Rollup merge of #123301 - Nadrieril:unions, r=compiler-errors

pattern analysis: fix union handling

Little known fact: rust supports union patterns. Exhaustiveness handles them soundly but reports nonsensical missing patterns. This PR fixes the reported patterns and documents what we're doing.

r? `@compiler-errors`
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2024-04-03 22:11:01 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 5f74403c8e
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
6 changed files with 138 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -1121,7 +1121,8 @@ impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for Pat<'tcx> {
printed += 1;
}
if printed < variant.fields.len() {
let is_union = self.ty.ty_adt_def().is_some_and(|adt| adt.is_union());
if printed < variant.fields.len() && (!is_union || printed == 0) {
write!(f, "{}..", start_or_comma())?;
}

View File

@ -140,6 +140,34 @@
//! [`ConstructorSet::split`]. The invariants of [`SplitConstructorSet`] are also of interest.
//!
//!
//! ## Unions
//!
//! Unions allow us to match a value via several overlapping representations at the same time. For
//! example, the following is exhaustive because when seeing the value as a boolean we handled all
//! possible cases (other cases such as `n == 3` would trigger UB).
//!
//! ```rust
//! # fn main() {
//! union U8AsBool {
//! n: u8,
//! b: bool,
//! }
//! let x = U8AsBool { n: 1 };
//! unsafe {
//! match x {
//! U8AsBool { n: 2 } => {}
//! U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
//! U8AsBool { b: false } => {}
//! }
//! }
//! # }
//! ```
//!
//! Pattern-matching has no knowledge that e.g. `false as u8 == 0`, so the values we consider in the
//! algorithm look like `U8AsBool { b: true, n: 2 }`. In other words, for the most part a union is
//! treated like a struct with the same fields. The difference lies in how we construct witnesses of
//! non-exhaustiveness.
//!
//!
//! ## Opaque patterns
//!
@ -974,7 +1002,6 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> ConstructorSet<Cx> {
/// any) are missing; 2/ split constructors to handle non-trivial intersections e.g. on ranges
/// or slices. This can get subtle; see [`SplitConstructorSet`] for details of this operation
/// and its invariants.
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self, ctors), ret)]
pub fn split<'a>(
&self,
ctors: impl Iterator<Item = &'a Constructor<Cx>> + Clone,

View File

@ -186,7 +186,6 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx: 'p> RustcPatCtxt<'p, 'tcx> {
/// Returns the types of the fields for a given constructor. The result must have a length of
/// `ctor.arity()`.
#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self))]
pub(crate) fn ctor_sub_tys<'a>(
&'a self,
ctor: &'a Constructor<'p, 'tcx>,
@ -283,7 +282,6 @@ impl<'p, 'tcx: 'p> RustcPatCtxt<'p, 'tcx> {
/// Creates a set that represents all the constructors of `ty`.
///
/// See [`crate::constructor`] for considerations of emptiness.
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self), ret)]
pub fn ctors_for_ty(
&self,
ty: RevealedTy<'tcx>,

