make raw_eq precondition more restrictive

This commit is contained in:
Ralf Jung 2022-07-20 10:22:16 -04:00
parent d60d88fe5c
commit 5848c27c79
2 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -173,13 +173,14 @@ macro_rules! is_raw_eq_comparable {
)+};
}
// SAFETY: All the ordinary integer types allow all bit patterns as distinct values
// SAFETY: All the ordinary integer types have no padding, and are no poointers.
is_raw_eq_comparable!(u8, u16, u32, u64, u128, usize, i8, i16, i32, i64, i128, isize);
// SAFETY: bool and char have *niches*, but no *padding*, so this is sound
// SAFETY: bool and char have *niches*, but no *padding* (and these are not pointer types), so this
// is sound
is_raw_eq_comparable!(bool, char);
// SAFETY: Similarly, the non-zero types have a niche, but no undef,
// SAFETY: Similarly, the non-zero types have a niche, but no undef and no pointers,
// and they compare like their underlying numeric type.
is_raw_eq_comparable!(
NonZeroU8,

View File

@ -2277,7 +2277,8 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" {
///
/// # Safety
///
/// It's UB to call this if any of the *bytes* in `*a` or `*b` are uninitialized.
/// It's UB to call this if any of the *bytes* in `*a` or `*b` are uninitialized or carries a
/// pointer value.
/// Note that this is a stricter criterion than just the *values* being
/// fully-initialized: if `T` has padding, it's UB to call this intrinsic.
///