diff --git a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir.rs b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir.rs index 8f26e05cb72..0e5b56d3491 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir.rs @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Pat<'tcx> { | Binding { subpattern: Some(subpattern), .. } | Deref { subpattern } | DerefPattern { subpattern, .. } - | InlineConstant { subpattern, .. } => subpattern.walk_(it), + | ExpandedConstant { subpattern, .. } => subpattern.walk_(it), Leaf { subpatterns } | Variant { subpatterns, .. } => { subpatterns.iter().for_each(|field| field.pattern.walk_(it)) } @@ -788,12 +788,17 @@ pub enum PatKind<'tcx> { value: mir::Const<'tcx>, }, - /// Inline constant found while lowering a pattern. - InlineConstant { - /// [LocalDefId] of the constant, we need this so that we have a + /// Pattern obtained by converting a constant (inline or named) to its pattern + /// representation using `const_to_pat`. + ExpandedConstant { + /// [DefId] of the constant, we need this so that we have a /// reference that can be used by unsafety checking to visit nested - /// unevaluated constants. - def: LocalDefId, + /// unevaluated constants and for diagnostics. If the `DefId` doesn't + /// correspond to a local crate, it points at the `const` item. + def_id: DefId, + /// If `false`, then `def_id` points at a `const` item, otherwise it + /// corresponds to a local inline const. + is_inline: bool, /// If the inline constant is used in a range pattern, this subpattern /// represents the range (if both ends are inline constants, there will /// be multiple InlineConstant wrappers). diff --git a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir/visit.rs b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir/visit.rs index 36f0e3d890c..81202a6eaad 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir/visit.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir/visit.rs @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ pub fn walk_pat<'thir, 'tcx: 'thir, V: Visitor<'thir, 'tcx>>( } } Constant { value: _ } => {} - InlineConstant { def: _, subpattern } => visitor.visit_pat(subpattern), + ExpandedConstant { def_id: _, is_inline: _, subpattern } => visitor.visit_pat(subpattern), Range(_) => {} Slice { prefix, slice, suffix } | Array { prefix, slice, suffix } => { for subpattern in prefix.iter() { diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/custom/parse/instruction.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/custom/parse/instruction.rs index d08809ef67b..c3e9bd302de 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/custom/parse/instruction.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/custom/parse/instruction.rs @@ -144,12 +144,20 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ParseCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { let mut targets = Vec::new(); for arm in rest { let arm = &self.thir[*arm]; - let PatKind::Constant { value } = arm.pattern.kind else { - return Err(ParseError { - span: arm.pattern.span, - item_description: format!("{:?}", arm.pattern.kind), - expected: "constant pattern".to_string(), - }); + let value = match arm.pattern.kind { + PatKind::Constant { value } => value, + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { ref subpattern, def_id: _, is_inline: false } + if let PatKind::Constant { value } = subpattern.kind => + { + value + } + _ => { + return Err(ParseError { + span: arm.pattern.span, + item_description: format!("{:?}", arm.pattern.kind), + expected: "constant pattern".to_string(), + }); + } }; values.push(value.eval_bits(self.tcx, self.typing_env)); targets.push(self.parse_block(arm.body)?); diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/match_pair.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/match_pair.rs index fcbf84a41d9..2815b390375 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/match_pair.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/match_pair.rs @@ -162,7 +162,11 @@ impl<'pat, 'tcx> MatchPairTree<'pat, 'tcx> { TestCase::Irrefutable { ascription: None, binding } } - PatKind::InlineConstant { subpattern: ref pattern, def, .. } => { + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern: ref pattern, def_id: _, is_inline: false } => { + subpairs.push(MatchPairTree::for_pattern(place_builder, pattern, cx)); + default_irrefutable() + } + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern: ref pattern, def_id, is_inline: true } => { // Apply a type ascription for the inline constant to the value at `match_pair.place` let ascription = place.map(|source| { let span = pattern.span; @@ -173,7 +177,7 @@ impl<'pat, 'tcx> MatchPairTree<'pat, 'tcx> { }) .args; let user_ty = cx.infcx.canonicalize_user_type_annotation(ty::UserType::TypeOf( - def.to_def_id(), + def_id, ty::UserArgs { args, user_self_ty: None }, )); let annotation = ty::CanonicalUserTypeAnnotation { diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs index a62d4e9d873..9f81e1052d6 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> { self.visit_primary_bindings(subpattern, subpattern_user_ty, f) } - PatKind::InlineConstant { ref subpattern, .. } => { + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { ref subpattern, .. } => { self.visit_primary_bindings(subpattern, pattern_user_ty, f) } diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs index 4a64a1f0f3e..66ea0a6e836 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'a, 'tcx> for UnsafetyVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { PatKind::Wild | // these just wrap other patterns, which we recurse on below. PatKind::Or { .. } | - PatKind::InlineConstant { .. } | + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { .. } | PatKind::AscribeUserType { .. } | PatKind::Error(_) => {} } @@ -386,8 +386,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'a, 'tcx> for UnsafetyVisitor<'a, 'tcx> { visit::walk_pat(self, pat); self.inside_adt = old_inside_adt; } - PatKind::InlineConstant { def, .. } => { - self.visit_inner_body(*def); + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { def_id, is_inline, .. } => { + if let Some(def) = def_id.as_local() + && *is_inline + { + self.visit_inner_body(def); + } visit::walk_pat(self, pat); } _ => { diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/errors.