs
|
||||
Certainty::Maybe(cause) => {
|
||||
debug!(?cause, "force ambiguity");
|
||||
*candidates = self.forced_ambiguity(cause);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::query_response::make_query_region_constraints
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::CanonicalVarValues;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::{CanonicalExt, QueryRegionConstraints};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::resolve::EagerResolver;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::{DefineOpaqueTypes, InferCtxt, InferOk};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::{InferCtxt, InferOk};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::infer::canonical::Canonical;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{
|
||||
@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// the values inferred while solving the instantiated goal.
|
||||
/// - `external_constraints`: additional constraints which aren't expressible
|
||||
/// using simple unification of inference variables.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self), ret)]
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) fn evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
certainty: Certainty,
|
||||
@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
original_values: Vec<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>,
|
||||
response: CanonicalResponse<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(Certainty, Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>), NoSolution> {
|
||||
) -> Certainty {
|
||||
let instantiation = Self::compute_query_response_instantiation_values(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
&original_values,
|
||||
@ -201,15 +201,13 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let Response { var_values, external_constraints, certainty } =
|
||||
response.instantiate(self.tcx(), &instantiation);
|
||||
|
||||
let nested_goals =
|
||||
Self::unify_query_var_values(self.infcx, param_env, &original_values, var_values)?;
|
||||
Self::unify_query_var_values(self.infcx, param_env, &original_values, var_values);
|
||||
|
||||
let ExternalConstraintsData { region_constraints, opaque_types } =
|
||||
external_constraints.deref();
|
||||
self.register_region_constraints(region_constraints);
|
||||
self.register_opaque_types(param_env, opaque_types)?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok((certainty, nested_goals))
|
||||
self.register_new_opaque_types(param_env, opaque_types);
|
||||
certainty
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// This returns the canoncial variable values to instantiate the bound variables of
|
||||
@ -296,32 +294,36 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
CanonicalVarValues { var_values }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(infcx, param_env), ret)]
|
||||
/// Unify the `original_values` with the `var_values` returned by the canonical query..
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This assumes that this unification will always succeed. This is the case when
|
||||
/// applying a query response right away. However, calling a canonical query, doing any
|
||||
/// other kind of trait solving, and only then instantiating the result of the query
|
||||
/// can cause the instantiation to fail. This is not supported and we ICE in this case.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We always structurally instantiate aliases. Relating aliases needs to be different
|
||||
/// depending on whether the alias is *rigid* or not. We're only really able to tell
|
||||
/// whether an alias is rigid by using the trait solver. When instantiating a response
|
||||
/// from the solver we assume that the solver correctly handled aliases and therefore
|
||||
/// always relate them structurally here.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(infcx), ret)]
|
||||
fn unify_query_var_values(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
original_values: &[ty::GenericArg<'tcx>],
|
||||
var_values: CanonicalVarValues<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Result<Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>, NoSolution> {
|
||||
) {
|
||||
assert_eq!(original_values.len(), var_values.len());
|
||||
|
||||
let mut nested_goals = vec![];
|
||||
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
|
||||
for (&orig, response) in iter::zip(original_values, var_values.var_values) {
|
||||
nested_goals.extend(
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
|
||||
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, orig, response)
|
||||
.map(|InferOk { value: (), obligations }| {
|
||||
obligations.into_iter().map(|o| Goal::from(o))
|
||||
})
|
||||
.map_err(|e| {
|
||||
debug!(?e, "failed to equate");
|
||||
NoSolution
|
||||
})?,
|
||||
);
|
||||
let InferOk { value: (), obligations } = infcx
|
||||
.at(&cause, param_env)
|
||||
.trace(orig, response)
|
||||
.eq_structurally_relating_aliases(orig, response)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(nested_goals)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn register_region_constraints(&mut self, region_constraints: &QueryRegionConstraints<'tcx>) {
|
||||
@ -333,21 +335,17 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for member_constraint in ®ion_constraints.member_constraints {
|
||||
// FIXME: Deal with member constraints :<
|
||||
let _ = member_constraint;
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert!(region_constraints.member_constraints.is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn register_opaque_types(
|
||||
fn register_new_opaque_types(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
opaque_types: &[(ty::OpaqueTypeKey<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)],
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
|
||||
) {
|
||||
for &(key, ty) in opaque_types {
|
||||
self.insert_hidden_type(key, param_env, ty)?;
|
||||
self.insert_hidden_type(key, param_env, ty).unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -366,19 +364,21 @@ impl<'tcx> inspect::ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Instantiate a `CanonicalState`. This assumes that unifying the var values
|
||||
/// trivially succeeds. Adding any inference constraints which weren't present when
|
||||
/// originally computing the canonical query can result in bugs.
