Rollup merge of #93721 - jyn514:less-macro-special-casing, r=petrochenkov

rustdoc: Special-case macro lookups less

Previously, rustdoc had 3 fallbacks it used:
1. `resolve_macro_path`
2. `all_macros`
3. `resolve_str_path_error`

Ideally, it would only use `resolve_str_path_error`, to be consistent with other namespaces.
Unfortunately, that doesn't consider macros that aren't defined at module scope;
consider for instance
```rust
{
    struct S;

    macro_rules! mac { () => {} }
    // `mac`'s scope starts here

    /// `mac` <- `resolve_str_path_error` won't see this
   struct Z;

    //`mac`'s scope ends here
}
```

This changes it to only use `all_macros` and `resolve_str_path_error`, and gives
`resolve_str_path_error` precedence over `all_macros` in case there are two macros with the same
name in the same module.

This is a smaller version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91427.

r? `@petrochenkov`
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2022-02-08 06:47:37 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 1f90f4fb85
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 14 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -2,10 +2,8 @@
//!
//! [RFC 1946]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1946-intra-rustdoc-links.md
use rustc_ast as ast;
use rustc_data_structures::{fx::FxHashMap, stable_set::FxHashSet};
use rustc_errors::{Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder};
use rustc_expand::base::SyntaxExtensionKind;
use rustc_hir::def::{
DefKind,
Namespace::{self, *},
@ -14,7 +12,6 @@ use rustc_hir::def::{
use rustc_hir::def_id::{CrateNum, DefId, CRATE_DEF_ID};
use rustc_middle::ty::{DefIdTree, Ty, TyCtxt};
use rustc_middle::{bug, span_bug, ty};
use rustc_resolve::ParentScope;
use rustc_session::lint::Lint;
use rustc_span::hygiene::MacroKind;
use rustc_span::symbol::{sym, Ident, Symbol};
@ -486,23 +483,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LinkCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
path_str: &'a str,
module_id: DefId,
) -> Result<Res, ResolutionFailure<'a>> {
let path = ast::Path::from_ident(Ident::from_str(path_str));
self.cx.enter_resolver(|resolver| {
// FIXME(jynelson): does this really need 3 separate lookups?
if let Ok((Some(ext), res)) = resolver.resolve_macro_path(
&path,
None,
&ParentScope::module(resolver.graph_root(), resolver),
false,
false,
) {
if let SyntaxExtensionKind::LegacyBang { .. } = ext.kind {
return Ok(res.try_into().unwrap());
}
}
if let Some(&res) = resolver.all_macros().get(&Symbol::intern(path_str)) {
return Ok(res.try_into().unwrap());
}
// NOTE: this needs 2 separate lookups because `resolve_str_path_error` doesn't take
// lexical scope into account (it ignores all macros not defined at the mod-level)
debug!("resolving {} as a macro in the module {:?}", path_str, module_id);
if let Ok((_, res)) =
resolver.resolve_str_path_error(DUMMY_SP, path_str, MacroNS, module_id)
@ -512,6 +495,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LinkCollector<'a, 'tcx> {
return Ok(res);
}
}
if let Some(&res) = resolver.all_macros().get(&Symbol::intern(path_str)) {
return Ok(res.try_into().unwrap());
}
Err(ResolutionFailure::NotResolved {
module_id,
partial_res: None,

View File

@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
// check-pass
#![allow(rustdoc::private_intra_doc_links)]
macro_rules! foo {
() => {};
}
/// [foo!]
pub fn baz() {}