core::rt: Schedulers only need a single cleanup_job at a time

Each context switch has up to one cleanup job and it is always
executed immediately after the context switch.
This commit is contained in:
Brian Anderson 2013-04-14 19:24:43 -07:00
parent 6b084bad25
commit 5f52aecb1e

View File

@ -38,12 +38,9 @@ pub struct Scheduler {
priv saved_context: Context,
/// The currently executing task
priv current_task: Option<~Task>,
/// A queue of jobs to perform immediately upon return from task
/// context to scheduler context.
/// XXX: This probably should be a single cleanup action and it
/// should run after a context switch, not on return from the
/// scheduler
priv cleanup_jobs: ~[CleanupJob]
/// An action performed after a context switch on behalf of the
/// code running before the context switch
priv cleanup_job: Option<CleanupJob>
}
// XXX: Some hacks to put a &fn in Scheduler without borrowck
@ -84,7 +81,7 @@ pub impl Scheduler {
stack_pool: StackPool::new(),
saved_context: Context::empty(),
current_task: None,
cleanup_jobs: ~[]
cleanup_job: None
}
}
@ -165,7 +162,7 @@ pub impl Scheduler {
assert!(self.current_task.is_none());
// Running tasks may have asked us to do some cleanup
self.run_cleanup_jobs();
self.run_cleanup_job();
}
@ -212,7 +209,7 @@ pub impl Scheduler {
Context::swap(last_task_context, sched_context);
}
self.run_cleanup_jobs();
self.run_cleanup_job();
}
/// Switch directly to another task, without going through the scheduler.
@ -233,7 +230,7 @@ pub impl Scheduler {
Context::swap(last_task_context, next_task_context);
}
self.run_cleanup_jobs();
self.run_cleanup_job();
}
// * Other stuff
@ -241,21 +238,25 @@ pub impl Scheduler {
fn in_task_context(&self) -> bool { self.current_task.is_some() }
fn enqueue_cleanup_job(&mut self, job: CleanupJob) {
self.cleanup_jobs.unshift(job);
assert!(self.cleanup_job.is_none());
self.cleanup_job = Some(job);
}
fn run_cleanup_jobs(&mut self) {
fn run_cleanup_job(&mut self) {
rtdebug!("running cleanup jobs");
while !self.cleanup_jobs.is_empty() {
match self.cleanup_jobs.pop() {
RescheduleTask(task) => {
// NB: Pushing to the *front* of the queue
self.task_queue.push_front(task);
}
RecycleTask(task) => task.recycle(&mut self.stack_pool),
GiveTask(task, f) => (f.to_fn())(self, task)
if self.cleanup_job.is_none() {
return;
}
let cleanup_job = self.cleanup_job.swap_unwrap();
match cleanup_job {
RescheduleTask(task) => {
// NB: Pushing to the *front* of the queue
self.task_queue.push_front(task);
}
RecycleTask(task) => task.recycle(&mut self.stack_pool),
GiveTask(task, f) => (f.to_fn())(self, task)
}
}
@ -271,16 +272,15 @@ pub impl Scheduler {
fn get_contexts(&mut self) -> (&'self mut Context,
Option<&'self mut Context>,
Option<&'self mut Context>) {
let last_task = if !self.cleanup_jobs.is_empty() {
let last_job: &'self mut CleanupJob = &mut self.cleanup_jobs[0];
let last_task: &'self Task = match last_job {
&RescheduleTask(~ref task) => task,
&RecycleTask(~ref task) => task,
&GiveTask(~ref task, _) => task,
};
Some(last_task)
} else {
None
let last_task = match self.cleanup_job {
Some(RescheduleTask(~ref task)) |
Some(RecycleTask(~ref task)) |
Some(GiveTask(~ref task, _)) => {
Some(task)
}
None => {
None
}
};
// XXX: Pattern matching mutable pointers above doesn't work
// because borrowck thinks the three patterns are conflicting
@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ pub impl Task {
// have asked us to do some cleanup.
let mut sched = ThreadLocalScheduler::new();
let sched = sched.get_scheduler();
sched.run_cleanup_jobs();
sched.run_cleanup_job();
start();