|
||||
pub fn instantiate_canonical_state<T: TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
original_values: &[ty::GenericArg<'tcx>],
|
||||
state: inspect::CanonicalState<'tcx, T>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>, T), NoSolution> {
|
||||
) -> T {
|
||||
let instantiation =
|
||||
EvalCtxt::compute_query_response_instantiation_values(infcx, original_values, &state);
|
||||
|
||||
let inspect::State { var_values, data } = state.instantiate(infcx.tcx, &instantiation);
|
||||
|
||||
let nested_goals =
|
||||
EvalCtxt::unify_query_var_values(infcx, param_env, original_values, var_values)?;
|
||||
Ok((nested_goals, data))
|
||||
EvalCtxt::unify_query_var_values(infcx, param_env, original_values, var_values);
|
||||
data
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::{specialization_graph, DefiningAnchor};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{
|
||||
self, OpaqueTypeKey, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeSuperVisitable, TypeVisitable,
|
||||
TypeVisitableExt, TypeVisitor,
|
||||
self, InferCtxtLike, OpaqueTypeKey, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeSuperVisitable,
|
||||
TypeVisitable, TypeVisitableExt, TypeVisitor,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_session::config::DumpSolverProofTree;
|
||||
use rustc_span::DUMMY_SP;
|
||||
@ -142,10 +142,7 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
generate_proof_tree: GenerateProofTree,
|
||||
) -> (
|
||||
Result<(bool, Certainty, Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>), NoSolution>,
|
||||
Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
) -> (Result<(bool, Certainty), NoSolution>, Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<'tcx>>) {
|
||||
EvalCtxt::enter_root(self, generate_proof_tree, |ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_goal(GoalEvaluationKind::Root, GoalSource::Misc, goal)
|
||||
})
|
||||
@ -327,7 +324,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
goal_evaluation_kind: GoalEvaluationKind,
|
||||
source: GoalSource,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(bool, Certainty, Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>), NoSolution> {
|
||||
) -> Result<(bool, Certainty), NoSolution> {
|
||||
let (orig_values, canonical_goal) = self.canonicalize_goal(goal);
|
||||
let mut goal_evaluation =
|
||||
self.inspect.new_goal_evaluation(goal, &orig_values, goal_evaluation_kind);
|
||||
@ -345,26 +342,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
Ok(response) => response,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let (certainty, has_changed, nested_goals) = match self
|
||||
.instantiate_response_discarding_overflow(
|
||||
goal.param_env,
|
||||
source,
|
||||
orig_values,
|
||||
canonical_response,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
Err(e) => {
|
||||
self.inspect.goal_evaluation(goal_evaluation);
|
||||
return Err(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(response) => response,
|
||||
};
|
||||
goal_evaluation.returned_goals(&nested_goals);
|
||||
let (certainty, has_changed) = self.instantiate_response_discarding_overflow(
|
||||
goal.param_env,
|
||||
source,
|
||||
orig_values,
|
||||
canonical_response,
|
||||
);
|
||||
self.inspect.goal_evaluation(goal_evaluation);
|
||||
|
||||
if !has_changed && !nested_goals.is_empty() {
|
||||
bug!("an unchanged goal shouldn't have any side-effects on instantiation");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME: We previously had an assert here that checked that recomputing
|
||||
// a goal after applying its constraints did not change its response.
|
||||
//
|
||||
@ -375,7 +359,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// Once we have decided on how to handle trait-system-refactor-initiative#75,
|
||||
// we should re-add an assert here.
|
||||
|
||||
Ok((has_changed, certainty, nested_goals))
|
||||
Ok((has_changed, certainty))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn instantiate_response_discarding_overflow(
|
||||
@ -384,7 +368,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
source: GoalSource,
|
||||
original_values: Vec<ty::GenericArg<'tcx>>,
|
||||
response: CanonicalResponse<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(Certainty, bool, Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>), NoSolution> {
|
||||
) -> (Certainty, bool) {
|
||||
// The old solver did not evaluate nested goals when normalizing.
|
||||
// It returned the selection constraints allowing a `Projection`
|
||||
// obligation to not hold in coherence while avoiding the fatal error
|
||||
@ -405,14 +389,14 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if response.value.certainty == Certainty::OVERFLOW && !keep_overflow_constraints() {
|
||||
Ok((Certainty::OVERFLOW, false, Vec::new()))
|
||||
(Certainty::OVERFLOW, false)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let has_changed = !response.value.var_values.is_identity_modulo_regions()
|
||||
|| !response.value.external_constraints.opaque_types.is_empty();
|
||||
|
||||
let (certainty, nested_goals) =
|
||||
self.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(param_env, original_values, response)?;
|
||||
Ok((certainty, has_changed, nested_goals))
|
||||
let certainty =
|
||||
self.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(param_env, original_values, response);
|
||||
(certainty, has_changed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -537,12 +521,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
ty::NormalizesTo { alias: goal.predicate.alias, term: unconstrained_rhs },
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let (_, certainty, instantiate_goals) = self.evaluate_goal(
|
||||
let (_, certainty) = self.evaluate_goal(
|
||||
GoalEvaluationKind::Nested { is_normalizes_to_hack: IsNormalizesToHack::Yes },
|
||||
GoalSource::Misc,
|
||||
unconstrained_goal,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
self.nested_goals.goals.extend(with_misc_source(instantiate_goals));
|
||||
|
||||
// Finally, equate the goal's RHS with the unconstrained var.
