mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2024-11-25 16:24:46 +00:00
Fix union handling in exhaustiveness
This commit is contained in:
parent
db9b4eac48
commit
27704c7f9e
@ -1120,7 +1120,8 @@ impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for Pat<'tcx> {
|
||||
printed += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if printed < variant.fields.len() {
|
||||
let is_union = self.ty.ty_adt_def().is_some_and(|adt| adt.is_union());
|
||||
if printed < variant.fields.len() && (!is_union || printed == 0) {
|
||||
write!(f, "{}..", start_or_comma())?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -140,6 +140,34 @@
|
||||
//! [`ConstructorSet::split`]. The invariants of [`SplitConstructorSet`] are also of interest.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Unions
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Unions allow us to match a value via several overlapping representations at the same time. For
|
||||
//! example, the following is exhaustive because when seeing the value as a boolean we handled all
|
||||
//! possible cases (other cases such as `n == 3` would trigger UB).
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ```rust
|
||||
//! # fn main() {
|
||||
//! union U8AsBool {
|
||||
//! n: u8,
|
||||
//! b: bool,
|
||||
//! }
|
||||
//! let x = U8AsBool { n: 1 };
|
||||
//! unsafe {
|
||||
//! match x {
|
||||
//! U8AsBool { n: 2 } => {}
|
||||
//! U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
|
||||
//! U8AsBool { b: false } => {}
|
||||
//! }
|
||||
//! }
|
||||
//! # }
|
||||
//! ```
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Pattern-matching has no knowledge that e.g. `false as u8 == 0`, so the values we consider in the
|
||||
//! algorithm look like `U8AsBool { b: true, n: 2 }`. In other words, for the most part a union is
|
||||
//! treated like a struct with the same fields. The difference lies in how we construct witnesses of
|
||||
//! non-exhaustiveness.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! ## Opaque patterns
|
||||
//!
|
||||
|
@ -1384,12 +1384,35 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> WitnessStack<Cx> {
|
||||
/// pats: [(false, "foo"), _, true]
|
||||
/// result: [Enum::Variant { a: (false, "foo"), b: _ }, true]
|
||||
/// ```
|
||||
fn apply_constructor(&mut self, pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'_, Cx>, ctor: &Constructor<Cx>) {
|
||||
fn apply_constructor(
|
||||
mut self,
|
||||
pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'_, Cx>,
|
||||
ctor: &Constructor<Cx>,
|
||||
) -> SmallVec<[Self; 1]> {
|
||||
let len = self.0.len();
|
||||
let arity = pcx.ctor_arity(ctor);
|
||||
let fields = self.0.drain((len - arity)..).rev().collect();
|
||||
let pat = WitnessPat::new(ctor.clone(), fields, pcx.ty.clone());
|
||||
self.0.push(pat);
|
||||
let fields: Vec<_> = self.0.drain((len - arity)..).rev().collect();
|
||||
if matches!(ctor, Constructor::UnionField)
|
||||
&& fields.iter().filter(|p| !matches!(p.ctor(), Constructor::Wildcard)).count() >= 2
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Convert a `Union { a: p, b: q }` witness into `Union { a: p }` and `Union { b: q }`.
|
||||
// First add `Union { .. }` to `self`.
|
||||
self.0.push(WitnessPat::wild_from_ctor(pcx.cx, ctor.clone(), pcx.ty.clone()));
|
||||
fields
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.filter(|(_, p)| !matches!(p.ctor(), Constructor::Wildcard))
|
||||
.map(|(i, p)| {
|
||||
let mut ret = self.clone();
|
||||
// Fill the `i`th field of the union with `p`.
|
||||
ret.0.last_mut().unwrap().fields[i] = p;
|
||||
ret
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
self.0.push(WitnessPat::new(ctor.clone(), fields, pcx.ty.clone()));
|
||||
smallvec![self]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1462,8 +1485,8 @@ impl<Cx: PatCx> WitnessMatrix<Cx> {
|
||||
*self = ret;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Any other constructor we unspecialize as expected.
|
||||
for witness in self.0.iter_mut() {
|
||||
witness.apply_constructor(pcx, ctor)
|
||||
for witness in std::mem::take(&mut self.0) {
|
||||
self.0.extend(witness.apply_constructor(pcx, ctor));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -20,12 +20,13 @@ fn main() {
|
||||
U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
match x {
|
||||
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }` not covered
|
||||
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
|
||||
U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
|
||||
U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Our approach can report duplicate witnesses sometimes.
|
||||
match (x, true) {
|
||||
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false)` and `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false)` not covered
|
||||
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
|
||||
(U8AsBool { b: true }, true) => {}
|
||||
(U8AsBool { b: false }, true) => {}
|
||||
(U8AsBool { n: 1.. }, true) => {}
|
||||
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }` not covered
|
||||
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
|
||||
--> $DIR/unions.rs:22:15
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | match x {
|
||||
| ^ pattern `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }` not covered
|
||||
| ^ patterns `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
|
||||
|
|
||||
note: `U8AsBool` defined here
|
||||
--> $DIR/unions.rs:3:11
|
||||
@ -10,23 +10,23 @@ note: `U8AsBool` defined here
|
||||
LL | union U8AsBool {
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^
|
||||
= note: the matched value is of type `U8AsBool`
|
||||
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL ~ U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {},
|
||||
LL + U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false } => todo!()
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false)` and `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false)` not covered
|
||||
--> $DIR/unions.rs:27:15
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | match (x, true) {
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false)` and `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false)` not covered
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: the matched value is of type `(U8AsBool, bool)`
|
||||
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL ~ U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {},
|
||||
LL + U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 } | U8AsBool { b: false } => todo!()
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
|
||||
--> $DIR/unions.rs:28:15
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | match (x, true) {
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: the matched value is of type `(U8AsBool, bool)`
|
||||
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL ~ (U8AsBool { n: 1.. }, true) => {},
|
||||
LL + (U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false) | (U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false) => todo!()
|
||||
LL + _ => todo!()
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user