From 646c8fc2c1e9b4c8b67a21d8b40c820bd2aef7a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oli Scherer Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 14:37:07 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Statically ensure an error is reported in report_arg_errors --- .../rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs | 30 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs b/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs index 6a77450f075..405ba392842 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { .map(|vars| self.resolve_vars_if_possible(vars)), ); - self.report_arg_errors( + self.set_tainted_by_errors(self.report_arg_errors( compatibility_diagonal, formal_and_expected_inputs, provided_args, @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { fn_def_id, call_span, call_expr, - ); + )); } } @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { fn_def_id: Option, call_span: Span, call_expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'tcx>, - ) { + ) -> ErrorGuaranteed { // Next, let's construct the error let (error_span, full_call_span, call_name, is_method) = match &call_expr.kind { hir::ExprKind::Call( @@ -486,10 +486,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { } let tcx = self.tcx; - // FIXME: taint after emitting errors and pass through an `ErrorGuaranteed` - self.set_tainted_by_errors( - tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(call_span, "no errors reported for args"), - ); // Get the argument span in the context of the call span so that // suggestions and labels are (more) correct when an arg is a @@ -696,8 +692,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { Some(mismatch_idx), is_method, ); - err.emit(); - return; + return err.emit(); } } } @@ -721,11 +716,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { if cfg!(debug_assertions) { span_bug!(error_span, "expected errors from argument matrix"); } else { - tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::ArgMismatchIndeterminate { span: error_span }); + return tcx.dcx().emit_err(errors::ArgMismatchIndeterminate { span: error_span }); } - return; } + let mut reported = None; errors.retain(|error| { let Error::Invalid(provided_idx, expected_idx, Compatibility::Incompatible(Some(e))) = error @@ -736,16 +731,18 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { let trace = mk_trace(provided_span, formal_and_expected_inputs[*expected_idx], provided_ty); if !matches!(trace.cause.as_failure_code(*e), FailureCode::Error0308) { - self.err_ctxt().report_and_explain_type_error(trace, *e).emit(); + reported = Some(self.err_ctxt().report_and_explain_type_error(trace, *e).emit()); return false; } true }); // We're done if we found errors, but we already emitted them. - if errors.is_empty() { - return; + if let Some(reported) = reported { + assert!(errors.is_empty()); + return reported; } + assert!(!errors.is_empty()); // Okay, now that we've emitted the special errors separately, we // are only left missing/extra/swapped and mismatched arguments, both @@ -802,8 +799,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { Some(expected_idx.as_usize()), is_method, ); - err.emit(); - return; + return err.emit(); } let mut err = if formal_and_expected_inputs.len() == provided_args.len() { @@ -1251,7 +1247,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> { ); } - err.emit(); + err.emit() } fn suggest_ptr_null_mut(