Expand the testing guide to cover optimizations, benchmarks and how to

be more precise about what's being benchmarked.

Also, reorganise the layout a bit, to put examples directly in their
sections.
This commit is contained in:
Huon Wilson 2014-02-09 16:14:53 +11:00
parent 38447344f1
commit a7719a7347

View File

@ -16,10 +16,12 @@ fn return_two_test() {
}
~~~
To run these tests, use `rustc --test`:
To run these tests, compile with `rustc --test` and run the resulting
binary:
~~~ {.notrust}
$ rustc --test foo.rs; ./foo
$ rustc --test foo.rs
$ ./foo
running 1 test
test return_two_test ... ok
@ -47,8 +49,8 @@ value. To run the tests in a crate, it must be compiled with the
`--test` flag: `rustc myprogram.rs --test -o myprogram-tests`. Running
the resulting executable will run all the tests in the crate. A test
is considered successful if its function returns; if the task running
the test fails, through a call to `fail!`, a failed `check` or
`assert`, or some other (`assert_eq`, ...) means, then the test fails.
the test fails, through a call to `fail!`, a failed `assert`, or some
other (`assert_eq`, ...) means, then the test fails.
When compiling a crate with the `--test` flag `--cfg test` is also
implied, so that tests can be conditionally compiled.
@ -100,7 +102,63 @@ failure output difficult. In these cases you can set the
`RUST_TEST_TASKS` environment variable to 1 to make the tests run
sequentially.
## Benchmarking
## Examples
### Typical test run
~~~ {.notrust}
$ mytests
running 30 tests
running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok
running driver::tests::mytest2 ... ignored
... snip ...
running driver::tests::mytest30 ... ok
result: ok. 28 passed; 0 failed; 2 ignored
~~~
### Test run with failures
~~~ {.notrust}
$ mytests
running 30 tests
running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok
running driver::tests::mytest2 ... ignored
... snip ...
running driver::tests::mytest30 ... FAILED
result: FAILED. 27 passed; 1 failed; 2 ignored
~~~
### Running ignored tests
~~~ {.notrust}
$ mytests --ignored
running 2 tests
running driver::tests::mytest2 ... failed
running driver::tests::mytest10 ... ok
result: FAILED. 1 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored
~~~
### Running a subset of tests
~~~ {.notrust}
$ mytests mytest1
running 11 tests
running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok
running driver::tests::mytest10 ... ignored
... snip ...
running driver::tests::mytest19 ... ok
result: ok. 11 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored
~~~
# Microbenchmarking
The test runner also understands a simple form of benchmark execution.
Benchmark functions are marked with the `#[bench]` attribute, rather
@ -111,11 +169,12 @@ component of your testsuite, pass `--bench` to the compiled test
runner.
The type signature of a benchmark function differs from a unit test:
it takes a mutable reference to type `test::BenchHarness`. Inside the
benchmark function, any time-variable or "setup" code should execute
first, followed by a call to `iter` on the benchmark harness, passing
a closure that contains the portion of the benchmark you wish to
actually measure the per-iteration speed of.
it takes a mutable reference to type
`extra::test::BenchHarness`. Inside the benchmark function, any
time-variable or "setup" code should execute first, followed by a call
to `iter` on the benchmark harness, passing a closure that contains
the portion of the benchmark you wish to actually measure the
per-iteration speed of.
For benchmarks relating to processing/generating data, one can set the
`bytes` field to the number of bytes consumed/produced in each
@ -128,15 +187,16 @@ For example:
~~~
extern mod extra;
use std::vec;
use extra::test::BenchHarness;
#[bench]
fn bench_sum_1024_ints(b: &mut extra::test::BenchHarness) {
fn bench_sum_1024_ints(b: &mut BenchHarness) {
let v = vec::from_fn(1024, |n| n);
b.iter(|| {v.iter().fold(0, |old, new| old + *new);} );
