mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-12-01 03:03:40 +00:00
Auto merge of #11859 - y21:issue11856, r=blyxyas
[`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: work with bodies instead of blocks separately Fixes #11856 Before this change, this lint would check blocks independently of each other, which means that it misses `assert!()`s from parent blocks. ```rs // check_block assert!(x.len() > 1); { // check_block // no assert here let _ = x[0] + x[1]; } ``` This PR changes it to work with bodies rather than individual blocks. That means that a function will be checked in one go and we can remember if an `assert!` occurred anywhere. Eventually it would be nice to have a more control flow-aware analysis, possibly by rewriting it as a MIR lint, but that's more complicated and I wanted this fixed first. changelog: [`missing_asserts_for_indexing`]: accept `assert!`s from parent blocks
This commit is contained in:
commit
96eab0655f
@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use clippy_utils::{eq_expr_value, hash_expr, higher};
|
||||
use rustc_ast::{LitKind, RangeLimits};
|
||||
use rustc_data_structures::unhash::UnhashMap;
|
||||
use rustc_errors::{Applicability, Diagnostic};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{BinOp, Block, Expr, ExprKind, UnOp};
|
||||
use rustc_hir::{BinOp, Block, Body, Expr, ExprKind, UnOp};
|
||||
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
|
||||
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
|
||||
use rustc_span::source_map::Spanned;
|
||||
@ -390,10 +390,10 @@ fn report_indexes(cx: &LateContext<'_>, map: &UnhashMap<u64, Vec<IndexEntry<'_>>
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl LateLintPass<'_> for MissingAssertsForIndexing {
|
||||
fn check_block(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'_>, block: &Block<'_>) {
|
||||
fn check_body(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'_>, body: &Body<'_>) {
|
||||
let mut map = UnhashMap::default();
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_expr(block, |expr| {
|
||||
for_each_expr(body.value, |expr| {
|
||||
check_index(cx, expr, &mut map);
|
||||
check_assert(cx, expr, &mut map);
|
||||
ControlFlow::<!, ()>::Continue(())
|
||||
|
@ -46,4 +46,26 @@ fn index_struct_different_fields(f: &Foo<'_>) {
|
||||
let _ = f.v[0] + f.v2[1];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn shadowing() {
|
||||
let x: &[i32] = &[1];
|
||||
assert!(x.len() > 1);
|
||||
|
||||
let x: &[i32] = &[1];
|
||||
let _ = x[0] + x[1];
|
||||
//~^ ERROR: indexing into a slice multiple times without an `assert`
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn issue11856(values: &[i32]) -> usize {
|
||||
let mut ascending = Vec::new();
|
||||
for w in values.windows(2) {
|
||||
assert!(w.len() > 1);
|
||||
if w[0] < w[1] {
|
||||
ascending.push((w[0], w[1]));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ascending.push((w[1], w[0]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ascending.len()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {}
|
||||
|
@ -160,5 +160,24 @@ LL | let _ = f.v[0] + f.v[1];
|
||||
| ^^^^^^
|
||||
= note: asserting the length before indexing will elide bounds checks
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 7 previous errors
|
||||
error: indexing into a slice multiple times without an `assert`
|
||||
--> $DIR/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs:54:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let _ = x[0] + x[1];
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= help: consider asserting the length before indexing: `assert!(x.len() > 1);`
|
||||
note: slice indexed here
|
||||
--> $DIR/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs:54:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let _ = x[0] + x[1];
|
||||
| ^^^^
|
||||
note: slice indexed here
|
||||
--> $DIR/missing_asserts_for_indexing_unfixable.rs:54:20
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | let _ = x[0] + x[1];
|
||||
| ^^^^
|
||||
= note: asserting the length before indexing will elide bounds checks
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 8 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user