Update tests

src/test/rustdoc-ui/deny-missing-docs-macro.stderr

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-error: missing documentation for macro
+error: missing documentation for a macro
   --> $DIR/deny-missing-docs-macro.rs:6:1
    |
 LL | macro_rules! foo {

src/test/rustdoc/macro-document-private-duplicate.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// FIXME: If two macros in the same module have the same name
+// (yes, that's a thing), rustdoc lists both of them on the index page,
+// but only documents the first one on the page for the macro.
+// Fortunately, this can only happen in document private items mode,
+// but it still isn't ideal beahvior.
+//
+// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88019#discussion_r693920453
+//
+// compile-flags: --document-private-items
+
+// @has macro_document_private_duplicate/index.html 'Doc 1.'
+// @has macro_document_private_duplicate/macro.a_macro.html 'Doc 1.'
+/// Doc 1.
+macro_rules! a_macro {
+    () => ()
+}
+
+// @has macro_document_private_duplicate/index.html 'Doc 2.'
+// @!has macro_document_private_duplicate/macro.a_macro.html 'Doc 2.'
+/// Doc 2.
+macro_rules! a_macro {
+    () => ()
+}

src/test/rustdoc/macro-document-private.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// Checks that private macros are documented when `--document-private-items`
+// is present.
+//
+// This is a regression test for issue #73754.
+//
+// compile-flags: --document-private-items
+
+#![feature(decl_macro)]
+
+
+// @has macro_document_private/macro.some_macro.html
+macro some_macro {
+    (a: tt) => {}
+}
+
+// @has macro_document_private/macro.another_macro.html
+macro_rules! another_macro {
+    (a: tt) => {}
+}

src/test/rustdoc/macro-indirect-use.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// Checks that it is possible to make a macro public through a `pub use` of its
+// parent module.
+//
+// This is a regression test for issue #87257.
+
+#![feature(decl_macro)]
+
+mod outer {
+    pub mod inner {
+        pub macro some_macro() {}
+    }
+}
+
+// @has macro_indirect_use/inner/index.html
+// @has macro_indirect_use/inner/macro.some_macro.html
+pub use outer::inner;

src/test/ui/lint/lint-level-macro-def-mod.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// This checks that exported macros lint as part of their module of origin, not
+// the root module.
+//
+// check-pass
+
+//! Top level documentation
+#![deny(missing_docs)]
+
+#[allow(missing_docs)]
+mod module {
+    #[macro_export]
+    macro_rules! hello {
+        () => ()
+    }
+}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/lint/lint-level-macro-def.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+// Checks that you can set a lint level specficially for a macro definition.
+//
+// This is a regression test for issue #59306.
+//
+// check-pass
+
+
+#[deny(missing_docs)]
+mod module {
+    #[allow(missing_docs)]
+    #[macro_export]
+    macro_rules! hello {
+        () => ()
+    }
+}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/lint/missing-doc-private-macro.rs

@@ -29,13 +29,13 @@ mod submodule {
 
     #[macro_export]
     macro_rules! exported_to_top_level {
-        //~^ ERROR missing documentation for macro
+        //~^ ERROR missing documentation for a macro
         () => ()
     }
 }
 
 pub macro top_level_pub_macro {
-    //~^ ERROR missing documentation for macro
+    //~^ ERROR missing documentation for a macro
     () => ()
 }
 

src/test/ui/lint/missing-doc-private-macro.stderr

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-error: missing documentation for macro
+error: missing documentation for a macro
   --> $DIR/missing-doc-private-macro.rs:31:5
    |
 LL |     macro_rules! exported_to_top_level {
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
 LL | #![deny(missing_docs)]
    |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
-error: missing documentation for macro
+error: missing documentation for a macro
   --> $DIR/missing-doc-private-macro.rs:37:1
    |
 LL | pub macro top_level_pub_macro {

src/test/ui/macros/macro-stability-rpass.rs

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 // run-pass
 // aux-build:unstable-macros.rs
 
-#![feature(unstable_macros, local_unstable)]
+#![unstable(feature = "one_two_three_testing", issue = "none")]
+#![feature(staged_api, unstable_macros, local_unstable)]
 
 #[macro_use] extern crate unstable_macros;