Merge pull request #2156 from cgm616/master

Deprecate should_assert_eq lint
This commit is contained in:
Oliver Schneider 2017-10-20 15:24:52 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 9293188b65
6 changed files with 13 additions and 154 deletions

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
A collection of lints to catch common mistakes and improve your [Rust](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust) code.
[There are 209 lints included in this crate!](https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html)
[There are 208 lints included in this crate!](https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html)
More to come, please [file an issue](https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rust-clippy/issues) if you have ideas!

View File

@ -4,6 +4,14 @@ macro_rules! declare_deprecated_lint {
}
}
/// **What it does:** Nothing. This lint has been deprecated.
///
/// **Deprecation reason:** This used to check for `assert!(a == b)` and recommend
/// replacement with `assert_eq!(a, b)`, but this is no longer needed after RFC 2011.
declare_deprecated_lint! {
pub SHOULD_ASSERT_EQ,
"`assert!()` will be more flexible with RFC 2011"
}
/// **What it does:** Nothing. This lint has been deprecated.
///

View File

@ -145,7 +145,6 @@ pub mod regex;
pub mod returns;
pub mod serde_api;
pub mod shadow;
pub mod should_assert_eq;
pub mod strings;
pub mod swap;
pub mod temporary_assignment;
@ -200,6 +199,10 @@ pub fn register_plugins(reg: &mut rustc_plugin::Registry) {
};
let mut store = reg.sess.lint_store.borrow_mut();
store.register_removed(
"should_assert_eq",
"`assert!()` will be more flexible with RFC 2011"
);
store.register_removed(
"extend_from_slice",
"`.extend_from_slice(_)` is a faster way to extend a Vec by a slice",
@ -327,7 +330,6 @@ pub fn register_plugins(reg: &mut rustc_plugin::Registry) {
reg.register_early_lint_pass(box double_parens::DoubleParens);
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box unused_io_amount::UnusedIoAmount);
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box large_enum_variant::LargeEnumVariant::new(conf.enum_variant_size_threshold));
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box should_assert_eq::ShouldAssertEq);
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box explicit_write::Pass);
reg.register_late_lint_pass(box needless_pass_by_value::NeedlessPassByValue);
reg.register_early_lint_pass(box literal_digit_grouping::LiteralDigitGrouping);
@ -546,7 +548,6 @@ pub fn register_plugins(reg: &mut rustc_plugin::Registry) {
returns::LET_AND_RETURN,
returns::NEEDLESS_RETURN,
serde_api::SERDE_API_MISUSE,
should_assert_eq::SHOULD_ASSERT_EQ,
strings::STRING_LIT_AS_BYTES,
swap::ALMOST_SWAPPED,
swap::MANUAL_SWAP,

View File

@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
use rustc::lint::*;
use rustc::hir::*;
use utils::{implements_trait, is_direct_expn_of, is_expn_of, span_lint};
/// **What it does:** Checks for `assert!(x == y)` or `assert!(x != y)` which
/// can be better written
/// using `assert_eq` or `assert_ne` if `x` and `y` implement `Debug` trait.
///
/// **Why is this bad?** `assert_eq` and `assert_ne` provide better assertion
/// failure reporting.
///
/// **Known problems:** Hopefully none.
///
/// **Example:**
/// ```rust
/// let (x, y) = (1, 2);
///
/// assert!(x == y); // assertion failed: x == y
/// assert_eq!(x, y); // assertion failed: `(left == right)` (left: `1`, right:
/// `2`)
/// ```
declare_lint! {
pub SHOULD_ASSERT_EQ,
Warn,
"using `assert` macro for asserting equality"
}
pub struct ShouldAssertEq;
impl LintPass for ShouldAssertEq {
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
lint_array![SHOULD_ASSERT_EQ]
}
}
impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for ShouldAssertEq {
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, e: &'tcx Expr) {
if_let_chain! {[
let ExprIf(ref cond, ..) = e.node,
let ExprUnary(UnOp::UnNot, ref cond) = cond.node,
let ExprBinary(ref binop, ref expr1, ref expr2) = cond.node,
is_direct_expn_of(e.span, "assert").is_some(),
let Some(debug_trait) = cx.tcx.lang_items().debug_trait(),
], {
let debug = is_expn_of(e.span, "debug_assert").map_or("", |_| "debug_");
let sugg = match binop.node {
BinOp_::BiEq => "assert_eq",
BinOp_::BiNe => "assert_ne",
_ => return,
};
let ty1 = cx.tables.expr_ty(expr1);
let ty2 = cx.tables.expr_ty(expr2);
if implements_trait(cx, ty1, debug_trait, &[]) &&
implements_trait(cx, ty2, debug_trait, &[]) {
span_lint(cx, SHOULD_ASSERT_EQ, e.span, &format!("use `{}{}` for better reporting", debug, sugg));
}
}}
}
}

View File

@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
#![allow(needless_pass_by_value)]
#![warn(should_assert_eq)]
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq)]
struct NonDebug(i32);
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
struct Debug(i32);
fn main() {
assert!(1 == 2);
assert!(Debug(1) == Debug(2));
assert!(NonDebug(1) == NonDebug(1)); // ok
assert!(Debug(1) != Debug(2));
assert!(NonDebug(1) != NonDebug(2)); // ok
test_generic(1, 2, 3, 4);
debug_assert!(4 == 5);
debug_assert!(4 != 6);
}
fn test_generic<T: std::fmt::Debug + Eq, U: Eq>(x: T, y: T, z: U, w: U) {
assert!(x == y);
assert!(z == w); // ok
assert!(x != y);
assert!(z != w); // ok
}

View File

@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
error: use `assert_eq` for better reporting
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:14:5
|
14 | assert!(1 == 2);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D should-assert-eq` implied by `-D warnings`
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
error: use `assert_eq` for better reporting
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:15:5
|
15 | assert!(Debug(1) == Debug(2));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
error: use `assert_ne` for better reporting
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:17:5
|
17 | assert!(Debug(1) != Debug(2));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
error: use `debug_assert_eq` for better reporting
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:22:5
|
22 | debug_assert!(4 == 5);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
error: use `debug_assert_ne` for better reporting
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:23:5
|
23 | debug_assert!(4 != 6);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
error: use `assert_eq` for better reporting
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:27:5
|
27 | assert!(x == y);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
error: use `assert_ne` for better reporting
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:30:5
|
30 | assert!(x != y);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate