mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-11-26 00:34:06 +00:00
Rollup merge of #125664 - compiler-errors:trace-tweaks, r=lcnr
Tweak relations to no longer rely on `TypeTrace` Remove `At::trace`, and inline all of the `Trace::equate`,etc methods into `At`. The only nontrivial change is that we use `AliasTerm` to relate two unevaluated consts in the old-solver impl of `ConstEquate`, since `AliasTerm` does implement `ToTrace` and will relate the args structurally (shallowly). r? lcnr
This commit is contained in:
commit
4c1228276b
@ -1158,7 +1158,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let (a_sig, b_sig) = self.normalize(new.span, (a_sig, b_sig));
|
||||
let sig = self
|
||||
.at(cause, self.param_env)
|
||||
.trace(prev_ty, new_ty)
|
||||
.lub(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a_sig, b_sig)
|
||||
.map(|ok| self.register_infer_ok_obligations(ok))?;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ pub struct At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
pub param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct Trace<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
at: At<'a, 'tcx>,
|
||||
trace: TypeTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
#[inline]
|
||||
pub fn at<'a>(
|
||||
@ -109,9 +104,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// call like `foo(x)`, where `foo: fn(i32)`, you might have
|
||||
/// `sup(i32, x)`, since the "expected" type is the type that
|
||||
/// appears in the signature.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See [`At::trace`] and [`Trace::sub`] for a version of
|
||||
/// this method that only requires `T: Relate<'tcx>`
|
||||
pub fn sup<T>(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
@ -121,13 +113,19 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.trace(expected, actual).sup(define_opaque_types, expected, actual)
|
||||
let mut fields = CombineFields::new(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
ToTrace::to_trace(self.cause, true, expected, actual),
|
||||
self.param_env,
|
||||
define_opaque_types,
|
||||
);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.sup()
|
||||
.relate(expected, actual)
|
||||
.map(|_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Makes `expected <: actual`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See [`At::trace`] and [`Trace::sub`] for a version of
|
||||
/// this method that only requires `T: Relate<'tcx>`
|
||||
pub fn sub<T>(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
@ -137,13 +135,19 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.trace(expected, actual).sub(define_opaque_types, expected, actual)
|
||||
let mut fields = CombineFields::new(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
ToTrace::to_trace(self.cause, true, expected, actual),
|
||||
self.param_env,
|
||||
define_opaque_types,
|
||||
);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.sub()
|
||||
.relate(expected, actual)
|
||||
.map(|_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Makes `expected <: actual`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See [`At::trace`] and [`Trace::eq`] for a version of
|
||||
/// this method that only requires `T: Relate<'tcx>`
|
||||
/// Makes `expected == actual`.
|
||||
pub fn eq<T>(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
@ -153,7 +157,40 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.trace(expected, actual).eq(define_opaque_types, expected, actual)
|
||||
let mut fields = CombineFields::new(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
ToTrace::to_trace(self.cause, true, expected, actual),
|
||||
self.param_env,
|
||||
define_opaque_types,
|
||||
);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::No)
|
||||
.relate(expected, actual)
|
||||
.map(|_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Equates `expected` and `found` while structurally relating aliases.
|
||||
/// This should only be used inside of the next generation trait solver
|
||||
/// when relating rigid aliases.
|
||||
pub fn eq_structurally_relating_aliases<T>(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
expected: T,
|
||||
actual: T,
|
||||
) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
assert!(self.infcx.next_trait_solver());
|
||||
let mut fields = CombineFields::new(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
ToTrace::to_trace(self.cause, true, expected, actual),
|
||||
self.param_env,
|
||||
DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
|
||||
);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::Yes)
|
||||
.relate(expected, actual)
|
||||
.map(|_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn relate<T>(
|
||||
@ -185,9 +222,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// this can result in an error (e.g., if asked to compute LUB of
|
||||
/// u32 and i32), it is meaningful to call one of them the
|
||||
/// "expected type".
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See [`At::trace`] and [`Trace::lub`] for a version of
|
||||
/// this method that only requires `T: Relate<'tcx>`
|
||||
pub fn lub<T>(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
@ -197,15 +231,21 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.trace(expected, actual).lub(define_opaque_types, expected, actual)
|
||||
let mut fields = CombineFields::new(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
ToTrace::to_trace(self.cause, true, expected, actual),
|
||||
self.param_env,
|
||||
define_opaque_types,
|
||||
);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.lub()
|
||||
.relate(expected, actual)
|
||||
.map(|value| InferOk { value, obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Computes the greatest-lower-bound, or mutual subtype, of two
|
||||
/// values. As with `lub` order doesn't matter, except for error
|
||||
/// cases.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// See [`At::trace`] and [`Trace::glb`] for a version of
|
||||
/// this method that only requires `T: Relate<'tcx>`
|
||||
pub fn glb<T>(
|
||||
self,
|
||||
define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
@ -215,105 +255,16 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> At<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.trace(expected, actual).glb(define_opaque_types, expected, actual)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Sets the "trace" values that will be used for
|
||||
/// error-reporting, but doesn't actually perform any operation
|
||||
/// yet (this is useful when you want to set the trace using
|
||||
/// distinct values from those you wish to operate upon).
|
||||
pub fn trace<T>(self, expected: T, actual: T) -> Trace<'a, 'tcx>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let trace = ToTrace::to_trace(self.cause, true, expected, actual);
|
||||
Trace { at: self, trace }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> Trace<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// Makes `a <: b`.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn sub<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace } = self;
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.sub()
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Makes `a :> b`.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn sup<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace } = self;
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.sup()
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Makes `a == b`.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn eq<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace } = self;
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::No)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Equates `a` and `b` while structurally relating aliases. This should only
|
||||
/// be used inside of the next generation trait solver when relating rigid aliases.
