Auto merge of #124194 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-40s0c4q, r=matthiaskrgr

Rollup of 3 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #123409 (Implement Modified Condition/Decision  Coverage)
 - #124104 (Fix capturing duplicated lifetimes via parent in `precise_captures` (`impl use<'...>`))
 - #124137 (Match hyphen in multi-revision comment matchers)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This commit is contained in:
bors 2024-04-20 10:50:39 +00:00
commit 584f183dc0
34 changed files with 1754 additions and 67 deletions

View File

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ use rustc_data_structures::small_c_str::SmallCStr;
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_middle::middle::codegen_fn_attrs::CodegenFnAttrs;
use rustc_middle::ty::layout::{
FnAbiError, FnAbiOfHelpers, FnAbiRequest, LayoutError, LayoutOfHelpers, TyAndLayout,
FnAbiError, FnAbiOfHelpers, FnAbiRequest, HasTyCtxt, LayoutError, LayoutOfHelpers, TyAndLayout,
};
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Instance, Ty, TyCtxt};
use rustc_sanitizers::{cfi, kcfi};
@ -1702,4 +1702,128 @@ impl<'a, 'll, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'll, 'tcx> {
};
kcfi_bundle
}
pub(crate) fn mcdc_parameters(
&mut self,
fn_name: &'ll Value,
hash: &'ll Value,
bitmap_bytes: &'ll Value,
) -> &'ll Value {
debug!("mcdc_parameters() with args ({:?}, {:?}, {:?})", fn_name, hash, bitmap_bytes);
assert!(llvm_util::get_version() >= (18, 0, 0), "MCDC intrinsics require LLVM 18 or later");
let llfn = unsafe { llvm::LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCParametersIntrinsic(self.cx().llmod) };
let llty = self.cx.type_func(
&[self.cx.type_ptr(), self.cx.type_i64(), self.cx.type_i32()],
self.cx.type_void(),
);
let args = &[fn_name, hash, bitmap_bytes];
let args = self.check_call("call", llty, llfn, args);
unsafe {
let _ = llvm::LLVMRustBuildCall(
self.llbuilder,
llty,
llfn,
args.as_ptr() as *const &llvm::Value,
args.len() as c_uint,
[].as_ptr(),
0 as c_uint,
);
// Create condition bitmap named `mcdc.addr`.
let mut bx = Builder::with_cx(self.cx);
bx.position_at_start(llvm::LLVMGetFirstBasicBlock(self.llfn()));
let cond_bitmap = {
let alloca =
llvm::LLVMBuildAlloca(bx.llbuilder, bx.cx.type_i32(), c"mcdc.addr".as_ptr());
llvm::LLVMSetAlignment(alloca, 4);
alloca
};
bx.store(self.const_i32(0), cond_bitmap, self.tcx().data_layout.i32_align.abi);
cond_bitmap
}
}
pub(crate) fn mcdc_tvbitmap_update(
&mut self,
fn_name: &'ll Value,
hash: &'ll Value,
bitmap_bytes: &'ll Value,
bitmap_index: &'ll Value,
mcdc_temp: &'ll Value,
) {
debug!(
"mcdc_tvbitmap_update() with args ({:?}, {:?}, {:?}, {:?}, {:?})",
fn_name, hash, bitmap_bytes, bitmap_index, mcdc_temp
);
assert!(llvm_util::get_version() >= (18, 0, 0), "MCDC intrinsics require LLVM 18 or later");
let llfn =
unsafe { llvm::LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCTVBitmapUpdateIntrinsic(self.cx().llmod) };
let llty = self.cx.type_func(
&[
self.cx.type_ptr(),
self.cx.type_i64(),
self.cx.type_i32(),
self.cx.type_i32(),
self.cx.type_ptr(),
],
self.cx.type_void(),
);
let args = &[fn_name, hash, bitmap_bytes, bitmap_index, mcdc_temp];
let args = self.check_call("call", llty, llfn, args);
unsafe {
let _ = llvm::LLVMRustBuildCall(
self.llbuilder,
llty,
llfn,
args.as_ptr() as *const &llvm::Value,
args.len() as c_uint,
[].as_ptr(),
0 as c_uint,
);
}
let i32_align = self.tcx().data_layout.i32_align.abi;
self.store(self.const_i32(0), mcdc_temp, i32_align);
}
pub(crate) fn mcdc_condbitmap_update(
&mut self,
fn_name: &'ll Value,
hash: &'ll Value,
cond_loc: &'ll Value,
mcdc_temp: &'ll Value,
bool_value: &'ll Value,
) {
debug!(
"mcdc_condbitmap_update() with args ({:?}, {:?}, {:?}, {:?}, {:?})",
fn_name, hash, cond_loc, mcdc_temp, bool_value
);
assert!(llvm_util::get_version() >= (18, 0, 0), "MCDC intrinsics require LLVM 18 or later");
let llfn = unsafe { llvm::LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCCondBitmapIntrinsic(self.cx().llmod) };
let llty = self.cx.type_func(
&[
self.cx.type_ptr(),
self.cx.type_i64(),
self.cx.type_i32(),
self.cx.type_ptr(),
self.cx.type_i1(),
],
self.cx.type_void(),
);
let args = &[fn_name, hash, cond_loc, mcdc_temp, bool_value];
self.check_call("call", llty, llfn, args);
unsafe {
let _ = llvm::LLVMRustBuildCall(
self.llbuilder,
llty,
llfn,
args.as_ptr() as *const &llvm::Value,
args.len() as c_uint,
[].as_ptr(),
0 as c_uint,
);
}
}
}

View File

@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{CodeRegion, CounterId, CovTerm, ExpressionId, MappingKind};
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{
CodeRegion, ConditionInfo, CounterId, CovTerm, DecisionInfo, ExpressionId, MappingKind,
};
/// Must match the layout of `LLVMRustCounterKind`.
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
@ -99,6 +101,86 @@ pub enum RegionKind {
/// associated with two counters, each representing the number of times the
/// expression evaluates to true or false.
BranchRegion = 4,
/// A DecisionRegion represents a top-level boolean expression and is
/// associated with a variable length bitmap index and condition number.
MCDCDecisionRegion = 5,
/// A Branch Region can be extended to include IDs to facilitate MC/DC.
MCDCBranchRegion = 6,
}
pub mod mcdc {
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{ConditionInfo, DecisionInfo};
/// Must match the layout of `LLVMRustMCDCDecisionParameters`.
#[repr(C)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Default)]
pub struct DecisionParameters {
bitmap_idx: u32,
conditions_num: u16,
}
// ConditionId in llvm is `unsigned int` at 18 while `int16_t` at [19](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81257)
type LLVMConditionId = i16;
/// Must match the layout of `LLVMRustMCDCBranchParameters`.
#[repr(C)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Default)]
pub struct BranchParameters {
condition_id: LLVMConditionId,
condition_ids: [LLVMConditionId; 2],
}
#[repr(C)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub enum ParameterTag {
None = 0,
Decision = 1,
Branch = 2,
}
/// Same layout with `LLVMRustMCDCParameters`
#[repr(C)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub struct Parameters {
tag: ParameterTag,
decision_params: DecisionParameters,
branch_params: BranchParameters,
}
impl Parameters {
pub fn none() -> Self {
Self {
tag: ParameterTag::None,
decision_params: Default::default(),
branch_params: Default::default(),
}
}
pub fn decision(decision_params: DecisionParameters) -> Self {
Self { tag: ParameterTag::Decision, decision_params, branch_params: Default::default() }
}
pub fn branch(branch_params: BranchParameters) -> Self {
Self { tag: ParameterTag::Branch, decision_params: Default::default(), branch_params }
}
}
impl From<ConditionInfo> for BranchParameters {
fn from(value: ConditionInfo) -> Self {
Self {
condition_id: value.condition_id.as_u32() as LLVMConditionId,
condition_ids: [
value.false_next_id.as_u32() as LLVMConditionId,
value.true_next_id.as_u32() as LLVMConditionId,
],
}
}
}
impl From<DecisionInfo> for DecisionParameters {
fn from(value: DecisionInfo) -> Self {
Self { bitmap_idx: value.bitmap_idx, conditions_num: value.conditions_num }
}
}
}
/// This struct provides LLVM's representation of a "CoverageMappingRegion", encoded into the
@ -122,6 +204,7 @@ pub struct CounterMappingRegion {
/// for the false branch of the region.
false_counter: Counter,
mcdc_params: mcdc::Parameters,
/// An indirect reference to the source filename. In the LLVM Coverage Mapping Format, the
/// file_id is an index into a function-specific `virtual_file_mapping` array of indexes
/// that, in turn, are used to look up the filename for this region.
@ -173,6 +256,26 @@ impl CounterMappingRegion {
end_line,
end_col,
),
MappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_term, false_term, mcdc_params } => {
Self::mcdc_branch_region(
Counter::from_term(true_term),
Counter::from_term(false_term),
mcdc_params,
local_file_id,
start_line,
start_col,
end_line,
end_col,
)
}
MappingKind::MCDCDecision(decision_info) => Self::decision_region(
decision_info,
local_file_id,
start_line,
start_col,
end_line,
end_col,
),
}
}
@ -187,6 +290,7 @@ impl CounterMappingRegion {
Self {
counter,
false_counter: Counter::ZERO,
mcdc_params: mcdc::Parameters::none(),
file_id,
expanded_file_id: 0,
start_line,
@ -209,6 +313,7 @@ impl CounterMappingRegion {
Self {
counter,
false_counter,
mcdc_params: mcdc::Parameters::none(),
file_id,
expanded_file_id: 0,
start_line,
@ -219,6 +324,54 @@ impl CounterMappingRegion {
}
}
pub(crate) fn mcdc_branch_region(
counter: Counter,
false_counter: Counter,
condition_info: ConditionInfo,
file_id: u32,
start_line: u32,
start_col: u32,
end_line: u32,
end_col: u32,
) -> Self {
Self {
counter,
false_counter,
mcdc_params: mcdc::Parameters::branch(condition_info.into()),
file_id,
expanded_file_id: 0,
start_line,
start_col,
end_line,
end_col,
kind: RegionKind::MCDCBranchRegion,
}
}
pub(crate) fn decision_region(
decision_info: DecisionInfo,
file_id: u32,
start_line: u32,
start_col: u32,
end_line: u32,
end_col: u32,
) -> Self {
let mcdc_params = mcdc::Parameters::decision(decision_info.into());
Self {
counter: Counter::ZERO,
false_counter: Counter::ZERO,
mcdc_params,
file_id,
expanded_file_id: 0,
start_line,
start_col,
end_line,
end_col,
kind: RegionKind::MCDCDecisionRegion,
}
}
// This function might be used in the future; the LLVM API is still evolving, as is coverage
// support.
#[allow(dead_code)]
@ -233,6 +386,7 @@ impl CounterMappingRegion {
Self {
counter: Counter::ZERO,
false_counter: Counter::ZERO,
mcdc_params: mcdc::Parameters::none(),
file_id,
expanded_file_id,
start_line,
@ -256,6 +410,7 @@ impl CounterMappingRegion {
Self {
counter: Counter::ZERO,
false_counter: Counter::ZERO,
mcdc_params: mcdc::Parameters::none(),
file_id,
expanded_file_id: 0,
start_line,
@ -280,6 +435,7 @@ impl CounterMappingRegion {
Self {
counter,
false_counter: Counter::ZERO,
mcdc_params: mcdc::Parameters::none(),
file_id,
expanded_file_id: 0,
start_line,