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/errors.rs index 62c6d85b73f..676f7c98b8f 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/errors.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/errors.rs @@ -860,8 +860,10 @@ pub(crate) struct PatternNotCovered<'s, 'tcx> { pub(crate) uncovered: Uncovered, #[subdiagnostic] pub(crate) inform: Option, + #[label(mir_build_confused)] + pub(crate) interpreted_as_const: Option, #[subdiagnostic] - pub(crate) interpreted_as_const: Option, + pub(crate) interpreted_as_const_sugg: Option, #[subdiagnostic] pub(crate) adt_defined_here: Option>, #[note(mir_build_privately_uninhabited)] @@ -911,9 +913,9 @@ impl<'tcx> Subdiagnostic for AdtDefinedHere<'tcx> { #[suggestion( mir_build_interpreted_as_const, code = "{variable}_var", - applicability = "maybe-incorrect" + applicability = "maybe-incorrect", + style = "verbose" )] -#[label(mir_build_confused)] pub(crate) struct InterpretedAsConst { #[primary_span] pub(crate) span: Span, diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/check_match.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/check_match.rs index 033501c66db..27920008c80 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/check_match.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/check_match.rs @@ -678,8 +678,25 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx> MatchVisitor<'p, 'tcx> { let mut let_suggestion = None; let mut misc_suggestion = None; let mut interpreted_as_const = None; + let mut interpreted_as_const_sugg = None; - if let PatKind::Constant { .. } + if let PatKind::ExpandedConstant { def_id, is_inline: false, .. } + | PatKind::AscribeUserType { + subpattern: + box Pat { kind: PatKind::ExpandedConstant { def_id, is_inline: false, .. }, .. }, + .. + } = pat.kind + && let DefKind::Const = self.tcx.def_kind(def_id) + && let Ok(snippet) = self.tcx.sess.source_map().span_to_snippet(pat.span) + // We filter out paths with multiple path::segments. + && snippet.chars().all(|c| c.is_alphanumeric() || c == '_') + { + let span = self.tcx.def_span(def_id); + let variable = self.tcx.item_name(def_id).to_string(); + // When we encounter a constant as the binding name, point at the `const` definition. + interpreted_as_const = Some(span); + interpreted_as_const_sugg = Some(InterpretedAsConst { span: pat.span, variable }); + } else if let PatKind::Constant { .. } | PatKind::AscribeUserType { subpattern: box Pat { kind: PatKind::Constant { .. }, .. }, .. @@ -692,9 +709,6 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx> MatchVisitor<'p, 'tcx> { misc_suggestion = Some(MiscPatternSuggestion::AttemptedIntegerLiteral { start_span: pat.span.shrink_to_lo(), }); - } else if snippet.chars().all(|c| c.is_alphanumeric() || c == '_') { - interpreted_as_const = - Some(InterpretedAsConst { span: pat.span, variable: snippet }); } } @@ -743,6 +757,7 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx> MatchVisitor<'p, 'tcx> { uncovered: Uncovered::new(pat.span, &cx, witnesses), inform, interpreted_as_const, + interpreted_as_const_sugg, witness_1_is_privately_uninhabited, _p: (), pattern_ty, @@ -1112,13 +1127,13 @@ fn report_non_exhaustive_match<'p, 'tcx>( if ty.is_ptr_sized_integral() { if ty.inner() == cx.tcx.types.usize { err.note(format!( - "`{ty}` does not have a fixed maximum value, so half-open ranges are necessary to match \ - exhaustively", + "`{ty}` does not have a fixed maximum value, so half-open ranges are \ + necessary to match exhaustively", )); } else if ty.inner() == cx.tcx.types.isize { err.note(format!( - "`{ty}` does not have fixed minimum and maximum values, so half-open ranges are necessary to match \ - exhaustively", + "`{ty}` does not have fixed minimum and maximum values, so half-open \ + ranges are necessary to match exhaustively", )); } } else if ty.inner() == cx.tcx.types.str_ { @@ -1139,6 +1154,31 @@ fn report_non_exhaustive_match<'p, 'tcx>( } } + for &arm in arms { + let arm = &thir.arms[arm]; + if let PatKind::ExpandedConstant { def_id, is_inline: false, .. } = arm.pattern.kind + && let Ok(snippet) = cx.tcx.sess.source_map().span_to_snippet(arm.pattern.span) + // We filter out paths with multiple path::segments. + && snippet.chars().all(|c| c.is_alphanumeric() || c == '_') + { + let const_name = cx.tcx.item_name(def_id); + err.span_label( + arm.pattern.span, + format!( + "this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern \ + matches against the value of constant `{const_name}`", + ), + ); + err.span_note(cx.tcx.def_span(def_id), format!("constant `{const_name}` defined here")); + err.span_suggestion_verbose( + arm.pattern.span.shrink_to_hi(), + "if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name", + "_var".to_string(), + Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, + ); + } + } + // Whether we suggest the actual missing patterns or `_`. let suggest_the_witnesses = witnesses.len() < 4; let suggested_arm = if suggest_the_witnesses { diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/mod.