|
||||
// We put the nested goals from this into goals instead of
|
||||
@ -573,12 +556,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (source, goal) in goals.goals.drain(..) {
|
||||
let (has_changed, certainty, instantiate_goals) = self.evaluate_goal(
|
||||
let (has_changed, certainty) = self.evaluate_goal(
|
||||
GoalEvaluationKind::Nested { is_normalizes_to_hack: IsNormalizesToHack::No },
|
||||
source,
|
||||
goal,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
self.nested_goals.goals.extend(with_misc_source(instantiate_goals));
|
||||
if has_changed {
|
||||
unchanged_certainty = None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -626,76 +608,101 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Is the projection predicate is of the form `exists<T> <Ty as Trait>::Assoc = T`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is the case if the `term` is an inference variable in the innermost universe
|
||||
/// and does not occur in any other part of the predicate.
|
||||
/// This is the case if the `term` does not occur in any other part of the predicate
|
||||
/// and is able to name all other placeholder and inference variables.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self), ret)]
|
||||
pub(super) fn term_is_fully_unconstrained(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::NormalizesTo<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let term_is_infer = match goal.predicate.term.unpack() {
|
||||
let universe_of_term = match goal.predicate.term.unpack() {
|
||||
ty::TermKind::Ty(ty) => {
|
||||
if let &ty::Infer(ty::TyVar(vid)) = ty.kind() {
|
||||
match self.infcx.probe_ty_var(vid) {
|
||||
Ok(value) => bug!("resolved var in query: {goal:?} {value:?}"),
|
||||
Err(universe) => universe == self.infcx.universe(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.infcx.universe_of_ty(vid).unwrap()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
false
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::TermKind::Const(ct) => {
|
||||
if let ty::ConstKind::Infer(ty::InferConst::Var(vid)) = ct.kind() {
|
||||
match self.infcx.probe_const_var(vid) {
|
||||
Ok(value) => bug!("resolved var in query: {goal:?} {value:?}"),
|
||||
Err(universe) => universe == self.infcx.universe(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.infcx.universe_of_ct(vid).unwrap()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
false
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Guard against `<T as Trait<?0>>::Assoc = ?0>`.
|
||||
struct ContainsTerm<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
struct ContainsTermOrNotNameable<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
term: ty::Term<'tcx>,
|
||||
universe_of_term: ty::UniverseIndex,
|
||||
infcx: &'a InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
impl<'tcx> TypeVisitor<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ContainsTerm<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> ContainsTermOrNotNameable<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
fn check_nameable(&self, universe: ty::UniverseIndex) -> ControlFlow<()> {
|
||||
if self.universe_of_term.can_name(universe) {
|
||||
ControlFlow::Continue(())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ControlFlow::Break(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> TypeVisitor<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ContainsTermOrNotNameable<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
type BreakTy = ();
|
||||
fn visit_ty(&mut self, t: Ty<'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
|
||||
if let Some(vid) = t.ty_vid()
|
||||
&& let ty::TermKind::Ty(term) = self.term.unpack()
|
||||
&& let Some(term_vid) = term.ty_vid()
|
||||
&& self.infcx.root_var(vid) == self.infcx.root_var(term_vid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ControlFlow::Break(())
|
||||
} else if t.has_non_region_infer() {
|
||||
t.super_visit_with(self)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ControlFlow::Continue(())
|
||||
match *t.kind() {
|
||||
ty::Infer(ty::TyVar(vid)) => {
|
||||
if let ty::TermKind::Ty(term) = self.term.unpack()
|
||||
&& let Some(term_vid) = term.ty_vid()
|
||||
&& self.infcx.root_var(vid) == self.infcx.root_var(term_vid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ControlFlow::Break(())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
self.check_nameable(self.infcx.universe_of_ty(vid).unwrap())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::Placeholder(p) => self.check_nameable(p.universe),
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
if t.has_non_region_infer() || t.has_placeholders() {
|
||||
t.super_visit_with(self)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ControlFlow::Continue(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn visit_const(&mut self, c: ty::Const<'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
|
||||
if let ty::ConstKind::Infer(ty::InferConst::Var(vid)) = c.kind()
|
||||
&& let ty::TermKind::Const(term) = self.term.unpack()
|
||||
&& let ty::ConstKind::Infer(ty::InferConst::Var(term_vid)) = term.kind()
|
||||
&& self.infcx.root_const_var(vid) == self.infcx.root_const_var(term_vid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ControlFlow::Break(())
|
||||
} else if c.has_non_region_infer() {
|
||||
c.super_visit_with(self)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ControlFlow::Continue(())
|
||||
match c.kind() {
|
||||
ty::ConstKind::Infer(ty::InferConst::Var(vid)) => {
|
||||
if let ty::TermKind::Const(term) = self.term.unpack()
|
||||
&& let ty::ConstKind::Infer(ty::InferConst::Var(term_vid)) = term.kind()
|
||||
&& self.infcx.root_const_var(vid) == self.infcx.root_const_var(term_vid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ControlFlow::Break(())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
self.check_nameable(self.infcx.universe_of_ct(vid).unwrap())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ConstKind::Placeholder(p) => self.check_nameable(p.universe),