View File

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ use rustc_codegen_ssa::traits::{
use rustc_data_structures::fx::{FxHashMap, FxIndexMap};
use rustc_llvm::RustString;
use rustc_middle::bug;
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::CoverageKind;
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{CoverageKind, FunctionCoverageInfo};
use rustc_middle::ty::layout::HasTyCtxt;
use rustc_middle::ty::Instance;
use rustc_target::abi::Align;
@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ pub struct CrateCoverageContext<'ll, 'tcx> {
pub(crate) function_coverage_map:
RefCell<FxIndexMap<Instance<'tcx>, FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx>>>,
pub(crate) pgo_func_name_var_map: RefCell<FxHashMap<Instance<'tcx>, &'ll llvm::Value>>,
pub(crate) mcdc_condition_bitmap_map: RefCell<FxHashMap<Instance<'tcx>, &'ll llvm::Value>>,
}
impl<'ll, 'tcx> CrateCoverageContext<'ll, 'tcx> {
@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ impl<'ll, 'tcx> CrateCoverageContext<'ll, 'tcx> {
Self {
function_coverage_map: Default::default(),
pgo_func_name_var_map: Default::default(),
mcdc_condition_bitmap_map: Default::default(),
}
}
@ -45,6 +47,12 @@ impl<'ll, 'tcx> CrateCoverageContext<'ll, 'tcx> {
) -> FxIndexMap<Instance<'tcx>, FunctionCoverageCollector<'tcx>> {
self.function_coverage_map.replace(FxIndexMap::default())
}
/// LLVM use a temp value to record evaluated mcdc test vector of each decision, which is called condition bitmap.
/// This value is named `mcdc.addr` (same as clang) and is a 32-bit integer.
fn try_get_mcdc_condition_bitmap(&self, instance: &Instance<'tcx>) -> Option<&'ll llvm::Value> {
self.mcdc_condition_bitmap_map.borrow().get(instance).copied()
}
}
// These methods used to be part of trait `CoverageInfoMethods`, which no longer
@ -90,6 +98,10 @@ impl<'tcx> CoverageInfoBuilderMethods<'tcx> for Builder<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
return;
};
if function_coverage_info.mcdc_bitmap_bytes > 0 {
ensure_mcdc_parameters(bx, instance, function_coverage_info);
}
let Some(coverage_context) = bx.coverage_context() else { return };
let mut coverage_map = coverage_context.function_coverage_map.borrow_mut();
let func_coverage = coverage_map
@ -131,8 +143,64 @@ impl<'tcx> CoverageInfoBuilderMethods<'tcx> for Builder<'_, '_, 'tcx> {
CoverageKind::ExpressionUsed { id } => {
func_coverage.mark_expression_id_seen(id);
}
CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { id, value, .. } => {
drop(coverage_map);
assert_ne!(
id.as_u32(),
0,
"ConditionId of evaluated conditions should never be zero"
);
let cond_bitmap = coverage_context
.try_get_mcdc_condition_bitmap(&instance)
.expect("mcdc cond bitmap should have been allocated for updating");
let cond_loc = bx.const_i32(id.as_u32() as i32 - 1);
let bool_value = bx.const_bool(value);
let fn_name = bx.get_pgo_func_name_var(instance);
let hash = bx.const_u64(function_coverage_info.function_source_hash);
bx.mcdc_condbitmap_update(fn_name, hash, cond_loc, cond_bitmap, bool_value);
}
CoverageKind::TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx } => {
drop(coverage_map);
let cond_bitmap = coverage_context
.try_get_mcdc_condition_bitmap(&instance)
.expect("mcdc cond bitmap should have been allocated for merging into the global bitmap");
let bitmap_bytes = bx.tcx().coverage_ids_info(instance.def).mcdc_bitmap_bytes;
assert!(bitmap_idx < bitmap_bytes, "bitmap index of the decision out of range");
assert!(
bitmap_bytes <= function_coverage_info.mcdc_bitmap_bytes,
"bitmap length disagreement: query says {bitmap_bytes} but function info only has {}",
function_coverage_info.mcdc_bitmap_bytes
);
let fn_name = bx.get_pgo_func_name_var(instance);
let hash = bx.const_u64(function_coverage_info.function_source_hash);
let bitmap_bytes = bx.const_u32(bitmap_bytes);
let bitmap_index = bx.const_u32(bitmap_idx);
bx.mcdc_tvbitmap_update(fn_name, hash, bitmap_bytes, bitmap_index, cond_bitmap);
}
}
}
}
fn ensure_mcdc_parameters<'ll, 'tcx>(
bx: &mut Builder<'_, 'll, 'tcx>,
instance: Instance<'tcx>,
function_coverage_info: &FunctionCoverageInfo,
) {
let Some(cx) = bx.coverage_context() else { return };
if cx.mcdc_condition_bitmap_map.borrow().contains_key(&instance) {
return;
}
let fn_name = bx.get_pgo_func_name_var(instance);
let hash = bx.const_u64(function_coverage_info.function_source_hash);
let bitmap_bytes = bx.const_u32(function_coverage_info.mcdc_bitmap_bytes);
let cond_bitmap = bx.mcdc_parameters(fn_name, hash, bitmap_bytes);
bx.coverage_context()
.expect("already checked above")
.mcdc_condition_bitmap_map
.borrow_mut()
.insert(instance, cond_bitmap);
}
/// Calls llvm::createPGOFuncNameVar() with the given function instance's

View File

@ -1631,6 +1631,10 @@ extern "C" {
// Miscellaneous instructions
pub fn LLVMRustGetInstrProfIncrementIntrinsic(M: &Module) -> &Value;
pub fn LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCParametersIntrinsic(M: &Module) -> &Value;
pub fn LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCTVBitmapUpdateIntrinsic(M: &Module) -> &Value;
pub fn LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCCondBitmapIntrinsic(M: &Module) -> &Value;
pub fn LLVMRustBuildCall<'a>(
B: &Builder<'a>,
Ty: &'a Type,

View File

@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ fn check_opaque_precise_captures<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, opaque_def_id: LocalDe
};
let mut expected_captures = UnordSet::default();
let mut shadowed_captures = UnordSet::default();
let mut seen_params = UnordMap::default();
let mut prev_non_lifetime_param = None;
for arg in precise_capturing_args {
@ -530,6 +531,21 @@ fn check_opaque_precise_captures<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, opaque_def_id: LocalDe
match tcx.named_bound_var(hir_id) {
Some(ResolvedArg::EarlyBound(def_id)) => {
expected_captures.insert(def_id);
// Make sure we allow capturing these lifetimes through `Self` and
// `T::Assoc` projection syntax, too. These will occur when we only
// see lifetimes are captured after hir-lowering -- this aligns with
// the cases that were stabilized with the `impl_trait_projection`
// feature -- see <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115659>.
if let DefKind::LifetimeParam = tcx.def_kind(def_id)
&& let ty::ReEarlyParam(ty::EarlyParamRegion { def_id, .. })
| ty::ReLateParam(ty::LateParamRegion {
bound_region: ty::BoundRegionKind::BrNamed(def_id, _),
..
}) = *tcx.map_opaque_lifetime_to_parent_lifetime(def_id.expect_local())
{
shadowed_captures.insert(def_id);
}
}
_ => {
tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(
@ -555,13 +571,20 @@ fn check_opaque_precise_captures<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, opaque_def_id: LocalDe
);
continue;
}
// If a param is shadowed by a early-bound (duplicated) lifetime, then
// it may or may not be captured as invariant, depending on if it shows
// up through `Self` or `T::Assoc` syntax.
if shadowed_captures.contains(&param.def_id) {
continue;
}
match param.kind {
ty::GenericParamDefKind::Lifetime => {
// Check if the lifetime param was captured but isn't named in the precise captures list.
if variances[param.index as usize] == ty::Invariant {
let param_span =
if let ty::ReEarlyParam(ty::EarlyParamRegion { def_id, .. })
let param_span = if let DefKind::OpaqueTy =
tcx.def_kind(tcx.parent(param.def_id))
&& let ty::ReEarlyParam(ty::EarlyParamRegion { def_id, .. })
| ty::ReLateParam(ty::LateParamRegion {
bound_region: ty::BoundRegionKind::BrNamed(def_id, _),
..

View File

@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ fn test_unstable_options_tracking_hash() {
);
tracked!(codegen_backend, Some("abc".to_string()));
tracked!(collapse_macro_debuginfo, CollapseMacroDebuginfo::Yes);
tracked!(coverage_options, CoverageOptions { branch: true });
tracked!(coverage_options, CoverageOptions { branch: true, mcdc: true });
tracked!(crate_attr, vec!["abc".to_string()]);
tracked!(cross_crate_inline_threshold, InliningThreshold::Always);
tracked!(debug_info_for_profiling, true);

