Patch projection to not be so eager to unify type variables. This code

is still probably wrong since it fails to incorporate the ambiguity
resolution measures that `select` uses. Also, made more complicated by
the fact that trait object types do not impl their own traits yet.

src/librustc/middle/traits/project.rs

@@ -125,21 +125,14 @@ pub fn project_type<'cx,'tcx>(
         ambiguous: false,
     };
 
-    let () = assemble_candidates_from_param_env(selcx,
-                                                obligation,
-                                                &mut candidates);
-
     let () = assemble_candidates_from_object_type(selcx,
                                                   obligation,
                                                   &mut candidates);
 
     if candidates.vec.is_empty() {
-        // FIXME(#20297) -- In `select.rs` there is similar logic that
-        // gives precedence to where-clauses, but it's a bit more
-        // fine-grained. I was lazy here and just always give
-        // precedence to where-clauses or other such sources over
-        // actually dredging through impls. This logic probably should
-        // be tightened up.
+        let () = assemble_candidates_from_param_env(selcx,
+                                                    obligation,
+                                                    &mut candidates);
 
         let () = try!(assemble_candidates_from_impls(selcx,
                                                      obligation,

src/test/run-pass/associated-types-where-clause-impl-ambiguity.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+// Copyright 2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
+// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
+// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
+//
+// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
+// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
+// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
+// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
+// except according to those terms.
+
+// Test how resolving a projection interacts with inference.  In this
+// case, we were eagerly unifying the type variable for the iterator
+// type with `I` from the where clause, ignoring the in-scope `impl`
+// for `ByRef`. The right answer was to consider the result ambiguous
+// until more type information was available.
+
+#![feature(associated_types, lang_items, unboxed_closures)]
+#![no_implicit_prelude]
+
+use std::option::Option::{None, Some, mod};
+
+trait Iterator {
+    type Item;
+
+    fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item>;
+}
+
+trait IteratorExt: Iterator {
+    fn by_ref(&mut self) -> ByRef<Self> {
+        ByRef(self)
+    }
+}
+
+impl<I> IteratorExt for I where I: Iterator {}
+
+struct ByRef<'a, I: 'a + Iterator>(&'a mut I);
+
+impl<'a, A, I> Iterator for ByRef<'a, I> where I: Iterator<Item=A> {
+    type Item = A;
+
+    fn next(&mut self) -> Option< <I as Iterator>::Item > {
+        self.0.next()
+    }
+}
+
+fn is_iterator_of<A, I: Iterator<Item=A>>(_: &I) {}
+
+fn test<A, I: Iterator<Item=A>>(mut it: I) {
+    is_iterator_of::<A, _>(&it.by_ref());
+}
+
+fn main() { }