View File

@ -871,12 +871,14 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> PlaceInfo<Cx> {
where
Cx: 'a,
{
debug!(?self.ty);
if self.private_uninhabited {
// Skip the whole column
return Ok((smallvec![Constructor::PrivateUninhabited], vec![]));
}
let ctors_for_ty = cx.ctors_for_ty(&self.ty)?;
debug!(?ctors_for_ty);
// We treat match scrutinees of type `!` or `EmptyEnum` differently.
let is_toplevel_exception =
@ -895,6 +897,7 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> PlaceInfo<Cx> {
// Analyze the constructors present in this column.
let mut split_set = ctors_for_ty.split(ctors);
debug!(?split_set);
let all_missing = split_set.present.is_empty();
// Build the set of constructors we will specialize with. It must cover the whole type, so
@ -1254,7 +1257,7 @@ impl<'p, Cx: PatCx> Matrix<'p, Cx> {
/// + true + [Second(true)] +
/// + false + [_] +
/// + _ + [_, _, tail @ ..] +
/// | ✓ | ? | // column validity
/// | ✓ | ? | // validity
/// ```
impl<'p, Cx: PatCx> fmt::Debug for Matrix<'p, Cx> {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
@ -1285,7 +1288,7 @@ impl<'p, Cx: PatCx> fmt::Debug for Matrix<'p, Cx> {
write!(f, " {sep}")?;
}
if is_validity_row {
write!(f, " // column validity")?;
write!(f, " // validity")?;
}
write!(f, "\n")?;
}
@ -1381,12 +1384,35 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> WitnessStack<Cx> {
/// pats: [(false, "foo"), _, true]
/// result: [Enum::Variant { a: (false, "foo"), b: _ }, true]
/// ```
fn apply_constructor(&mut self, pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'_, Cx>, ctor: &Constructor<Cx>) {
fn apply_constructor(
mut self,
pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'_, Cx>,
ctor: &Constructor<Cx>,
) -> SmallVec<[Self; 1]> {
let len = self.0.len();
let arity = pcx.ctor_arity(ctor);
let fields = self.0.drain((len - arity)..).rev().collect();
let pat = WitnessPat::new(ctor.clone(), fields, pcx.ty.clone());
self.0.push(pat);
let fields: Vec<_> = self.0.drain((len - arity)..).rev().collect();
if matches!(ctor, Constructor::UnionField)
&& fields.iter().filter(|p| !matches!(p.ctor(), Constructor::Wildcard)).count() >= 2
{
// Convert a `Union { a: p, b: q }` witness into `Union { a: p }` and `Union { b: q }`.
// First add `Union { .. }` to `self`.
self.0.push(WitnessPat::wild_from_ctor(pcx.cx, ctor.clone(), pcx.ty.clone()));
fields
.into_iter()
.enumerate()
.filter(|(_, p)| !matches!(p.ctor(), Constructor::Wildcard))
.map(|(i, p)| {
let mut ret = self.clone();
// Fill the `i`th field of the union with `p`.
ret.0.last_mut().unwrap().fields[i] = p;
ret
})
.collect()
} else {
self.0.push(WitnessPat::new(ctor.clone(), fields, pcx.ty.clone()));
smallvec![self]
}
}
}
@ -1459,8 +1485,8 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> WitnessMatrix<Cx> {
*self = ret;
} else {
// Any other constructor we unspecialize as expected.
for witness in self.0.iter_mut() {
witness.apply_constructor(pcx, ctor)
for witness in std::mem::take(&mut self.0) {
self.0.extend(witness.apply_constructor(pcx, ctor));
}
}
}
@ -1617,7 +1643,6 @@ fn compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness<'a, 'p, Cx: PatCx>(
};
// Analyze the constructors present in this column.
debug!("ty: {:?}", place.ty);
let ctors = matrix.heads().map(|p| p.ctor());
let (split_ctors, missing_ctors) = place.split_column_ctors(mcx.tycx, ctors)?;
@ -1669,7 +1694,10 @@ fn compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness<'a, 'p, Cx: PatCx>(
for row in matrix.rows() {
if row.useful {
if let PatOrWild::Pat(pat) = row.head() {
mcx.useful_subpatterns.insert(pat.uid);
let newly_useful = mcx.useful_subpatterns.insert(pat.uid);
if newly_useful {
debug!("newly useful: {pat:?}");
}
}
}
}
@ -1768,6 +1796,7 @@ pub fn compute_match_usefulness<'p, Cx: PatCx>(
.map(|arm| {
debug!(?arm);
let usefulness = collect_pattern_usefulness(&cx.useful_subpatterns, arm.pat);
debug!(?usefulness);
(arm, usefulness)
})
.collect();

View File

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
fn main() {
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
union U8AsBool {
n: u8,
b: bool,
}
let x = U8AsBool { n: 1 };
unsafe {
match x {
// exhaustive
U8AsBool { n: 2 } => {}
U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
U8AsBool { b: false } => {}
}
match x {
// exhaustive
U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
U8AsBool { n: 0 } => {}
U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {}
}
match x {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {}
}
// Our approach can report duplicate witnesses sometimes.
match (x, true) {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
(U8AsBool { b: true }, true) => {}
(U8AsBool { b: false }, true) => {}
(U8AsBool { n: 1.. }, true) => {}
}
}
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
--> $DIR/unions.rs:22:15
|
LL | match x {
| ^ patterns `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
|
note: `U8AsBool` defined here
--> $DIR/unions.rs:3:11
|
LL | union U8AsBool {
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: the matched value is of type `U8AsBool`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {},
LL + U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 } | U8AsBool { b: false } => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
--> $DIR/unions.rs:28:15
|
LL | match (x, true) {
| ^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(U8AsBool, bool)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ (U8AsBool { n: 1.. }, true) => {},
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0004`.