View File

@ -4,8 +4,6 @@
#include "llvm/ProfileData/Coverage/CoverageMappingWriter.h"
#include "llvm/ProfileData/InstrProf.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace llvm;
// FFI equivalent of enum `llvm::coverage::Counter::CounterKind`
@ -43,6 +41,8 @@ enum class LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind {
SkippedRegion = 2,
GapRegion = 3,
BranchRegion = 4,
MCDCDecisionRegion = 5,
MCDCBranchRegion = 6
};
static coverage::CounterMappingRegion::RegionKind
@ -58,15 +58,102 @@ fromRust(LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind Kind) {
return coverage::CounterMappingRegion::GapRegion;
case LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind::BranchRegion:
return coverage::CounterMappingRegion::BranchRegion;
#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(18, 0)
case LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind::MCDCDecisionRegion:
return coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCDecisionRegion;
case LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind::MCDCBranchRegion:
return coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCBranchRegion;
#else
case LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind::MCDCDecisionRegion:
break;
case LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind::MCDCBranchRegion:
break;
#endif
}
report_fatal_error("Bad LLVMRustCounterMappingRegionKind!");
}
enum LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag {
None = 0,
Decision = 1,
Branch = 2,
};
struct LLVMRustMCDCDecisionParameters {
uint32_t BitmapIdx;
uint16_t NumConditions;
};
struct LLVMRustMCDCBranchParameters {
int16_t ConditionID;
int16_t ConditionIDs[2];
};
struct LLVMRustMCDCParameters {
LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag Tag;
LLVMRustMCDCDecisionParameters DecisionParameters;
LLVMRustMCDCBranchParameters BranchParameters;
};
// LLVM representations for `MCDCParameters` evolved from LLVM 18 to 19.
// Look at representations in 18
// https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project/blob/66a2881a/llvm/include/llvm/ProfileData/Coverage/CoverageMapping.h#L253-L263
// and representations in 19
// https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/843cc474faefad1d639f4c44c1cf3ad7dbda76c8/llvm/include/llvm/ProfileData/Coverage/MCDCTypes.h
#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(18, 0) && LLVM_VERSION_LT(19, 0)
static coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCParameters
fromRust(LLVMRustMCDCParameters Params) {
auto parameter = coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCParameters{};
switch (Params.Tag) {
case LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag::None:
return parameter;
case LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag::Decision:
parameter.BitmapIdx =
static_cast<unsigned>(Params.DecisionParameters.BitmapIdx),
parameter.NumConditions =
static_cast<unsigned>(Params.DecisionParameters.NumConditions);
return parameter;
case LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag::Branch:
parameter.ID = static_cast<coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCConditionID>(
Params.BranchParameters.ConditionID),
parameter.FalseID =
static_cast<coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCConditionID>(
Params.BranchParameters.ConditionIDs[0]),
parameter.TrueID =
static_cast<coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCConditionID>(
Params.BranchParameters.ConditionIDs[1]);
return parameter;
}
report_fatal_error("Bad LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag!");
}
#elif LLVM_VERSION_GE(19, 0)
static coverage::mcdc::Parameters fromRust(LLVMRustMCDCParameters Params) {
switch (Params.Tag) {
case LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag::None:
return std::monostate();
case LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag::Decision:
return coverage::mcdc::DecisionParameters(
Params.DecisionParameters.BitmapIdx,
Params.DecisionParameters.NumConditions);
case LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag::Branch:
return coverage::mcdc::BranchParameters(
static_cast<coverage::mcdc::ConditionID>(
Params.BranchParameters.ConditionID),
{static_cast<coverage::mcdc::ConditionID>(
Params.BranchParameters.ConditionIDs[0]),
static_cast<coverage::mcdc::ConditionID>(
Params.BranchParameters.ConditionIDs[1])});
}
report_fatal_error("Bad LLVMRustMCDCParametersTag!");
}
#endif
// FFI equivalent of struct `llvm::coverage::CounterMappingRegion`
// https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm-project/blob/ea6fa9c2/llvm/include/llvm/ProfileData/Coverage/CoverageMapping.h#L211-L304
struct LLVMRustCounterMappingRegion {
LLVMRustCounter Count;
LLVMRustCounter FalseCount;
LLVMRustMCDCParameters MCDCParameters;
uint32_t FileID;
uint32_t ExpandedFileID;
uint32_t LineStart;
@ -135,7 +222,8 @@ extern "C" void LLVMRustCoverageWriteMappingToBuffer(
MappingRegions.emplace_back(
fromRust(Region.Count), fromRust(Region.FalseCount),
#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(18, 0) && LLVM_VERSION_LT(19, 0)
coverage::CounterMappingRegion::MCDCParameters{},
// LLVM 19 may move this argument to last.
fromRust(Region.MCDCParameters),
#endif
Region.FileID, Region.ExpandedFileID, // File IDs, then region info.
Region.LineStart, Region.ColumnStart, Region.LineEnd, Region.ColumnEnd,

View File

@ -1546,6 +1546,33 @@ extern "C" LLVMValueRef LLVMRustGetInstrProfIncrementIntrinsic(LLVMModuleRef M)
unwrap(M), llvm::Intrinsic::instrprof_increment));
}
extern "C" LLVMValueRef LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCParametersIntrinsic(LLVMModuleRef M) {
#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(18, 0)
return wrap(llvm::Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
unwrap(M), llvm::Intrinsic::instrprof_mcdc_parameters));
#else
report_fatal_error("LLVM 18.0 is required for mcdc intrinsic functions");
#endif
}
extern "C" LLVMValueRef LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCTVBitmapUpdateIntrinsic(LLVMModuleRef M) {
#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(18, 0)
return wrap(llvm::Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
unwrap(M), llvm::Intrinsic::instrprof_mcdc_tvbitmap_update));
#else
report_fatal_error("LLVM 18.0 is required for mcdc intrinsic functions");
#endif
}
extern "C" LLVMValueRef LLVMRustGetInstrProfMCDCCondBitmapIntrinsic(LLVMModuleRef M) {
#if LLVM_VERSION_GE(18, 0)
return wrap(llvm::Intrinsic::getDeclaration(
unwrap(M), llvm::Intrinsic::instrprof_mcdc_condbitmap_update));
#else
report_fatal_error("LLVM 18.0 is required for mcdc intrinsic functions");
#endif
}
extern "C" LLVMValueRef LLVMRustBuildMemCpy(LLVMBuilderRef B,
LLVMValueRef Dst, unsigned DstAlign,
LLVMValueRef Src, unsigned SrcAlign,

View File

@ -51,6 +51,25 @@ rustc_index::newtype_index! {
pub struct ExpressionId {}
}
rustc_index::newtype_index! {
/// ID of a mcdc condition. Used by llvm to check mcdc coverage.
///
/// Note for future: the max limit of 0xFFFF is probably too loose. Actually llvm does not
/// support decisions with too many conditions (7 and more at LLVM 18 while may be hundreds at 19)
/// and represents it with `int16_t`. This max value may be changed once we could
/// figure out an accurate limit.
#[derive(HashStable)]
#[encodable]
#[orderable]
#[max = 0xFFFF]
#[debug_format = "ConditionId({})"]
pub struct ConditionId {}
}
impl ConditionId {
pub const NONE: Self = Self::from_u32(0);
}
/// Enum that can hold a constant zero value, the ID of an physical coverage
/// counter, or the ID of a coverage-counter expression.
///
@ -106,6 +125,22 @@ pub enum CoverageKind {
/// mappings. Intermediate expressions with no direct mappings are
/// retained/zeroed based on whether they are transitively used.)
ExpressionUsed { id: ExpressionId },
/// Marks the point in MIR control flow represented by a evaluated condition.
///
/// This is eventually lowered to `llvm.instrprof.mcdc.condbitmap.update` in LLVM IR.
///
/// If this statement does not survive MIR optimizations, the condition would never be
/// taken as evaluated.
CondBitmapUpdate { id: ConditionId, value: bool },
/// Marks the point in MIR control flow represented by a evaluated decision.
///
/// This is eventually lowered to `llvm.instrprof.mcdc.tvbitmap.update` in LLVM IR.
///
/// If this statement does not survive MIR optimizations, the decision would never be
/// taken as evaluated.
TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx: u32 },
}
impl Debug for CoverageKind {
@ -116,6 +151,12 @@ impl Debug for CoverageKind {
BlockMarker { id } => write!(fmt, "BlockMarker({:?})", id.index()),
CounterIncrement { id } => write!(fmt, "CounterIncrement({:?})", id.index()),
ExpressionUsed { id } => write!(fmt, "ExpressionUsed({:?})", id.index()),
CondBitmapUpdate { id, value } => {
write!(fmt, "CondBitmapUpdate({:?}, {:?})", id.index(), value)
}
TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx } => {
write!(fmt, "TestVectorUpdate({:?})", bitmap_idx)
}
}
}
}
@ -172,16 +213,23 @@ pub enum MappingKind {
Code(CovTerm),
/// Associates a branch region with separate counters for true and false.
Branch { true_term: CovTerm, false_term: CovTerm },
/// Associates a branch region with separate counters for true and false.
MCDCBranch { true_term: CovTerm, false_term: CovTerm, mcdc_params: ConditionInfo },
/// Associates a decision region with a bitmap and number of conditions.
MCDCDecision(DecisionInfo),
}
impl MappingKind {
/// Iterator over all coverage terms in this mapping kind.
pub fn terms(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = CovTerm> {
let one = |a| std::iter::once(a).chain(None);
let two = |a, b| std::iter::once(a).chain(Some(b));
let zero = || None.into_iter().chain(None);
let one = |a| Some(a).into_iter().chain(None);
let two = |a, b| Some(a).into_iter().chain(Some(b));
match *self {
Self::Code(term) => one(term),
Self::Branch { true_term, false_term } => two(true_term, false_term),
Self::MCDCBranch { true_term, false_term, .. } => two(true_term, false_term),
Self::MCDCDecision(_) => zero(),
}
}
@ -193,6 +241,12 @@ impl MappingKind {
Self::Branch { true_term, false_term } => {
Self::Branch { true_term: map_fn(true_term), false_term: map_fn(false_term) }
}
Self::MCDCBranch { true_term, false_term, mcdc_params } => Self::MCDCBranch {
true_term: map_fn(true_term),
false_term: map_fn(false_term),
mcdc_params,
},
Self::MCDCDecision(param) => Self::MCDCDecision(param),
}
}
}
@ -212,7 +266,7 @@ pub struct Mapping {
pub struct FunctionCoverageInfo {
pub function_source_hash: u64,
pub num_counters: usize,
pub mcdc_bitmap_bytes: u32,
pub expressions: IndexVec<ExpressionId, Expression>,
pub mappings: Vec<Mapping>,
}
@ -226,6 +280,8 @@ pub struct BranchInfo {
/// data structures without having to scan the entire body first.
pub num_block_markers: usize,
pub branch_spans: Vec<BranchSpan>,
pub mcdc_branch_spans: Vec<MCDCBranchSpan>,
pub mcdc_decision_spans: Vec<MCDCDecisionSpan>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
@ -235,3 +291,45 @@ pub struct BranchSpan {
pub true_marker: BlockMarkerId,
pub false_marker: BlockMarkerId,
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct ConditionInfo {
pub condition_id: ConditionId,
pub true_next_id: ConditionId,
pub false_next_id: ConditionId,
}
impl Default for ConditionInfo {
fn default() -> Self {
Self {
condition_id: ConditionId::NONE,
true_next_id: ConditionId::NONE,
false_next_id: ConditionId::NONE,
}
}
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct MCDCBranchSpan {
pub span: Span,
pub condition_info: ConditionInfo,
pub true_marker: BlockMarkerId,
pub false_marker: BlockMarkerId,
}
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug)]
#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct DecisionInfo {
pub bitmap_idx: u32,
pub conditions_num: u16,
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
#[derive(TyEncodable, TyDecodable, Hash, HashStable, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct MCDCDecisionSpan {
pub span: Span,
pub conditions_num: usize,
pub end_markers: Vec<BlockMarkerId>,
}

