auto merge of #9090 : jbclements/rust/let-var-hygiene, r=luqmana

This appears to fix issue #9049. It also re-enables the ICE check on comparing idents for equality; it appears that ICEs are better than seg faults.
This commit is contained in:
bors 2013-09-10 01:06:00 -07:00
commit 96da35611f
4 changed files with 33 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -671,7 +671,8 @@ fn enter_opt<'r>(bcx: @mut Block,
let mut reordered_patterns = ~[];
let r = ty::lookup_struct_fields(tcx, struct_id);
for field in r.iter() {
match field_pats.iter().find(|p| p.ident == field.ident) {
match field_pats.iter().find(|p| p.ident.name
== field.ident.name) {
None => reordered_patterns.push(dummy),
Some(fp) => reordered_patterns.push(fp.pat)
}
@ -752,7 +753,7 @@ fn enter_rec_or_struct<'r>(bcx: @mut Block,
ast::PatStruct(_, ref fpats, _) => {
let mut pats = ~[];
for fname in fields.iter() {
match fpats.iter().find(|p| p.ident == *fname) {
match fpats.iter().find(|p| p.ident.name == fname.name) {
None => pats.push(dummy),
Some(pat) => pats.push(pat.pat)
}
@ -1102,7 +1103,7 @@ fn collect_record_or_struct_fields(bcx: @mut Block,
fn extend(idents: &mut ~[ast::Ident], field_pats: &[ast::FieldPat]) {
for field_pat in field_pats.iter() {
let field_ident = field_pat.ident;
if !idents.iter().any(|x| *x == field_ident) {
if !idents.iter().any(|x| x.name == field_ident.name) {
idents.push(field_ident);
}
}

View File

@ -256,7 +256,8 @@ impl Reflector {
let fields = ty::struct_fields(tcx, did, substs);
let mut named_fields = false;
if !fields.is_empty() {
named_fields = fields[0].ident != special_idents::unnamed_field;
named_fields =
fields[0].ident.name != special_idents::unnamed_field.name;
}
let extra = ~[self.c_slice(ty_to_str(tcx, t).to_managed()),

View File

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ use extra::serialize::{Encodable, Decodable, Encoder, Decoder};
// table) and a SyntaxContext to track renaming and
// macro expansion per Flatt et al., "Macros
// That Work Together"
#[deriving(Clone, Eq, IterBytes, ToStr)]
#[deriving(Clone, IterBytes, ToStr)]
pub struct Ident { name: Name, ctxt: SyntaxContext }
impl Ident {
@ -36,17 +36,7 @@ impl Ident {
pub fn new(name: Name) -> Ident { Ident {name: name, ctxt: EMPTY_CTXT}}
}
// defining eq in this way is a way of guaranteeing that later stages of the
// compiler don't compare identifiers unhygienically. Unfortunately, some tests
// (specifically debuginfo in no-opt) want to do these comparisons, and that
// seems fine. If only I could find a nice way to statically ensure that
// the compiler "proper" never compares identifiers.... I'm leaving this
// code here (commented out) for potential use in debugging. Specifically, if
// there's a bug where "identifiers aren't matching", it may be because
// they should be compared using mtwt_resolve. In such a case, re-enabling this
// code (and disabling deriving(Eq) for Idents) could help to isolate the
// problem
/* impl Eq for Ident {
impl Eq for Ident {
fn eq(&self, other: &Ident) -> bool {
if (self.ctxt == other.ctxt) {
self.name == other.name
@ -64,7 +54,6 @@ impl Ident {
! self.eq(other)
}
}
*/
/// A SyntaxContext represents a chain of macro-expandings
/// and renamings. Each macro expansion corresponds to

View File

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
// Copyright 2012 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
enum Foo {
B { b1: int, bb1: int},
}
macro_rules! match_inside_expansion(
() => (
match B { b1:29 , bb1: 100} {
B { b1:b2 , bb1:bb2 } => b2+bb2
}
)
)
fn main() {
assert_eq!(match_inside_expansion!(),129);
}