}
#[bench]
fn initialise_a_vector(b: &mut extra::test::BenchHarness) {
fn initialise_a_vector(b: &mut BenchHarness) {
b.iter(|| {vec::from_elem(1024, 0u64);} );
b.bytes = 1024 * 8;
}
@ -163,66 +223,9 @@ Advice on writing benchmarks:
To run benchmarks, pass the `--bench` flag to the compiled
test-runner. Benchmarks are compiled-in but not executed by default.
## Examples
### Typical test run
~~~ {.notrust}
> mytests
running 30 tests
running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok
running driver::tests::mytest2 ... ignored
... snip ...
running driver::tests::mytest30 ... ok
result: ok. 28 passed; 0 failed; 2 ignored
~~~ {.notrust}
### Test run with failures
~~~ {.notrust}
> mytests
running 30 tests
running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok
running driver::tests::mytest2 ... ignored
... snip ...
running driver::tests::mytest30 ... FAILED
result: FAILED. 27 passed; 1 failed; 2 ignored
~~~
### Running ignored tests
~~~ {.notrust}
> mytests --ignored
running 2 tests
running driver::tests::mytest2 ... failed
running driver::tests::mytest10 ... ok
result: FAILED. 1 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored
~~~
### Running a subset of tests
~~~ {.notrust}
> mytests mytest1
running 11 tests
running driver::tests::mytest1 ... ok
running driver::tests::mytest10 ... ignored
... snip ...
running driver::tests::mytest19 ... ok
result: ok. 11 passed; 0 failed; 1 ignored
~~~
### Running benchmarks
~~~ {.notrust}
> mytests --bench
$ rustc mytests.rs -O --test
$ mytests --bench
running 2 tests
test bench_sum_1024_ints ... bench: 709 ns/iter (+/- 82)
@ -231,6 +234,77 @@ test initialise_a_vector ... bench: 424 ns/iter (+/- 99) = 19320 MB/s
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 2 measured
~~~
## Benchmarks and the optimizer
Benchmarks compiled with optimizations activated can be dramatically
changed by the optimizer so that the benchmark is no longer
benchmarking what one expects. For example, the compiler might
recognize that some calculation has no external effects and remove
it entirely.
~~~
extern mod extra;
use extra::test::BenchHarness;
#[bench]
fn bench_xor_1000_ints(bh: &mut BenchHarness) {
bh.iter(|| {
range(0, 1000).fold(0, |old, new| old ^ new);
});
}
~~~
gives the following results
~~~ {.notrust}
running 1 test
test bench_xor_1000_ints ... bench: 0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 1 measured
~~~
The benchmarking runner offers two ways to avoid this. Either, the
closure that the `iter` method receives can return an arbitrary value
which forces the optimizer to consider the result used and ensures it
cannot remove the computation entirely. This could be done for the
example above by adjusting the `bh.iter` call to
~~~
bh.iter(|| range(0, 1000).fold(0, |old, new| old ^ new))
~~~
Or, the other option is to call the generic `extra::test::black_box`
function, which is an opaque "black box" to the optimizer and so
forces it to consider any argument as used.
~~~
use extra::test::black_box
bh.iter(|| {
black_box(range(0, 1000).fold(0, |old, new| old ^ new));
});
~~~
Neither of these read or modify the value, and are very cheap for
small values. Larger values can be passed indirectly to reduce
overhead (e.g. `black_box(&huge_struct)`).
Performing either of the above changes gives the following
benchmarking results
~~~ {.notrust}
running 1 test
test bench_xor_1000_ints ... bench: 375 ns/iter (+/- 148)
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 1 measured
~~~
However, the optimizer can still modify a testcase in an undesirable
manner even when using either of the above. Benchmarks can be checked
by hand by looking at the output of the compiler using the `--emit=ir`
(for LLVM IR), `--emit=asm` (for assembly) or compiling normally and
using any method for examining object code.
## Saving and ratcheting metrics
When running benchmarks or other tests, the test runner can record