View File

@ -475,7 +475,8 @@ fn write_coverage_branch_info(
branch_info: &coverage::BranchInfo,
w: &mut dyn io::Write,
) -> io::Result<()> {
let coverage::BranchInfo { branch_spans, .. } = branch_info;
let coverage::BranchInfo { branch_spans, mcdc_branch_spans, mcdc_decision_spans, .. } =
branch_info;
for coverage::BranchSpan { span, true_marker, false_marker } in branch_spans {
writeln!(
@ -483,7 +484,26 @@ fn write_coverage_branch_info(
"{INDENT}coverage branch {{ true: {true_marker:?}, false: {false_marker:?} }} => {span:?}",
)?;
}
if !branch_spans.is_empty() {
for coverage::MCDCBranchSpan { span, condition_info, true_marker, false_marker } in
mcdc_branch_spans
{
writeln!(
w,
"{INDENT}coverage mcdc branch {{ condition_id: {:?}, true: {true_marker:?}, false: {false_marker:?} }} => {span:?}",
condition_info.condition_id
)?;
}
for coverage::MCDCDecisionSpan { span, conditions_num, end_markers } in mcdc_decision_spans {
writeln!(
w,
"{INDENT}coverage mcdc decision {{ conditions_num: {conditions_num:?}, end: {end_markers:?} }} => {span:?}"
)?;
}
if !branch_spans.is_empty() || !mcdc_branch_spans.is_empty() || !mcdc_decision_spans.is_empty()
{
writeln!(w)?;
}

View File

@ -361,4 +361,8 @@ pub struct CoverageIdsInfo {
/// InstrumentCoverage MIR pass, if the highest-numbered counter increments
/// were removed by MIR optimizations.
pub max_counter_id: mir::coverage::CounterId,
/// Coverage codegen for mcdc needs to know the size of the global bitmap so that it can
/// set the `bytemap-bytes` argument of the `llvm.instrprof.mcdc.tvbitmap.update` intrinsic.
pub mcdc_bitmap_bytes: u32,
}

View File

@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ TrivialTypeTraversalImpls! {
crate::mir::coverage::BlockMarkerId,
crate::mir::coverage::CounterId,
crate::mir::coverage::ExpressionId,
crate::mir::coverage::ConditionId,
crate::mir::Local,
crate::mir::Promoted,
crate::traits::Reveal,

View File

@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ mir_build_deref_raw_pointer_requires_unsafe_unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn_allowed =
.note = raw pointers may be null, dangling or unaligned; they can violate aliasing rules and cause data races: all of these are undefined behavior
.label = dereference of raw pointer
mir_build_exceeds_mcdc_condition_num_limit = Conditions number of the decision ({$conditions_num}) exceeds limit ({$max_conditions_num}). MCDC analysis will not count this expression.
mir_build_extern_static_requires_unsafe =
use of extern static is unsafe and requires unsafe block
.note = extern statics are not controlled by the Rust type system: invalid data, aliasing violations or data races will cause undefined behavior

View File

@ -1,14 +1,20 @@
use std::assert_matches::assert_matches;
use std::collections::hash_map::Entry;
use std::collections::VecDeque;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{BlockMarkerId, BranchSpan, CoverageKind};
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{
BlockMarkerId, BranchSpan, ConditionId, ConditionInfo, CoverageKind, MCDCBranchSpan,
MCDCDecisionSpan,
};
use rustc_middle::mir::{self, BasicBlock, UnOp};
use rustc_middle::thir::{ExprId, ExprKind, Thir};
use rustc_middle::thir::{ExprId, ExprKind, LogicalOp, Thir};
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
use rustc_span::def_id::LocalDefId;
use rustc_span::Span;
use crate::build::Builder;
use crate::errors::MCDCExceedsConditionNumLimit;
pub(crate) struct BranchInfoBuilder {
/// Maps condition expressions to their enclosing `!`, for better instrumentation.
@ -16,6 +22,9 @@ pub(crate) struct BranchInfoBuilder {
num_block_markers: usize,
branch_spans: Vec<BranchSpan>,
mcdc_branch_spans: Vec<MCDCBranchSpan>,
mcdc_decision_spans: Vec<MCDCDecisionSpan>,
mcdc_state: Option<MCDCState>,
}
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
@ -33,7 +42,14 @@ impl BranchInfoBuilder {
/// is enabled and `def_id` represents a function that is eligible for coverage.
pub(crate) fn new_if_enabled(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: LocalDefId) -> Option<Self> {
if tcx.sess.instrument_coverage_branch() && tcx.is_eligible_for_coverage(def_id) {
Some(Self { nots: FxHashMap::default(), num_block_markers: 0, branch_spans: vec![] })
Some(Self {
nots: FxHashMap::default(),
num_block_markers: 0,
branch_spans: vec![],
mcdc_branch_spans: vec![],
mcdc_decision_spans: vec![],
mcdc_state: MCDCState::new_if_enabled(tcx),
})
} else {
None
}
@ -79,6 +95,55 @@ impl BranchInfoBuilder {
}
}
fn record_conditions_operation(&mut self, logical_op: LogicalOp, span: Span) {
if let Some(mcdc_state) = self.mcdc_state.as_mut() {
mcdc_state.record_conditions(logical_op, span);
}
}
fn fetch_condition_info(
&mut self,
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
true_marker: BlockMarkerId,
false_marker: BlockMarkerId,
) -> Option<ConditionInfo> {
let mcdc_state = self.mcdc_state.as_mut()?;
let (mut condition_info, decision_result) =
mcdc_state.take_condition(true_marker, false_marker);
if let Some(decision) = decision_result {
match decision.conditions_num {
0 => {
unreachable!("Decision with no condition is not expected");
}
1..=MAX_CONDITIONS_NUM_IN_DECISION => {
self.mcdc_decision_spans.push(decision);
}
_ => {
// Do not generate mcdc mappings and statements for decisions with too many conditions.
let rebase_idx = self.mcdc_branch_spans.len() - decision.conditions_num + 1;
let to_normal_branches = self.mcdc_branch_spans.split_off(rebase_idx);
self.branch_spans.extend(to_normal_branches.into_iter().map(
|MCDCBranchSpan { span, true_marker, false_marker, .. }| BranchSpan {
span,
true_marker,
false_marker,
},
));
// ConditionInfo of this branch shall also be reset.
condition_info = None;
tcx.dcx().emit_warn(MCDCExceedsConditionNumLimit {
span: decision.span,
conditions_num: decision.conditions_num,
max_conditions_num: MAX_CONDITIONS_NUM_IN_DECISION,
});
}
}
}
condition_info
}
fn next_block_marker_id(&mut self) -> BlockMarkerId {
let id = BlockMarkerId::from_usize(self.num_block_markers);
self.num_block_markers += 1;
@ -86,14 +151,167 @@ impl BranchInfoBuilder {
}
pub(crate) fn into_done(self) -> Option<Box<mir::coverage::BranchInfo>> {
let Self { nots: _, num_block_markers, branch_spans } = self;
let Self {
nots: _,
num_block_markers,
branch_spans,
mcdc_branch_spans,
mcdc_decision_spans,
..
} = self;
if num_block_markers == 0 {
assert!(branch_spans.is_empty());
return None;
}
Some(Box::new(mir::coverage::BranchInfo { num_block_markers, branch_spans }))
Some(Box::new(mir::coverage::BranchInfo {
num_block_markers,
branch_spans,
mcdc_branch_spans,
mcdc_decision_spans,
}))
}
}
/// The MCDC bitmap scales exponentially (2^n) based on the number of conditions seen,
/// So llvm sets a maximum value prevents the bitmap footprint from growing too large without the user's knowledge.
/// This limit may be relaxed if the [upstream change](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82448) is merged.
const MAX_CONDITIONS_NUM_IN_DECISION: usize = 6;
struct MCDCState {
/// To construct condition evaluation tree.
decision_stack: VecDeque<ConditionInfo>,
processing_decision: Option<MCDCDecisionSpan>,
}
impl MCDCState {
fn new_if_enabled(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>) -> Option<Self> {
tcx.sess
.instrument_coverage_mcdc()
.then(|| Self { decision_stack: VecDeque::new(), processing_decision: None })
}
// At first we assign ConditionIds for each sub expression.
// If the sub expression is composite, re-assign its ConditionId to its LHS and generate a new ConditionId for its RHS.
//
// Example: "x = (A && B) || (C && D) || (D && F)"
//
// Visit Depth1:
// (A && B) || (C && D) || (D && F)
// ^-------LHS--------^ ^-RHS--^
// ID=1 ID=2
//
// Visit LHS-Depth2:
// (A && B) || (C && D)
// ^-LHS--^ ^-RHS--^
// ID=1 ID=3
//
// Visit LHS-Depth3:
// (A && B)
// LHS RHS
// ID=1 ID=4
//
// Visit RHS-Depth3:
// (C && D)
// LHS RHS
// ID=3 ID=5
//
// Visit RHS-Depth2: (D && F)
// LHS RHS
// ID=2 ID=6
//
// Visit Depth1:
// (A && B) || (C && D) || (D && F)
// ID=1 ID=4 ID=3 ID=5 ID=2 ID=6
//
// A node ID of '0' always means MC/DC isn't being tracked.
//
// If a "next" node ID is '0', it means it's the end of the test vector.
//
// As the compiler tracks expression in pre-order, we can ensure that condition info of parents are always properly assigned when their children are visited.
// - If the op is AND, the "false_next" of LHS and RHS should be the parent's "false_next". While "true_next" of the LHS is the RHS, the "true next" of RHS is the parent's "true_next".
// - If the op is OR, the "true_next" of LHS and RHS should be the parent's "true_next". While "false_next" of the LHS is the RHS, the "false next" of RHS is the parent's "false_next".
fn record_conditions(&mut self, op: LogicalOp, span: Span) {
let decision = match self.processing_decision.as_mut() {
Some(decision) => {
decision.span = decision.span.to(span);
decision
}
None => self.processing_decision.insert(MCDCDecisionSpan {
span,
conditions_num: 0,
end_markers: vec![],
}),
};
let parent_condition = self.decision_stack.pop_back().unwrap_or_default();
let lhs_id = if parent_condition.condition_id == ConditionId::NONE {
decision.conditions_num += 1;
ConditionId::from(decision.conditions_num)
} else {
parent_condition.condition_id
};
decision.conditions_num += 1;
let rhs_condition_id = ConditionId::from(decision.conditions_num);
let (lhs, rhs) = match op {
LogicalOp::And => {
let lhs = ConditionInfo {
condition_id: lhs_id,
true_next_id: rhs_condition_id,
false_next_id: parent_condition.false_next_id,
};
let rhs = ConditionInfo {
condition_id: rhs_condition_id,
true_next_id: parent_condition.true_next_id,
false_next_id: parent_condition.false_next_id,
};
(lhs, rhs)
}
LogicalOp::Or => {
let lhs = ConditionInfo {
condition_id: lhs_id,
true_next_id: parent_condition.true_next_id,
false_next_id: rhs_condition_id,
};
let rhs = ConditionInfo {
condition_id: rhs_condition_id,
true_next_id: parent_condition.true_next_id,
false_next_id: parent_condition.false_next_id,
};
(lhs, rhs)
}
};
// We visit expressions tree in pre-order, so place the left-hand side on the top.
self.decision_stack.push_back(rhs);
self.decision_stack.push_back(lhs);
}
fn take_condition(
&mut self,
true_marker: BlockMarkerId,
false_marker: BlockMarkerId,
) -> (Option<ConditionInfo>, Option<MCDCDecisionSpan>) {
let Some(condition_info) = self.decision_stack.pop_back() else {
return (None, None);
};
let Some(decision) = self.processing_decision.as_mut() else {
bug!("Processing decision should have been created before any conditions are taken");
};
if condition_info.true_next_id == ConditionId::NONE {
decision.end_markers.push(true_marker);
}
if condition_info.false_next_id == ConditionId::NONE {
decision.end_markers.push(false_marker);
}
if self.decision_stack.is_empty() {
(Some(condition_info), self.processing_decision.take())
} else {
(Some(condition_info), None)
}
}
}
@ -137,10 +355,27 @@ impl Builder<'_, '_> {
let true_marker = inject_branch_marker(then_block);
let false_marker = inject_branch_marker(else_block);
if let Some(condition_info) =
branch_info.fetch_condition_info(self.tcx, true_marker, false_marker)
{
branch_info.mcdc_branch_spans.push(MCDCBranchSpan {
span: source_info.span,
condition_info,
true_marker,
false_marker,
});
} else {
branch_info.branch_spans.push(BranchSpan {
span: source_info.span,
true_marker,
false_marker,
});
}
}
pub(crate) fn visit_coverage_branch_operation(&mut self, logical_op: LogicalOp, span: Span) {
if let Some(branch_info) = self.coverage_branch_info.as_mut() {
branch_info.record_conditions_operation(logical_op, span);
}
}
}

