mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2025-02-01 09:33:26 +00:00
implement ConstEvaluatable
goals in new solver
we don't yet handle `generic_const_exprs`, someone else can do that :3
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd68ead9ec
commit
abcaf30f9b
@ -425,12 +425,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::WellFormed(arg)) => {
|
||||
self.compute_well_formed_goal(Goal { param_env, predicate: arg })
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Ambiguous => {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// FIXME: implement this predicate :)
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstEvaluatable(_)) => {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Clause(ty::ClauseKind::ConstEvaluatable(ct)) => {
|
||||
self.compute_const_evaluatable_goal(Goal { param_env, predicate: ct })
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::ConstEquate(_, _) => {
|
||||
bug!("ConstEquate should not be emitted when `-Ztrait-solver=next` is active")
|
||||
@ -440,6 +436,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
param_env,
|
||||
predicate: (lhs, rhs, direction),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
ty::PredicateKind::Ambiguous => {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let kind = self.infcx.instantiate_binder_with_placeholders(kind);
|
||||
|
@ -159,6 +159,43 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
|
||||
fn compute_const_evaluatable_goal(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
Goal { param_env, predicate: ct }: Goal<'tcx, ty::Const<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
match ct.kind() {
|
||||
ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(uv) => {
|
||||
// We never return `NoSolution` here as `try_const_eval_resolve` emits an
|
||||
// error itself when failing to evaluate, so emitting an additional fulfillment
|
||||
// error in that case is unnecessary noise. This may change in the future once
|
||||
// evaluation failures are allowed to impact selection, e.g. generic const
|
||||
// expressions in impl headers or `where`-clauses.
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME(generic_const_exprs): Implement handling for generic
|
||||
// const expressions here.
|
||||
if let Some(_normalized) = self.try_const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv, ct.ty()) {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ConstKind::Infer(_) => {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS)
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ConstKind::Placeholder(_) | ty::ConstKind::Value(_) | ty::ConstKind::Error(_) => {
|
||||
self.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// We can freely ICE here as:
|
||||
// - `Param` gets replaced with a placeholder during canonicalization
|
||||
// - `Bound` cannot exist as we don't have a binder around the self Type
|
||||
// - `Expr` is part of `feature(generic_const_exprs)` and is not implemented yet
|
||||
ty::ConstKind::Param(_) | ty::ConstKind::Bound(_, _) | ty::ConstKind::Expr(_) => {
|
||||
bug!("unexpect const kind: {:?}", ct)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self), ret)]
|
||||
fn compute_const_arg_has_type_goal(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
|
||||
--> $DIR/default-param-wf-concrete.rs:1:28
|
||||
--> $DIR/default-param-wf-concrete.rs:4:28
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | struct Foo<const N: u8 = { 255 + 1 }>;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^ attempt to compute `u8::MAX + 1_u8`, which would overflow
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
|
||||
--> $DIR/default-param-wf-concrete.rs:4:28
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | struct Foo<const N: u8 = { 255 + 1 }>;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^ attempt to compute `u8::MAX + 1_u8`, which would overflow
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to previous error
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.
|
@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
|
||||
// revisions: old next
|
||||
//[next] compile-flags: -Ztrait-solver=next
|
||||
|
||||
struct Foo<const N: u8 = { 255 + 1 }>;
|
||||
//~^ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
||||
|
@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
||||
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
|
||||
--> $DIR/const-len-underflow-separate-spans.rs:7:20
|
||||
--> $DIR/const-len-underflow-separate-spans.rs:10:20
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | const LEN: usize = ONE - TWO;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^ attempt to compute `1_usize - 2_usize`, which would overflow
|
||||
|
||||
note: erroneous constant used
|
||||
--> $DIR/const-len-underflow-separate-spans.rs:11:17
|
||||
--> $DIR/const-len-underflow-separate-spans.rs:14:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let a: [i8; LEN] = unimplemented!();
|
||||
| ^^^
|
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
|
||||
--> $DIR/const-len-underflow-separate-spans.rs:10:20
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | const LEN: usize = ONE - TWO;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^ attempt to compute `1_usize - 2_usize`, which would overflow
|
||||
|
||||
note: erroneous constant used
|
||||
--> $DIR/const-len-underflow-separate-spans.rs:14:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let a: [i8; LEN] = unimplemented!();
|
||||
| ^^^
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to previous error
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`.
|
@ -2,6 +2,9 @@
|
||||
// spot (where the underflow occurred), while also providing the
|
||||
// overall context for what caused the evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
// revisions: old next
|
||||
//[next] compile-flags: -Ztrait-solver=next
|
||||
|
||||
const ONE: usize = 1;
|
||||
const TWO: usize = 2;
|
||||
const LEN: usize = ONE - TWO;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user