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
if c.has_non_region_infer() || c.has_placeholders() {
|
||||
c.super_visit_with(self)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ControlFlow::Continue(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut visitor = ContainsTerm { infcx: self.infcx, term: goal.predicate.term };
|
||||
|
||||
term_is_infer
|
||||
&& goal.predicate.alias.visit_with(&mut visitor).is_continue()
|
||||
let mut visitor = ContainsTermOrNotNameable {
|
||||
infcx: self.infcx,
|
||||
universe_of_term,
|
||||
term: goal.predicate.term,
|
||||
};
|
||||
goal.predicate.alias.visit_with(&mut visitor).is_continue()
|
||||
&& goal.param_env.visit_with(&mut visitor).is_continue()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -718,6 +725,26 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// This sohuld only be used when we're either instantiating a previously
|
||||
/// unconstrained "return value" or when we're sure that all aliases in
|
||||
/// the types are rigid.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, param_env), ret)]
|
||||
pub(super) fn eq_structurally_relating_aliases<T: ToTrace<'tcx>>(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
lhs: T,
|
||||
rhs: T,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
|
||||
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
|
||||
let InferOk { value: (), obligations } = self
|
||||
.infcx
|
||||
.at(&cause, param_env)
|
||||
.trace(lhs, rhs)
|
||||
.eq_structurally_relating_aliases(lhs, rhs)?;
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, param_env), ret)]
|
||||
pub(super) fn sub<T: ToTrace<'tcx>>(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
|
@ -58,44 +58,26 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let candidate = candidates.pop().unwrap();
|
||||
let (certainty, nested_goals) = ecx
|
||||
.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(
|
||||
trait_goal.param_env,
|
||||
orig_values,
|
||||
candidate.result,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| SelectionError::Unimplemented)?;
|
||||
let certainty = ecx.instantiate_and_apply_query_response(
|
||||
trait_goal.param_env,
|
||||
orig_values,
|
||||
candidate.result,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(Some((candidate, certainty, nested_goals)))
|
||||
Ok(Some((candidate, certainty)))
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
let (candidate, certainty, nested_goals) = match result {
|
||||
Ok(Some((candidate, certainty, nested_goals))) => {
|
||||
(candidate, certainty, nested_goals)
|
||||
}
|
||||
let (candidate, certainty) = match result {
|
||||
Ok(Some(result)) => result,
|
||||
Ok(None) => return Ok(None),
|
||||
Err(e) => return Err(e),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let nested_obligations: Vec<_> = nested_goals
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|goal| {
|
||||
Obligation::new(
|
||||
self.tcx,
|
||||
ObligationCause::dummy(),
|
||||
goal.param_env,
|
||||
goal.predicate,
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
let goal = self.resolve_vars_if_possible(trait_goal);
|
||||
match (certainty, candidate.source) {
|
||||
// Rematching the implementation will instantiate the same nested goals that
|
||||
// would have caused the ambiguity, so we can still make progress here regardless.
|
||||
(_, CandidateSource::Impl(def_id)) => {
|
||||
rematch_impl(self, goal, def_id, nested_obligations)
|
||||
}
|
||||
(_, CandidateSource::Impl(def_id)) => rematch_impl(self, goal, def_id),
|
||||
|
||||
// If an unsize goal is ambiguous, then we can manually rematch it to make
|
||||
// selection progress for coercion during HIR typeck. If it is *not* ambiguous,
|
||||
@ -108,20 +90,20 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
| (Certainty::Yes, CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(src @ BuiltinImplSource::Misc))
|
||||
if self.tcx.lang_items().unsize_trait() == Some(goal.predicate.def_id()) =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
rematch_unsize(self, goal, nested_obligations, src, certainty)
|
||||
rematch_unsize(self, goal, src, certainty)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Technically some builtin impls have nested obligations, but if
|
||||
// `Certainty::Yes`, then they should've all been verified and don't
|
||||
// need re-checking.
|
||||
(Certainty::Yes, CandidateSource::BuiltinImpl(src)) => {
|
||||
Ok(Some(ImplSource::Builtin(src, nested_obligations)))
|
||||
Ok(Some(ImplSource::Builtin(src, vec![])))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// It's fine not to do anything to rematch these, since there are no
|
||||
// nested obligations.
|
||||
(Certainty::Yes, CandidateSource::ParamEnv(_) | CandidateSource::AliasBound) => {
|
||||
Ok(Some(ImplSource::Param(nested_obligations)))
|
||||
Ok(Some(ImplSource::Param(vec![])))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(Certainty::Maybe(_), _) => Ok(None),
|
||||
@ -192,19 +174,16 @@ fn rematch_impl<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::TraitPredicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
impl_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
mut nested: Vec<PredicateObligation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> SelectionResult<'tcx, Selection<'tcx>> {
|
||||
let args = infcx.fresh_args_for_item(DUMMY_SP, impl_def_id);
|
||||
let impl_trait_ref =
|
||||
infcx.tcx.impl_trait_ref(impl_def_id).unwrap().instantiate(infcx.tcx, args);
|
||||
|
||||
nested.extend(
|
||||
infcx
|
||||
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
|
||||
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| SelectionError::Unimplemented)?
|
||||
.into_obligations(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
let mut nested = infcx
|
||||
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), goal.param_env)
|
||||
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::No, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)
|
||||
.map_err(|_| SelectionError::Unimplemented)?
