only mark projection as ambiguous if GAT substs are constrained

This commit is contained in:
Michael Goulet 2022-02-10 22:45:58 -08:00
parent e646f3d2a9
commit 784c7a6cad
6 changed files with 88 additions and 43 deletions

View File

@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeVariableTable<'_, 'tcx> {
let index = self.values().push(TypeVariableData { origin });
assert_eq!(eq_key.vid.as_u32(), index as u32);
debug!("new_var(index={:?}, universe={:?}, origin={:?}", eq_key.vid, universe, origin,);
debug!("new_var(index={:?}, universe={:?}, origin={:?})", eq_key.vid, universe, origin);
eq_key.vid
}

View File

@ -1073,16 +1073,6 @@ fn project<'cx, 'tcx>(
return Ok(Projected::Progress(Progress::error(selcx.tcx())));
}
// If the obligation contains any inference types or consts in associated
// type substs, then we don't assemble any candidates.
// This isn't really correct, but otherwise we can end up in a case where
// we constrain inference variables by selecting a single predicate, when
// we need to stay general. See issue #91762.
let (_, predicate_own_substs) = obligation.predicate.trait_ref_and_own_substs(selcx.tcx());
if predicate_own_substs.iter().any(|g| g.has_infer_types_or_consts()) {
return Err(ProjectionError::TooManyCandidates);
}
let mut candidates = ProjectionCandidateSet::None;
// Make sure that the following procedures are kept in order. ParamEnv
@ -1180,7 +1170,7 @@ fn assemble_candidates_from_trait_def<'cx, 'tcx>(
ProjectionCandidate::TraitDef,
bounds.iter(),
true,
)
);
}
/// In the case of a trait object like
@ -1245,27 +1235,34 @@ fn assemble_candidates_from_predicates<'cx, 'tcx>(
let bound_predicate = predicate.kind();
if let ty::PredicateKind::Projection(data) = predicate.kind().skip_binder() {
let data = bound_predicate.rebind(data);
let same_def_id = data.projection_def_id() == obligation.predicate.item_def_id;
if data.projection_def_id() != obligation.predicate.item_def_id {
continue;
}
let is_match = same_def_id
&& infcx.probe(|_| {
selcx.match_projection_projections(
obligation,
data,
potentially_unnormalized_candidates,
)
});
let is_match = infcx.probe(|_| {
selcx.match_projection_projections(
obligation,
data,
potentially_unnormalized_candidates,
)
});
if is_match {
candidate_set.push_candidate(ctor(data));
match is_match {
Some(true) => {
candidate_set.push_candidate(ctor(data));
if potentially_unnormalized_candidates
&& !obligation.predicate.has_infer_types_or_consts()
{
// HACK: Pick the first trait def candidate for a fully
// inferred predicate. This is to allow duplicates that
// differ only in normalization.
return;
if potentially_unnormalized_candidates
&& !obligation.predicate.has_infer_types_or_consts()
{
// HACK: Pick the first trait def candidate for a fully
// inferred predicate. This is to allow duplicates that
// differ only in normalization.
return;
}
}
Some(false) => {}
None => {
candidate_set.mark_ambiguous();
}
}
}

View File

@ -1508,12 +1508,15 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
})
}
/// Return Some(true) if the obligation's predicate type applies to the env_predicate, and
/// Some(false) if it does not. Returns None in the case that the projection type is a GAT,
/// and applying this env_predicate constrains any of the obligation's GAT substitutions.
pub(super) fn match_projection_projections(
&mut self,
obligation: &ProjectionTyObligation<'tcx>,
env_predicate: PolyProjectionPredicate<'tcx>,
potentially_unnormalized_candidates: bool,
) -> bool {
) -> Option<bool> {
let mut nested_obligations = Vec::new();
let (infer_predicate, _) = self.infcx.replace_bound_vars_with_fresh_vars(
obligation.cause.span,
@ -1535,7 +1538,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
infer_predicate.projection_ty
};
self.infcx
let is_match = self
.infcx
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
.define_opaque_types(false)
.sup(obligation.predicate, infer_projection)
@ -1545,7 +1549,24 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
nested_obligations.into_iter().chain(obligations),
)
.map_or(false, |res| res.may_apply())
})
});
if is_match {
let generics = self.tcx().generics_of(obligation.predicate.item_def_id);
if !generics.params.is_empty() {
// If any of the obligation's predicate substs shallow-resolve to
// something new, that means that we must have newly inferred something
// about the GAT. We should give up with ambiguity in that case.
if obligation.predicate.substs[generics.parent_count..]
.iter()
.any(|&p| p.has_infer_types_or_consts() && self.infcx.shallow_resolve(p) != p)
{
return None;
}
}
}
Some(is_match)
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

View File

@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ impl<T> UnsafeCopy for T {}
fn main() {
let b = Box::new(42usize);
let copy = <()>::copy(&b);
//~^ type annotations needed
let raw_b = Box::deref(&b) as *const _;
let raw_copy = Box::deref(&copy) as *const _;

View File

@ -27,13 +27,6 @@ help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
LL | type Copy<T: std::clone::Clone>: Copy = Box<T>;
| +++++++++++++++++++
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> $DIR/issue-74824.rs:19:16
|
LL | let copy = <()>::copy(&b);
| ^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type for type parameter `T` declared on the associated function `copy`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0277, E0282.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
// check-pass
#![feature(generic_associated_types)]
pub trait Build {
type Output<O>;
fn build<O>(self, input: O) -> Self::Output<O>;
}
pub struct IdentityBuild;
impl Build for IdentityBuild {
type Output<O> = O;
fn build<O>(self, input: O) -> Self::Output<O> {
input
}
}
fn a() {
let _x: u8 = IdentityBuild.build(10);
}
fn b() {
let _x: Vec<u8> = IdentityBuild.build(Vec::new());
}
fn c() {
let mut f = IdentityBuild.build(|| ());
(f)();
}
pub fn main() {
a();
b();
c();
}