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/mod.rs index 6b9e3b85999..08c6b4abd3b 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/mod.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/pattern/mod.rs @@ -149,21 +149,30 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> PatCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { None => Ok((None, None, None)), Some(expr) => { let (kind, ascr, inline_const) = match self.lower_lit(expr) { - PatKind::InlineConstant { subpattern, def } => { - (subpattern.kind, None, Some(def)) + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern, def_id, is_inline: true } => { + (subpattern.kind, None, def_id.as_local()) + } + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern, is_inline: false, .. } => { + (subpattern.kind, None, None) } PatKind::AscribeUserType { ascription, subpattern: box Pat { kind, .. } } => { (kind, Some(ascription), None) } kind => (kind, None, None), }; - let value = if let PatKind::Constant { value } = kind { - value - } else { - let msg = format!( - "found bad range pattern endpoint `{expr:?}` outside of error recovery" - ); - return Err(self.tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(expr.span, msg)); + let value = match kind { + PatKind::Constant { value } => value, + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern, .. } + if let PatKind::Constant { value } = subpattern.kind => + { + value + } + _ => { + let msg = format!( + "found bad range pattern endpoint `{expr:?}` outside of error recovery" + ); + return Err(self.tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(expr.span, msg)); + } }; Ok((Some(PatRangeBoundary::Finite(value)), ascr, inline_const)) } @@ -288,7 +297,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> PatCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { }; } for def in [lo_inline, hi_inline].into_iter().flatten() { - kind = PatKind::InlineConstant { def, subpattern: Box::new(Pat { span, ty, kind }) }; + kind = PatKind::ExpandedConstant { + def_id: def.to_def_id(), + is_inline: true, + subpattern: Box::new(Pat { span, ty, kind }), + }; } Ok(kind) } @@ -562,7 +575,12 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> PatCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { let args = self.typeck_results.node_args(id); let c = ty::Const::new_unevaluated(self.tcx, ty::UnevaluatedConst { def: def_id, args }); - let pattern = self.const_to_pat(c, ty, id, span); + let subpattern = self.const_to_pat(c, ty, id, span); + let pattern = Box::new(Pat { + span, + ty, + kind: PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern, def_id, is_inline: false }, + }); if !is_associated_const { return pattern; @@ -637,7 +655,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> PatCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { let ct = ty::UnevaluatedConst { def: def_id.to_def_id(), args }; let subpattern = self.const_to_pat(ty::Const::new_unevaluated(self.tcx, ct), ty, id, span); - PatKind::InlineConstant { subpattern, def: def_id } + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern, def_id: def_id.to_def_id(), is_inline: true } } /// Converts literals, paths and negation of literals to patterns. diff --git a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/print.rs b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/print.rs index dae13df4054..6be0ed5fb31 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/print.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/thir/print.rs @@ -707,9 +707,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ThirPrinter<'a, 'tcx> { print_indented!(self, format!("value: {:?}", value), depth_lvl + 2); print_indented!(self, "}", depth_lvl + 1); } - PatKind::InlineConstant { def, subpattern } => { - print_indented!(self, "InlineConstant {", depth_lvl + 1); - print_indented!(self, format!("def: {:?}", def), depth_lvl + 2); + PatKind::ExpandedConstant { def_id, is_inline, subpattern } => { + print_indented!(self, "ExpandedConstant {", depth_lvl + 1); + print_indented!(self, format!("def_id: {def_id:?}"), depth_lvl + 2); + print_indented!(self, format!("is_inline: {is_inline:?}"), depth_lvl + 2); print_indented!(self, "subpattern:", depth_lvl + 2); self.print_pat(subpattern, depth_lvl + 2); print_indented!(self, "}", depth_lvl + 1); diff --git a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/rustc.rs b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/rustc.rs index 936e5235c55..cc0763ac751 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/rustc.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/rustc.rs @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx: 'p> RustcPatCtxt<'p, 'tcx> { let fields: Vec<_>; match &pat.kind { PatKind::AscribeUserType { subpattern, .. } - | PatKind::InlineConstant { subpattern, .. } => return self.lower_pat(subpattern), + | PatKind::ExpandedConstant { subpattern, .. } => return self.lower_pat(subpattern), PatKind::Binding { subpattern: Some(subpat), .. } => return self.lower_pat(subpat), PatKind::Binding { subpattern: None, .. } | PatKind::Wild => { ctor = Wildcard; diff --git a/tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/bad-pattern.stderr b/tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/bad-pattern.stderr index ca8c2a16d32..5f980c46a1f 100644 --- a/tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/bad-pattern.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/closures/2229_closure_analysis/bad-pattern.stderr @@ -97,16 +97,19 @@ LL | if let Refutable::A = v3 { todo!