|
||||
.into_obligations();
|
||||
|
||||
nested.extend(
|
||||
infcx.tcx.predicates_of(impl_def_id).instantiate(infcx.tcx, args).into_iter().map(
|
||||
@ -221,11 +200,11 @@ fn rematch_impl<'tcx>(
|
||||
fn rematch_unsize<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::TraitPredicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
mut nested: Vec<PredicateObligation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
source: BuiltinImplSource,
|
||||
certainty: Certainty,
|
||||
) -> SelectionResult<'tcx, Selection<'tcx>> {
|
||||
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
||||
let mut nested = vec![];
|
||||
let a_ty = structurally_normalize(goal.predicate.self_ty(), infcx, goal.param_env, &mut nested);
|
||||
let b_ty = structurally_normalize(
|
||||
goal.predicate.trait_ref.args.type_at(1),
|
||||
|
@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ use std::mem;
|
||||
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::solve::MaybeCause;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::Obligation;
|
||||
use rustc_infer::traits::{
|
||||
query::NoSolution, FulfillmentError, FulfillmentErrorCode, MismatchedProjectionTypes,
|
||||
PredicateObligation, SelectionError, TraitEngine,
|
||||
@ -11,7 +10,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
|
||||
|
||||
use super::eval_ctxt::GenerateProofTree;
|
||||
use super::{Certainty, Goal, InferCtxtEvalExt};
|
||||
use super::{Certainty, InferCtxtEvalExt};
|
||||
|
||||
/// A trait engine using the new trait solver.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@ -48,11 +47,11 @@ impl<'tcx> FulfillmentCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
obligation: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
|
||||
result: &Result<(bool, Certainty, Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>), NoSolution>,
|
||||
result: &Result<(bool, Certainty), NoSolution>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if let Some(inspector) = infcx.obligation_inspector.get() {
|
||||
let result = match result {
|
||||
Ok((_, c, _)) => Ok(*c),
|
||||
Ok((_, c)) => Ok(*c),
|
||||
Err(NoSolution) => Err(NoSolution),
|
||||
};
|
||||
(inspector)(infcx, &obligation, result);
|
||||
@ -80,13 +79,13 @@ impl<'tcx> TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
.evaluate_root_goal(obligation.clone().into(), GenerateProofTree::IfEnabled)
|
||||
.0
|
||||
{
|
||||
Ok((_, Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity), _)) => {
|
||||
Ok((_, Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity))) => {
|
||||
FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: false }
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok((_, Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow), _)) => {
|
||||
Ok((_, Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow))) => {
|
||||
FulfillmentErrorCode::Ambiguity { overflow: true }
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok((_, Certainty::Yes, _)) => {
|
||||
Ok((_, Certainty::Yes)) => {
|
||||
bug!("did not expect successful goal when collecting ambiguity errors")
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(_) => {
|
||||
@ -120,7 +119,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
let goal = obligation.clone().into();
|
||||
let result = infcx.evaluate_root_goal(goal, GenerateProofTree::IfEnabled).0;
|
||||
self.inspect_evaluated_obligation(infcx, &obligation, &result);
|
||||
let (changed, certainty, nested_goals) = match result {
|
||||
let (changed, certainty) = match result {
|
||||
Ok(result) => result,
|
||||
Err(NoSolution) => {
|
||||
errors.push(FulfillmentError {
|
||||
@ -178,16 +177,6 @@ impl<'tcx> TraitEngine<'tcx> for FulfillmentCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
// Push any nested goals that we get from unifying our canonical response
|
||||
// with our obligation onto the fulfillment context.
|
||||
self.obligations.extend(nested_goals.into_iter().map(|goal| {
|
||||
Obligation::new(
|
||||
infcx.tcx,
|
||||
obligation.cause.clone(),
|
||||
goal.param_env,
|
||||
goal.predicate,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}));
|
||||
has_changed |= changed;
|
||||
match certainty {
|
||||
Certainty::Yes => {}
|
||||
|
@ -63,21 +63,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectCandidate<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
infcx.probe(|_| {
|
||||
let mut instantiated_goals = vec![];
|
||||
for goal in &self.nested_goals {
|
||||
let goal = match ProofTreeBuilder::instantiate_canonical_state(
|
||||
let goal = ProofTreeBuilder::instantiate_canonical_state(
|
||||
infcx,
|
||||
self.goal.goal.param_env,
|
||||
self.goal.orig_values,
|
||||
*goal,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
Ok((_goals, goal)) => goal,
|
||||
Err(NoSolution) => {
|
||||
warn!(
|
||||
"unexpected failure when instantiating {:?}: {:?}",
|
||||
goal, self.nested_goals
|
||||
);
|
||||
return ControlFlow::Continue(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
);
|
||||
instantiated_goals.push(goal);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ struct WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub uncanonicalized_goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: WipGoalEvaluationKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
pub evaluation: Option<WipCanonicalGoalEvaluation<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub returned_goals: Vec<Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
@ -103,7 +102,6 @@ impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
evaluation: self.evaluation.unwrap().finalize(),
|
||||
returned_goals: self.returned_goals,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -312,7 +310,6 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
evaluation: None,
|
||||
returned_goals: vec![],
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -369,17 +366,6 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn returned_goals(&mut self, goals: &[Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>]) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert!(evaluation.returned_goals.is_empty());
|
||||
evaluation.returned_goals.extend(goals);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation(&mut self, goal_evaluation: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, *goal_evaluation.state.unwrap()) {
|
||||
|
@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// This function is necessary in nearly all cases before matching on a type.
|
||||
/// Not doing so is likely to be incomplete and therefore unsound during
|
||||
/// coherence.
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, param_env), ret)]
|
||||
fn structurally_normalize_ty(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
@ -68,6 +68,34 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
kind => bug!("unknown DefKind {} in projection goal: {goal:#?}", kind.descr(def_id)),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// When normalizing an associated item, constrain the result to `term`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// While `NormalizesTo` goals have the normalized-to term as an argument,
|
||||
/// this argument is always fully unconstrained for associated items.
|
||||
/// It is therefore appropriate to instead think of these `NormalizesTo` goals
|
||||
/// as function returning a term after normalizing.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// When equating an inference variable and an alias, we tend to emit `alias-relate`
|
||||
/// goals and only actually instantiate the inference variable with an alias if the
|
||||
/// alias is rigid. However, this means that constraining the expected term of
|
||||
/// such goals ends up fully structurally normalizing the resulting type instead of
|
||||
/// only by one step. To avoid this we instead use structural equality here, resulting
|
||||
/// in each `NormalizesTo` only projects by a single step.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Not doing so, currently causes issues because trying to normalize an opaque type
|
||||
/// during alias-relate doesn't actually constrain the opaque if the concrete type
|
||||
/// is an inference variable. This means that `NormalizesTo` for associated types
|
||||
/// normalizing to an opaque type always resulted in ambiguity, breaking tests e.g.
|
||||
/// tests/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-78450.rs.
|
||||
pub fn instantiate_normalizes_to_term(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, NormalizesTo<'tcx>>,
|
||||
term: ty::Term<'tcx>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
self.eq_structurally_relating_aliases(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, term)
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
@ -104,8 +132,8 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
goal.predicate.alias,
|
||||
assumption_projection_pred.projection_ty,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, assumption_projection_pred.term)
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_normalizes_to_term(goal, assumption_projection_pred.term);
|
||||
|
||||
// Add GAT where clauses from the trait's definition
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(
|
||||
@ -192,8 +220,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
"cannot project to an associated function"
|
||||
),
|
||||
};
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, error_term)
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_normalizes_to_term(goal, error_term);
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -248,8 +275,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
ty::AssocKind::Fn => unreachable!("we should never project to a fn"),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, term.instantiate(tcx, args))
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_normalizes_to_term(goal, term.instantiate(tcx, args));
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -456,7 +482,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
borrow_region.expect_region(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term.ty().unwrap(), upvars_ty)?;
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_normalizes_to_term(goal, upvars_ty.into());
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -543,8 +569,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, metadata_ty.into())
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_normalizes_to_term(goal, metadata_ty.into());
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -627,20 +652,22 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.probe_misc_candidate("builtin AsyncIterator kind").enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
let expected_ty = ecx.next_ty_infer();
|
||||
// Take `AsyncIterator<Item = I>` and turn it into the corresponding
|
||||
// coroutine yield ty `Poll<Option<I>>`.
|
||||
let expected_ty = Ty::new_adt(
|
||||
let wrapped_expected_ty = Ty::new_adt(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
tcx.adt_def(tcx.require_lang_item(LangItem::Poll, None)),
|
||||
tcx.mk_args(&[Ty::new_adt(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
tcx.adt_def(tcx.require_lang_item(LangItem::Option, None)),
|
||||
tcx.mk_args(&[goal.predicate.term.into()]),
|
||||
tcx.mk_args(&[expected_ty.into()]),
|
||||
)
|
||||
.into()]),
|
||||
);
|
||||
let yield_ty = args.as_coroutine().yield_ty();
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, expected_ty, yield_ty)?;
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, wrapped_expected_ty, yield_ty)?;
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_normalizes_to_term(goal, expected_ty.into());
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -742,8 +769,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for NormalizesTo<'tcx> {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.probe_misc_candidate("builtin discriminant kind").enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, discriminant_ty.into())
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_normalizes_to_term(goal, discriminant_ty.into());
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,11 +1,7 @@
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [*const ?1t, RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:27 ~ associated_type[f554]::{impl#3}::'a#1), 'a) })], def_id: DefId(0:5 ~ associated_type[f554]::ToUnit::Unit) }
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Overlap<for<'a> fn(&'a (), ())>` for type `for<'a> fn(&'a (), ())`
|
||||
--> $DIR/associated-type.rs:31:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Trait<Alias<_>>` for type `Alias<_>`
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Trait<_>`
|
||||
--> $DIR/opaques.rs:30:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | impl<T> Trait<T> for T {
|
||||
| ---------------------- first implementation here
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | impl<T> Trait<T> for defining_scope::Alias<T> {
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `Alias<_>`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation
|
||||
|
||||
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
|
||||
--> $DIR/opaques.rs:13:20
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | pub fn cast<T>(x: Container<Alias<T>, T>) -> Container<T, T> {
|
||||
| ^ cannot infer type for struct `Container<Alias<T>, T>`
|
||||
| ^ cannot infer type for struct `Container<T, T>`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `AnotherTrait` for type `D<OpaqueType>`
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `AnotherTrait` for type `D<_>`
|
||||
--> $DIR/auto-trait-coherence.rs:24:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | impl<T: Send> AnotherTrait for T {}
|
||||
| -------------------------------- first implementation here
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | impl AnotherTrait for D<OpaqueType> {
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `D<OpaqueType>`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `D<_>`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ impl<T: Send> AnotherTrait for T {}
|
||||
// (We treat opaque types as "foreign types" that could grow more impls
|
||||
// in the future.)
