mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-11-24 07:44:10 +00:00
Adjust the output of unnecessary_unwrap and provide a suggestion
This commit is contained in:
parent
03d3131cb4
commit
b4775435e8
@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
|
||||
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
|
||||
use clippy_utils::higher;
|
||||
use clippy_utils::ty::is_type_diagnostic_item;
|
||||
use clippy_utils::{differing_macro_contexts, usage::is_potentially_mutated};
|
||||
use clippy_utils::{differing_macro_contexts, path_to_local, usage::is_potentially_mutated};
|
||||
use if_chain::if_chain;
|
||||
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::intravisit::{walk_expr, walk_fn, FnKind, NestedVisitorMap, Visitor};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{BinOpKind, Body, Expr, ExprKind, FnDecl, HirId, Path, QPath, UnOp};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{BinOpKind, Body, Expr, ExprKind, FnDecl, HirId, PathSegment, UnOp};
|
||||
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::hir::map::Map;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::lint::in_external_macro;
|
||||
@ -74,26 +75,61 @@ struct UnwrappableVariablesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
unwrappables: Vec<UnwrapInfo<'tcx>>,
|
||||
cx: &'a LateContext<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// What kind of unwrappable this is.
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
enum UnwrappableKind {
|
||||
Option,
|
||||
Result,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl UnwrappableKind {
|
||||
fn success_variant_pattern(self) -> &'static str {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
UnwrappableKind::Option => "Some(..)",
|
||||
UnwrappableKind::Result => "Ok(..)",
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn error_variant_pattern(self) -> &'static str {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
UnwrappableKind::Option => "None",
|
||||
UnwrappableKind::Result => "Err(..)",
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Contains information about whether a variable can be unwrapped.
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
|
||||
struct UnwrapInfo<'tcx> {
|
||||
/// The variable that is checked
|
||||
ident: &'tcx Path<'tcx>,
|
||||
local_id: HirId,
|
||||
/// The if itself
|
||||
if_expr: &'tcx Expr<'tcx>,
|
||||
/// The check, like `x.is_ok()`
|
||||
check: &'tcx Expr<'tcx>,
|
||||
/// The check's name, like `is_ok`
|
||||
check_name: &'tcx PathSegment<'tcx>,
|
||||
/// The branch where the check takes place, like `if x.is_ok() { .. }`
|
||||
branch: &'tcx Expr<'tcx>,
|
||||
/// Whether `is_some()` or `is_ok()` was called (as opposed to `is_err()` or `is_none()`).
|
||||
safe_to_unwrap: bool,
|
||||
/// What kind of unwrappable this is.
|
||||
kind: UnwrappableKind,
|
||||
/// If the check is the entire condition (`if x.is_ok()`) or only a part of it (`foo() &&
|
||||
/// x.is_ok()`)
|
||||
is_entire_condition: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Collects the information about unwrappable variables from an if condition
|
||||
/// The `invert` argument tells us whether the condition is negated.