View File

@ -77,11 +77,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
match expr.kind {
ExprKind::LogicalOp { op: LogicalOp::And, lhs, rhs } => {
this.visit_coverage_branch_operation(LogicalOp::And, expr_span);
let lhs_then_block = unpack!(this.then_else_break_inner(block, lhs, args));
let rhs_then_block = unpack!(this.then_else_break_inner(lhs_then_block, rhs, args));
rhs_then_block.unit()
}
ExprKind::LogicalOp { op: LogicalOp::Or, lhs, rhs } => {
this.visit_coverage_branch_operation(LogicalOp::Or, expr_span);
let local_scope = this.local_scope();
let (lhs_success_block, failure_block) =
this.in_if_then_scope(local_scope, expr_span, |this| {

View File

@ -818,6 +818,15 @@ pub struct NontrivialStructuralMatch<'tcx> {
pub non_sm_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
}
#[derive(Diagnostic)]
#[diag(mir_build_exceeds_mcdc_condition_num_limit)]
pub(crate) struct MCDCExceedsConditionNumLimit {
#[primary_span]
pub span: Span,
pub conditions_num: usize,
pub max_conditions_num: usize,
}
#[derive(Diagnostic)]
#[diag(mir_build_pattern_not_covered, code = E0005)]
pub(crate) struct PatternNotCovered<'s, 'tcx> {

View File

@ -100,9 +100,12 @@ fn instrument_function_for_coverage<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, mir_body: &mut mir:
&coverage_counters,
);
inject_mcdc_statements(mir_body, &basic_coverage_blocks, &coverage_spans);
mir_body.function_coverage_info = Some(Box::new(FunctionCoverageInfo {
function_source_hash: hir_info.function_source_hash,
num_counters: coverage_counters.num_counters(),
mcdc_bitmap_bytes: coverage_spans.test_vector_bitmap_bytes(),
expressions: coverage_counters.into_expressions(),
mappings,
}));
@ -136,20 +139,33 @@ fn create_mappings<'tcx>(
.as_term()
};
coverage_spans
.all_bcb_mappings()
.filter_map(|&BcbMapping { kind: bcb_mapping_kind, span }| {
let kind = match bcb_mapping_kind {
let mut mappings = Vec::new();
mappings.extend(coverage_spans.all_bcb_mappings().filter_map(
|BcbMapping { kind: bcb_mapping_kind, span }| {
let kind = match *bcb_mapping_kind {
BcbMappingKind::Code(bcb) => MappingKind::Code(term_for_bcb(bcb)),
BcbMappingKind::Branch { true_bcb, false_bcb } => MappingKind::Branch {
true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb),
false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb),
},
BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info } => {
MappingKind::MCDCBranch {
true_term: term_for_bcb(true_bcb),
false_term: term_for_bcb(false_bcb),
mcdc_params: condition_info,
}
}
BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx, conditions_num, .. } => {
MappingKind::MCDCDecision(DecisionInfo { bitmap_idx, conditions_num })
}
};
let code_region = make_code_region(source_map, file_name, span, body_span)?;
let code_region = make_code_region(source_map, file_name, *span, body_span)?;
Some(Mapping { kind, code_region })
})
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
},
));
mappings
}
/// For each BCB node or BCB edge that has an associated coverage counter,
@ -204,6 +220,55 @@ fn inject_coverage_statements<'tcx>(
}
}
/// For each conditions inject statements to update condition bitmap after it has been evaluated.
/// For each decision inject statements to update test vector bitmap after it has been evaluated.
fn inject_mcdc_statements<'tcx>(
mir_body: &mut mir::Body<'tcx>,
basic_coverage_blocks: &CoverageGraph,
coverage_spans: &CoverageSpans,
) {
if coverage_spans.test_vector_bitmap_bytes() == 0 {
return;
}
// Inject test vector update first because `inject_statement` always insert new statement at head.
for (end_bcbs, bitmap_idx) in
coverage_spans.all_bcb_mappings().filter_map(|mapping| match &mapping.kind {
BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { end_bcbs, bitmap_idx, .. } => {
Some((end_bcbs, *bitmap_idx))
}
_ => None,
})
{
for end in end_bcbs {
let end_bb = basic_coverage_blocks[*end].leader_bb();
inject_statement(mir_body, CoverageKind::TestVectorBitmapUpdate { bitmap_idx }, end_bb);
}
}
for (true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_id) in
coverage_spans.all_bcb_mappings().filter_map(|mapping| match mapping.kind {
BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info } => {
Some((true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info.condition_id))
}
_ => None,
})
{
let true_bb = basic_coverage_blocks[true_bcb].leader_bb();
inject_statement(
mir_body,
CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { id: condition_id, value: true },
true_bb,
);
let false_bb = basic_coverage_blocks[false_bcb].leader_bb();
inject_statement(
mir_body,
CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { id: condition_id, value: false },
false_bb,
);
}
}
/// Given two basic blocks that have a control-flow edge between them, creates
/// and returns a new block that sits between those blocks.
fn inject_edge_counter_basic_block(

View File

@ -61,7 +61,17 @@ fn coverage_ids_info<'tcx>(
.max()
.unwrap_or(CounterId::ZERO);
CoverageIdsInfo { max_counter_id }
let mcdc_bitmap_bytes = mir_body
.coverage_branch_info
.as_deref()
.map(|info| {
info.mcdc_decision_spans
.iter()
.fold(0, |acc, decision| acc + (1_u32 << decision.conditions_num).div_ceil(8))
})
.unwrap_or_default();
CoverageIdsInfo { max_counter_id, mcdc_bitmap_bytes }
}
fn all_coverage_in_mir_body<'a, 'tcx>(

View File

@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
use rustc_data_structures::graph::DirectedGraph;
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
use rustc_middle::mir;
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::ConditionInfo;
use rustc_span::{BytePos, Span};
use std::collections::BTreeSet;
use crate::coverage::graph::{BasicCoverageBlock, CoverageGraph, START_BCB};
use crate::coverage::spans::from_mir::SpanFromMir;
@ -9,12 +11,20 @@ use crate::coverage::ExtractedHirInfo;
mod from_mir;
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub(super) enum BcbMappingKind {
/// Associates an ordinary executable code span with its corresponding BCB.
Code(BasicCoverageBlock),
/// Associates a branch span with BCBs for its true and false arms.
Branch { true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock, false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock },
/// Associates a mcdc branch span with condition info besides fields for normal branch.
MCDCBranch {
true_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock,
false_bcb: BasicCoverageBlock,
condition_info: ConditionInfo,
},
/// Associates a mcdc decision with its join BCB.
MCDCDecision { end_bcbs: BTreeSet<BasicCoverageBlock>, bitmap_idx: u32, conditions_num: u16 },
}
#[derive(Debug)]
@ -26,6 +36,7 @@ pub(super) struct BcbMapping {
pub(super) struct CoverageSpans {
bcb_has_mappings: BitSet<BasicCoverageBlock>,
mappings: Vec<BcbMapping>,
test_vector_bitmap_bytes: u32,
}
impl CoverageSpans {
@ -36,6 +47,10 @@ impl CoverageSpans {
pub(super) fn all_bcb_mappings(&self) -> impl Iterator<Item = &BcbMapping> {
self.mappings.iter()
}
pub(super) fn test_vector_bitmap_bytes(&self) -> u32 {
self.test_vector_bitmap_bytes
}
}
/// Extracts coverage-relevant spans from MIR, and associates them with
@ -85,17 +100,26 @@ pub(super) fn generate_coverage_spans(
let mut insert = |bcb| {
bcb_has_mappings.insert(bcb);
};
for &BcbMapping { kind, span: _ } in &mappings {
match kind {
let mut test_vector_bitmap_bytes = 0;
for BcbMapping { kind, span: _ } in &mappings {
match *kind {
BcbMappingKind::Code(bcb) => insert(bcb),
BcbMappingKind::Branch { true_bcb, false_bcb } => {
BcbMappingKind::Branch { true_bcb, false_bcb }
| BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, .. } => {
insert(true_bcb);
insert(false_bcb);
}
BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx, conditions_num, .. } => {
// `bcb_has_mappings` is used for inject coverage counters
// but they are not needed for decision BCBs.
// While the length of test vector bitmap should be calculated here.
test_vector_bitmap_bytes = test_vector_bitmap_bytes
.max(bitmap_idx + (1_u32 << conditions_num as u32).div_ceil(8));
}
}
}
Some(CoverageSpans { bcb_has_mappings, mappings })
Some(CoverageSpans { bcb_has_mappings, mappings, test_vector_bitmap_bytes })
}
#[derive(Debug)]