() }; error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13 | +LL | const PAT: u32 = 0; + | -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable +... LL | let PAT = v1; - | ^^^ - | | - | pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered - | missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable - | help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var` + | ^^^ pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u32` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let PAT_var = v1; + | ~~~~~~~ error: aborting due to 7 previous errors diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs index 61bdf57ffdb..759d2e8b2ed 100644 --- a/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs @@ -1,28 +1,43 @@ mod foo { pub const b: u8 = 2; - pub const d: u8 = 2; + //~^ missing patterns are not covered because `b` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable + pub const d: (u8, u8) = (2, 1); + //~^ missing patterns are not covered because `d` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable } use foo::b as c; use foo::d; const a: u8 = 2; +//~^ missing patterns are not covered because `a` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable + +#[derive(PartialEq)] +struct S { + foo: u8, +} + +const e: S = S { + foo: 0, +}; fn main() { let a = 4; //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding //~| patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered - //~| missing patterns are not covered because `a` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable //~| HELP introduce a variable instead let c = 4; //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding //~| patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered - //~| missing patterns are not covered because `c` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable //~| HELP introduce a variable instead - let d = 4; + let d = (4, 4); //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding - //~| patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered - //~| missing patterns are not covered because `d` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable + //~| patterns `(0_u8..=1_u8, _)` and `(3_u8..=u8::MAX, _)` not covered //~| HELP introduce a variable instead + let e = S { + //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding + //~| pattern `S { foo: 1_u8..=u8::MAX }` not covered + //~| HELP introduce a variable instead + foo: 1, + }; fn f() {} // Check that the `NOTE`s still work with an item here (cf. issue #35115). } diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.stderr b/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.stderr index 2aed68bdd64..afb67a3a118 100644 --- a/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-pattern-irrefutable.stderr @@ -1,45 +1,76 @@ error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding - --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:12:9 + --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:24:9 | +LL | const a: u8 = 2; + | ----------- missing patterns are not covered because `a` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable +... LL | let a = 4; - | ^ - | | - | patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered - | missing patterns are not covered because `a` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable - | help: introduce a variable instead: `a_var` + | ^ patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u8` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let a_var = 4; + | ~~~~~ error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding - --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:17:9 + --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:28:9 | +LL | pub const b: u8 = 2; + | --------------- missing patterns are not covered because `b` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable +... LL | let c = 4; - | ^ - | | - | patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered - | missing patterns are not covered because `c` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable - | help: introduce a variable instead: `c_var` + | ^ patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u8` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let b_var = 4; + | ~~~~~ error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding - --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:22:9 + --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:32:9 | -LL | let d = 4; - | ^ - | | - | patterns `0_u8..=1_u8` and `3_u8..=u8::MAX` not covered - | missing patterns are not covered because `d` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable - | help: introduce a variable instead: `d_var` +LL | pub const d: (u8, u8) = (2, 1); + | --------------------- missing patterns are not covered because `d` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable +... +LL | let d = (4, 4); + | ^ patterns `(0_u8..=1_u8, _)` and `(3_u8..=u8::MAX, _)` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html - = note: the matched value is of type `u8` + = note: the matched value is of type `(u8, u8)` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let d_var = (4, 4); + | ~~~~~ -error: aborting due to 3 previous errors +error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding + --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:36:9 + | +LL | const e: S = S { + | ---------- missing patterns are not covered because `e` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable +... +LL | let e = S { + | ^ pattern `S { foo: 1_u8..