Fix unwinding

This commit is contained in:
Antoni Boucher 2023-01-06 10:42:38 -05:00
parent 71d7e561bd
commit a4b74e3adf
2 changed files with 6 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@ -472,7 +472,6 @@ impl<'a, 'gcc, 'tcx> BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx> for Builder<'a, 'gcc, 'tcx> {
}
else {
// FIXME: FIXME: FIXME: Seems like bad (_URC_NO_REASON) return code, perhaps because the cleanup pad was created properly.
// FIXME: Wrong personality function: __gcc_personality_v0
println!("Try/catch in {:?}", self.current_func());
self.block.add_try_catch(None, try_block, catch);
}
@ -1220,15 +1219,6 @@ impl<'a, 'gcc, 'tcx> BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx> for Builder<'a, 'gcc, 'tcx> {
self.cleanup_blocks.borrow_mut().insert(self.block);
// FIXME: we're probably not creating a real cleanup pad here.
// FIXME: It seems to be the actual problem:
// libunwind finds a catch, so returns _URC_HANDLER_FOUND instead of _URC_CONTINUE_UNWIND.
// TODO: can we generate a goto from the finally to the cleanup landing pad?
// TODO: add this block to a cleanup_blocks variable and generate a try/finally instead if
// the catch block for it is a cleanup block.
// => NO, a cleanup is only called during unwinding.
//
// TODO: look at TRY_CATCH_IS_CLEANUP, CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR, WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR, CLEANUP_EH_ONLY.
let eh_pointer_builtin = self.cx.context.get_target_builtin_function("__builtin_eh_pointer");
let zero = self.cx.context.new_rvalue_zero(self.int_type);
let ptr = self.cx.context.new_call(None, eh_pointer_builtin, &[zero]);
@ -1242,21 +1232,14 @@ impl<'a, 'gcc, 'tcx> BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx> for Builder<'a, 'gcc, 'tcx> {
self.block.add_assignment(None, value.access_field(None, field1), ptr);
self.block.add_assignment(None, value.access_field(None, field2), zero); // TODO: set the proper value here (the type of exception?).
/*
// Resume.
let param = self.context.new_parameter(None, ptr.get_type(), "exn");
// TODO: should we call __builtin_unwind_resume instead?
// FIXME: should probably not called resume because it could be executed (I believe) in
// normal (no exception) cases
let unwind_resume = self.context.new_function(None, FunctionType::Extern, self.type_void(), &[param], "_Unwind_Resume", false);
self.block.add_eval(None, self.context.new_call(None, unwind_resume, &[ptr]));*/
value.to_rvalue()
}
fn resume(&mut self, exn: RValue<'gcc>) {
// TODO: check if this is normal that we need to dereference the value.
let exn = exn.dereference(None).to_rvalue();
let param = self.context.new_parameter(None, exn.get_type(), "exn");
// TODO: should we call __builtin_unwind_resume instead?
// TODO(antoyo): should we call __builtin_unwind_resume instead? This might actually be the same.
let unwind_resume = self.context.new_function(None, FunctionType::Extern, self.type_void(), &[param], "_Unwind_Resume", false);
self.llbb().add_eval(None, self.context.new_call(None, unwind_resume, &[exn]));
self.unreachable();

View File

@ -1179,16 +1179,10 @@ fn codegen_gnu_try<'gcc>(bx: &mut Builder<'_, 'gcc, '_>, try_func: RValue<'gcc>,
// Type indicator for the exception being thrown.
//
// The first value in this tuple is a pointer to the exception object
// being thrown. The second value is a "selector" indicating which of
// the landing pad clauses the exception's type had been matched to.
// rust_try ignores the selector.
// The value is a pointer to the exception object
// being thrown.
bx.switch_to_block(catch);
/*let lpad_ty = bx.type_struct(&[bx.type_i8p(), bx.type_i32()], false);
let vals = bx.landing_pad(lpad_ty, bx.eh_personality(), 1);
let tydesc = bx.const_null(bx.type_i8p());
bx.add_clause(vals, tydesc);
let ptr = bx.extract_value(vals, 0);*/
bx.set_personality_fn(bx.eh_personality());
let eh_pointer_builtin = bx.cx.context.get_target_builtin_function("__builtin_eh_pointer");
let zero = bx.cx.context.new_rvalue_zero(bx.int_type);