View File

@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
use rustc_data_structures::captures::Captures;
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashSet;
use rustc_index::IndexVec;
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{BlockMarkerId, BranchSpan, CoverageKind};
use rustc_middle::mir::coverage::{
BlockMarkerId, BranchSpan, CoverageKind, MCDCBranchSpan, MCDCDecisionSpan,
};
use rustc_middle::mir::{
self, AggregateKind, BasicBlock, FakeReadCause, Rvalue, Statement, StatementKind, Terminator,
TerminatorKind,
@ -227,7 +229,10 @@ fn filtered_statement_span(statement: &Statement<'_>) -> Option<Span> {
// These coverage statements should not exist prior to coverage instrumentation.
StatementKind::Coverage(
CoverageKind::CounterIncrement { .. } | CoverageKind::ExpressionUsed { .. },
CoverageKind::CounterIncrement { .. }
| CoverageKind::ExpressionUsed { .. }
| CoverageKind::CondBitmapUpdate { .. }
| CoverageKind::TestVectorBitmapUpdate { .. },
) => bug!(
"Unexpected coverage statement found during coverage instrumentation: {statement:?}"
),
@ -384,10 +389,11 @@ pub(super) fn extract_branch_mappings(
}
}
branch_info
.branch_spans
.iter()
.filter_map(|&BranchSpan { span: raw_span, true_marker, false_marker }| {
let bcb_from_marker =
|marker: BlockMarkerId| basic_coverage_blocks.bcb_from_bb(block_markers[marker]?);
let check_branch_bcb =
|raw_span: Span, true_marker: BlockMarkerId, false_marker: BlockMarkerId| {
// For now, ignore any branch span that was introduced by
// expansion. This makes things like assert macros less noisy.
if !raw_span.ctxt().outer_expn_data().is_root() {
@ -395,13 +401,56 @@ pub(super) fn extract_branch_mappings(
}
let (span, _) = unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro(raw_span, body_span)?;
let bcb_from_marker =
|marker: BlockMarkerId| basic_coverage_blocks.bcb_from_bb(block_markers[marker]?);
let true_bcb = bcb_from_marker(true_marker)?;
let false_bcb = bcb_from_marker(false_marker)?;
Some((span, true_bcb, false_bcb))
};
Some(BcbMapping { kind: BcbMappingKind::Branch { true_bcb, false_bcb }, span })
let branch_filter_map = |&BranchSpan { span: raw_span, true_marker, false_marker }| {
check_branch_bcb(raw_span, true_marker, false_marker).map(|(span, true_bcb, false_bcb)| {
BcbMapping { kind: BcbMappingKind::Branch { true_bcb, false_bcb }, span }
})
};
let mcdc_branch_filter_map =
|&MCDCBranchSpan { span: raw_span, true_marker, false_marker, condition_info }| {
check_branch_bcb(raw_span, true_marker, false_marker).map(
|(span, true_bcb, false_bcb)| BcbMapping {
kind: BcbMappingKind::MCDCBranch { true_bcb, false_bcb, condition_info },
span,
},
)
};
let mut next_bitmap_idx = 0;
let decision_filter_map = |decision: &MCDCDecisionSpan| {
let (span, _) = unexpand_into_body_span_with_visible_macro(decision.span, body_span)?;
let end_bcbs = decision
.end_markers
.iter()
.map(|&marker| bcb_from_marker(marker))
.collect::<Option<_>>()?;
let bitmap_idx = next_bitmap_idx;
next_bitmap_idx += (1_u32 << decision.conditions_num).div_ceil(8);
Some(BcbMapping {
kind: BcbMappingKind::MCDCDecision {
end_bcbs,
bitmap_idx,
conditions_num: decision.conditions_num as u16,
},
span,
})
};
branch_info
.branch_spans
.iter()
.filter_map(branch_filter_map)
.chain(branch_info.mcdc_branch_spans.iter().filter_map(mcdc_branch_filter_map))
.chain(branch_info.mcdc_decision_spans.iter().filter_map(decision_filter_map))
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
}

View File

@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ pub enum InstrumentCoverage {
pub struct CoverageOptions {
/// Add branch coverage instrumentation.
pub branch: bool,
/// Add mcdc coverage instrumentation.
pub mcdc: bool,
}
/// Settings for `-Z instrument-xray` flag.

View File

@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ mod desc {
pub const parse_optimization_fuel: &str = "crate=integer";
pub const parse_dump_mono_stats: &str = "`markdown` (default) or `json`";
pub const parse_instrument_coverage: &str = parse_bool;
pub const parse_coverage_options: &str = "`branch` or `no-branch`";
pub const parse_coverage_options: &str = "either `no-branch`, `branch` or `mcdc`";
pub const parse_instrument_xray: &str = "either a boolean (`yes`, `no`, `on`, `off`, etc), or a comma separated list of settings: `always` or `never` (mutually exclusive), `ignore-loops`, `instruction-threshold=N`, `skip-entry`, `skip-exit`";
pub const parse_unpretty: &str = "`string` or `string=string`";
pub const parse_treat_err_as_bug: &str = "either no value or a non-negative number";
@ -949,17 +949,19 @@ mod parse {
let Some(v) = v else { return true };
for option in v.split(',') {
let (option, enabled) = match option.strip_prefix("no-") {
Some(without_no) => (without_no, false),
None => (option, true),
};
let slot = match option {
"branch" => &mut slot.branch,
_ => return false,
};
*slot = enabled;
match option {
"no-branch" => {
slot.branch = false;
slot.mcdc = false;
}
"branch" => slot.branch = true,
"mcdc" => {
slot.branch = true;
slot.mcdc = true;
}
_ => return false,
}
}
true
}

View File

@ -352,6 +352,10 @@ impl Session {
self.instrument_coverage() && self.opts.unstable_opts.coverage_options.branch
}
pub fn instrument_coverage_mcdc(&self) -> bool {
self.instrument_coverage() && self.opts.unstable_opts.coverage_options.mcdc
}
pub fn is_sanitizer_cfi_enabled(&self) -> bool {
self.opts.unstable_opts.sanitizer.contains(SanitizerSet::CFI)
}

View File

@ -351,8 +351,8 @@ $ llvm-cov report \
This unstable option provides finer control over some aspects of coverage
instrumentation. Pass one or more of the following values, separated by commas.
- `branch` or `no-branch`
- Enables or disables branch coverage instrumentation.
- Either `no-branch`, `branch` or `mcdc`
- `branch` enables branch coverage instrumentation and `mcdc` further enables modified condition/decision coverage instrumentation. `no-branch` disables branch coverage instrumentation, which is same as do not pass `branch` or `mcdc`.
## Other references

View File

@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ This option controls details of the coverage instrumentation performed by
Multiple options can be passed, separated by commas. Valid options are:
- `branch` or `no-branch`: Enables or disables branch coverage instrumentation.
- `no-branch`, `branch` or `mcdc`: `branch` enables branch coverage instrumentation and `mcdc` further enables modified condition/decision coverage instrumentation. `no-branch` disables branch coverage instrumentation as well as mcdc instrumentation, which is same as do not pass `branch` or `mcdc`.