|
||||
fn collect_unwrap_info<'tcx>(
|
||||
cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
|
||||
if_expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>,
|
||||
expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>,
|
||||
branch: &'tcx Expr<'_>,
|
||||
invert: bool,
|
||||
is_entire_condition: bool,
|
||||
) -> Vec<UnwrapInfo<'tcx>> {
|
||||
fn is_relevant_option_call(cx: &LateContext<'_>, ty: Ty<'_>, method_name: &str) -> bool {
|
||||
is_type_diagnostic_item(cx, ty, sym::option_type) && ["is_some", "is_none"].contains(&method_name)
|
||||
@ -106,18 +142,18 @@ fn collect_unwrap_info<'tcx>(
|
||||
if let ExprKind::Binary(op, left, right) = &expr.kind {
|
||||
match (invert, op.node) {
|
||||
(false, BinOpKind::And | BinOpKind::BitAnd) | (true, BinOpKind::Or | BinOpKind::BitOr) => {
|
||||
let mut unwrap_info = collect_unwrap_info(cx, left, branch, invert);
|
||||
unwrap_info.append(&mut collect_unwrap_info(cx, right, branch, invert));
|
||||
let mut unwrap_info = collect_unwrap_info(cx, if_expr, left, branch, invert, false);
|
||||
unwrap_info.append(&mut collect_unwrap_info(cx, if_expr, right, branch, invert, false));
|
||||
return unwrap_info;
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if let ExprKind::Unary(UnOp::Not, expr) = &expr.kind {
|
||||
return collect_unwrap_info(cx, expr, branch, !invert);
|
||||
return collect_unwrap_info(cx, if_expr, expr, branch, !invert, false);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if_chain! {
|
||||
if let ExprKind::MethodCall(method_name, _, args, _) = &expr.kind;
|
||||
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(None, path)) = &args[0].kind;
|
||||
if let Some(local_id) = path_to_local(&args[0]);
|
||||
let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(&args[0]);
|
||||
let name = method_name.ident.as_str();
|
||||
if is_relevant_option_call(cx, ty, &name) || is_relevant_result_call(cx, ty, &name);
|
||||
@ -129,7 +165,24 @@ fn collect_unwrap_info<'tcx>(
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let safe_to_unwrap = unwrappable != invert;
|
||||
return vec![UnwrapInfo { ident: path, check: expr, branch, safe_to_unwrap }];
|
||||
let kind = if is_type_diagnostic_item(cx, ty, sym::option_type) {
|
||||
UnwrappableKind::Option
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
UnwrappableKind::Result
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
return vec![
|
||||
UnwrapInfo {
|
||||
local_id,
|
||||
if_expr,
|
||||
check: expr,
|
||||
check_name: method_name,
|
||||
branch,
|
||||
safe_to_unwrap,
|
||||
kind,
|
||||
is_entire_condition,
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -137,11 +190,17 @@ fn collect_unwrap_info<'tcx>(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> UnwrappableVariablesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
fn visit_branch(&mut self, cond: &'tcx Expr<'_>, branch: &'tcx Expr<'_>, else_branch: bool) {
|
||||
fn visit_branch(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
if_expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>,
|
||||
cond: &'tcx Expr<'_>,
|
||||
branch: &'tcx Expr<'_>,
|
||||
else_branch: bool,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let prev_len = self.unwrappables.len();
|
||||
for unwrap_info in collect_unwrap_info(self.cx, cond, branch, else_branch) {
|
||||
if is_potentially_mutated(unwrap_info.ident, cond, self.cx)
|
||||
|| is_potentially_mutated(unwrap_info.ident, branch, self.cx)
|
||||
for unwrap_info in collect_unwrap_info(self.cx, if_expr, cond, branch, else_branch, true) {
|
||||
if is_potentially_mutated(unwrap_info.local_id, cond, self.cx)
|
||||
|| is_potentially_mutated(unwrap_info.local_id, branch, self.cx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// if the variable is mutated, we don't know whether it can be unwrapped:
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
@ -163,32 +222,62 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for UnwrappableVariablesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
if let Some(higher::If { cond, then, r#else }) = higher::If::hir(expr) {
|
||||
walk_expr(self, cond);
|
||||
self.visit_branch(cond, then, false);
|
||||
self.visit_branch(expr, cond, then, false);
|
||||
if let Some(else_inner) = r#else {
|
||||
self.visit_branch(cond, else_inner, true);
|
||||
self.visit_branch(expr, cond, else_inner, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// find `unwrap[_err]()` calls:
|
||||
if_chain! {
|
||||
if let ExprKind::MethodCall(method_name, _, args, _) = expr.kind;
|
||||
if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(None, path)) = args[0].kind;
|
||||
if let Some(id) = path_to_local(&args[0]);
|
||||
if [sym::unwrap, sym::expect, sym!(unwrap_err)].contains(&method_name.ident.name);
|
||||
let call_to_unwrap = [sym::unwrap, sym::expect].contains(&method_name.ident.name);
|
||||
if let Some(unwrappable) = self.unwrappables.iter()
|
||||
.find(|u| u.ident.res == path.res);
|
||||
.find(|u| u.local_id == id);
|
||||
// Span contexts should not differ with the conditional branch
|
||||
if !differing_macro_contexts(unwrappable.branch.span, expr.span);
|
||||
if !differing_macro_contexts(unwrappable.branch.span, unwrappable.check.span);
|
||||
then {
|
||||
if call_to_unwrap == unwrappable.safe_to_unwrap {
|
||||
let is_entire_condition = unwrappable.is_entire_condition;
|
||||
let unwrappable_variable_name = self.cx.tcx.hir().name(unwrappable.local_id);
|
||||
let suggested_pattern = if call_to_unwrap {
|
||||
unwrappable.kind.success_variant_pattern()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
unwrappable.kind.error_variant_pattern()
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
span_lint_and_then(
|
||||
self.cx,
|
||||
UNNECESSARY_UNWRAP,
|
||||
expr.span,
|
||||
&format!("you checked before that `{}()` cannot fail, \
|
||||
instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`",
|
||||
method_name.ident.name),
|
||||
|diag| { diag.span_label(unwrappable.check.span, "the check is happening here"); },
|
||||
&format!(
|
||||
"called `{}` on `{}` after checking its variant with `{}`",
|
||||
method_name.ident.name,
|
||||
unwrappable_variable_name,
|
||||
unwrappable.check_name.ident.as_str(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
|diag| {
|
||||
if is_entire_condition {
|
||||
diag.span_suggestion(
|
||||
unwrappable.check.span.with_lo(unwrappable.if_expr.span.lo()),
|
||||
"try",
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"if let {} = {}",
|
||||
suggested_pattern,
|
||||
unwrappable_variable_name,
|
||||
),
|
||||
// We don't track how the unwrapped value is used inside the
|
||||
// block or suggest deleting the unwrap, so we can't offer a
|
||||
// fixable solution.
|
||||
Applicability::Unspecified,
|
||||
);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
diag.span_label(unwrappable.check.span, "the check is happening here");
|
||||
diag.help("try using `if let` or `match`");
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
span_lint_and_then(
|
||||
|
@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
|
||||
use crate as utils;
|
||||
use rustc_hir as hir;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::def::Res;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::intravisit;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::intravisit::{NestedVisitorMap, Visitor};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::HirIdSet;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind, HirId, Path};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind, HirId};
|
||||
use rustc_infer::infer::TyCtxtInferExt;
|
||||
use rustc_lint::LateContext;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::hir::map::Map;
|
||||
@ -35,12 +34,8 @@ pub fn mutated_variables<'tcx>(expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>) ->
|
||||
Some(delegate.used_mutably)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn is_potentially_mutated<'tcx>(variable: &'tcx Path<'_>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>) -> bool {
|
||||
if let Res::Local(id) = variable.res {
|
||||
mutated_variables(expr, cx).map_or(true, |mutated| mutated.contains(&id))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
true
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn is_potentially_mutated<'tcx>(variable: HirId, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>) -> bool {
|
||||
mutated_variables(expr, cx).map_or(true, |mutated| mutated.contains(&variable))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct MutVarsDelegate {
|
||||
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:8:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() && y.is_err() {
|
||||
@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | #![deny(clippy::panicking_unwrap, clippy::unnecessary_unwrap)]
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: this call to `unwrap_err()` will always panic
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:9:9
|
||||
@ -36,7 +37,7 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() && y.is_err() {
|
||||
LL | y.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `y` after checking its variant with `is_err`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:11:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() && y.is_err() {
|
||||
@ -44,6 +45,8 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() && y.is_err() {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | y.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: this call to `unwrap()` will always panic
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:25:9
|
||||
@ -54,7 +57,7 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || y.is_ok() {
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:26:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() || y.is_ok() {
|
||||
@ -62,6 +65,8 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || y.is_ok() {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: this call to `unwrap()` will always panic
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:27:9
|
||||
@ -72,7 +77,7 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || y.is_ok() {
|
||||
LL | y.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `y` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:28:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() || y.is_ok() {
|
||||
@ -80,14 +85,18 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || y.is_ok() {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | y.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:32:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() && !(y.is_ok() || z.is_err()) {
|
||||
| --------- the check is happening here
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: this call to `unwrap_err()` will always panic
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:33:9
|
||||
@ -107,7 +116,7 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() && !(y.is_ok() || z.is_err()) {
|
||||
LL | y.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `y` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:35:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() && !(y.is_ok() || z.is_err()) {
|
||||
@ -115,8 +124,10 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() && !(y.is_ok() || z.is_err()) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | y.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `z` after checking its variant with `is_err`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:36:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() && !(y.is_ok() || z.is_err()) {
|
||||