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn eq_structurally_relating_aliases<T>(self, a: T, b: T) -> InferResult<'tcx, ()>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace } = self;
|
||||
debug_assert!(at.infcx.next_trait_solver());
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.equate(StructurallyRelateAliases::Yes)
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |_| InferOk { value: (), obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn lub<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> InferResult<'tcx, T>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace } = self;
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.lub()
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
|
||||
pub fn glb<T>(self, define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes, a: T, b: T) -> InferResult<'tcx, T>
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: Relate<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let Trace { at, trace } = self;
|
||||
let mut fields = at.infcx.combine_fields(trace, at.param_env, define_opaque_types);
|
||||
let mut fields = CombineFields::new(
|
||||
self.infcx,
|
||||
ToTrace::to_trace(self.cause, true, expected, actual),
|
||||
self.param_env,
|
||||
define_opaque_types,
|
||||
);
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.glb()
|
||||
.relate(a, b)
|
||||
.map(move |t| InferOk { value: t, obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
.relate(expected, actual)
|
||||
.map(|value| InferOk { value, obligations: fields.obligations })
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -836,21 +836,6 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn combine_fields<'a>(
|
||||
&'a self,
|
||||
trace: TypeTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
) -> CombineFields<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
CombineFields {
|
||||
infcx: self,
|
||||
trace,
|
||||
param_env,
|
||||
obligations: PredicateObligations::new(),
|
||||
define_opaque_types,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn can_sub<T>(&self, param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>, expected: T, actual: T) -> bool
|
||||
where
|
||||
T: at::ToTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
|
@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ pub struct CombineFields<'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
pub define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'infcx, 'tcx> CombineFields<'infcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn new(
|
||||
infcx: &'infcx InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
trace: TypeTrace<'tcx>,
|
||||
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
||||
define_opaque_types: DefineOpaqueTypes,
|
||||
) -> Self {
|
||||
Self { infcx, trace, param_env, define_opaque_types, obligations: vec![] }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn super_combine_tys<R>(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
|
@ -363,7 +363,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, InferCtxt<'tcx>> {
|
||||
for (&orig, response) in iter::zip(original_values, var_values.var_values) {
|
||||
let InferOk { value: (), obligations } = infcx
|
||||
.at(&cause, param_env)
|
||||
.trace(orig, response)
|
||||
.eq_structurally_relating_aliases(orig, response)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
|
@ -776,7 +776,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, InferCtxt<'tcx>> {
|
||||
let InferOk { value: (), obligations } = self
|
||||
.infcx
|
||||
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), param_env)
|
||||
.trace(term, ctor_term)
|
||||
.eq_structurally_relating_aliases(term, ctor_term)?;
|
||||
debug_assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
self.relate(param_env, alias, variance, rigid_ctor)
|
||||
@ -796,11 +795,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, InferCtxt<'tcx>> {
|
||||
rhs: T,
|
||||
) -> Result<(), NoSolution> {
|
||||
let cause = ObligationCause::dummy();
|
||||
let InferOk { value: (), obligations } = self
|
||||
.infcx
|
||||
.at(&cause, param_env)
|
||||
.trace(lhs, rhs)
|
||||
.eq_structurally_relating_aliases(lhs, rhs)?;
|
||||
let InferOk { value: (), obligations } =
|
||||
self.infcx.at(&cause, param_env).eq_structurally_relating_aliases(lhs, rhs)?;
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -566,10 +566,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ObligationProcessor for FulfillProcessor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Ok(new_obligations) = infcx
|
||||
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
|
||||
.trace(c1, c2)
|
||||
// Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
|
||||
// `generic_const_exprs`
|
||||
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a.args, b.args)
|
||||
.eq(
|
||||
DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
|
||||
ty::AliasTerm::from(a),
|
||||
ty::AliasTerm::from(b),
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ProcessResult::Changed(mk_pending(
|
||||
new_obligations.into_obligations(),
|
||||
|
@ -910,10 +910,13 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
if let Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: () }) = self
|
||||
.infcx
|
||||
.at(&obligation.cause, obligation.param_env)
|
||||
.trace(c1, c2)
|
||||
// Can define opaque types as this is only reachable with
|
||||
// `generic_const_exprs`
|
||||
.eq(DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes, a.args, b.args)
|
||||
.eq(
|
||||
DefineOpaqueTypes::Yes,
|
||||
ty::AliasTerm::from(a),
|
||||
ty::AliasTerm::from(b),
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return self.evaluate_predicates_recursively(
|
||||
previous_stack,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user