View File

@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ fn parse_expected(
// //[rev1]~
// //[rev1,rev2]~^^
static RE: Lazy<Regex> =
Lazy::new(|| Regex::new(r"//(?:\[(?P<revs>[\w,]+)])?~(?P<adjust>\||\^*)").unwrap());
Lazy::new(|| Regex::new(r"//(?:\[(?P<revs>[\w\-,]+)])?~(?P<adjust>\||\^*)").unwrap());
let captures = RE.captures(line)?;
@ -178,3 +178,6 @@ fn parse_expected(
);
Some((which, Error { line_num, kind, msg }))
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_parse_expected_matching() {
// Ensure that we correctly extract expected revisions
let d1 = "//[rev1,rev2]~^ ERROR foo";
let d2 = "//[rev1,rev2-foo]~^ ERROR foo";
assert!(parse_expected(None, 1, d1, Some("rev1")).is_some());
assert!(parse_expected(None, 1, d1, Some("rev2")).is_some());
assert!(parse_expected(None, 1, d2, Some("rev1")).is_some());
assert!(parse_expected(None, 1, d2, Some("rev2-foo")).is_some());
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
Function name: mcdc_if::mcdc_check_a
Raw bytes (64): 0x[01, 01, 04, 01, 05, 09, 02, 0d, 0f, 09, 02, 08, 01, 0f, 01, 01, 09, 28, 00, 02, 01, 08, 00, 0e, 30, 05, 02, 01, 02, 00, 00, 08, 00, 09, 05, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 30, 0d, 09, 02, 00, 00, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 0d, 00, 0f, 02, 06, 0f, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 0b, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 4
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Expression(3, Add)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
Number of file 0 mappings: 8
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 15, 1) to (start + 1, 9)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 0, conditions_num: 2 } at (prev + 1, 8) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(1), false: Expression(0, Sub), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 8) to (start + 0, 9)
true = c1
false = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(3), false: Counter(2), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
true = c3
false = c2
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 0, 15) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Expression(3, Add)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c2 + (c0 - c1))
- Code(Expression(2, Add)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= (c3 + (c2 + (c0 - c1)))
Function name: mcdc_if::mcdc_check_b
Raw bytes (64): 0x[01, 01, 04, 01, 05, 09, 02, 0d, 0f, 09, 02, 08, 01, 17, 01, 01, 09, 28, 00, 02, 01, 08, 00, 0e, 30, 05, 02, 01, 02, 00, 00, 08, 00, 09, 05, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 30, 0d, 09, 02, 00, 00, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 0d, 00, 0f, 02, 06, 0f, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 0b, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 4
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Expression(3, Add)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
Number of file 0 mappings: 8
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 23, 1) to (start + 1, 9)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 0, conditions_num: 2 } at (prev + 1, 8) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(1), false: Expression(0, Sub), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 8) to (start + 0, 9)
true = c1
false = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(3), false: Counter(2), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
true = c3
false = c2
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 0, 15) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Expression(3, Add)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c2 + (c0 - c1))
- Code(Expression(2, Add)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= (c3 + (c2 + (c0 - c1)))
Function name: mcdc_if::mcdc_check_both
Raw bytes (64): 0x[01, 01, 04, 01, 05, 09, 02, 0d, 0f, 09, 02, 08, 01, 1f, 01, 01, 09, 28, 00, 02, 01, 08, 00, 0e, 30, 05, 02, 01, 02, 00, 00, 08, 00, 09, 05, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 30, 0d, 09, 02, 00, 00, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 0d, 00, 0f, 02, 06, 0f, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 0b, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 4
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Expression(3, Add)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
Number of file 0 mappings: 8
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 31, 1) to (start + 1, 9)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 0, conditions_num: 2 } at (prev + 1, 8) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(1), false: Expression(0, Sub), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 8) to (start + 0, 9)
true = c1
false = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(3), false: Counter(2), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
true = c3
false = c2
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 0, 15) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Expression(3, Add)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c2 + (c0 - c1))
- Code(Expression(2, Add)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= (c3 + (c2 + (c0 - c1)))
Function name: mcdc_if::mcdc_check_neither
Raw bytes (64): 0x[01, 01, 04, 01, 05, 09, 02, 0d, 0f, 09, 02, 08, 01, 07, 01, 01, 09, 28, 00, 02, 01, 08, 00, 0e, 30, 05, 02, 01, 02, 00, 00, 08, 00, 09, 05, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 30, 0d, 09, 02, 00, 00, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 0d, 00, 0f, 02, 06, 0f, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 0b, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 4
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Expression(3, Add)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
Number of file 0 mappings: 8
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 7, 1) to (start + 1, 9)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 0, conditions_num: 2 } at (prev + 1, 8) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(1), false: Expression(0, Sub), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 8) to (start + 0, 9)
true = c1
false = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(3), false: Counter(2), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
true = c3
false = c2
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 0, 15) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Expression(3, Add)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c2 + (c0 - c1))
- Code(Expression(2, Add)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= (c3 + (c2 + (c0 - c1)))
Function name: mcdc_if::mcdc_check_not_tree_decision
Raw bytes (87): 0x[01, 01, 08, 01, 05, 02, 09, 05, 09, 0d, 1e, 02, 09, 11, 1b, 0d, 1e, 02, 09, 0a, 01, 31, 01, 03, 0a, 28, 00, 03, 03, 08, 00, 15, 30, 05, 02, 01, 02, 03, 00, 09, 00, 0a, 02, 00, 0e, 00, 0f, 30, 09, 1e, 03, 02, 00, 00, 0e, 00, 0f, 0b, 00, 14, 00, 15, 30, 11, 0d, 02, 00, 00, 00, 14, 00, 15, 11, 00, 16, 02, 06, 1b, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 17, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 8
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Sub), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Expression(7, Sub)
- expression 4 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Sub), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 5 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Expression(6, Add)
- expression 6 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Expression(7, Sub)
- expression 7 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Sub), rhs = Counter(2)
Number of file 0 mappings: 10
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 49, 1) to (start + 3, 10)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 0, conditions_num: 3 } at (prev + 3, 8) to (start + 0, 21)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(1), false: Expression(0, Sub), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 3 } at (prev + 0, 9) to (start + 0, 10)
true = c1
false = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 14) to (start + 0, 15)
= (c0 - c1)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(2), false: Expression(7, Sub), condition_id: 3, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 14) to (start + 0, 15)
true = c2
false = ((c0 - c1) - c2)
- Code(Expression(2, Add)) at (prev + 0, 20) to (start + 0, 21)
= (c1 + c2)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(4), false: Counter(3), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 20) to (start + 0, 21)
true = c4
false = c3
- Code(Counter(4)) at (prev + 0, 22) to (start + 2, 6)
- Code(Expression(6, Add)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c3 + ((c0 - c1) - c2))
- Code(Expression(5, Add)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= (c4 + (c3 + ((c0 - c1) - c2)))
Function name: mcdc_if::mcdc_check_tree_decision
Raw bytes (87): 0x[01, 01, 08, 01, 05, 05, 0d, 05, 0d, 0d, 11, 09, 02, 1b, 1f, 0d, 11, 09, 02, 0a, 01, 27, 01, 03, 09, 28, 00, 03, 03, 08, 00, 15, 30, 05, 02, 01, 02, 00, 00, 08, 00, 09, 05, 00, 0e, 00, 0f, 30, 0d, 0a, 02, 00, 03, 00, 0e, 00, 0f, 0a, 00, 13, 00, 14, 30, 11, 09, 03, 00, 00, 00, 13, 00, 14, 1b, 00, 16, 02, 06, 1f, 02, 0c, 02, 06, 17, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 8
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(3)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(3)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(4)
- expression 4 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
- expression 5 operands: lhs = Expression(6, Add), rhs = Expression(7, Add)
- expression 6 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Counter(4)
- expression 7 operands: lhs = Counter(2), rhs = Expression(0, Sub)
Number of file 0 mappings: 10
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 39, 1) to (start + 3, 9)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 0, conditions_num: 3 } at (prev + 3, 8) to (start + 0, 21)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(1), false: Expression(0, Sub), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 8) to (start + 0, 9)
true = c1
false = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Counter(1)) at (prev + 0, 14) to (start + 0, 15)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(3), false: Expression(2, Sub), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 3 } at (prev + 0, 14) to (start + 0, 15)
true = c3
false = (c1 - c3)
- Code(Expression(2, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 19) to (start + 0, 20)
= (c1 - c3)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(4), false: Counter(2), condition_id: 3, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 19) to (start + 0, 20)
true = c4
false = c2
- Code(Expression(6, Add)) at (prev + 0, 22) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c3 + c4)
- Code(Expression(7, Add)) at (prev + 2, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= (c2 + (c0 - c1))
- Code(Expression(5, Add)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= ((c3 + c4) + (c2 + (c0 - c1)))
Function name: mcdc_if::mcdc_nested_if
Raw bytes (124): 0x[01, 01, 0d, 01, 05, 02, 09, 05, 09, 1b, 15, 05, 09, 1b, 15, 05, 09, 11, 15, 02, 09, 2b, 32, 0d, 2f, 11, 15, 02, 09, 0e, 01, 3b, 01, 01, 09, 28, 00, 02, 01, 08, 00, 0e, 30, 05, 02, 01, 00, 02, 00, 08, 00, 09, 02, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 30, 09, 32, 02, 00, 00, 00, 0d, 00, 0e, 1b, 01, 09, 01, 0d, 28, 01, 02, 01, 0c, 00, 12, 30, 16, 15, 01, 02, 00, 00, 0c, 00, 0d, 16, 00, 11, 00, 12, 30, 0d, 11, 02, 00, 00, 00, 11, 00, 12, 0d, 00, 13, 02, 0a, 2f, 02, 0a, 00, 0b, 32, 01, 0c, 02, 06, 27, 03, 01, 00, 02]
Number of files: 1
- file 0 => global file 1
Number of expressions: 13
- expression 0 operands: lhs = Counter(0), rhs = Counter(1)
- expression 1 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Sub), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 2 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 3 operands: lhs = Expression(6, Add), rhs = Counter(5)
- expression 4 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 5 operands: lhs = Expression(6, Add), rhs = Counter(5)
- expression 6 operands: lhs = Counter(1), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 7 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Counter(5)
- expression 8 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Sub), rhs = Counter(2)
- expression 9 operands: lhs = Expression(10, Add), rhs = Expression(12, Sub)
- expression 10 operands: lhs = Counter(3), rhs = Expression(11, Add)
- expression 11 operands: lhs = Counter(4), rhs = Counter(5)
- expression 12 operands: lhs = Expression(0, Sub), rhs = Counter(2)
Number of file 0 mappings: 14
- Code(Counter(0)) at (prev + 59, 1) to (start + 1, 9)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 0, conditions_num: 2 } at (prev + 1, 8) to (start + 0, 14)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(1), false: Expression(0, Sub), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 2 } at (prev + 0, 8) to (start + 0, 9)
true = c1
false = (c0 - c1)
- Code(Expression(0, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
= (c0 - c1)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(2), false: Expression(12, Sub), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 13) to (start + 0, 14)
true = c2
false = ((c0 - c1) - c2)
- Code(Expression(6, Add)) at (prev + 1, 9) to (start + 1, 13)
= (c1 + c2)
- MCDCDecision { bitmap_idx: 1, conditions_num: 2 } at (prev + 1, 12) to (start + 0, 18)
- MCDCBranch { true: Expression(5, Sub), false: Counter(5), condition_id: 1, true_next_id: 2, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 12) to (start + 0, 13)
true = ((c1 + c2) - c5)
false = c5
- Code(Expression(5, Sub)) at (prev + 0, 17) to (start + 0, 18)
= ((c1 + c2) - c5)
- MCDCBranch { true: Counter(3), false: Counter(4), condition_id: 2, true_next_id: 0, false_next_id: 0 } at (prev + 0, 17) to (start + 0, 18)
true = c3
false = c4
- Code(Counter(3)) at (prev + 0, 19) to (start + 2, 10)
- Code(Expression(11, Add)) at (prev + 2, 10) to (start + 0, 11)
= (c4 + c5)
- Code(Expression(12, Sub)) at (prev + 1, 12) to (start + 2, 6)
= ((c0 - c1) - c2)
- Code(Expression(9, Add)) at (prev + 3, 1) to (start + 0, 2)
= ((c3 + (c4 + c5)) + ((c0 - c1) - c2))