=u8::MAX }` not covered + | + = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant + = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html +note: `S` defined here + --> $DIR/const-pattern-irrefutable.rs:15:8 + | +LL | struct S { + | ^ + = note: the matched value is of type `S` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let e_var = S { + | ~~~~~ + +error: aborting due to 4 previous errors For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0005`. diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/incomplete-slice.stderr b/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/incomplete-slice.stderr index bd61f43727b..c73d1f05900 100644 --- a/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/incomplete-slice.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const_in_pattern/incomplete-slice.stderr @@ -3,8 +3,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered | LL | match &[][..] { | ^^^^^^^ patterns `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered +LL | +LL | E_SL => {} + | ---- this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `E_SL` | = note: the matched value is of type `&[E]` +note: constant `E_SL` defined here + --> $DIR/incomplete-slice.rs:6:1 + | +LL | const E_SL: &[E] = &[E::A]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | E_SL_var => {} + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL ~ E_SL => {}, diff --git a/tests/ui/match/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs b/tests/ui/match/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95c8119cdb9 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/match/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +fn main() { + match 1 { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns + //~^ patterns `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered + //~| the matched value is of type `i32` + x => {} //~ this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding + //~^ HELP ensure that all possible cases are being handled + //~| HELP if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + } + const x: i32 = 4; //~ NOTE constant `x` defined here +} diff --git a/tests/ui/match/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.stderr b/tests/ui/match/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.stderr new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..99af1c7a16e --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/match/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered + --> $DIR/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs:2:11 + | +LL | match 1 { + | ^ patterns `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered +... +LL | x => {} + | - this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `x` + | + = note: the matched value is of type `i32` +note: constant `x` defined here + --> $DIR/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs:9:5 + | +LL | const x: i32 = 4; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | x_var => {} + | ++++ +help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms + | +LL | x => {}, i32::MIN..=3_i32 | 5_i32..=i32::MAX => todo!() + | ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + +error: aborting due to 1 previous error + +For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0004`. diff --git a/tests/ui/mir/issue-112269.stderr b/tests/ui/mir/issue-112269.stderr index f5b79602797..adb662c98a7 100644 --- a/tests/ui/mir/issue-112269.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/mir/issue-112269.stderr @@ -1,30 +1,34 @@ error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/issue-112269.rs:3:9 | +LL | const x: i32 = 4; + | ------------ missing patterns are not covered because `x` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable LL | let x: i32 = 3; - | ^ - | | - | patterns `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered - | missing patterns are not covered because `x` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable - | help: introduce a variable instead: `x_var` + | ^ patterns `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `i32` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let x_var: i32 = 3; + | ~~~~~ error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/issue-112269.rs:7:9 | +LL | const y: i32 = 3; + | ------------ missing patterns are not covered because `y` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable LL | let y = 4; - | ^ - | | - | patterns `i32::MIN..=2_i32` and `4_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered - | missing patterns are not covered because `y` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable - | help: introduce a variable instead: `y_var` + | ^ patterns `i32::MIN..=2_i32` and `4_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `i32` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let y_var = 4; + | ~~~~~ error: aborting due to 2 previous errors diff --git a/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/match-arm-statics-2.stderr b/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/match-arm-statics-2.stderr index e4dd35a5995..60b4fcca286 100644 --- a/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/match-arm-statics-2.