diff --git a/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.cov-map b/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.cov-map new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b0cee300522 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.cov-map @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +Function name: let_else_loop::_if (unused) +Raw bytes (19): 0x[01, 01, 00, 03, 00, 16, 01, 01, 0c, 00, 02, 09, 00, 10, 00, 02, 09, 00, 10] +Number of files: 1 +- file 0 => global file 1 +Number of expressions: 0 +Number of file 0 mappings: 3 +- Code(Zero) at (prev + 22, 1) to (start + 1, 12) +- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 16) +- Code(Zero) at (prev + 2, 9) to (start + 0, 16) + +Function name: let_else_loop::_loop_either_way (unused) +Raw bytes (19): 0x[01, 01, 00, 03, 00, 0f, 01, 01, 14, 00, 01, 1c, 00, 23, 00, 01, 05, 00, 0c] +Number of files: 1 +- file 0 => global file 1 +Number of expressions: 0 +Number of file 0 mappings: 3 +- Code(Zero) at (prev + 15, 1) to (start + 1, 20) +- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 28) to (start + 0, 35) +- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 5) to (start + 0, 12) + +Function name: let_else_loop::loopy +Raw bytes (19): 0x[01, 01, 00, 03, 01, 09, 01, 01, 14, 00, 01, 1c, 00, 23, 05, 01, 01, 00, 02] +Number of files: 1 +- file 0 => global file 1 +Number of expressions: 0 +Number of file 0 mappings: 3 +- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 9, 1) to (start + 1, 20) +- Code(Zero) at (prev + 1, 28) to (start + 0, 35) +- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 1, 1) to (start + 0, 2) + diff --git a/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.coverage b/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.coverage new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3b3c39ff301 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.coverage @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ + LL| |#![feature(coverage_attribute)] + LL| |//@ edition: 2021 + LL| |//@ ignore-test + LL| |// Regression test for . + LL| |// These code patterns should not trigger an ICE when allocating a physical + LL| |// counter to a node and also one of its in-edges, because that is allowed + LL| |// when the node contains a tight loop to itself. + LL| | + LL| 1|fn loopy(cond: bool) { + LL| 1| let true = cond else { loop {} }; + ^0 + LL| 1|} + LL| | + LL| |// Variant that also has `loop {}` on the success path. + LL| |// This isn't needed to catch the original ICE, but might help detect regressions. + LL| 0|fn _loop_either_way(cond: bool) { + LL| 0| let true = cond else { loop {} }; + LL| 0| loop {} + LL| |} + LL| | + LL| |// Variant using regular `if` instead of let-else. + LL| |// This doesn't trigger the original ICE, but might help detect regressions. + LL| 0|fn _if(cond: bool) { + LL| 0| if cond { + LL| 0| loop {} + LL| | } else { + LL| 0| loop {} + LL| | } + LL| |} + LL| | + LL| |#[coverage(off)] + LL| |fn main() { + LL| | loopy(true); + LL| |} + diff --git a/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.rs b/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..92a252cbbdc --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/coverage/let_else_loop.rs @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +#![feature(coverage_attribute)] +//@ edition: 2021 +//@ ignore-test +// Regression test for . +// These code patterns should not trigger an ICE when allocating a physical +// counter to a node and also one of its in-edges, because that is allowed +// when the node contains a tight loop to itself. + +fn loopy(cond: bool) { + let true = cond else { loop {} }; +} + +// Variant that also has `loop {}` on the success path. +// This isn't needed to catch the original ICE, but might help detect regressions. +fn _loop_either_way(cond: bool) { + let true = cond else { loop {} }; + loop {} +} + +// Variant using regular `if` instead of let-else. +// This doesn't trigger the original ICE, but might help detect regressions. +fn _if(cond: bool) { + if cond { + loop {} + } else { + loop {} + } +} + +#[coverage(off)] +fn main() { + loopy(true); +}