Do raise a same-arms warning when the two arms are separated by an arm with a guard, fix #1996.

clippy_lints/src/copies.rs

@@ -178,22 +178,26 @@ fn lint_same_cond(cx: &LateContext, conds: &[&Expr]) {
 
 /// Implementation if `MATCH_SAME_ARMS`.
 fn lint_match_arms(cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr) {
-    let hash = |arm: &Arm| -> u64 {
+    if let ExprMatch(_, ref arms, MatchSource::Normal) = expr.node {
+        let hash = |&(_, arm): &(usize, &Arm)| -> u64 {
             let mut h = SpanlessHash::new(cx);
             h.hash_expr(&arm.body);
             h.finish()
         };
 
-    let eq = |lhs: &Arm, rhs: &Arm| -> bool {
+        let eq = |&(lindex, lhs): &(usize, &Arm), &(rindex, rhs): &(usize, &Arm)| -> bool {
+            let min_index = usize::min(lindex, rindex);
+            let max_index = usize::max(rindex, rindex);
             // Arms with a guard are ignored, those can’t always be merged together
-        lhs.guard.is_none() && rhs.guard.is_none() &&
+            // This is also the case for arms in-between each there is an arm with a guard
+            (min_index..=max_index).all(|index| arms[index].guard.is_none()) &&
                 SpanlessEq::new(cx).eq_expr(&lhs.body, &rhs.body) &&
                 // all patterns should have the same bindings
                 bindings(cx, &lhs.pats[0]) == bindings(cx, &rhs.pats[0])
         };
 
-    if let ExprMatch(_, ref arms, MatchSource::Normal) = expr.node {
+        let indexed_arms: Vec<(usize, &Arm)> = arms.iter().enumerate().collect();
-        if let Some((i, j)) = search_same(arms, hash, eq) {
+        if let Some((&(_, i), &(_, j))) = search_same(&indexed_arms, hash, eq) {
             span_lint_and_then(
                 cx,
                 MATCH_SAME_ARMS,

tests/ui/matches.rs

@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ fn match_wild_err_arm() {
         Err(_) => println!("err")
     }
 
-    // this is a current false positive, see #1996
+    // this used to be a false positive, see #1996
     match x {
         Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
         Ok(x) if x*x == 64 => println!("ok 64"),

tests/ui/matches.stderr

@@ -390,24 +390,6 @@ note: consider refactoring into `Ok(3) | Ok(_)`
     |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     = note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info)
 
-error: this `match` has identical arm bodies
-   --> $DIR/matches.rs:292:18
-    |
-292 |         Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
-    |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-    |
-note: same as this
-   --> $DIR/matches.rs:290:18
-    |
-290 |         Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
-    |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-note: consider refactoring into `Ok(3) | Ok(_)`
-   --> $DIR/matches.rs:290:18
-    |
-290 |         Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
-    |                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-    = note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info)
-
 error: this `match` has identical arm bodies
    --> $DIR/matches.rs:298:29
     |

tests/ui/regex.stderr

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ error: trivial regex
 error: trivial regex
   --> $DIR/regex.rs:62:40
    |
-62 |     let trivial_backslash = Regex::new("a/.b");
+62 |     let trivial_backslash = Regex::new("a//.b");
    |                                        ^^^^^^^
    |
    = help: consider using consider using `str::contains`