coverage: Make MCDC take in account last RHS of condition-coverage

Condition coverage extends branch coverage to treat the specific case
of last operands of boolean decisions not involved in control flow.
This is ultimately made for MCDC to be exhaustive on all boolean expressions.

This patch adds a call to `visit_branch_coverage_operation` to track the
top-level operand of the said decisions, and changes
`visit_coverage_standalone_condition` so MCDC branch registration is called
when enabled on these _last RHS_ cases.
This commit is contained in:
Dorian Péron 2024-05-03 09:56:13 +00:00
parent acd6e4c0fd
commit 6c7c824767
2 changed files with 47 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@ -118,17 +118,35 @@ impl BranchInfoBuilder {
}
}
fn add_two_way_branch<'tcx>(
fn register_two_way_branch<'tcx>(
&mut self,
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
cfg: &mut CFG<'tcx>,
source_info: SourceInfo,
true_block: BasicBlock,
false_block: BasicBlock,
) {
let true_marker = self.markers.inject_block_marker(cfg, source_info, true_block);
let false_marker = self.markers.inject_block_marker(cfg, source_info, false_block);
// Separate path for handling branches when MC/DC is enabled.
if let Some(mcdc_info) = self.mcdc_info.as_mut() {
let inject_block_marker =
|source_info, block| self.markers.inject_block_marker(cfg, source_info, block);
mcdc_info.visit_evaluated_condition(
tcx,
source_info,
true_block,
false_block,
inject_block_marker,
);
} else {
let true_marker = self.markers.inject_block_marker(cfg, source_info, true_block);
let false_marker = self.markers.inject_block_marker(cfg, source_info, false_block);
self.branch_spans.push(BranchSpan { span: source_info.span, true_marker, false_marker });
self.branch_spans.push(BranchSpan {
span: source_info.span,
true_marker,
false_marker,
});
}
}
pub(crate) fn into_done(self) -> Option<Box<mir::coverage::BranchInfo>> {
@ -205,7 +223,14 @@ impl<'tcx> Builder<'_, 'tcx> {
mir::TerminatorKind::if_(mir::Operand::Copy(place), true_block, false_block),
);
branch_info.add_two_way_branch(&mut self.cfg, source_info, true_block, false_block);
// Separate path for handling branches when MC/DC is enabled.
branch_info.register_two_way_branch(
self.tcx,
&mut self.cfg,
source_info,
true_block,
false_block,
);
let join_block = self.cfg.start_new_block();
self.cfg.goto(true_block, source_info, join_block);
@ -236,22 +261,13 @@ impl<'tcx> Builder<'_, 'tcx> {
let source_info = SourceInfo { span: self.thir[expr_id].span, scope: self.source_scope };
// Separate path for handling branches when MC/DC is enabled.
if let Some(mcdc_info) = branch_info.mcdc_info.as_mut() {
let inject_block_marker = |source_info, block| {
branch_info.markers.inject_block_marker(&mut self.cfg, source_info, block)
};
mcdc_info.visit_evaluated_condition(
self.tcx,
source_info,
then_block,
else_block,
inject_block_marker,
);
return;
}
branch_info.add_two_way_branch(&mut self.cfg, source_info, then_block, else_block);
branch_info.register_two_way_branch(
self.tcx,
&mut self.cfg,
source_info,
then_block,
else_block,
);
}
/// If branch coverage is enabled, inject marker statements into `true_block`
@ -270,6 +286,12 @@ impl<'tcx> Builder<'_, 'tcx> {
// FIXME(#124144) This may need special handling when MC/DC is enabled.
let source_info = SourceInfo { span: pattern.span, scope: self.source_scope };
branch_info.add_two_way_branch(&mut self.cfg, source_info, true_block, false_block);
branch_info.register_two_way_branch(
self.tcx,
&mut self.cfg,
source_info,
true_block,
false_block,
);
}
}

View File

@ -150,6 +150,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
ExprKind::LogicalOp { op, lhs, rhs } => {
let condition_scope = this.local_scope();
let source_info = this.source_info(expr.span);
this.visit_coverage_branch_operation(op, expr.span);
// We first evaluate the left-hand side of the predicate ...
let (then_block, else_block) =
this.in_if_then_scope(condition_scope, expr.span, |this| {