Rollup merge of #87700 - kornelski:e530text, r=oli-obk

Expand explanation of E0530

The explanation didn't cover a puzzling case of enum variants missing fields.
This commit is contained in:
Yuki Okushi 2021-08-11 04:18:36 +09:00 committed by GitHub
commit 4442806626
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -1,32 +1,57 @@
A binding shadowed something it shouldn't.
Erroneous code example:
A match arm or a variable has a name that is already used by
something else, e.g.
* struct name
* enum variant
* static
* associated constant
This error may also happen when an enum variant *with fields* is used
in a pattern, but without its fields.
```compile_fail
enum Enum {
WithField(i32)
}
use Enum::*;
match WithField(1) {
WithField => {} // error: missing (_)
}
```
Match bindings cannot shadow statics:
```compile_fail,E0530
static TEST: i32 = 0;
let r: (i32, i32) = (0, 0);
let r = 123;
match r {
TEST => {} // error: match bindings cannot shadow statics
TEST => {} // error: name of a static
}
```
To fix this error, just change the binding's name in order to avoid shadowing
one of the following:
* struct name
* struct/enum variant
* static
* const
* associated const
Fixed example:
Fixed examples:
```
static TEST: i32 = 0;
let r: (i32, i32) = (0, 0);
let r = 123;
match r {
something => {} // ok!
some_value => {} // ok!
}
```
or
```
const TEST: i32 = 0; // const, not static
let r = 123;
match r {
TEST => {} // const is ok!
other_values => {}
}
```