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/match-arm-statics-2.stderr @@ -3,8 +3,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(true, false)` not covered | LL | match (true, false) { | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `(true, false)` not covered +LL | +LL | TRUE_TRUE => (), + | --------- this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `TRUE_TRUE` | = note: the matched value is of type `(bool, bool)` +note: constant `TRUE_TRUE` defined here + --> $DIR/match-arm-statics-2.rs:14:1 + | +LL | const TRUE_TRUE: (bool, bool) = (true, true); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | TRUE_TRUE_var => (), + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown | LL ~ (false, true) => (), diff --git a/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.stderr b/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.stderr index a8786d02414..0a3991fe3d1 100644 --- a/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.stderr @@ -199,8 +199,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered | LL | match s { | ^ patterns `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered +LL | +LL | CONST => {} + | ----- this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `CONST` | = note: the matched value is of type `&[bool]` +note: constant `CONST` defined here + --> $DIR/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.rs:88:5 + | +LL | const CONST: &[bool] = &[true]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | CONST_var => {} + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL ~ CONST => {}, @@ -212,8 +224,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered | LL | match s { | ^ patterns `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered +LL | +LL | CONST => {} + | ----- this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `CONST` | = note: the matched value is of type `&[bool]` +note: constant `CONST` defined here + --> $DIR/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.rs:88:5 + | +LL | const CONST: &[bool] = &[true]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | CONST_var => {} + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL ~ &[false] => {}, @@ -225,8 +249,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered | LL | match s { | ^ patterns `&[]` and `&[_, _, ..]` not covered +... +LL | CONST => {} + | ----- this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `CONST` | = note: the matched value is of type `&[bool]` +note: constant `CONST` defined here + --> $DIR/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.rs:88:5 + | +LL | const CONST: &[bool] = &[true]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | CONST_var => {} + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL ~ CONST => {}, @@ -238,8 +274,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[_, _, ..]` not covered | LL | match s { | ^ pattern `&[_, _, ..]` not covered +... +LL | CONST => {} + | ----- this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `CONST` | = note: the matched value is of type `&[bool]` +note: constant `CONST` defined here + --> $DIR/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.rs:88:5 + | +LL | const CONST: &[bool] = &[true]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | CONST_var => {} + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown | LL ~ CONST => {}, @@ -251,8 +299,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[false]` not covered | LL | match s { | ^ pattern `&[false]` not covered +... +LL | CONST => {} + | ----- this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `CONST` | = note: the matched value is of type `&[bool]` +note: constant `CONST` defined here + --> $DIR/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.rs:88:5 + | +LL | const CONST: &[bool] = &[true]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | CONST_var => {} + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown | LL ~ &[_, _, ..] => {}, @@ -264,8 +324,20 @@ error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&[false]` not covered | LL | match s1 { | ^^ pattern `&[false]` not covered +LL | +LL | CONST1 => {} + | ------ this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `CONST1` | = note: the matched value is of type `&[bool; 1]` +note: constant `CONST1` defined here + --> $DIR/slice-patterns-exhaustiveness.rs:124:5 + | +LL | const CONST1: &[bool; 1] = &[true]; + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name + | +LL | CONST1_var => {} + | ++++ help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown | LL ~ CONST1 => {}, diff --git a/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.rs b/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.rs index af47ba8baa3..1a440a90cd7 100644 --- a/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.rs +++ b/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.rs @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ fn main() { let A = 3; //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding //~| patterns `i32::MIN..=1_i32` and `3_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered - //~| missing patterns are not covered because `A` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable //~| HELP introduce a variable instead //~| SUGGESTION A_var const A: i32 = 2; + //~^ missing patterns are not covered because `A` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable } diff --git a/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.stderr b/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.stderr index b6c28612802..a275d8e4e83 100644 --- a/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.stderr +++ b/tests/ui/suggestions/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.stderr @@ -2,15 +2,18 @@ error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/const-pat-non-exaustive-let-new-var.rs:2:9 | LL | let A = 3; - | ^ - | | - | patterns `i32::MIN..=1_i32` and `3_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered - | missing patterns are not covered because `A` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable - | help: introduce a variable instead: `A_var` + | ^ patterns `i32::MIN..=1_i32` and `3_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered +... +LL | const A: i32 = 2; + | ------------ missing patterns are not covered because `A` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `i32` +help: introduce a variable instead + | +LL | let A_var = 3; + | ~~~~~ error: aborting due to 1 previous error