Rollup merge of #93221 - alyssaverkade:fix-93093, r=wesleywiser

[borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns

Previously, when rustc was provided an async function that tried to
mutate through a shared reference to an implicit self (as shown in the
ui test), rustc would suggest modifying the parameter signature
to `&mut` + the fully qualified name of the ty (in the case of the repro
`S`). If a user modified their code to match the suggestion, the
compiler would not accept it.

This commit modifies the suggestion so that when rustc is provided the
ui test that is also attached in this commit, it suggests (correctly)
`&mut self`. We try to be careful about distinguishing between implicit
and explicit self annotations, since the latter seem to be handled
correctly already.

This is my first PR here so I'm pretty sure I probably missed something/could use better terminology. I also didn't try to make the match exhaustive since implicit self is the only real special case that I need to handle (that I'm aware of), and I'm pretty sure there's a cleaner way to do this so any advice would be greatly appreciated! (I'm also not terribly confident about how I wrote the ui tests)

here is your cc as requested `@compiler-errors`

This is an attempt to fix #93093
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2022-02-02 19:34:02 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit b622552e10
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 52 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -488,12 +488,32 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> MirBorrowckCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
// don't create labels for compiler-generated spans // don't create labels for compiler-generated spans
Some(_) => None, Some(_) => None,
None => { None => {
let (span, suggestion) = suggest_ampmut( let (span, suggestion) = if name != kw::SelfLower {
self.infcx.tcx, suggest_ampmut(
local_decl, self.infcx.tcx,
opt_assignment_rhs_span, local_decl,
*opt_ty_info, opt_assignment_rhs_span,
); *opt_ty_info,
)
} else {
match local_decl.local_info.as_deref() {
Some(LocalInfo::User(ClearCrossCrate::Set(
mir::BindingForm::Var(mir::VarBindingForm {
opt_ty_info: None,
..
}),
))) => {
suggest_ampmut_self(self.infcx.tcx, local_decl)
}
// explicit self (eg `self: &'a Self`)
_ => suggest_ampmut(
self.infcx.tcx,
local_decl,
opt_assignment_rhs_span,
*opt_ty_info,
),
}
};
Some((true, span, suggestion)) Some((true, span, suggestion))
} }
} }

View File

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
// edition:2018
struct S {
foo: usize,
}
impl S {
async fn bar(&self) { //~ HELP consider changing this to be a mutable reference
//~| SUGGESTION &mut self
self.foo += 1; //~ ERROR cannot assign to `self.foo`, which is behind a `&` reference [E0594]
}
}
fn main() {
S { foo: 1 }.bar();
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
error[E0594]: cannot assign to `self.foo`, which is behind a `&` reference
--> $DIR/issue-93093.rs:8:9
|
LL | async fn bar(&self) {
| ----- help: consider changing this to be a mutable reference: `&mut self`
LL |
LL | self.foo += 1;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ `self` is a `&` reference, so the data it refers to cannot be written
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0594`.