View File

@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
LL| |#![feature(coverage_attribute)]
LL| |//@ edition: 2021
LL| |//@ min-llvm-version: 18
LL| |//@ compile-flags: -Zcoverage-options=mcdc
LL| |//@ llvm-cov-flags: --show-mcdc
LL| |
LL| 2|fn mcdc_check_neither(a: bool, b: bool) {
LL| 2| if a && b {
^0
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:8) to (LL:14)
|
| Number of Conditions: 2
| Condition C1 --> (LL:8)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:13)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2 Result
| 1 { F, - = F }
|
| C1-Pair: not covered
| C2-Pair: not covered
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 0.00%
|
------------------
LL| 0| say("a and b");
LL| 2| } else {
LL| 2| say("not both");
LL| 2| }
LL| 2|}
LL| |
LL| 2|fn mcdc_check_a(a: bool, b: bool) {
LL| 2| if a && b {
^1
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:8) to (LL:14)
|
| Number of Conditions: 2
| Condition C1 --> (LL:8)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:13)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2 Result
| 1 { F, - = F }
| 2 { T, T = T }
|
| C1-Pair: covered: (1,2)
| C2-Pair: not covered
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 50.00%
|
------------------
LL| 1| say("a and b");
LL| 1| } else {
LL| 1| say("not both");
LL| 1| }
LL| 2|}
LL| |
LL| 2|fn mcdc_check_b(a: bool, b: bool) {
LL| 2| if a && b {
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:8) to (LL:14)
|
| Number of Conditions: 2
| Condition C1 --> (LL:8)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:13)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2 Result
| 1 { T, F = F }
| 2 { T, T = T }
|
| C1-Pair: not covered
| C2-Pair: covered: (1,2)
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 50.00%
|
------------------
LL| 1| say("a and b");
LL| 1| } else {
LL| 1| say("not both");
LL| 1| }
LL| 2|}
LL| |
LL| 3|fn mcdc_check_both(a: bool, b: bool) {
LL| 3| if a && b {
^2
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:8) to (LL:14)
|
| Number of Conditions: 2
| Condition C1 --> (LL:8)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:13)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2 Result
| 1 { F, - = F }
| 2 { T, F = F }
| 3 { T, T = T }
|
| C1-Pair: covered: (1,3)
| C2-Pair: covered: (2,3)
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 100.00%
|
------------------
LL| 1| say("a and b");
LL| 2| } else {
LL| 2| say("not both");
LL| 2| }
LL| 3|}
LL| |
LL| 4|fn mcdc_check_tree_decision(a: bool, b: bool, c: bool) {
LL| 4| // This expression is intentionally written in a way
LL| 4| // where 100% branch coverage indicates 100% mcdc coverage.
LL| 4| if a && (b || c) {
^3 ^2
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:8) to (LL:21)
|
| Number of Conditions: 3
| Condition C1 --> (LL:8)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:14)
| Condition C3 --> (LL:19)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2, C3 Result
| 1 { F, -, - = F }
| 2 { T, F, F = F }
| 3 { T, T, - = T }
| 4 { T, F, T = T }
|
| C1-Pair: covered: (1,3)
| C2-Pair: covered: (2,3)
| C3-Pair: covered: (2,4)
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 100.00%
|
------------------
LL| 2| say("pass");
LL| 2| } else {
LL| 2| say("reject");
LL| 2| }
LL| 4|}
LL| |
LL| 4|fn mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(a: bool, b: bool, c: bool) {
LL| 4| // Contradict to `mcdc_check_tree_decision`,
LL| 4| // 100% branch coverage of this expression does not mean indicates 100% mcdc coverage.
LL| 4| if (a || b) && c {
^1
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:8) to (LL:21)
|
| Number of Conditions: 3
| Condition C1 --> (LL:9)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:14)
| Condition C3 --> (LL:20)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2, C3 Result
| 1 { T, -, F = F }
| 2 { T, -, T = T }
| 3 { F, T, T = T }
|
| C1-Pair: not covered
| C2-Pair: not covered
| C3-Pair: covered: (1,2)
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 33.33%
|
------------------
LL| 2| say("pass");
LL| 2| } else {
LL| 2| say("reject");
LL| 2| }
LL| 4|}
LL| |
LL| 3|fn mcdc_nested_if(a: bool, b: bool, c: bool) {
LL| 3| if a || b {
^0
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:8) to (LL:14)
|
| Number of Conditions: 2
| Condition C1 --> (LL:8)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:13)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2 Result
| 1 { T, - = T }
|
| C1-Pair: not covered
| C2-Pair: not covered
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 0.00%
|
------------------
LL| 3| say("a or b");
LL| 3| if b && c {
^2
------------------
|---> MC/DC Decision Region (LL:12) to (LL:18)
|
| Number of Conditions: 2
| Condition C1 --> (LL:12)
| Condition C2 --> (LL:17)
|
| Executed MC/DC Test Vectors:
|
| C1, C2 Result
| 1 { F, - = F }
| 2 { T, F = F }
| 3 { T, T = T }
|
| C1-Pair: covered: (1,3)
| C2-Pair: covered: (2,3)
| MC/DC Coverage for Decision: 100.00%
|
------------------
LL| 1| say("b and c");
LL| 2| }
LL| 0| } else {
LL| 0| say("neither a nor b");
LL| 0| }
LL| 3|}
LL| |
LL| |#[coverage(off)]
LL| |fn main() {
LL| | mcdc_check_neither(false, false);
LL| | mcdc_check_neither(false, true);
LL| |
LL| | mcdc_check_a(true, true);
LL| | mcdc_check_a(false, true);
LL| |
LL| | mcdc_check_b(true, true);
LL| | mcdc_check_b(true, false);
LL| |
LL| | mcdc_check_both(false, true);
LL| | mcdc_check_both(true, true);
LL| | mcdc_check_both(true, false);
LL| |
LL| | mcdc_check_tree_decision(false, true, true);
LL| | mcdc_check_tree_decision(true, true, false);
LL| | mcdc_check_tree_decision(true, false, false);
LL| | mcdc_check_tree_decision(true, false, true);
LL| |
LL| | mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(false, true, true);
LL| | mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(true, true, false);
LL| | mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(true, false, false);
LL| | mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(true, false, true);
LL| |
LL| | mcdc_nested_if(true, false, true);
LL| | mcdc_nested_if(true, true, true);
LL| | mcdc_nested_if(true, true, false);
LL| |}
LL| |
LL| |#[coverage(off)]
LL| |fn say(message: &str) {
LL| | core::hint::black_box(message);
LL| |}

103
tests/coverage/mcdc_if.rs Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
#![feature(coverage_attribute)]
//@ edition: 2021
//@ min-llvm-version: 18
//@ compile-flags: -Zcoverage-options=mcdc
//@ llvm-cov-flags: --show-mcdc
fn mcdc_check_neither(a: bool, b: bool) {
if a && b {
say("a and b");
} else {
say("not both");
}
}
fn mcdc_check_a(a: bool, b: bool) {
if a && b {
say("a and b");
} else {
say("not both");
}
}
fn mcdc_check_b(a: bool, b: bool) {
if a && b {
say("a and b");
} else {
say("not both");
}
}
fn mcdc_check_both(a: bool, b: bool) {
if a && b {
say("a and b");
} else {
say("not both");
}
}
fn mcdc_check_tree_decision(a: bool, b: bool, c: bool) {
// This expression is intentionally written in a way
// where 100% branch coverage indicates 100% mcdc coverage.
if a && (b || c) {
say("pass");
} else {
say("reject");
}
}
fn mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(a: bool, b: bool, c: bool) {
// Contradict to `mcdc_check_tree_decision`,
// 100% branch coverage of this expression does not mean indicates 100% mcdc coverage.
if (a || b) && c {
say("pass");
} else {
say("reject");
}
}
fn mcdc_nested_if(a: bool, b: bool, c: bool) {
if a || b {
say("a or b");
if b && c {
say("b and c");
}
} else {
say("neither a nor b");
}
}
#[coverage(off)]
fn main() {
mcdc_check_neither(false, false);
mcdc_check_neither(false, true);
mcdc_check_a(true, true);
mcdc_check_a(false, true);
mcdc_check_b(true, true);
mcdc_check_b(true, false);
mcdc_check_both(false, true);
mcdc_check_both(true, true);
mcdc_check_both(true, false);
mcdc_check_tree_decision(false, true, true);
mcdc_check_tree_decision(true, true, false);
mcdc_check_tree_decision(true, false, false);
mcdc_check_tree_decision(true, false, true);
mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(false, true, true);
mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(true, true, false);
mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(true, false, false);
mcdc_check_not_tree_decision(true, false, true);
mcdc_nested_if(true, false, true);
mcdc_nested_if(true, true, true);
mcdc_nested_if(true, true, false);
}
#[coverage(off)]
fn say(message: &str) {
core::hint::black_box(message);
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
#![feature(precise_capturing)]
//~^ WARN the feature `precise_capturing` is incomplete
trait Tr {
type Assoc;
}
struct W<'a>(&'a ());
impl Tr for W<'_> {
type Assoc = ();
}
// The normal way of capturing `'a`...
impl<'a> W<'a> {
fn good1() -> impl use<'a> Into<<W<'a> as Tr>::Assoc> {}
}
// This ensures that we don't error when we capture the *parent* copy of `'a`,
// since the opaque captures that rather than the duplicated `'a` lifetime
// synthesized from mentioning `'a` directly in the bounds.
impl<'a> W<'a> {
fn good2() -> impl use<'a> Into<<Self as Tr>::Assoc> {}
}
// The normal way of capturing `'a`... but not mentioned in the bounds.
impl<'a> W<'a> {
fn bad1() -> impl use<> Into<<W<'a> as Tr>::Assoc> {}
//~^ ERROR `impl Trait` captures lifetime parameter, but it is not mentioned in `use<...>` precise captures list
}
// But also make sure that we error here...
impl<'a> W<'a> {
//~^ ERROR `impl Trait` captures lifetime parameter, but it is not mentioned in `use<...>` precise captures list
fn bad2() -> impl use<> Into<<Self as Tr>::Assoc> {}
}
fn main() {}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
warning: the feature `precise_capturing` is incomplete and may not be safe to use and/or cause compiler crashes
--> $DIR/capture-parent-arg.rs:1:12
|
LL | #![feature(precise_capturing)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: see issue #123432 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123432> for more information
= note: `#[warn(incomplete_features)]` on by default
error: `impl Trait` captures lifetime parameter, but it is not mentioned in `use<...>` precise captures list
--> $DIR/capture-parent-arg.rs:28:37
|
LL | impl<'a> W<'a> {
| -- this lifetime parameter is captured
LL | fn bad1() -> impl use<> Into<<W<'a> as Tr>::Assoc> {}
| -------------------^^---------------- lifetime captured due to being mentioned in the bounds of the `impl Trait`
error: `impl Trait` captures lifetime parameter, but it is not mentioned in `use<...>` precise captures list
--> $DIR/capture-parent-arg.rs:33:6
|
LL | impl<'a> W<'a> {
| ^^
LL |
LL | fn bad2() -> impl use<> Into<<Self as Tr>::Assoc> {}
| ------------------------------------ lifetime captured due to being mentioned in the bounds of the `impl Trait`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors; 1 warning emitted

View File

@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
error: incorrect value `bad` for unstable option `coverage-options` - `branch` or `no-branch` was expected
error: incorrect value `bad` for unstable option `coverage-options` - either `no-branch`, `branch` or `mcdc` was expected

View File

@ -8,7 +8,13 @@
//@ [no-branch] check-pass
//@ [no-branch] compile-flags: -Zcoverage-options=no-branch
//@ [mcdc] check-pass
//@ [mcdc] compile-flags: -Zcoverage-options=mcdc
//@ [bad] check-fail
//@ [bad] compile-flags: -Zcoverage-options=bad
//@ [conflict] check-fail
//@ [conflict] compile-flags: -Zcoverage-options=no-branch,mcdc
fn main() {}