@ -124,6 +135,8 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() && !(y.is_ok() || z.is_err()) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | z.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: this call to `unwrap_err()` will always panic
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:37:9
|
||||
@ -143,7 +156,7 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:46:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
@ -151,8 +164,10 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `y` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:47:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
@ -160,6 +175,8 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | y.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: this call to `unwrap_err()` will always panic
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:48:9
|
||||
@ -179,7 +196,7 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
LL | z.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `z` after checking its variant with `is_err`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals.rs:50:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
@ -187,6 +204,8 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() || !(y.is_ok() && z.is_err()) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | z.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: try using `if let` or `match`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 20 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_some`
|
||||
--> $DIR/complex_conditionals_nested.rs:8:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_some() {
|
||||
| ----------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| -------------- help: try: `if let Some(..) = x`
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_some`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:39:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_some() {
|
||||
| ----------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| -------------- help: try: `if let Some(..) = x`
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
|
||||
LL | #![deny(clippy::panicking_unwrap, clippy::unnecessary_unwrap)]
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `expect()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `expect` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_some`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:40:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_some() {
|
||||
| ----------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| -------------- help: try: `if let Some(..) = x`
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
LL | x.expect("an error message"); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
@ -53,20 +53,20 @@ LL | if x.is_none() {
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_none`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:48:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_none() {
|
||||
| ----------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| -------------- help: try: `if let Some(..) = x`
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_some`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:7:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if $a.is_some() {
|
||||
| ------------ the check is happening here
|
||||
| --------------- help: try: `if let Some(..) = x`
|
||||
LL | $a.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
...
|
||||
@ -75,19 +75,19 @@ LL | m!(x);
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this error originates in the macro `m` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:56:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() {
|
||||
| --------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| ------------ help: try: `if let Ok(..) = x`
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `expect()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `expect` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:57:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() {
|
||||
| --------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| ------------ help: try: `if let Ok(..) = x`
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
LL | x.expect("an error message"); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
@ -119,11 +119,11 @@ LL | if x.is_ok() {
|
||||
LL | x.expect("an error message"); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_ok`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:62:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_ok() {
|
||||
| --------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| ------------ help: try: `if let Err(..) = x`
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
@ -136,20 +136,20 @@ LL | if x.is_err() {
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap_err()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap_err` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_err`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:66:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_err() {
|
||||
| ---------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| ------------- help: try: `if let Err(..) = x`
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // will panic
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap_err(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: you checked before that `unwrap()` cannot fail, instead of checking and unwrapping, it's better to use `if let` or `match`
|
||||
error: called `unwrap` on `x` after checking its variant with `is_err`
|
||||
--> $DIR/simple_conditionals.rs:68:9
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | if x.is_err() {
|
||||
| ---------- the check is happening here
|
||||
| ------------- help: try: `if let Ok(..) = x`
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | x.unwrap(); // unnecessary
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user