|
||||
impl AnotherTrait for D<OpaqueType> {
|
||||
//~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `AnotherTrait` for type `D<OpaqueType>`
|
||||
//[old]~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `AnotherTrait` for type `D<OpaqueType>`
|
||||
//[next]~^^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `AnotherTrait` for type `D<_>`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
||||
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ LL | type A = impl Foo;
|
||||
= note: `A` must be used in combination with a concrete type within the same module
|
||||
|
||||
error: opaque type's hidden type cannot be another opaque type from the same scope
|
||||
--> $DIR/two_tait_defining_each_other2.rs:11:5
|
||||
--> $DIR/two_tait_defining_each_other2.rs:12:5
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | x // B's hidden type is A (opaquely)
|
||||
| ^ one of the two opaque types used here has to be outside its defining scope
|
||||
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `A == B`
|
||||
--> $DIR/two_tait_defining_each_other2.rs:11:5
|
||||
error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `_ == A`
|
||||
--> $DIR/two_tait_defining_each_other2.rs:10:8
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | x // B's hidden type is A (opaquely)
|
||||
| ^ cannot satisfy `A == B`
|
||||
LL | fn muh(x: A) -> B {
|
||||
| ^ cannot satisfy `_ == A`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ type B = impl Foo;
|
||||
trait Foo {}
|
||||
|
||||
fn muh(x: A) -> B {
|
||||
//[next]~^ ERROR type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `_ == A`
|
||||
x // B's hidden type is A (opaquely)
|
||||
//[current]~^ ERROR opaque type's hidden type cannot be another opaque type
|
||||
//[next]~^^ ERROR type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `A == B`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct Bar;
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
//@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
|
||||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
// Regression test for trait-system-refactor-initiative#84.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We try to infer `T::Rigid: Into<?0>` and have 2 candidates from where-clauses:
|
||||
//
|
||||
// - `Into<String>`
|
||||
// - `Into<<T::Rigid as Elaborate>::Assoc>`
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This causes ambiguity unless we normalize the alias in the second candidate
|
||||
// to detect that they actually result in the same constraints.
|
||||
trait Trait {
|
||||
type Rigid: Elaborate<Assoc = String> + Into<String> + Default;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
trait Elaborate: Into<Self::Assoc> {
|
||||
type Assoc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn test<T: Trait>() {
|
||||
let rigid: T::Rigid = Default::default();
|
||||
drop(rigid.into());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
//@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
|
||||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
// Regression test for trait-system-refactor-initiative#86. This previously
|
||||
// failed with ambiguity due to multiple candidates with different
|
||||
// normalization.
|
||||
|
||||
trait Bar {
|
||||
type Item;
|
||||
type Assoc: AsRef<[Self::Item]>;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct Foo<T: Bar> {
|
||||
t: <T as Bar>::Assoc,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<T: Bar<Item = u32>> Foo<T>
|
||||
where
|
||||
<T as Bar>::Assoc: AsRef<[u32]>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
fn hello(&self) {
|
||||
println!("{}", self.t.as_ref().len());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ trait Trait {}
|
||||
impl<T: Copy> Trait for T {}
|
||||
struct LocalTy;
|
||||
impl Trait for <LocalTy as Overflow>::Assoc {}
|
||||
//~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `Trait` for type `<LocalTy as Overflow>::Assoc`
|
||||
//~^ ERROR conflicting implementations of trait `Trait`
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
||||
|
@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Trait` for type `<LocalTy as Overflow>::Assoc`
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Trait`
|
||||
--> $DIR/trait_ref_is_knowable-norm-overflow.rs:18:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | impl<T: Copy> Trait for T {}
|
||||
| ------------------------- first implementation here
|
||||
LL | struct LocalTy;
|
||||
LL | impl Trait for <LocalTy as Overflow>::Assoc {}
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation for `<LocalTy as Overflow>::Assoc`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ conflicting implementation
|
||||
|
||||
error[E0275]: overflow evaluating the requirement `<T as Overflow>::Assoc: Sized`
|
||||
--> $DIR/trait_ref_is_knowable-norm-overflow.rs:10:18
|
||||
|
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ impl<T> Id for T {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// Coherence should be able to reason that `(): PartialEq<<T as Id>::Assoc>>`
|
||||
// Coherence should be able to reason that `(): PartialEq<<LocalTy as Id>::Assoc>>`
|
||||
// does not hold.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// See https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/51
|
||||
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
//@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
|
||||
//@ known-bug: trait-system-refactor-initiative#60
|
||||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
// Generalizing a projection containing an inference variable
|
||||
// which cannot be named by the `root_vid` can result in ambiguity.
|
||||
// which cannot be named by the `root_vid` previously resulted in ambiguity.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Because we do not decrement the universe index when exiting a forall,
|
||||
// this can cause unexpected failures.
