From 1049e88d1f673acc7c94842ba671383864e0a0c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Klabnik Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:27:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Static and dynamic dispatch: missing word --- src/doc/trpl/static-and-dynamic-dispatch.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/doc/trpl/static-and-dynamic-dispatch.md b/src/doc/trpl/static-and-dynamic-dispatch.md index 98dac9bf84b..a119a5b0021 100644 --- a/src/doc/trpl/static-and-dynamic-dispatch.md +++ b/src/doc/trpl/static-and-dynamic-dispatch.md @@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ dynamic dispatch is sometimes more efficient. However, the common case is that it is more efficient to use static dispatch, and one can always have a thin statically-dispatched wrapper function that does -a dynamic, but not vice versa, meaning static calls are more flexible. The -standard library tries to be statically dispatched where possible for this +a dynamic dispatch, but not vice versa, meaning static calls are more flexible. +The standard library tries to be statically dispatched where possible for this reason. ## Dynamic dispatch