|
||||
|
@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
|
||||
error[E0284]: type annotations needed
|
||||
--> $DIR/generalize-proj-new-universe-index-2.rs:74:5
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | bound::<<Rigid as IdHigherRankedBound>::Assoc, <Wrapper<Leaf> as Id>::Assoc, _>()
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type of the type parameter `V` declared on the function `bound`
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: cannot satisfy `<<Rigid as IdHigherRankedBound>::Assoc as WithAssoc<<Wrapper<Leaf> as Id>::Assoc>>::Assoc == _`
|
||||
note: required by a bound in `bound`
|
||||
--> $DIR/generalize-proj-new-universe-index-2.rs:69:21
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | fn bound<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized, V: ?Sized>()
|
||||
| ----- required by a bound in this function
|
||||
LL | where
|
||||
LL | T: WithAssoc<U, Assoc = V>,
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `bound`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0284`.
|
@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
//@ compile-flags: -Znext-solver
|
||||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
// With #119106 generalization now results in `AliasRelate` if the generalized
|
||||
// alias contains an inference variable which is not nameable.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We previously proved alias-relate after canonicalization, which does not keep track
|
||||
// of universe indices, so all inference vars were nameable inside of `AliasRelate`.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// If we now have a rigid projection containing an unnameable inference variable,
|
||||
// we should emit an alias-relate obligation, which constrains the type of `x` to
|
||||
// an alias. This caused us to emit yet another equivalent alias-relate obligation
|
||||
// when trying to instantiate the query result, resulting in overflow.
|
||||
trait Trait<'a> {
|
||||
type Assoc: Default;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn takes_alias<'a, T: Trait<'a>>(_: <T as Trait<'a>>::Assoc) {}
|
||||
|
||||
fn foo<T: for<'a> Trait<'a>>() {
|
||||
let x = Default::default();
|
||||
|
||||
let _incr_universe: for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a (), &'b ()) =
|
||||
(|&(), &()| ()) as for<'a> fn(&'a (), &'a ());
|
||||
|
||||
takes_alias::<T>(x);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
|
||||
error[E0284]: type annotations needed: cannot satisfy `_ == <<T as Id<_>>::Id as Unnormalizable>::Assoc`
|
||||
--> $DIR/occurs-check-nested-alias.rs:36:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | x = y;
|
||||
| ^ cannot satisfy `_ == <<T as Id<_>>::Id as Unnormalizable>::Assoc`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0284`.
|
@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
|
||||
//@ revisions: old next
|
||||
//@[old] check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
// Currently always fails to generalize the outer alias, even if it
|
||||
// is treated as rigid by `alias-relate`.
|
||||
//@[next] compile-flags: -Znext-solver
|
||||
//@[next] known-bug: trait-system-refactor-initiative#8
|
||||
//@ check-pass
|
||||
|
||||
// case 3 of https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/8.
|
||||
#![crate_type = "lib"]
|
||||
#![allow(unused)]
|
||||
trait Unnormalizable {
|
||||
@ -14,8 +12,8 @@ trait Unnormalizable {
|
||||
trait Id<T> {
|
||||
type Id;
|
||||
}
|
||||
impl<T, U> Id<T> for U {
|
||||
type Id = U;
|
||||
impl<T, U> Id<U> for T {
|
||||
type Id = T;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct Inv<T>(*mut T);
|
||||
@ -24,15 +22,23 @@ fn unconstrained<T>() -> T {
|
||||
todo!()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn create<T, U: Unnormalizable>(
|
||||
x: &U,
|
||||
) -> (Inv<T>, Inv<<<U as Id<T>>::Id as Unnormalizable>::Assoc>) {
|
||||
fn create<T: Unnormalizable, U>(
|
||||
x: &T,
|
||||
) -> (Inv<U>, Inv<<<T as Id<U>>::Id as Unnormalizable>::Assoc>) {
|
||||
todo!()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn foo<T: Unnormalizable>() {
|
||||
let q = unconstrained();
|
||||
let (mut x, y) = create::<_, _>(&q);
|
||||
x = y;
|
||||
drop::<T>(q);
|
||||
let t = unconstrained();
|
||||
let (mut u, assoc) = create::<_, _>(&t);
|
||||
u = assoc;
|
||||
// Instantiating `?u` with `<<?t as Id<?u>>::Id as Unnormalizable>::Assoc` would
|
||||
// result in a cyclic type. However, we can still unify these types by first
|
||||
// normalizing the inner associated type. Emitting an error here would be incomplete.
|
||||
drop::<T>(t);
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME(-Znext-solver): This line is necessary due to an unrelated solver bug
|
||||
// and should get removed in the future.
|
||||
// https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/96
|
||||
drop::<Inv<<T as Unnormalizable>::Assoc>>(u);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -14,13 +14,9 @@ LL | #![feature(lazy_type_alias)]
|
||||
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
|
||||
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [ReBound(DebruijnIndex(0), BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
WARN rustc_infer::infer::relate::generalize may incompletely handle alias type: AliasTy { args: [RePlaceholder(!1_BoundRegion { var: 0, kind: BrNamed(DefId(0:15 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::{impl#1}::'a), 'a) }), ?1t], def_id: DefId(0:8 ~ issue_118950_root_region[d54f]::Assoc) }
|
||||
error[E0119]: conflicting implementations of trait `Overlap<fn(_)>` for type `fn(_)`
|
||||
--> $DIR/issue-118950-root-region.rs:19:1
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user